Published January 31, 2007 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Description

Livezey, Bradley C., Zusi, Richard L. (2007): Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 149 (1): 1-95, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x

Files

source.pdf

Files (1.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5cb15960375d992613989b280fd80043
1.8 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFB15960375D9926FF989B28FFD80043
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFB15960375D9926FF989B28FFD80043

References

  • Abouheif E. 1997. Developmental genetics and homology: a hierarchical approach. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 405-408.
  • Abourachid A. 2000. Bipedal locomotion in birds: the importance of functional parameters in terrestrial adaptation in Anatidae. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 1994-1998.
  • Abourachid A. 2001. Kinematic parameters of terrestrial locomotion in cursorial (ratites), swimming (ducks), and striding birds (quail and guinea fowl). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology (Part A) 131: 113-119.
  • Abourachid A, Renous S. 2000. Bipedal locomotion in ratites (Paleognatiform [sic]): examples of cursorial birds. Ibis 142: 538-549.
  • Alberch P. 1985. Problems with the interpretation of developmental sequences. Systematic Zoology 34: 46-58.
  • Alfaro ME, Zoller S, Lutzoni F. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 255-266.
  • Altshuler DL, Dudley R, Ellington CP. 2004. Aerodynamic forces of revolving hummingbird wings and wing models. Journal of Zoology (London) 264: 327-332.
  • Alvarenga HMF. 1995. A large and probably flightless anhinga from the Miocene of Chile. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 181: 149-162.
  • Alvarenga HMF. 1999. A fossil screamer (Anseriformes: Anhimidae) from the middle Tertiary of southeastern Brazil. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 89: 223-230.
  • Alvarenga HMF, Guilherme E. 2003. The anhingas (Aves: Anhingidae) from the upper Tertiary (Miocene-Pliocene) of southwestern Amazonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 614-621.
  • Ames PL. 1971. The morphology of the syrinx in passerine birds. Peabody Museum of Natural History Bulletin 37: 1- 194.
  • Andersson M. 1999. Hybridization and skua phylogeny. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 266: 1579-1585.
  • Anisimova M, Gascuel O. 2006. Approximate likelihoodratio test for branches: a fast, accurate, and powerful alternative. Systematic Biology 55: 539-552.
  • Ansari HA, Kaul D. 1986. Cytotaxonomic study in the order Falconiformes (Aves). Zoologica Scripta 15: 351-356.
  • Arbogast BS, Edwards SV, Wakeley J, Beerli P, Slowinski JB. 2002. Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetic and population genetic time scales. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 707- 740.
  • Archibald GW. 1976. Crane taxonomy as revealed by the unison call. In: Lewis JC, ed. Proceedings of the National Crane Workshop, I. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University, 225-251.
  • Archie JW. 1989. Homoplasy excess ratios: new indices for measuring levels of homoplasy in phylogenetic systematics and a critique of the consistency index. Systematic Zoology 38: 253-269.
  • Armstrong MH, Braun EL, Kimball RT. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of avian ovomucoid intron G: a comparison of nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies in Galliformes. Auk 118: 799-804.
  • Arthur W. 2004. Biased embryos and evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ast JC, Dimcheff D, Sorenson MD, Mindell D. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of total mitochondrial DNA in birds. Cladistics 13: 162.
  • Athreya KB, Jagers P, eds. 1997. Classical and modern branching processes. New York: Springer.
  • Austin JJ. 1996. Molecular phylogenetics of Puffinus shearwaters: preliminary evidence from mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6: 77-88.
  • Austin JJ, Smith AB, Thomas RH. 1997. Paleontology in a molecular world: the search for authentic ancient DNA. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 303-306.
  • Averianov AO, Pantekyev AV, Potapova OR, Nessov LA. 1991. Bony-toothed birds (Aves: Pelecaniformes: Odontopterygia) from the late Paleocene and Eocene of the western margin of ancient Asia. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute of the USSR Academy of Science 239: 3-12.
  • Avise JC, Aquadro CF. 1987. Malate dyhydrogenase isoenzymes provide a phylogenetic marker for the Piciformes (woodpeckers and allies). Auk 104: 324-328.
  • Avise JC, Nelson WS. 1995. Reply [to Hackett et al. (1995)]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4: 319.
  • Avise JC, Nelson WS, Sibley CG. 1994a. DNA sequence support for a close phylogenetic relationship between some storks and New World vultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 91: 5173-5177.
  • Avise JC, Nelson WS, Sibley CG. 1994b. Why one-kilobase sequences from mitochondrial DNA fail to solve the hoatzin phylogenetic enigma. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 3: 175-184.
  • Baker AJ, Daugherty CH, Colbourne R, McLennan JL. 1995. Flightless brown kiwis of New Zealand possess extremely subdivided population structure and cryptic species like small mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 92: 8254-8258.
  • Baker RH, Yu X, DeSalle R. 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous-analysis trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 427-436.
  • Baker RH, Gatesy J. 2002. Is morphology still relevant? In: DeSalle R, Giribet G, Wheeler W, eds. Molecular systematics and evolution: theory and practice. Basel: Birkhauser- Verlag, 163-174.
  • Baker AJ, Huymen LJ, Haddrath O, Millar CD, Lumbert DM. 2005. Reconstucting the tempo and mode of evolution in an extinct clade of birds with ancient DNA: the giant moas of New Zealand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 102: 8257-8262.
  • Ballard JWO, Thayer MK, Newton AF Jr, Grismer ER. 1998. Data sets, partitions, and characters: philosophies and procedures for analyzing multiple data sets. Systematic Biology 47: 367-396.
  • Ballmann P. 1979. Fossile Glareolidae aus dem Miozan des Nordlinger Ries (Aves: Charadriiformes). Bonner Zoologische Beitrage 30: 51-101.
  • Balouet J-C. 1984. Les Paleognathes (Aves) sont-ils primitifs? Bulletin de la Societe Zoologique de France 108: 648-653.
  • Bang R, Schultz TR, DeSalle R. 2002. Development, homology and systematics. In: DeSalle R, Giribet G, Wheeler W, eds. Molecular systematics and evolution: theory and practice. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag, 175-186.
  • Banks JC, Palma RL, Paterson AM. 2006. Cophylogenetic relationships between penguins and their chewing lice. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 156-166.
  • Barker FK, Barrowclough GF, Groth JG. 2002. A phylogenetic hypothesis for passerine birds: taxonomic and biogeographic implications of an analysis of nuclear DNA sequence data. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 269: 295-308.
  • Barker FK, Cibois A, Schlikler P, Feinstein J, Cracraft J. 2004. Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 101: 11040-11045.
  • Barker FK, Lanyon SM. 2000. The impact of parsimony weighting schemes on inferred relationships among toucans and neotropical barbets (Aves: Piciformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15: 215-234.
  • Barnikol HA. 1953. Vergleichend anatomische und taxonomisch phylogenetische Studien am Kopf der Opisthocomiformes. Musophagidae, Galli, Columbae und Cuculi. Ein Beitrag zum Opisthocomus -Problem. Zoologische Jahrbucher (Abteilung fur Systematik) 81: 487-526.
  • Barriel V, Tassy P. 1998. Rooting with multiple outgroups: consensus versus parsimony. Cladistics 14: 193-200.
  • Barrowclough GF. 1992. Biochemical studies of the higher level systematics of birds. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 112 (Suppl.): 39-52.
  • Barrowclough GF, Groth JG, Mertz LA. 2006. The RAG-1 exon in the avian order Caprimulgiformes: phylogeny, heterozygosity, and base composition. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41: 238-248.
  • Bartlett AD. 1861. On the affinities of Balaeniceps. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1861: 131-181.
  • Bartlett AD. 1862. Note on the habits and affinities of the kagu (Rhinochetus jubatus). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1862: 218-219.
  • Bartlett E. 1877. Remarks on the affinities of Mesites. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1877: 292-293.
  • Baum DA, Larson A. 1991. Adaptation reviewed: a phylogenetic methodology for studying character macroevolution. Systematic Zoology 40: 1-18.
  • Beddard FE. 1884. A contribution to the anatomy of Scopus umbretta. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1884: 543-553.
  • Beddard FE. 1886. On the syrinx and other points in the anatomy of the Caprimulgidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1886: 147-153.
  • Beddard FE. 1888. On certain points in the visceral anatomy of Balaeniceps rex, bearing upon its affinities. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1888: 284-290.
  • Beddard FE. 1889. Contributions to the anatomy of the hoatzin (Opisthocomus cristatus) with particular reference to the structure of the wing in the young. Ibis 31: 283-293.
  • Beddard FE. 1890. On Phodilus badius, with remarks on its systematic position. Ibis 32: 293-304.
  • Beddard FE. 1891. Contributions to the anatomy of the kagu (Rhinochetus jubatus). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1891: 9-21.
  • Beddard FE. 1893. On the osteology, pterylosis, and muscular anatomy of the American fin-foot (Heliornis surinamensis). Ibis 35: 30-40.
  • Beddard FE. 1897. Notes upon the anatomy of Phaethon. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1897: 288-295.
  • Beddard FE. 1898. The structure and classification of birds. London: Longmans and Green.
  • Beecher WJ. 1953. A phylogeny of the oscines. Auk 79: 270- 333.
  • Beiko RG, Keith JM, Harlow TJ, Ragan MA. 2006. Searching for converence in phylogenetic Markov chain Monte Carlo. Systematic Biology 55: 553-565.
  • Benson RD. 1999. Presbyornis isoni and other late Paleocene birds from North Dakota. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 89: 253-259.
  • Benton MJ. 1990. Phylogeny of major tetrapod groups: morphological data and divergence dates. Journal of Molecular Evolution 30: 409-424.
  • Benton MJ. 1996. Testing the time axis of phylogenies. In: Harvey PH, Leigh Brown AJ, Maynard Smith J, Nee S, eds. New uses for new phylogenies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 217-233.
  • Benton MJ. 1999. Early origins of modern birds and mammals: molecules vs. morphology. Bioessays 21: 314-321.
  • Benton MJ. 2000. Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead? Biological Reviews (Cambridge) 75: 633-648.
  • Benton MJ. 2001. Finding the tree of life: matching phylogenetic trees to the fossil record through the 20th century. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 268: 2123-2130.
  • Benton MJ, Clark JM. 1988. Archosaur phylogeny and the relationships of the Crocodylia. In: Benton MJ, ed. The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, Vol. 1: amphibians, reptiles, birds. Oxford, UK: Systematics Association, 295-338.
