Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published February 28, 2003 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Suprageneric relationships of galliform birds (Aves, Galliformes): a cladistic analysis of morphological characters

Creators

Description

Dyke, Gareth J., Gulas, Bonnie E., Crowe, Timothy M. (2003): Suprageneric relationships of galliform birds (Aves, Galliformes): a cladistic analysis of morphological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 137 (2): 227-244, DOI: 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2003.00048.x, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1046/j.1096-3642.2003.00048.x

Files

source.pdf

Files (312.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8044647a4e10288596a2a0e1c5479719
312.8 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:8044647A4E10FF85FFA2FFE1C5479719
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/8044647A4E10FF85FFA2FFE1C5479719

Has part
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/7C7D1C024E10FF84FEEBF9F8C4F59106 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/7C7D1C024E13FF86FC2FFF13C10E9273 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5437425 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5437427 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5437429 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5437431 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5437433 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5437435 (DOI)

References

  • Akishinonomiya F, Miyake T, Takada M, Ohno S, Kondo N. 1995. The genetic link between the Chinese bamboo partridge (Bambusicola thoracica) and the chicken and junglefowls of the genus Gallus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 11053-11056.
  • Armstrong MH, Braun EL, Kimball RT. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of the avian ovomucoid intron G: a comparison of nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies in Galliformes. Auk 118: 799-804.
  • Baumel JJ, Witmer LM. 1993. Osteologica. In: Baumel JJ, King AS, Breazile JE, Evans HE, Vanden Berge J, eds. Handbook of avian anatomy: nomina anatomica avium, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Nuttall Ornithological Club, 45-132.
  • Beddard FE. 1898. The structure and classification of birds. London: Longman, Green & Co.
  • Beebe CW. 1914. Preliminary pheasant studies. Zoologica 1: 261-285.
  • Beebe CW. 1918-22. A monograph of the pheasants. London: Witherby.
  • Bloomer P, Crowe TM. 1998. Francolin phylogenetics: molecular, morphobehavioural, and combined evidence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 236-254.
  • Brodkorb P. 1964. Catalogue of fossil birds, Part 2 (Anseriformes through Galliformes). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biology Sciences 8: 195-335.
  • Chiappe LM. 1996. Late Cretaceous birds of southern South America: anatomy and systematics of Enantiornithines and Patagopteryx deferrariisi. Munchner Geowissenschaften 30: 203-244.
  • Chiappe LM. 2002. Basal bird phylogeny: problems and solutions. In: Chiappe LM, Witmer LD, eds. Mesozoic birds: above the heads of the dinosaurs. Berkeley: University of California Press, 448-472, in press.
  • Cooper A, Penny D. 1997. Mass survival of birds across the KT boundary: molecular evidence. Science 275: 1109-1113.
  • Cracraft J. 1981. Towards a phylogenetic classification of the Recent birds of the world (Class Aves). Auk 98: 681-714.
  • Cracraft J. 1986. The origin and early diversification of birds. Paleobiology 12: 383-399.
  • Cracraft J. 1988. The major clades of birds. In: Benton MJ, ed. The phylogeny and classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 1: amphibians, reptiles, birds. Oxford: Systematics Association.
  • Crowe TM. 1978. The evolution of guinea-fowl (Galliformes, Phasianidae, Numidinae) taxonomy, phylogeny, speciation and biogeography. Annals of the South African Museum 76: 43-136.
  • Crowe TM, Crowe AA. 1985. The genus Francolinus as a model for avian evolution and biogeography in Africa. I. Relationships among species. In: Schuchmann KL, ed. Proceedings of the international symposium on African vertebrates. Bonn: Museum Koenig.
  • Crowe TM, Harley EH, Jakutowicz MB, Komen J, Crowe AA. 1992. Phylogenetic, taxonomic and biogeographical implications of genetic, morphological, and behavioral variation in francolins (Phasianidae: Francolinus). Auk 109: 24- 42.
  • Delacour J. 1977. The pheasants of the World, 2nd edn. Hindhead, UK: World Pheasant Association and Spur Publications.
  • Delacour J, Amadon D. 1973. Curassows and related birds. New York: American Museum of Natural History.
  • Dyke GJ, Gulas BE. 2002. The fossil galliform bird Paraortygoides from the Eocene of England. American Museum Novitates 3360: 1-14.
