Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published March 31, 2002 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A molecular perspective on the evolutionary affinities of an enigmatic neotropical frog, Allophryne ruthveni

Creators

Description

Austin, J. D., Lougheed, S. C., Tanner, K., Chek, A. A., Bogart, J. P., Boag, P. T. (2002): A molecular perspective on the evolutionary affinities of an enigmatic neotropical frog, Allophryne ruthveni. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 134 (3): 335-346, DOI: 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00011.x, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00011.x

Files

source.pdf

Files (419.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:fc1ca9e882c0c9e7e5b1d25968eaa796
419.5 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FC1CFFE8FFC0FFE7FFB1D259FFEAFF96
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FC1CFFE8FFC0FFE7FFB1D259FFEAFF96

Has part
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/00258790FFCAFFEDFF20D376FC21FE21 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/00258790FFCAFFEDFF20D398FAD7FDDC (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/00258790FFCAFFEDFF20D0BEFB67FCF9 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/00258790FFCAFFEDFF20D120FBFAFB94 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/00258790FFCAFFEDFF20D655FB88F8E4 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/00258790FFCBFFECFF2ED376FA9EFDBA (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/00258790FFCBFFECFF2ED00DFCFBFD29 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5434260 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5434262 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5434264 (DOI)

References

  • Baez AM. 1985. Anuro leptodactilido en el Cretacio superior (Grupo Bauru) de Brasil. Ameghiniana 22: 75-79.
  • Berbee ML, Yoskimura A, Sugiyama J, Taylor JW. 1995. Is Penicillium monophyletic? An evaluation of phylogeny in the Family Trichocomaceae from 18S, 5.8S and ITS ribosomal DNA sequence data. Mycologia 87: 210-222.
  • Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
  • Brochu CA. 1997. Morphology, fossils, divergence timing and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis. Systematic Biology 46: 479-522.
  • Brown JM, Pellmyr O, Thompson JN, Harrison RG. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of the Prodoxidae (Lepidoptera: Incurvariodea) indicates rapid ecological diversification of yucca moths. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87: 795-801.
  • Burns KJ. 1997. Molecular systematics of tanagers (Thraupinae): evolution and biogeography of a diverse radiation of Neotropical birds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 334-348.
  • Burton TC. 1998a. Pointing the way: the distribution and evolution of some characters of the finger muscles of frogs. American Museum Novitates 3229: 1-13.
  • Burton TC. 1998b. Are the extensor muscles of the fingers of anurans an adaptation to arboreality? Journal of Herpetology 32: 611-617.
  • Caldwell JP, Hoogmoed MS. 1998. Allophrynidae, Allophryne, A. Ruthveni. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. 666: 1-3.
  • Cannatella DC, Hillis DM, Chippindale PT, Weigt L, Rand AS, Ryan MJ. 1998. Phylogeny of the Physalaemus pustulosus species group, with an examination of data incongruence. Systematic Biology 47: 311-335.
  • Cherry LM, Case SM, Wilson AC. 1978. Frog perspective on the morphological difference between humans and chimpanzees. Science 200: 209-211.
  • Duellman WE. 1975. On the classification of frogs. Occasional Paper of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 42: 1-15.
  • Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1986. Biology of amphibians. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Edwards SV. 1997. Relevance of microevolutionary processes to higher level molecular systematics. In: Mindell D, ed. Avian molecular evolution and systematics. San Diego: Academic Press, 251-278.
  • Emerson SB, Inger RF, Iskandar D. 2000. Molecular systematics and biogeography of the fanged frogs of Southeast Asia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 131-142.
  • Eriksson T. 1998. Autodecay, version 4.0. (Hypercard Stack Distributed by the Author). Botaniska Institutionen, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
  • Estes R, Reig OA. 1973. The early fossil record of frogs: a review of the evidence. In: Vial JL, ed. Evolutionary biology of the anurans: contemporary research on major problems. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 11-63.
  • Fabrezi M, Langone JA. 2000. Los caracteres morphologicos del controvertido Neobatrachia arboricola Allophryne ruthveni Gaige, 1926. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 14: 47- 59.
  • Faith DP. 1991. Cladistic permutation tests for monophyly and nonmonophyly. Systematic Zoology 40: 366-375.
  • Faith DP, Cranston PS. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone?: on permutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics 7: 1-28.
  • Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolution trees from gene frequencies and quantitative characters: finding maximum likelihood estimates. Evolution 35: 1229-1242.
  • Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
  • Felsenstein J. 1993. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package), version 3.5c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Ford LS. 1993. The phylogenetic position of the dart-poison frogs (Dendrobatidae) among anurans: an examination of the competing hypotheses and their characters. Ethology, Ecology, and Evolution 5: 219-231.
  • Ford LS, Cannatella DC. 1993. The major clades of frogs. Herpetological Monographs 7: 94-117.
  • Gaige HT. 1926. A new frog from British Guiana. University of Michigan Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History 176: 1-3.
  • Georges A, Birrell J, Saint KM, McCord W, Donnellan SC. 1999. A phylogeny for side-necked turtles (Chelonia: Pleurodira) based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequence variation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 67: 213-246.
  • Glaw F, Kohler J. 1998. Amphibian diversity exceeds that of mammals. Herpetological Review 29: 11-12.