  • Benz BW, Robbins MB, Peterson AT. 2006. Evolutionary history of woodpeckers and allies (Aves: Picidae): placing key taxa on the phylogenetic tree. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 389-399.
  • Berger AJ. 1960. Some anatomical characters of the Cuculidae and the Musophagidae. Wilson Bulletin 72: 60-103.
  • Berglund-Sonnhammer A-C, Steffansson P, Betts MJ, Liberles DA. 2006. Optimal gene trees from sequences and species trees using a soft interpretation of parsimony. Journal of Molecular Evolution 63: 240-250.
  • Bergsten J. 2005. A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics 21: 163-193.
  • Berman SL, Raikow RJ. 1982. The hind limb musculature of the mousebirds (Coliiformes). Auk 99: 41-57.
  • Bertelli S, Giannini NP, Goloboff PA. 2002. A phylogeny of the tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathiformes) based on integumentary characters. Systematic Biology 51: 959-979.
  • Bininda-Emonds ORP, Bryant HN, Russell AP. 1998. Supraspecific taxa as terminals in cladistic analysis: implicit assumptions of monophyly and a comparison of methods. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 64: 101-133.
  • Bininda-Emonds ORP, Gittleman JL, Steel MA. 2002. The (super) tree of life: procedures, problems, and prospects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 265-289.
  • Birdsley JS. 2002. Phylogeny of the tyrant flycatchers (Tyrannidae) based on morphology and behavior. Auk 119: 715-734.
  • Birks SM, Edwards SV. 2002. A phylogeny of the megapodes (Aves: Megapodiidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 408-421.
  • Bjorklund M. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among Charadriiformes: reanalysis of previous data. Auk 111: 825- 832.
  • Bledsoe AH, Raikow RJ. 1990. A quantitative assessment of congruence between molecular and nonmolecular estimates of phylogeny. Journal of Molecular Evolution 30: 247-259.
  • Bleiweiss R. 1998a. Relative-rate tests and biological causes of molecular evolution in hummingbirds. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 481-491.
  • Bleiweiss R. 1998b. Phylogeny, body mass, and genetic consequences of lek-mating behavior in hummingbirds. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 492-498.
  • Bleiweiss R. 1998c. Fossil gap analysis supports early Tertiary origin of trophically diverse avian orders. Geology 26: 323-326.
  • Bleiweiss R. 1998d. Origin of hummingbird faunas. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 65: 77-97.
  • Bleiweiss R, Kirsch JAW, Lapointe FJ. 1994. DNA-DNA hybridization-based phylogeny for 'higher' nonpasserines: reevaluating a key part of the avian family tree. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 3: 248-255.
  • Bleiweiss R, Kirsch JAW, Matheus JC. 1997. DNA hybridization evidence for the principal lineages of hummingbirds (Aves: Trochilidae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 325-343.
  • Bleiweiss R, Kirsch JAW, Shafi N. 1995. Confirmation of a portion of the Sibley-Ahlquist 'tapestry'. Auk 112: 87- 97.
  • Bock WJ. 1959. Preadaptation and multiple evolutionary pathways. Evolution 13: 194-211.
  • Bock WJ. 1960a. Secondary articulation of the avian mandible. Auk 77: 19-55.
  • Bock WJ. 1960b. The palatine process of the premaxilla in the Passeres. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 122: 361-488.
  • Bock WJ. 1963a. Evolution and phylogeny in morphologically uniform groups. American Naturalist 97: 265-285.
  • Bock WJ. 1963b. The cranial evidence for ratite affinities. In: Sibley CG, ed. Proceedings XIII International Ornithological Congress. Washington, DC: American Ornithologists' Union, 39-54.
  • Bock WJ. 1967. The use of adaptive characters in avian classification. In: Snow DW, ed. Proceedings XIV International Ornithological Congress. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 61-74.
  • Bock WJ. 1979. The homology concept: its philosophical foundation and practical methodology. Zoologische Beitrage (Neue Folge) 32: 327-353.
  • Bock WJ. 1994. History and nomenclature of avian familygroup names. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 222: 1-281.
  • Bock WJ. 1999. Functional and evolutionary morphology of woodpeckers. Ostrich 70: 23-31.
  • Bock WJ, Buhler P. 1988. The evolution and biogeographical history of the palaeognathous birds. In: van den Elzen R, Schuchmann K-L, Schmidt-Koenig K, eds. Current topics in avian biology. Bonn, Germany: Deutsche Ornithologische- Geselshaft. 31-36.
  • Bock WJ, McEvey A. 1969. Osteology of Pedionomus torquatus (Aves: Pedionomidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria (New Series) 82: 187-232.
  • Bohm M. 1930. Uber den Bau des jugendlichen Schadels von Balaeniceps rex nebst Bemerkungen uber dessen systematische Stellung und uber das Gaumenskelett der Vogel. Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Oekologie der Tiere 17: 677-718.
  • Bohning-Gaese K, Gonzalez-Guzman LI, Brown JH. 1998. Constraints on dispersal and the evolution of the avifauna of the Northern Hemisphere. Evolutionary Ecology 12: 767-783.
  • Boker H. 1929. Flugvermogen und Kropf bei Opisthocomus cristatus und Stringops [sic] Habroptilus. Gegenbaurs Morphologisches Jahrbuch 63: 152-207.
  • Boles WE. 1995. The world's oldest songbird (Aves: Passeriformes). Nature 374: 321-322.
  • Boles WE. 1997. Fossil songbirds (Passeriformes) from the early Eocene of Australia. Emu 97: 43-50.
  • Bourdon E. 2005. Osteological evidence for sister group relationship between pseudo-toothed birds (Aves: Odontopterygiformes) and waterfowls [sic] (Anseriformes). Naturwissenschaften 92: 586-591.
  • Bourdon E, Boya B, Iarochene M. 2005. Earliest African neornithine bird: a new species of Prophaethontidae (Aves) from the Paleocene of Morocco. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25: 157-170.
  • Bout RG. 1997. Postures of the avian craniocervical column. Journal of Morphology 231: 287-295.
  • Brady RH. 1982. Parsimony, hierarchy, and biological implications. In: Platnick NI, Funk VA, eds. Advances in cladistics, Vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press, 49- 60.
  • Braun ML, Brumfield RT. 1998. Enigmatic phylogeny of skuas: an alternative hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 265: 995-999.
  • Braun EL, Kimball RT. 2002. Examining basal avian divergences with mitochondrial sequences: model complexity, taxon sampling, and sequence length. Systematic Biology 51: 614-625.
  • Bremer K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
  • Bremer K. 1997. Estimating branch support. Cladistics 13: 165-166.
  • Bridge ES, Jones AW, Baker AJ. 2005. A phylogenetic framework for the terns (Sternini) inferred from mt DNA sequences: implications for taxonomy and plumage evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 459-469.
  • Briggs JC. 2003. Fishes and birds: Gondwana life rafts reconsidered. Systematic Biology 52: 548-553.
  • Brochu CA. 2001. Progress and future directions in archosaur phylogenetics. Journal of Paleontology 75: 1185- 1201.
  • Brochu CA, Norell MA. 2000. Temporal congruence and the origin of birds. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20: 197- 200.
  • Brochu CA, Norell MA. 2001. Time and trees: a quantitative assessment of temporal congruence in the birds origins debate. In: Gauthier J, Gall LF, eds. New perspectives on the origin and early evolution of birds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 511-535.
  • Brochu CA, Sumrall CD, Theodor JM. 2004. When clocks (and communities) collide: estimating divergence time from molecules and the fossil record. Journal of Palaeontology 78: 1-6.
  • Brodkorb P. 1963. Catalogue of fossil birds: Part 1 (Archaeopterygiformes through Ardeiformes). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 7: 179-293.
  • Brodkorb P. 1964. Catalogue of fossil birds: Part 2 (Anseriformes through Galliformes). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 7: 295-335.
  • Brodkorb P. 1967. Catalogue of fossil birds: Part 3 (Ralliformes, Ichthyornithiformes, Charadriiformes). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 11: 99-220.
  • Brodkorb P. 1971a. Origin and evolution of birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, eds. Avian biology, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 19-55.
  • Brodkorb P. 1971b. Catalogue of fossil birds: Part 4 (Columbiformes through Piciformes). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 15: 163-266.
  • Brodkorb P. 1976. Discovery of a Cretaceous bird, apparently ancestral to the orders Coraciiformes and Piciformes (Aves: Carinatae). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 27: 67-73.
  • Brodkorb P. 1978. Catalogue of fossil birds: Part 5 (Passeriformes). Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 23: 139-228.
  • Broham L. 2003. What can DNA tell us about the Cambrian explosion? Integrative and Comparative Biology 43: 148- 156.
  • Broham L, Woofit M, Lee MSY, Rambaut A. 2002. Testing the relationship between morphological and molecular rates of change along phylogenies. Evolution 56: 1921-1930.
  • Brom TG. 1990. Villi and the phyly of Wetmore's Order Passeriformes (Aves). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 98: 63-72.
  • Bryant HN. 1997. Hypothetical ancestors and rooting in cladistic analysis. Cladistics 13: 337-348.
  • Bryant HN. 2001. Character polarity and the rooting of cladograms. In: Wagner GP, ed. The character concept in evolutionary biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 319-342.
  • Buckley TR, Simon C, Chambers GK. 2001. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum-likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support. Systematic Biology 50: 67-86.
  • Buhler P. 1970. Schadelmorphologie und Kiefermechanik der Caprimulgidae (Aves). Zeitschrift fur Morphologie der Tiere 66: 337-399.
  • Burbridge ML, Colbourne RM, Robertson HA, Baker AJ. 2003. Moleclar and other biological evidence supports the recognition of at least three species of brown kiwi. Conservation Genetics 4: 167-177.
  • Burke AC, Feduccia A. 1997. Developmental patterns and the identification of homologies in the avian hand. Science 278: 666-668.
  • Burness G, Chardine JW, Darveau C-A. 2005. Flight muscle enzyme activities do not differ between pelagic and nearshore foraging seabirds species. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology (Part A) 140: 53-58.
  • Burt DW. 2002. Origin and evolution of avian microchromosomes. Cytogenetics and Genome Research 96: 97-112.
  • Burt DB. 2004. Plumage-based phylogenetic analyses of the Merops bee-eaters. Ibis 146: 481-492.