  • Dzerzhinsky FY. 1995. Evidence for common ancestry of the Galliformes and Anseriformes. Courier Forschungsintut Senckenberg 181: 325-336.
  • Ericson PGP. 1996. The skeletal evidence for a sister-group relationship of anseriform and galliform birds - a critical evaluation. Journal of Avian Biology 27: 195-202.
  • Ericson PGP. 1997. Systematic relationships of the Paleogene family Presbyornithidae (Aves: Anseriformes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 21: 429-483.
  • Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
  • Furbringer M. 1888. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Systematik der Vogel, Vols 1 & 2. Amsterdam: Von Holkema.
  • Gadow H. 1893. Vogel II systematischer thiel. In: Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Thier-Riechs. Leipzig: CF Winter.
  • Garrod AH. 1874. On certain muscles of birds and on their value in classification, part II. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1874: 111-123.
  • Groth JG, Barrowclough GF. 1999. Basal divergences in birds and the phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12: 115-123.
  • Gutierrez RJ, Barrowclough GF, Groth JG. 2000. A classification of the grouse (Aves: Tetraoninae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Wildlife Biology 6: 205- 211.
  • Hedges SB, Parker PH, Sibley CG, Kumar S. 1996. Continental breakup and the ordinal diversification of birds and mammals. Nature 381: 226-229.
  • Hennache A, Randi E, Lucchini V. 1998. Genetic diversity, phylogenetic relationships and conservation of Edwards's Pheasant Lophura edwardsi. Bird Conservation International 9: 395-410.
  • Hillis DM. 1995. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Systematic Biology 44: 3-16.
  • Holman JA. 1961. Osteology of living and fossil New World quails (Aves, Galliformes). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum of Natural History, Biology Sciences 6: 131-233.
  • Holman JA. 1964. Osteology of gallinaceous birds. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences 27: 230-252.
  • Hope S. 2002. The Mesozoic fossil record of Neornithes (modern birds). In: Chiappe LM, Witmer LD, eds. Mesozoic birds: above the heads of the dinosaurs. Berkeley: University of California Press, 339-388, in press.
  • Houde P. 1987. Critical evaluation of DNA hybridization studies in avian systematics. Auk 104: 17-32.
  • Houde P. 1992. [Review of] Sibley and Ahlquist, phylogeny and classification of birds. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 62-63.
  • Howard H. 1929. The avifauna of Emeryville Shellmound. University Of California Publications in Zoology 32: 301- 394.
  • del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J. 1994. Galliformes. In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, eds. Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol. 2. Barcelona: Lynx Ediciones, 434-557.
  • Hudson GE, Lanzillotti PJ. 1964. Muscles of the pectoral limb in galliform birds. American Midland Naturalist 71: 1- 113.
  • Hudson GE, Lanzillotti PJ, Edwards GD. 1959. Muscles of the pelvic limb in galliform birds. American Midland Naturalist 61: 1-67.
  • Hudson GE, Parker RA, Van den Berge J, Lanzillotti PJ. 1966. A numerical analysis of the modifications of the appendicular muscles in various genera of gallinaceous birds. American Midland Naturalist 76: 1-73.
  • Hughes JM. 2000. Monophyly and phylogeny of cuckoos (Aves, Cuculidae) inferred from osteological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 130: 263-307.
  • Hughes JM, Baker AJ. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin) resolved using mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1300-1307.
  • Huxley TH. 1867. On the classification of birds; and on the taxonomic value of the modifications of certain of the cranial bones observable in that class. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1867: 415-472.
  • Johnsgard PA. 1973. Grouse and quails of North America. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Johnsgard PA. 1986. The pheasants of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kimball RT, Braun EL, Ligon JD. 1997. Resolution of the phylogenetic position of the Congo peafowl, Afropavo congensis: a biogeographic and evolutionary enigma. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 264: 1517- 1523.
  • Kimball RT, Braun EL, Zwartjes PW, Crowe TM, Ligon JD. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyletic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 38-54.
  • Lanyon SM. 1992. [Review of] Sibley and Ahlquist, phylogeny and classification of birds. Condor 94: 304-307.
  • Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, 10th edn. Holmiae: L. Salmii.