  • Goebel AM, Donnelly JM, Atz ME. 1999. PCR primers and amplification methods for 12S ribosomal DNA, the control region, cytochrome oxidase I, and cytochrome b in bufonids and other frogs, and an overview of PCR primers which have amplified DNA in amphibians successfully. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 163-199.
  • Goin CJ, Goin OB, Zug GR. 1978. Introduction to Herpetology, 3rd edn. San Fransisco: Freeman.
  • Graybeal A. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of bufonid frogs and tests of alternate macroevolutionary hypotheses characterizing their radiation. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 119: 297-338.
  • Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. 1985. Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22: 160-174.
  • Hay JM, Ruvinsky I, Hedges SB, Maxson LR. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of amphibian Families inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 928-937.
  • Hedges SB, Maxson LR. 1993. A molecular perspective on lissamphibian phylogeny. Herpetological Monographs 7: 27-42.
  • Hendy MD, Penny D. 1989. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Systematic Zoology 38: 297- 309.
  • Hillis DM. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 23-42.
  • Hillis DM. 1991. The phylogeny of amphibians: current knowledge and the role of cytogenetics. In: Green DM, Sessions SK, eds. Amphibian cytogenetics and evolution. San Diego: Academic Press, 233-258.
  • Hillis DM, Ammerman LK, Dixson MT, de Sa RO. 1993. Ribosomal DNA and the phylogeny of frogs. Herpetological Monographs 7: 118-131.
  • Houde P, Cooper A, Leslie E, Strabd AE, Montano GA. 1997. Phylogeny and evolution of 12S rDNS in Gruiformes (Aves). In: Mindell D, ed. Avian molecular evolution and systematics. San Diego: Academic Press, 121-158.
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Bull JJ, Cunningham CW. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 152-158.
  • Inger RF. 1967. The development of a phylogeny of frogs. Evolution 21: 369-384.
  • Kessing B, Croom H, Martin A, McIntosh C, McMillan WO, Palumbi S. 1989. The simple fool's guide to PCR. Department of Biology. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
  • Kimura M. 1980. A simple model for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequence. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111-120.
  • Kluge AG. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38: 7-25.
  • Kraus F, Miyamoto MM. 1991. Rapid cladogenesis among the pecoran ruminants: evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Systematic Biology 40: 117-130.
  • Lyons-Weiler J, Hoelzer GA. 1997. Escaping from the Felsenstein zone by detecting long branches in phylogenetic signal. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 375- 384.
  • Lyons-Weiler J, Hoelzer GA, Tausch RJ. 1996. Relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA) I: the statistical measurement of phylogenetic signal. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 749-757.
  • Maddison WP. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46: 523-536.
  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1996. Macclade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.05. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
  • Maxson LR. 1976. The phylogenetic status of phyllomedusine frogs (Hylidae) as evidenced from immunological studies of their serum albumins. Experientia 32: 1149-1150.
  • Milner AR. 1993. Amphibian-grade tetrapoda. In: Benton MJ, ed. The fossil record 2. London: Chapman & Hall, 665-679.
  • Naylor GJP, Brown WM. 1998. Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on comparisons of sequence. Systematic Biology 47: 61-76.
  • Nichols R. 2001. Gene trees and species trees are not the same. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 358-363.
  • Noble GK. 1931. The biology of the Amphibia. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Reig OA. 1958. Proposiciones para una nueva macrosystematica de los anuros. Nota preliminar. Physis 21: 109- 118.
  • Richard CM, Moore WS. 1996. A phylogeny of the African treefrog Family Hyperoliidae based on mitochondrial rDNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5: 533-547.
  • Ruvinsky I, Maxson LR. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships among bufonid frogs (Anura: Neobatrachia) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5: 533-547.
  • Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for constructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406-425.
  • Savage JM. 1973. The geographic distribution of frogs. In: Vial JL, ed. Evolutionary biology of the anurans: contemporary research on major problems. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 351-445.
  • Savage JM. 1986. Nomenclatural notes on the Anura (Amphibia). Proceedings of the Biological Society, Washington 99: 42-45.
  • Schauble CS, Moritz C, Slade RW. 2000. A molecular phylogeny for the frog genus Limnodynastes (Anura: Myobatrachidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 379-391.
  • Shaffer HB, Meylan P, McKnight ML. 1997. Tests of turtle phylogeny: Molecular, morphological, and paleontological approaches. Systematic Biology 46: 235-268.
  • Sumida M, Ogata M, Nishioka M. 2000. Molecular phylogenetic relationships of pond frogs distributed in the Palearctic region inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial 12S ribosomal RNA and cytochrome b genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 278-285.
  • Swofford DL. 1998. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0 Beta. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
  • Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotides in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 512-526.
  • Tanaka T, Matsui M, Wu G, Fei L, Takenaka O. 1999. Identity of Rana chensinensis from other brown frogs as assessed by mitchondrial cytochrome b sequences. Copeia 1999: 187-190.
  • Trueb L. 1973. Bones, frogs, and evolution. In: Vial JL, ed. Evolutionary biology of anurans: contemporary research on major problems. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 65-132.
  • Vawter L, Brown WM. 1993. Rates and patterns of base change in the small subunit ribosomal gene. Genetics 134: 597-608.