  • Burton PJK. 1974. Jaw and tongue features in Psittaciformes and other orders with special reference to the anatomy of the tooth-billed pigeon (Didunculus strigirostris). Journal of Zoology (London) 174: 255-276.
  • Burton PJK. 1984. Anatomy and evolution of the feeding apparatus in the avian orders Coraciiformes and Piciformes. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Zoology Series) 47: 331-443.
  • Bybee PJ, Lee AH, Lamm E-T. 2006. Sizing the Jurassic theropod dinosaur Allosaurus: assessing growth stategy and evolution of ontogenetic scaling of limbs. Journal of Morphology 267: 347-359.
  • Cao Y, Sorenson MD, Kumazawa Y, Mindell DP. 2000. Phylogenetic position of turtles among amniotes: evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Gene 259: 139-148.
  • Carrano MT, Biewener AA. 1999. Experimental alteration of limb posture in the chicken (Gallus gallus) and its bearing on the use of birds as analogs for dinosaur locomotion. Journal of Morphology 240: 237-249,.
  • Carroll RL. 1988. Vertebrate paleontology and evolution. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  • Carroll RL. 1997. Patterns and processes of vertebrate evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Caspers G-J, de Weerd DU, Wattel J, de Jong WW. 1997. α- crystallin sequences support a galliform/anseriform clade. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 1637-1646.
  • Caspers G-J, Wattel J, de Jong WW. 1994. α A-crystallin sequences group tinamou with ratites. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11: 711-713.
  • Chandler AC. 1916. A study of the structure of feathers, with reference to their taxonomic significance. Publications in Zoology of the University of California (Berkeley) 13: 243- 446.
  • Chatterjee S. 1997. The rise of birds. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Chen Z-Q, Ritzel RG, Lin CC, Hodgetts RB. 1991. Sequence conservation in avian CR1: an interspersed repetitive DNA family evolving under functional constraints. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 88: 5814-5818.
  • Chen YP, Zhang Y, Jiang T-X, Barlow AJ, St. Amand TR, Hu Y, Heaney S, Francis-West P, Chuon C-M, Maas R. 2000. Conservation of early odontogenic signaling pathways in Aves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 97: 10044-10049.
  • Cheneval J, Escuillie F. 1992. New data concerning Palaelodus ambiguus (Aves: Phoenicopteriformes: Palaelodidae): ecological and evolutionary interpretations. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series 36: 208-224.
  • Chiappe LM. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships among basal birds. In: Gauthier J, Gall LF, eds. New perspectives on the origin and early evolution of birds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 126-139.
  • Chiappe LM. 2002. Basal bird phylogeny. In: Chiappe LM, Witmer LM, eds. Mesozoic birds: above the heads of dinosaurs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 448-472.
  • Chiappe LM, Dyke GJ. 2002. The Mesozoic radiation of birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 91-124.
  • Chiu C-H, Nonaka D, Xue L, Amemiya CT, Wagner GP. 2000. Evolution of Hoxa-11 in lineages phylogenetically positioned along the fin-limb transition. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 305-316.
  • Christian P, Christidis DL, Schodde R. 1992. Biochemical systematics of the Charadriiformes (shorebirds): relationships between Charadrii, Scolopaci, and Lari. Australian Journal of Zoology 40: 291-302.
  • Christidis L, Schodde LR, Shaw DD, Maynes SF. 1991. Relationships among the Australian-New Guinean parrots, lorikeets, and cockatoos (Aves: Psittaciformes: protein evidence. Condor 93: 302-317.
  • Chu PC. 1994. Historical examination of delayed plumage maturation in the shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes). Evolution 48: 327-350.
  • Chu PC. 1995. Phylogenetic re-analysis of Strauch's osteological data set for the Charadriiformes. Condor 97: 174- 196.
  • Chubb AL. 2004a. New nuclear evidence for the oldest divergence among neognath birds: the phylogenetic utility of ZENK (I). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 140- 151.
  • Chubb AL. 2004b. Nuclear corroboration of DNA-DNA hybridization in deep phylogenies of hummingbirds, swifts, and passerines: the phylogenetic utility of ZENK (II). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 128-139.
  • Cicero C, Johnson NK. 2006. The tempo of avian diversification: reply. Evolution 60: 413-414.
  • Clark HL. 1901. The classification of birds. Auk 18: 370-381.
  • Clark JM, Norell MA, Makovicky PJ. 2002. Cladistic approaches to the relationships of birds to other theropod dinosaurs. In: Chiappe LM, Witmer LM, eds. Mesozoic birds: above the heads of dinosaurs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 31-61.
  • Clarke JA. 2004. Morphology, phylogenetic taxonomy, and systematics of Ichthyornis and Apatornis (Avialae: Ornithurae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 286: 1-179.
  • Clarke JA, Chiappe LM. 2001. A new carinate bird from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia. American Museum Novitates 3323: 1-23.
  • Clarke JA, Norell MA. 2002. The morphology and phylogenetic position of Apsaravis ukhaana from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. American Museum Novitates 3387: 1-46.
  • Clarke JA, Norell MA. 2004. New avialan remains and a review of the known avifauna from the Late Cretaceous Nemegt Formation of Mongolia. American Museum Novitates 3447: 1-12.
  • Clarke JA, Norell MA, Dashzeveg D. 2005a. New avian remains from the Eocene of Monogolia and the phylogenetic position of the Eogruidae (Aves, Gruoidea). American Museum Novitates 3494: 1-17.
  • Clarke JA, Olivero EB, Puerta P. 2003. Description of the earliest fossil penguin from South American and first Paleogene vertebrate locality of Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. American Museum Novitates 3423: 1-18.
  • Clarke JA, Tambussi CP, Noriega JI, Ericson GM, Ketcham RA. 2005b. Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. Nature 433: 305-308.
  • Coddington JA. 1994. The roles of homology and convergence in studies of adaptation. In: Eggleton P, Vane-Wright RI, eds. Phylogenetics and ecology. London, UK: Academic Press, 53-78.
  • Cohen BL, Baker AJ, Blechschmidt K, Dittmann DL, Furness RW, Gerwin JA, Helbig AJ, De Korte K, Marshall HD, Palma RL, Peter H-U, Ramli R, Siebold I, Willcox MS, Wilson RH, Zink RM. 1997. Enigmatic phylogeny of skuas (Aves: Stercorariidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 264: 181-190.
  • Cohn JMW. 1968. The convergent flight mechanism of swifts (Apodi) and hummingbirds (Trochili) (Aves). Doctoral dissertation, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
  • Colbert EH. 1980. Evolution of the vertebrates: a history of the backboned animals through time, 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Collins TM, Wimberger PH, Naylor GJP. 1994. Compositional bias, character-state bias, and character-state reconstruction under parsimony. Systematic Biology 43: 482-496.
  • Cooke J. 2004. Developmental mechanism and evolutionary origin of vertebrate left/right asymmetries. Biological Reviews (Cambridge) 79: 377-407.
  • Cooper A. 1997. Studies of avian ancient DNA: from Jurassic Park to modern island extinctions. In: Mindell DP, ed. Avian molecular evolution. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 345-373.
  • Cooper A, Fortey R. 1998. Evolutionary explosions and the phylogenetic fuse. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 151- 156.
  • Cooper A, Lalueza-Fox C, Anderson S, Rambaut A, Austin J, Ward R. 2001. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two extinct moas clarify ratite evolution. Nature 409: 704-707.
  • Cooper A, Mourer-Chauvire C, Chambers GK, von Haeseler A, Wilson AC, Paabo S. 1992. Independent origins of New Zealand moas and kiwis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 89: 8741-8744.
  • Cooper A, Penny D. 1997. Mass survival of birds across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary: molecular evidence. Science 275: 1109-1113.
  • Cottam PA. 1957. The pelecaniform characters of the skeleton of the shoebill stork, Balaeniceps rex. British Museum (Natural History) Bulletin (Zoological Series) 5: 49-72.
  • Cotton JA, Page RDM. 2002. Going nuclear: gene family evolution and vertebrate phylogeny reconciled. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 269: 1555-1561.
  • Cracraft J. 1967a. On the systematic position of the boatbilled heron. Auk 84: 529-533.
  • Cracraft J. 1967b. Comments on homology and analogy. Systematic Zoology 16: 355-359.
  • Cracraft J. 1968. The lacrimal-ectethmoid bone complex in birds: a single-character analysis. American Midland Naturalist 80: 316-359.
  • Cracraft J. 1969. Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (Class Aves): 1. The Eocene family Geranoididae and the early history of the Gruiformes. American Museum Novitates 2388: 1-41.
  • Cracraft J. 1971a. Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (Class Aves): 2. Additional comments on the Bathornithidae, with descriptions of new species. American Museum Novitates 2449: 1-14.
  • Cracraft J. 1971b. The relationships and evolution of the rollers: families Coraciidae, Brachypteraciidae, and Leptosomatidae. Auk 88: 723-752.
  • Cracraft J. 1972a. The systematics and evolution of the Cathartidae in the Old World Tertiary. Condor 74: 272-283.
  • Cracraft J. 1972b. The relationships of the higher taxa of birds: problems in phylogenetic reasoning. Condor 74: 379- 392.
  • Cracraft J. 1973a. Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (Class Aves): 3. Phylogeny of the suborder Grues. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 151: 1- 128.
  • Cracraft J. 1973b. Continental drift, paleoclimatology, and the evolution of birds. Journal of Zoology (London) 169: 455- 545.
  • Cracraft J. 1974a. Phylogeny and evolution of the ratite birds. Ibis 116: 494-521.
  • Cracraft J. 1974b. Phylogenetic models and classification. Systematic Zoology 23: 71-90.
  • Cracraft J. 1975. Mesozoic dispersal of terrestrial faunas around the southern end of the world. Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (Nouvell Serie A, Zoologie) 88: 29-54.
  • Cracraft J. 1976a. Covariation patterns in the postcranial skelton of moas (Aves, Dirnornithidae): a factor analytic study. Paleobiology 2: 166-173.
  • Cracraft J. 1976b. The hindlimb elements of the moas (Aves, Dinornithidae): a multivariate assessment of size and shape. Journal of Morphology 150: 495-526.
  • Cracraft J. 1976c. Avian evolution on southern continents: influences of palaeogeography and palaeoclimatology. In: Frith HJ, Calaby JH, eds. Proceedings of the 16th International Ornithological Congress. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science, 40-52.
  • Cracraft J. 1978. Science, philosophy, and systematics. Systematic Zoology 27: 213-216.