  • Livezey BC. 1986. A phylogenetic analysis of Recent anseriform genera using morphological characters. Auk 103: 737- 754.
  • Livezey BC. 1997. A phylogenetic analysis of basal Anseriformes, the fossil Presbyornis and the interordinal relationships of waterfowl. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 121: 361-428.
  • Livezey BC. 1998a. Erratum - A phylogenetic analysis of basal Anseriformes, the fossil Presbyornis, and the interordinal relationships of waterfowl. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 124: 397-398.
  • Livezey BC. 1998b. A phylogenetic analysis of the Gruiformes (Aves) based on morphological characters, with an emphasis on the rails (Rallidae). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B 353: 2077-2151.
  • Livezey BC, Zusi RL. 2001. Higher-order phylogenetics of modern Aves based on comparative anatomy. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 51: 179-205.
  • Lowe PR. 1938. Some preliminary notes on the anatomy and systematic position of Afropavo congensis Chapin. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Ornithological Congress, Rouen.
  • Mayr G. 2000. A new basal galliform bird from the Middle Eocene of Messel (Hessen, Germany). Senckenbergiana Lethaea 80: 45-57.
  • McGowan PJK, Panchen AL. 1994. Plumage variation and geographical distribution in the Kalij and Silver Pheasants. Bulletin of the British Ornithological Club 114: 1568- 1571.
  • Mindell DP, Sorenson MD, Huddleston CJ, Miranda HC Jr, Knight A, Sawchuk SJ, Yuri T. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among and within select avian orders based on mitochondrial DNA. In: Mindell DP, ed. Avian molecular systematics and evolution. New York: Academic Press.
  • Monroe BL Jr, Sibley CG. 1990. A world checklist of birds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • O'Hara RJ. 1991. [Review of] Sibley and Ahlquist, phylogeny and classification of birds. Auk 108: 990-994.
  • Olson SL. 1974. Telecrex restudied: a small Eocene guineafowl. Wilson Bulletin 86: 246-250.
  • Olson SL. 1985. The fossil record of birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC, eds. Avian biology, Vol. 8. New York: Academic Press.
  • Omland KE. 1997. Correlated rates of molecular and morphological evolution. Evolution 51: 1381-1393.
  • Randi E. 1996. A mitochodrial cytochrome b phylogeny of the Alectoris partridges. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6: 214-227.
  • Randi E, Lucchini V. 1998. Organization and evolution of the mitochondrial DNA control-region in the avian genus Alectoris. Journal of Molecular Evolution 47: 449-462.
  • Randi E, Lucchini V, Hennache A, Kimball RT, Braun EL, Ligon JD. 2001. Evolution of the mitochondrial DNA control region and cytochrome b genes and the inference of phylogenetic relationships in the avian genus Lophura (Galliformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19: 187-201.
  • Scott EA. 1997. Systematic relationships of the endemic Vietnamese pheasant. In: Hennache A, ed. The international studbook for the Edwards' Pheasant and its conservation. Paris: Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle.
  • Seebohm H. 1890. The classification of birds: an attempt to classify and subclasses, orders, suborders and some of the families of existing birds. London: R. Porter.
  • Sharpe RB. 1891. A review of recent attempts to classifiy birds. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Ornithological Congress, Budapest.
  • Shufeldt RW. 1904. An arrangement of the families and higher groups of birds. American Naturalist 38: 833-857.
  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE. 1973. The relationships of the Hoatzin. Auk 90: 1-13.
  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Siegel-Causey D. 1997. Phylogeny of the Pelecaniformes: molecular systematics of a privative group. In: Mindell DP, ed. Avian molecular systematics and evolution. New York: Academic Press.
  • Swofford DW. 1998. paup - phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, Version 4.06b for Macintosh. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.
  • Verheyen R. 1956. Contribution a l'anatomie et a la systematique des Galliformes. Bulletin Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 32: 1-24.
  • Verheyen R. 1961. A new classification for the non-passerine birds of the world. Bulletin Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 37: 1-36.
  • Wetmore A. 1960. A classification for the birds of the world. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 139: 1-37.
  • Wiley EO. 1981. Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.
  • Zusi RL, Livezey BC. 2000. Homology and phylogenetic implications of some enigmatic cranial features in galliform and anseriform birds. Annals of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 69: 157-193.