  • Cracraft J. 1979. Phylogenetic analysis, evolutionary models, and paleontology. In: Cracraft J, Eldredge N, eds. Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology. New York: Columbia University Press, 7-39.
  • Cracraft J. 1980. Phylogenetic theory and methodology in avian paleontology: a critical appraisal. Contributions to Science of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 330: 9-16.
  • Cracraft J. 1981. Toward a phylogenetic classification of the recent birds of the world (Class Aves). Auk 98: 681-714.
  • Cracraft J. 1982a. Phylogenetic relationships and monophyly of loons, grebes, and hesperornithiform birds, with comments on the early history of birds. Systematic Zoology 31: 35-56.
  • Cracraft J. 1982b. Phylogenetic relationships and transantartic [sic] biogeography of some gruiform birds. Geobios Memoire Special 6: 393-402.
  • Cracraft J. 1982c. Geographic differentiation, cladistics, and vicariance biogeography: reconstructing the tempo and mode of evolution. American Zoologist 22: 411-424.
  • Cracraft J. 1982d. A nonequilibrium theory for the ratecontrol of speciation and extinction and the origin of macroevolutionary patterns. Systematic Zoology 31: 348-365.
  • Cracraft J. 1984. Conceptual and methodological aspects of the study of evolutionary rates, with some comments on bradytely in birds. In: Eldredge N, Stanley SM, eds. Living fossils. New York: Springer, 95-104.
  • Cracraft J. 1985. Monophyly and phylogenetic relationships of the Pelecaniformes: a numerical cladistic analysis. Auk 102: 834-853.
  • Cracraft J. 1986. The origin and early diversification of birds. Paleobiology 12: 383-399.
  • Cracraft J. 1987. DNA hybridization and avian phylogenetics. In: Hecht MK, Wallace B, Prance GT, eds. Evolutionary biology, Vol. 21. New York: Plenum Press, 47-96.
  • Cracraft J. 1988. The major clades of birds. In: Benton MJ, ed. The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, Vol. 1: amphibians, reptiles, birds. Oxford, UK: Systematics Association, 339-361.
  • Cracraft J. 1992a. The species of the birds-of-paradise (Paradisaeidae): applying the phylogenetic species concept to a complex pattern of diversification. Cladistics 8: 1-43.
  • Cracraft J. 1992b. Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study of molecular evolution [review]. Molecular Biology and Evolution 9: 182-186.
  • Cracraft J. 2001. Avian evolution, Gondwana biogeography and the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction event. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 268: 459-469.
  • Cracraft J, Barker FK, Braun MJ, Harshman J, Dyke GJ, Feinstein J, Stanley S, Cibois A, Schikler P, Beresford P, Garcia-Morena J, Sorenson MD, Yuri T, Mindell DP. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships among modern birds (Neornithes): toward an avian tree of life. In: Cracraft J, Donoghue MJ, eds. Assembling the tree of life. New York: Oxford University Press, 468-489.
  • Cracraft J, Barker FK, Cibois A. 2003. Avian higher-level phylogenetics and the Howard and Moore checklist of birds. In: Dickinson HC, ed. The Howard and Moore complete checklist of birds of the world, 3rd edn. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press. 16-21.
  • Cracraft J, Clarke J. 2001. The basal clades of modern birds. In: Gauthier J, Gall LF, eds. new perspectives on the origin and early evolution of birds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 143-156.
  • Cracraft J, Feinstein J. 2000. What is not a bird of paradise? Molecular and morphological evidence places Macgregoria in the Meliphagidae and the Cnemophilinae near the base of the corvoid tree. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 267: 235-241.
  • Cracraft J, Mindell DP. 1989. The early history of modern birds: a comparison of molecular and morphological evidence. In: Fernholm B, Bremer K, Jornvall J, eds. The hierarchy of life. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Exerptica Medica. 389-403.
  • Cracraft J, Rich PV. 1972. The systematics and evolution of the Cathartidae in the Old World Tertiary. Condor 74: 272- 283.
  • Craw RC, Grehan JR, Heads MJ. 1999. Panbiogeography: tracking the history of life. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Crowe TM, Harley EH, Jakutowicz MB, Kowen J, Crowe AA. 1992. Phylogenetic, taxonomic, and biogeographical implications of genetic, morphological, and behavioral variation in francolins (Phasianidae: Francolinus). Auk 109: 24- 43.
  • Cubo J. 2003. Evidence for speciational change in the evolution of ratites (Palaeognathae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 99-106.
  • Cubo J, Arthur W. 2001. Patterns of correlated character evolution in flightless birds: a phylogenetic approach. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 693-702.
  • de Beer G. 1956. The evolution of ratites. British Museum (Natural History) Bulletin (Zoological Series) 4: 59-70.
  • Dalla Vecchia FM, Chiappe LM. 2002. First avian skeleton from the Mesozoic of northern Gondwana. Journal of Vertebrae Paleontology 22: 856-860.
  • DeFilippis VR, Moore WS. 2000. Resolution of phylogenetic relationships among recently evolved species as a function of amount of DNA sequence: an empirical study based on woodpeckers (Aves: Picidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 143-160.
  • Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sardgatal J, eds. 1992. Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol. 1. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
  • Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sardgatal J, eds. 2001. Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol. 6. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
  • Delacour J, Mayr E. 1945. The family Anatidae. Wilson Bulletin 57: 3-55.
  • Delport W, Ferguson JWH, Bloomer P. 2002. Characterization and evolution of the mitochondrial DNA control region in hornbills (Bucerotiformes). Journal of Molecular Evolution 54: 794-806.
  • Dimcheff SV. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of grouse: individual and combined performance of W -linked, autosomal, and mitochondrial loci. Systematic Biology 51: 930-945.
  • Dimcheff DE, Drovetski SV, Mindell DP. 2002. Molecular evolution and systematics of Tetraoninae and other Galliformes using mitochondrial 12S and ND2 genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: 203-215.
  • Dominguez-Bello MG, Ruiz MC, Michelangeli F. 1993. Evolutionary significance of foregut fermentation in the hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin; Aves: Opisthocomidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology (Part B) 163: 594-601.
  • Donne-Gousse C, Laudet V, Hanni C. 2002. A molecular phylogeny of anseriforms based on mitochondrial DNA analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 339- 356.
  • Doyle JL. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Systematic Botany 17: 144-163.
  • Doyle JL. 1996. Homoplasy connections and disconnections: genes and species, molecules and morphology. In: Sanderson MJ, Hufford L, eds. Homoplasy: the recurrence of similarity in evolution. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 37-66.
  • Drouin G, Moniz de Sa M. 1995. The concerted evolution of 5S ribosomal genes linked to the repeat units of other multigene families. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 481- 493.
  • Dumbacher JP, Thane TK, Fleischer RC. 2003. Phylogeny of the owlet-nightjars (Aves: Aegothelidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 540-549.
  • Dyke GJ. 2001a. The evolutionary radiation of modern birds: systematics and patterns of diversification. Geological Journal 36: 305-315.
  • Dyke GJ. 2001b. The fossil waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes) from the Eocene of England. American Museum Novitates 3354: 1-15.
  • Dyke GJ. 2001c. A primitive swift from the London Clay and the relationships of fossil apodiform birds. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21: 195-200.
  • Dyke GJ. 2003. The fossil record and molecular clocks: basal radiations within Neornithes. In: Smith P, Donoghue MP, eds. Molecular clocks and the fossil record. London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 263-278.
  • Dyke GJ, Cooper JH. 2000. A new psittaciform bird from the London Clay (Lower Eocene) of England. Palaeontology 43: 271-285.
  • Dyke GJ, Dortangs RW, Jagt JWM, Mulder EWA, Schulp AS, Chiappe LM. 2002. Europe's last Mesozoic bird. Naturwissenschaften 89: 408-411.
  • Dyke GJ, Gulas BE, Crowe TM. 2003. Suprageneric relationships of galliform birds (Aves, Galliformes): a cladistic analysis of morphological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 137: 227-244.
  • Dyke GJ, Mayr G. 1999. Did parrots exist in the Cretaceous period? Nature 399: 317-318.
  • Dyke GJ, Van Tuinen M. 2004. The evolutionary radiation of modern birds (Neornithes): reconciling molecules, morphology and the fossil record. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 153-177.
  • Dyke GJ, Waterhouse DM. 2000. A mousebird (Aves: Coliiformes) from the Eocene of England. Journal fur Ornithologie 141: 1-9.
  • Dzerzhinsky FY. 1995. Evidence for common ancestry of the Galliformes and Anseriformes. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 181: 325-336.
  • Eberhard JR, Bermingham E. 2001. Phylogeny and comparative biogeography of Pionopsitta parrots and Pteroglossus toucans. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36: 288- 304.
  • Eberhard JR, Bermingham E. 2004. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Amazona ochrocephala (Aves: Psittacidae) complex. Auk 121: 318-332.
  • Eberhard JR, Wright TF, Bermingham E. 2001. Duplication and concerted evolution of the mitochondrial control region in the parrot genus Amazona. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 1330-1342.
  • Edwards SV, Arctander P, Wilson AC. 1991. Mitochondrial resolution of a deep branch in the genealogical tree for perching birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 243: 99-107.
  • Edwards SV, Boles WE. 2002. Out of Gondwana: the origin of passerine birds. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 347- 349.
  • Edwards SV, Fertil B, Giron A, Deschavanne PJ. 2002. A genomic schism in birds revealed by phylogenetic analysis of DNA strings. Systematic Biology 51: 599-613.
  • Edwards SV, Jennings WB, Shedlock AM. 2005. Phylogenetics of modern birds in the era of genomics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Seris B) 272: 979-992.
  • Edwards SV, Wilson AC. 1990. Phylogenetically informative length polymorphism and sequence variability in mitochondrial DNA of Australian songbirds (Pomatostomus). Genetics 126: 695-711.
  • Ekman J, Ericson PGP. 2006. Out of Gondwanaland: the evolutionary history of cooperative breeding and social behaviour among crows, magpies, jays and allies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 273: 1-9.
  • Eldredge N. 1989. Macroevolutionary dynamics: species, niches, and adaptive peaks. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Eldredge N, Cracraft J. 1980. Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process: method and theory in comparative biology. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Elliot DG. 1878. A study of the Pteroclidae or family of the sand-grouse. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1878: 223-264.
  • Elzanowski A. 1977. On the role of basipterygoid processes in some birds. Verhandlungen der Anatomischen Gesellschaft (Jena) 71: 1303-1307.
  • Elzanowski A. 1981. Embryonic bird skeletons from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. Palaeontologia Polonica 42: 147- 176.
  • Emslie SD. 1988. The fossil history and phylogenetic relationships of condors (Ciconiiformes: Vulturidae) in the New World. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 8: 212-228.
  • Ericson PGP. 1996. The skeletal evidence for a sister-group relationship of anseriform and galliform birds - a critical evaluation. Journal of Avian Biology 27: 195-202.
  • Ericson PGP. 1997. Systematic relationships of the Paleogene family Presbyornithidae (Aves: Anseriformes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 121: 429-483.
  • Ericson PGP. 1999. New material of Juncitarsus (Phoenicopteriformes), with a guide for differentiating that genus from the Presbyornithidae (Anseriformes). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 89: 245-251.
  • Ericson PGP, Christidis L, Cooper A, Irestedt M, Jackson J, Johansson US, Norman JA. 2002a. A Gondwanan origin of passerine birds supported by DNA sequences of the endemic New Zealand wrens. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 269: 235-241.
  • Ericson PGP, Christidis L, Irestedt M, Norman JA. 2002b. Systematic affinities of the lyrebirds (Passeriformes: Menura), with a novel classification of the major groups of passerine birds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25: 53-62.
  • Ericson PGP, Envall L, Irestedt M, Norman JA. 2003a. Interfamilial relationships of the shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) based on nuclear DNA sequence data. BMC (Biomed Central) Evolutionary Biology 3 (16): 1-14.
  • Ericson PGP, Irestedt M, Johansson US. 2003b. Evolution, biogeography, and patterns of diversification in passerine birds. Journal of Avian Biology 34: 3-15.
  • Ericson PGP, Johansson US, Parsons TJ. 2000. Major divisions in oscines revealed by insertions in the nuclear gene c-myc: a novel gene in avian phylogenetics. Auk 117: 1069-1078.
  • Ericson PGP, Johansson US. 2003. Phylogeny of Passerida (Aves: Passeriformes) based on nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 126-138.
  • Ericson PGP, Parsons TJ, Johansson US. 1998. Morphological and molecular support for nonmonophyly of the Galloanserae. In: Gauthier JA, Gall LF, eds. New perspectives on the origin and early evolution of birds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 157-168.
  • Ericson PGP, Zuccon D, Ohlson JI, Johansson US, Alvarenga H, Prum RO. 2006. Higher-level phylogeny and morphological evolution of tyrant flycatchers, cotingas, manakins, and their allies (Aves: Tyrannida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 471-483.
  • Espinosa de los Monteros A. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships among the trogons. Auk 115: 937-954.
  • Espinosa de los Monteros A. 2000. Higher-level phylogeny of Trogoniformes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14: 20-34.
  • Evans SE. 1988. The early history and relationships of the Diapsida. In: Benton MJ, ed. The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, Vol. 1: amphibians, reptiles, birds. Oxford, UK: Systematics Association, 221-260.
  • Fain MG, Houde P. 2004. Parallel radiations in the primary clades of birds. Evolution 58: 2558-2573.
  • Faith DP. 1989. Homoplasy as pattern: multivariate analysis of morphological convergence in Anseriformes. Cladistics 5: 235-258.
  • Farris JS. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology 18: 374-385.
  • Farris JS. 1982. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In: Platnick NI, Funk VA, eds. Advances in cladistics, Vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press, 7-36.
  • Farris JS. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
  • Farris JS, Kallersjo M, Crowe TM, Lipscomb D, Johansson U. 1999. Frigatebirds, tropicbirds, and Ciconiida: excesses of confidence probability. Cladistics 15: 1-7.
  • Farris JS, Kallersjo M, De Laet JE. 2001. Branch lengths do not indicate support - even in maximum likelihood. Cladistics 17: 298-299.
  • Fautin DG, Watling L. 1999. Review of textbooks of invertebrate zoology. American Zoologist 39: 818-824.
  • Feduccia A. 1973. Evolutionary trends in the Neotropical ovenbirds and woodhewers. Ornithological Monographs 13: 1-69.
  • Feduccia A. 1976. Osteological evidence for shorebird affinities of the flamingoes. Auk 93: 587-601.
  • Feduccia A. 1977a. The whalebill is a stork. Nature 266: 719- 720.
  • Feduccia A. 1977b. Hypothetical stages in the evolution of modern ducks and flamingos. Journal of Theoretical Biology 67: 715-721.
  • Feduccia A. 1977c. A model for the evolution of perching birds. Systematic Zoology 26: 19-31.
  • Feduccia A. 1980. The age of birds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Feduccia A. 1985. The morphological evidence for ratite monophyly. Fact or fiction? In: Ilyichev VD, Gavrilov VM, eds. Acta XVIII Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici, Vol. 1. Moscow, USSR: Academy of Science, 184- 190.
  • Feduccia A. 1986. The scapulocoracoid of flightless birds: a primitive avian character similar to that of theropods. Ibis 128: 128-132.
  • Feduccia A. 1995. Explosive evolution in Tertiary birds and mammals. Science 267: 637-638.
  • Feduccia A. 1996. The origin and evolution of birds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Feduccia A. 1999. 1, 2, 3 = 2, 3, 4: accommodating the cladogram. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 96: 4740-4742.
  • Feduccia A. 2003. 'Big bang' for Tertiary birds? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 172-176.
  • Feduccia A, Lingham-Soliar T, Hinchliffe JR. 2005. Do feathered dinosaurs exist? Testing the hypothesis on neontological and paleontological evidence. Journal of Morphology 266: 125-166.
  • Feduccia A, Martin LD. 1976. The Eocene zygodactyl birds of North America (Aves: Piciformes). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 27: 101-110.
  • Felsenstein J. 1978. The number of evolutionary trees. Systematic Zoology 27: 27-33.
  • Felsenstein J. 1979. Alternative methods of phylogenetic inference and their interrelationship. Systematic Zoology 28: 49-62.
  • Felsenstein J. 1983. Parsimony in systematics: biological and statistical issues. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14: 313-333.
  • Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenetics: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
  • Felsenstein J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Felsenstein J, Kishino H. 1993. Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies? A reply to Hillis and Bull. Systematic Biology 42: 193-200.
  • Fidler AE, Kuhn S, Gwinner E. 2004. Convergent evolution of strigiform and caprimulgiform dark-activity is supported by phylogenetic analysis using the arylakylamine N - acetyltransferase (Aanat) gene. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33: 908-921.
  • Figuerola J. 1999. A comparative study on the evolution of reversed size dimorphism in monogamous waders. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 67: 1-18.
  • Fink WL. 1988. Phylogenetic analysis and the detection of ontogenetic patterns. In: McKinney ML, ed. Heterochrony in evolution: a multidisciplinary approach. New York: Plenum Press, 71-91.
  • Fisher DC. 1992. Stratigraphic parsimony. In: Maddison WP, Maddison DR, eds. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 124-129.
  • Fitzpatrick JW. 1988. Why so many passerine birds? A response to Raikow. Systematic Zoology 37: 71-76.
  • Fjeldsa J. 1976. The systematic affinities of sandgrouses, Pteroclidae. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 139: 179-243.
  • Forbes WA. 1881. Note on the structure of the palate in the trogons (Trogonidae). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1881: 836-837.
  • Forbes WA. 1882. Description of the pterylosis of Mesites, with remarks on the position of that genus. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1882: 267-271.
  • Forey PL, Kitching IJ. 2000. Experiments in coding multistate characters. In: Scotland R, Pennington RT, eds. Homology and systematics: coding characters for phylogenetic analysis. London, UK: Taylor & Francis, 54-80.
  • Freudenstein JV. 2005. Characters, states, and homology. Systematic Biology 54: 965-973.
  • Friesen VL, Baker AJ, Piatt JF. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships within the Alcidae (Charadriiformes: Aves) inferred from total molecular evidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 359-367.
  • Fry CH. 1980. The evolutionary biology of kingfishers (Alcedinidae). Living Bird 18: 113-160.
  • Fry CH. 1984. The bee-eaters. Calton, UK: T & AD Poyser.
  • Fujita M. 2004. Kinematic parameters of the walking of herons. ground-feeders, and waterfowl. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology (Part A) 139: 117-124.
  • Furbringer M. 1888. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Systematik der Vogel, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Anatomie der Stutz- und Bewegungsorgane, 2 Volumes. Amsterdam, Holland: T. J. Van Holkema.
  • Fusco G. 2001. How many processes are responsible for phenotypic evolution? Evolution and Development 3: 279-286.
  • Gadow H. 1877. Anatomie des Phoenicopterus roseus Pall. und seine Stellung in System. Journal fur Ornithologie 25: 382-397.
  • Gadow H. 1882. On some points in the anatomy of Pterocles, with remarks on its systematic position. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1882: 312-332.
  • Gadow H. 1891a. Notes on the structure of Pedionomus torquatus, with regard to its systematic position. Records of the Australian Museum 1: 205-211.
  • Gadow H. 1891b. Crop and sternum of Opisthocomus cristatus: a contribution to the question of the correlation of organs and the inheritance of acquired characters. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 2: 147-154.
  • Gadow H. 1892. On the classification of birds. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1892: 229-256.
  • Gadow H. 1893. Vogel, II. Systematischer Theil. In: Bronn HG, ed. Klassen und Ordnungen des Thierreichs, 6(4). Leipzig: CF Winter, 303.
  • Galis F. 1999. On the homology of structures and Hox genes: the vertebral column. In: Bock GR, Cardew G, eds. Homology. Chichester, UK: Academic Press, 80-94.
  • Galis F, Kundrat M, Metz JAJ. 2005. Hox genes, digit identities and the theropod/bird transition. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Series B) 304: 198-205.
  • Galis F, van Alphen JJM, Metz JAJ. 2002. Digit reduction: via repatterning or developmental arrest? Evolution and Development 4: 249-251.
  • Garcia-Moreno J. 2004. Is there a universal mt DNA clock for birds? Journal of Avian Biology 35: 1-4.
  • Garcia-Moreno J, Cortes N, Garcia-Deraqs GM, Hernandez-Banos BE. 2006. Local origins and diversification among Lampornis hummingbirds: a Mesoamerican taxon. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38: 488-498.
  • Garcia-Moreno J, Sorenson MD, Mindell DP. 2003. Congruent avian phylogenies inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Journal of Molecular Biology 57: 27-37.
  • Garrod AH. 1873a. On certain muscles of the thigh of birds and on their value in classification. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1873: 626-644.
  • Garrod AH. 1873b. On some points in the anatomy of Steatornis. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1873: 526-535.
  • Garrod AH. 1874. On certain muscles of the thigh of birds and on their value in classification. Part II. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1874: 111-124.
  • Garrod AH. 1876. Notes on the anatomy of the colies (Colius). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1876: 416- 419.
  • Garrod AH. 1879. Notes on points in the anatomy of the hoatzin (Opisthocomus cristatus). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1879: 109-114.
  • Gatesy SM. 1991. Hind limb scaling in birds and other theropods: implications for terrestrial locomotion. Journal of Morphology 209: 83-96.
  • Gatesy SM, Biewiener AA. 1991. Bipedal locomotion: effects of speed, size and limb posture in birds and humans. Journal of Zoology (London) 224: 127-147.
  • Geeta R. 2003. Structure trees and species trees: what they say about morphological development and evolution. Evolution and Development 5: 609-621.
  • Geffen E, Yom-Tov Y. 2001. Factors affecting the rate of intraspecific nest parasitism among Anseriformes and Galliformes. Animal Behaviour 62: 1027-1038.
  • Gelman A, Xiao-Li M. 2004. Applied Bayesian modeling and causal inference from incomplete-data perspectives. Chichester, UK: J. Wiley and Sons.
  • Giebel CGA. 1873. Balaeniceps rex. Zeitschrift fur die Gesamten Naturwissenschaften (Abteilung 1) 7: 350-354.
  • Gittleman JL, Anderson CG, Kot M, Luh H-K. 1996. Comparative tests of evolutionary lability and rates using molecular phylogenies. In: Harvey PH, Brown AJ, Maynard Smith J, Nee S, eds. New uses for new phylogenies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 289-307.
  • Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ. 1997a. Homoplasy in molecular vs. morphological data: the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. In: Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ, eds. Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 55-101.
  • Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ. 1997b. Consistency, characters, and the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 320-333.
  • Glenny FH. 1954. Antarctica as a center of origin of birds. Ohio Journal of Science 54: 307-314.
  • Goedert JL. 1988. A new Late Eocene species of Plotopteridae (Aves: Pelecaniformes) from northwestern Oregon. Proceedings of the California Academy of Science 45: 97-102.
  • Goedert JL. 1989. Giant late Eocene marine birds (Pelecaniformes: Pelagornithidae) from northwestern Oregon. Journal of Paleontology 63: 939-944.
  • Goedert JL, Cornish J. 2002. A preliminary report on the diversity and stratigraphic distribution of the Plotopteridae (Pelecaniformes) in Paleogene rocks of Washington state, USA. In: Zhou Z, Zhang F, eds. Proceedings of the 5th Symposium of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution, 1-4 June 2000. Beijing, PRC: Science Press, 63-76.
  • Gohlich UB, Mourer-Chauvire C. 2005. Revision of the phasianids (Aves: Galliformes) from the lower Miocene of Saint-Gerand-le-Puy (Allier, France). Palaeontology 48: 1331-1350.
  • Goldring GB, Dean AM. 1998. The structural basis of molecular adaptation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 355- 369.
  • Goloboff PA. 1999. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 15: 415- 428.
  • Gomez-Diaz E, Gonzalez-Solis J, Peinado MA, Page RDM. 2006. Phylogeography of the Calonectris shearwaters using molecular and morphometric data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41: 322-332.
  • Gonzalez-Barba G, Schwennicke T, Goedert JL, Barnes LG. 2002. Earliest Pacific basin record of the Pelagornithidae (Aves: Pelecaniformes). Journal of Vertebrae Paleontology 22: 722-725.
  • Gould SJ. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
  • Gould SJ, Eldredge N. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3: 115-151.
  • Grant T, Kluge AG. 2004. Transformation series as an ideographic character concept. Cladistics 20: 23-31.
  • Grau ET, Pereira SL, Silveira LF, Hofling E, Wajntal A. 2005. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of Neotropical piping guans (Aves: Galliformes): Pipile Bonaparte, 1856 is a synonym of Aburria Reichenbach, 1853. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 637-645.
  • Graur D, Li W-H. 2000. Fundamentals of molecular evolution, 2nd edn. Sunderlund, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Graybeal A. 1994. Evaluating the phylogenetic utility of genes: a search for genes informative about deep divergences among vertebrates. Systematic Biology 43: 174-193.
  • Graybeal A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Systematic Biology 47: 9-17.
  • Grellet-Tinner G, Norell M. 2002. An avian egg from the Campanian of Bayn Dzak, Mongolia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22: 719-721.
  • Griffiths CS. 1994. Syringeal morphology and the phylogeny of the Falconidae. Condor 96: 127-140.
  • Griffiths CS. 1999. Phylogeny of the Falconidae inferred from molecular and morphological data. Auk 116: 116-130.
  • Griffiths CS, Barrowclough GF, Groth JG, Mertz L. 2004. Phylogeny of the Falconidae (Aves): a comparison of the efficacy of morphological, mitochondrial, and nuclear data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32: 101-109.
  • Groombridge JJ, Jones CG, Nichols RA, Carlton M, Bruford MW. 2004. Molecular phylogeny and morphological change in the Psittacula parakeets. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 96-108.
  • Groth JG, Barrowclough GF. 1999. Basal divergences in birds and the phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12: 115-123.
  • Gutierrez RJ, Barrowclough GF, Groth JG. 2000. A classification of the grouse (Aves: Tetraoninae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Wildlife Biology 6: 205-211.
  • Haccou P, Jagers P, Vatutin VA. 2005. Branching processes: variation, growth, and extinction of populations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hackett SJ, Griffiths CS, Bates JM, Klein N. 1995. Re: a commentary on the use of sequence data for phylogeny reconstruction. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4: 350-353.
  • Haddrath O, Baker AJ. 2001. Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences of extinct birds: ratite phylogenetics and the vicariance biogeography hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 268: 939-945.
  • Hagey LR, Schteingart CD, Ton-Nu H-T, Rossi SS, Odell D, Hoffmann AF. 1990. β- phocacolic acid in bile; biochemical evidence that the flamingo is related to an ancient goose. Condor 92: 593-597.
  • Hall BK. 1984. Developmental processes underlying heterochrony as an evolutionary mechanism. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 1-7.
  • Hall BK. 1994. Introduction. In: Hall BK, ed. Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1-19.
  • Hall BK. 2001. Development of the clavicles in birds and mammals. Journal of Experimental Zoology 289: 153-161.
  • Hall BK. 2003. Descent with modification: the unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biological Reviews (Cambridge) 78: 409-433.
  • Hamrick MW. 2002. Developmental mechanisms of digit reduction. Evolution and Development 4: 247-248.
  • Handt E, Hoss M, Krings M, Paabo S. 1994. Ancient DNA: methodological challenges. Experientia 50: 524-529.
  • Haring E, Kruckenhauser L, Gamauf A, Riesing MJ, Pinsker W. 2001. The complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Buteo buteo (Aves, Accipitridae) indicates an early split in the phylogeny of raptors. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 1892-1904.
  • Harlid A, Arnason U. 1998. Analyses of mitochondrial DNA nest ratite birds within the Neognathae: supporting a neotenous origin of ratite morphological characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 266: 305-309.
  • Harlid A, Janke A, Arnason U. 1997. The mt DNA sequence of the ostrich and the divergence between palaeognathous and neognathous birds. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 754-761.
  • Harlid A, Janke A, Arnason U. 1998. The complete mitochondrial genome of Rhea americana and early avian divergences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 46: 669-679.
  • Harris TE. 1963. The theory of branching process. Mineola NY: Dover.
  • Harrison CJO. 1982a. The earliest parrot: a new species from the British Eocene. Ibis 124: 203-210.
  • Harrison CJO. 1982b. Cuculiform, piciform and passeriform birds in the lower Eocene of England. Tertiary Research 4: 71-81.
  • Harrison GL, McLenachan PA, Phillips MJ, Slack KE, Cooper A, Penny D. 2004. Four new avian mitochondrial genomes help get to basic evolutionary questions in the late Cretaceous. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 974- 983.
  • Harrison CJO, Walker CA. 1976a. Birds of the British upper Eocene. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 59: 323- 351.
  • Harrison CJO, Walker CA. 1976b. A reappraisal of Propha- ethon shrubsolei Andrews (Aves). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History): Geology 27: 1-30.
  • Harshman J. 1994a. The effect of irrelevant characters on bootstrap values. Systematic Biology 43: 419-424.
  • Harshman J. 1994b. Reweaving the tapestry: What can we learn from Sibley and Ahlquist (1990)? Auk 111: 377-388.
  • Harshman J, Braun EL, Braun MJ, Hackett SJ, Han K-J, Huddleston Kimball RT, Markes BD, Miglia KJ, Moore WA, Reddy S, Sheldon FH, Steadman D, Yri T, Witt C. 2006. Early Bird, an international collaboration in deep molecular phylogenetic of birds: Can four million bases resolve the tree [abstract]? Journal of Ornithology 147 (Suppl. 1): 42.
  • Haszprunar G. 1998. Parsimony analysis as a specific kind of homology estimation and the implications for character weighting. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 333- 339.
  • Hauser DL, Presch W. 1991. The effect of ordered characters on phylogenetic reconstruction. Cladistics 7: 243-265.
  • Hedges SB. 1994. Molecular evidence for the origin of birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 91: 2621-2624.
  • Hedges SB, Parker PH, Sibley CG, Kumar S. 1996. Continental breakup and the ordinal diversification of birds and mammals. Nature 381: 226-229.
  • Hedges SB, Sibley CG. 1994. Molecules vs morphology in avian evolution: the case of the 'pelecaniform' birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 91: 9861-9865.
  • Hedges SB, Simmons MD, van Dijk AMA, Caspers G-J, deJong WW, Sibley CG. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of the hoatzin, an enigmatic South American bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 92: 11662- 11665.
  • Helbig AJ, Kocum A, Seibold I, Braun MJ. 2005. A multigene phylogeny of aquiline eagles (Aves: Accipitriformes) reveals extensive paraphyly at the genus level. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 147-164.
  • Helbig A, Seibold I. 1995. Are storks and New World vultures paraphyletic? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4: 315-319.
  • Helfenbein KG, DeSalle R. 2005. Falsifications and corroborations: Karl Popper's influence on systematics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 271-280.
  • Helm-Bychowski KM, Cracraft J. 1993. Recovering phylogenetic signal from DNA sequences: relationships within the corvine assemblage (Class Aves) as inferred from complete sequences of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome- b gene. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 1196-1214.
  • Helm-Bychowski KM, Wilson AC. 1986. Rates of nuclear- DNA evolution in pheasant-like birds: evidence from restriction maps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 83: 688-692.
  • Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Heyde CC. 1997. Quasi-likelihood and its application: a general approach to optimal parameter estimation. New York: Springer.
  • Hill RV. 2005. Integration of morphological data sets for phylogenetic analysis of Amniota: the importance of integumentary characters and increased taxonomic sampling. Systematic Biology 54: 530-547.
  • Hillis DM, Bull JJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182-192.
  • Hillis DM, Wiens JJ. 2000. Molecules versus morphology in systematics. In: Wiens JJ, ed. Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1-19.
  • Hinchliffe JR. 1985. 'One, two, three' or 'two, three, four': an embryologist's view of the homologies of the digits and carpus of modern birds. In: Hecht MK, Ostrom JH, Viohl G, Wellnhofer P, eds. The beginnings of birds. Willibaldsburg, Germany: Freunde des Jura-Museumd Eichstatt, 141-147.
  • Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Cooper A, Drummond AJ. 2005. Time dependency of molecular rate estimates and systematic overestimation of recent divergence times. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1561-1568.
  • Ho CY-K, Prager E, Wilson AC, Osuga DT, Feeney RE. 1976. Penguin evolution: comparisons demonstrate phylogenetic relationship to flying aquatic birds. Journal of Molecular Evolution 8: 271-282.
  • Hoff KM. 1966. A comparative study of the appendicular muscles of Strigiformes and Caprimulgiformes. Pullman, WA: Washington State University.
  • Holdaway RN. 1994. An exploratory phylogenetic analysis of the genera of the Accipitridae, with notes on the biogeography of the family. In: Meyburn B-U, Chancellor RD, eds. Raptor conservation today. London, UK: World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Owls, 601-649.
  • Holman JA. 1961. Osteology of the living and fossil New World quails (Aves, Galliformes). Florida State Museum Bulletin (Biological Series) 6: 131-233.
  • Holmquist R, Pearl D, Jukes TH. 1983. Non-uniform molecular divergence: the quantitative evolutionary analysis of genes and messenger RNAs under selective structural constraints. In: Goodman M, ed. Macromolecular sequences in systematic and evolutionary biology. New York: Plenum Press, 281-315.
  • Holtz TR Jr. 1998. A new phylogeny of the carnivorous dinosaurs. Gaia 15: 5-61.
  • Homberger DG. 1980. Functional morphology and evolution of the feeding apparatus in parrots, with secial reference to the Pesquet's parrot, Psttrichas fuligidus (Lesson). In: Pasquier RF, ed. Conservation of New World parrots. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 471-485.
  • Hope S. 2002. The Mesozoic radiation of Neornithes. In: Chiappe LM, Witmer LM, eds. Mesozoic birds: above the heads of dinosaurs. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 339-388.
  • Houde PW. 1987. Critical evaluation of DNA hybridization studies in avian systematics. Auk 104: 17-32.
  • Houde PW. 1988. Palaeognathous birds form the early Tertiary of the Northern Hemisphere. Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club 22: 1-148.
  • Houde PW. 1994. Evolution of the Heliornithidae: reciprocal illumination by morphology, biogeography and DNA hybridization (Aves: Gruiformes). Cladistics 10: 1-19.
  • Houde PW, Cooper A, Leslie E, Strand AE, Montano GA. 1997. Phylogeny and evolution of 12S r DNA in Gruiformes (Aves). In: Mindell DP, ed. Avian molecular evolution and systematics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 121-158.
  • Houde PW, Haubold H. 1987. Palaeotis weigelti restudied: a small Middle Eocene ostrich (Aves: Struthioniformes). Palaeovertebrata 17: 27-42.
  • Houde PW, Olson SL. 1981. Palaeognathous carinate birds from the Early Tertiary of North America. Science 214: 1236-1237.
  • Houde PW, Olson SL. 1992. A radiation of coly-like birds from the Eocene of North America (Aves: Sandcoleiformes new order). Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Series 36: 137-160.
  • Howard H. 1957. Gigantic 'toothed' marine birds from the Miocene of California. Bulletin of the Department of Geology of the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 1: 1-23.
  • Hudson GE, Lanzillotti PJ. 1964. Muscles of the pectoral limb in galliform birds. American Midland Naturalist 71: 1- 113.
  • Hudson GE, Lanzillotti PJ, Edwards GD. 1959. Muscles of the pelvic limb in galliform birds. American Midland Naturalist 61: 1-67.
  • Hudson GE, Parker RA, Vanden Berge J, Lanzillotti PJ. 1966. A numerical analysis of the modifications of the appendicular muscles in various genera of gallinaceous birds. American Midland Naturalist 76: 1-73.
  • Huelsenbeck JP. 1991. Tree-length distribution skewness: an indicator of phylogenetic information. Systematic Zoology 40: 257-270.
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Bull JJ, Cunningham CW. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 152-158.
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Miller RE, Ronquist F. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Systematic Biology 51: 673-688.
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2003. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Systematic Biology 52: 131-158.
  • Huelsenbeck JP, Rannala B. 2000. Using stratigraphic information in phylogenetics. In: Wiens JJ, ed. Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 165-191.
  • Hughes JM. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis of the Cuculidae (Aves, Cuculiformes) using behavioral and ecological characters. Auk 113: 10-22.
  • Hughes JM. 2000. Monophyly and phylogeny of cuckoos (Aves, Cuculidae) inferred from osteological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 130: 263-307.
  • Hughes JM, Baker AJ. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin) resolved using mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1300-1307.
  • Humphries CJ, Parenti LR. 1999. Cladistic biogeography. Interpreting patterns of plant and animal distributions, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Hutchinson JR. 2001a. The evolution of pelvic osteology and soft tissues on the line to extant birds (Neornithes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 131: 123-168.
  • Hutchinson JR. 2001b. The evolution of femoral osteology and soft tissues on the line to extant birds (Neornithes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 131: 169-197.
  • Hutchinson JR. 2002. The evolution of hindlimb tendons and muscles on the line to crown-group birds. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology (Part A) 133: 1051-1086.
  • Huxley TH. 1867. On the classification of birds; and on the taxonomic value of the modifications of certain of the cranial bones observable in that class. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1867: 415-472.
  • Insua DR, Ruggeri F, eds. 2000. Robust Bayesian analysis. New York: Springer.
  • Irestedt M, Fjeldsa J, Johansson US, Ericson PGP. 2002. Systematic relationships and biogeography of the tracheophone suboscines (Aves: Passeriformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 499-512.
  • Irestedt M, Johansson US, Parsons TJ, Ericson PGP. 2001. Phylogeny of major lineages of suboscines (Passeriformes) analysed by nuclear DNA sequence data. Journal of Avian Biology 32: 15-25.
  • Iwabe N, Hara Y, Kumazawa Y, Shibamoto K, Saito Y, Miyata T, Kotah K. 2004. Sister group relationship of turtles to the bird-crocodilian clade revealed by nuclear DNAcoded proteins. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 810-813.
  • Jablonski D. 2000. Micro- and macroevolution: scale and hierarchy in evolutionary biology and paleobiology. Paleobiology 26 (Suppl.): 15-52.
  • Jablonski D. 2005. Mass extinctions and macroevolution. Paleobiology 31 (Suppl.): 192-210.
  • James HF. 2004. The osteology and phylogeny of the Hawaiian finch radiation (Fringillidae: Drepanidini), including extinct taxa. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 207-255.
  • James HF. 2005. Palaeogene fossils and the radiation of fossil birds. Auk 122: 1049-1054.
  • Janke A, Arnason U. 1997. The complete mitochondrial genome of Alligator mississippiensis and the separation between Recent Archosauria (birds and crocodiles). Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 1266-1272.
  • Jeffrey JE, Richarson MK, Coates MI, Bininda-Emonds ORP. 2002. Analyzing developmental sequences within a phylogenetic framework. Systematic Biology 51: 478-491.
  • Jehl JR Jr. 1968. Relationships in the Charadrii (shorebirds): a taxonomic study based on color patterns of the downy young. Memoirs of the San Diego Society of Natural History 3: 1-54.
  • Jehl JR Jr. 1971. The color patterns of downy young ratites and tinamous. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History 16: 292-301.
  • Jenkin PM. 1957. The filter-feeding and food of flamingoes (Phoenicopteri). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 240: 401-493.
  • Jenner RA. 2004a. Accepting partnership by submission? Morphological phylogenetics in a molecular millenium. Systematic Biology 53: 333-342.
  • Jenner RA. 2004b. When molecules and morphology clash: reconciling conflicting phylogenies of the Metazoa by considering secondary character loss. Evolution and Development 6: 372-378.
  • Johansson US, Ericson PGP. 2003. Molecular support for a sister group relationship between Pici and Galbulae (Piciformes sensu Wetmore 1960). Journal of Avian Biology 34: 185-197.
  • Johansson US, Ericson PGP. 2004. A re-evaluation of basal phylogenetic relationships within trogons (Aves: Trogonidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 43: 166-173.
  • Johansson US, Parsons TJ, Irestedt M, Ericson PGP. 2001. Clades within the 'higher land birds', evaluated by nuclear DNA sequences. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 39: 37-51.
  • Johnsgard PA. 1960. Hybridization in the Anatidae and its taxonomic implications. Condor 62: 25-33.
  • Johnsgard PA. 1961. The taxonomy of the Anatidae - a behavioural analysis. Ibis 103: 71-85.
  • Johnsgard PA. 1963. Behavioral isolating mechanisms in the family Anatidae. In: Sibley CG, ed. Proceedings of the 13th International Ornithological Congress., Vol. I. Washington, DC: American Ornithologists' Union, 531-543.
  • Johnson KP. 2001. Taxon sampling and the phylogenetic position of Passeriformes: evidence from 916 avian cytochrome b sequences. Systematic Biology 50: 128-136.
  • Johnson NK, Cicero C. 2004. New mitochondrial DNA data affirm the importance of Pleistocene speciation in North American birds. Evolution 58: 1122-1130.
  • Johnson KP, Clayton DH. 2000a. Nuclear and mitochondrial genes contain similar phylogenetic signal for pigeons and doves (Aves: Columbiformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14: 141-151.
  • Johnson KP, Clayton DH. 2000b. A molecular phylogeny of the dove genus Zenaida: mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Condor 102: 864-870.
  • Johnson KP, Goodman SM, Lanyon SM. 2000. A phylogenetic study of the Malagasy couas with insights into cuckoo relationships. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14: 436-444.
  • Johnson KP, Sorenson MD. 1998. Comparing molecular evolution in two mitochondrial protein coding genes (cytochrome b and ND4) in the dabbling ducks (Tribe: Anatini). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 10: 82-94.
  • Johnson KP, Sorenson MD. 1999. Phylogeny and biogeography of dabbling ducks (genus Anas): a comparison of molecular and morphological characters. Auk 116: 792-805.
  • Johnson KP, Weckstein JD, Witt CC, Faucett RC, Moyle RG. 2002. The perils of using host relationships in parasite taxonomy: phylogeny of the Degeeriella complex. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32: 150-157.
  • Jollie MT. 1953. Are the Falconiformes a monophyletic group? Ibis 95: 369-371.
  • Jollie MT. 1976. A contribution to the morphology and phylogeny of the Falconiformes. Evolutionary Theory 1: 285- 298.
  • Jollie MT. 1977a. A contribution to the morphology and phylogeny of the Falconiformes (part II). Evolutionary Theory 2: 115-208.
  • Jollie MT. 1977b. A contribution to the morphology and phylogeny of the Falconiformes (part III). Evolutionary Theory 2: 209-300.
  • Jollie MT. 1977c. A contribution to the morphology and phylogeny of the Falconiformes (part IV). Evolutionary Theory 3: 1-141.
  • de Kloet RS, de Kloet SR. 2003. The evolution of the spindlin gene in birds: independent cessation of the recombination of sex chromosomes at the spindin gene in neognathous birds and tinamous, a palaeognathous avian family. Genetica 119: 333-342.
  • de Kloet RS, de Kloet SR. 2005. The evolution of the spindlin gene in birds: sequence analysis of an intron of the spindlin W and Z gene reveals four major divisions of the Psittaciformes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36: 706-721.
  • Kadi F, Mouchiroud D, Sabeur G, Bernardi G. 1993. The compositional patterns of the avian genomes and their evolutionary implications. Journal of Molecular Evolution 37: 544-551.
  • Kallersjo M, Albert VA, Farris JS. 1999. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15: 91-93.
  • Kallersjo M, Farris JS, Kluge AG, Bolt C. 1992. Skewness and permutation. Cladistics 8: 275-287.
  • Kardong KV, Zweers GA. 1997. Vertebrate evolution at geological boundaries: introduction. Zoology 100: 121-127.
  • Karhu A. 1992. Morphological divergence within the order Apodiformes as revealed by the structure of the humerus. Contributions to Science of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 36: 379-384.
  • Karhu A. 1999. A new genus and species of the family Jungornithidae (Apodiformes) from the late Eocene of the northern Caucasus, with comments on the ancestry of hummingbirds. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 89: 207-216.
  • Karhu A. 2001. Convergence in the shoulder joint structure of hummingbirds, galliforms and tinamous. In: Kurochkin E, Rakchimov I, eds. Achievements and problems of ornithology of northern Eurasia at a boundary of centuries. Kazan, Tatarstan: Magarif Publishers, 118-132.
  • Kearney M. 2002. Fragmentary taxa, missing data, and ambiguity: mistaken assumptions and conclusions. Systematic Biology 51: 369-381.
  • Kearney M, Clark JM. 2003. Problems due to missing data in phylogenetic analyses including fossils: a critical review. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 263-274.
  • Kemp A. 1995. The Hornbills: Bucerotiformes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Kennedy M, Gray RD, Spencer HG. 2000. The phylogenetic relationships of the shags and cormorants: Can sequence data resolve a disagreement between behavior and morphology? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 345-359.
  • Kennedy M, Holland BR, Gray RD, Spencer HG. 2005. Untangling long branches: identifying conflicting phylogenetic signals using spectral analysis, neighbor-net, and consensus networks. Systematic Biology 54: 620-633.
  • Kennedy M, Page RDM. 2002. Seabird supertrees: combining partial estimates of procellariform phylogeny. Auk 119: 88-108.
  • Kennedy M, Spencer HG. 2000. Phylogenies of the frigatebirds (Fregatidae) and tropicbirds (Phaethontidae), two divergent groups of the traditional order Pelecaniformes, inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 31-38.
  • Kennedy M, Spencer HG. 2004. Phylogenies of the frigatebirds (Fregatidae) and tropicbirds (Phaethontidae), two divergent groups of the traditional order Pelecaniformes, inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 31-38.
  • Kennedy M, Spencer HG, Gray RD. 1996. Hop, step and gape: Do the social displays of the Pelecaniformes reflect phylogeny? Animal Behaviour 51: 273-291.
  • Kessler LG, Avise JC. 1985. A comparative description of mitochondrial DNA differentiation in selected avian and other vertebrate genera. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2: 109-125.
  • Kim J. 1996. General inconsistency conditions for maximum parsimony: effects of branch lengths and increasing numbers of taxa. Systematic Biology 45: 363-374.
  • Kim J. 1998. What do we know about the performance of estimators for large phylogenies? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 25-26.
  • Kimball RT, Braun EL, Zwartjes PW, Crowe TM, Ligon JD. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of the pheasants and partridges suggests that these lineages are not monophyletic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 38-54.
  • Kimmel M, Axelrod DE. 2002. Branching processes in biology. New York: Springer.
  • Kirchman JJ, Hackett SJ, Goodman SM, Bates JM. 2001. Phylogeny and systematics of ground rollers (Brachypteraciidae) of Madagascar. Auk 118: 849-863.
  • Klassen GJ, Mooi RD, Kicke A. 1991. Consistency indices and random data. Systematic Zoology 40: 446-457.
  • Klicka J, Zink RM. 1997. The importance of recent ice ages in speciation: a failed paradigm. Science 277: 1666-1669.
  • Klingenberg CP. 1998. Heterochrony and allometry: the analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biological Reviews (Cambridge) 73: 79-123.
  • Kluge AG. 1997a. Testability and the refutation and corroboration of cladistic hypotheses. Cladistics 13: 81-96.
  • Kluge AG. 1997b. Sophisticated falsification and research cycles: consequences for differential character weighting in phylogenetic systematics. Zoologica Scripta 26: 349-360.
  • Kluge AG. 1999. The science of phylogenetic systematics: explanation, prediction, and test. Cladistics 14: 151-158.
  • Kluge AG, Wolf AJ. 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics 9: 183-199.
  • Kochmer JP, Wagner RH. 1988. Why are there so many kinds of passerine birds? Because they are small. A reply to Raikow. Systematic Zoology 37: 68-69.
  • Konig C. 1982. Zur systematischen Stellung der Neuweltgeier (Cathartidae). Journal fur Ornithologie 123: 259-267.
  • Kornegay JR, Kocher TD, Williams LA, Wilson AC. 2003. Pathways of lysozyme evolution inferred from the sequences of cytochrome b in birds. Journal of Molecular Evolution 37: 367-379.
  • Kornegay JR, Schilling JW, Wilson AC. 1994. Molecular adaptation of a leaf-eating bird: stomach lysozyme of the hoatzin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 921- 928.
  • Kozlova EB. 1961. Trends of evolution in waders of the family Charadriidae (on the base of a study of the skull structure). Trudy Zoological Institute of the Academy of Science USSR 24: 183-212.
  • Kraus F. 1978. An empirical evaluation of the use of the ontogeny polarization criterion in phylogenetic inference. Systematic Zoology 37: 106-141.
  • Krawjewski C, King DG. 1996. Molecular divergence and phylogeny: rates and patterns of cytochrome b evolution in cranes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 21-30.
  • Kreitman M, Antezana M. 2000. The population and evolutionary genetics of codon bias. In: Singh RS, Kribas CB, eds. Evolutionary genetics: from molecules to morphology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 82-101.
  • Kristoffersen AV. 2001. An early Paleogene trogon (Aves: Trogoniformes) from the Fur Formation, Denmark. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 661-666.
  • Ksepka DT, Bertelli S, Giannini NP. 2006. The phylogeny of the living and fossil Sphenisciformes (penguins). Cladistics 22: 412-441.
  • Kumar S, Hedges SB. 1998. A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 392: 917-920.
  • Kumazawa Y, Nishida M. 1995. Variations in mitochondrial t RNA gene organization of reptiles as phylogenetic markers. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 759-772.
  • Kurochkin EN. 1988. Cretaceous birds of Mongolia and their significance for the study of the phylogeny of Class Aves. In: Kurochkin EN, ed. Fossil reptiles and birds of Mongolia. Trudy Sovmestnoi Sovetsko-Monglo'skoi Paleontologischeskoi Ekspeditsii, 33-42.
  • Kurochkin EN, Dyke GJ, Karhu AA. 2002. A new presbyornithid bird (Aves, Anseriformes) from the late Cretaceous of southern Mongolia. American Museum Novitates 3386: 1- 11.
  • Kuroda N. 1954. On the classification and phylogeny of the order Tubinares, particularly the shearwaters (Puffinus), with special considerations on their osteology and habit differentiation (Aves). Tokyo: Herald Company.
  • Lake JA. 1997. Phylogenetic inference: How much evolutionary history is knowable? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 213-219.
  • Lambrecht K. 1933. Handbuch der Palaeornithologie. Berlin: Gebruder Borntraeger.
  • Lang C. 1956. Das Cranium der Ratiten mit besonderer Berucksichtigung von Struthio camelus. Zeitschrift fur Wissenschaftliche Zoologie 159: 165-224.
  • Lanyon SM. 1992. Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution [review]. Condor 94: 304-307.
  • Lanyon SM, Hall JG. 1994. Reexamination of barbet monophyly using mitochondrial-DNA sequence data. Auk 111: 389-397.
  • Lanyon SM, Zink RM. 1987. Genetic variation in piciform birds: monophyly and generic and familial relationships. Auk 104: 724-732.
  • Larhammar D, Milner RJ. 1989. Phylogenetic relationship of birds with crocodiles and mammals, as deduced from protein sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 6: 693- 696.
  • Lauder GV. 1994. Homology, form, and function. In: Hall BK, ed. Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 151-196.
  • Laurin M, Reisz R. 1997. New perspective on tetrapod phylogeny. In: Sumida SS, Martin KLM, eds. Amniote origins: completing the transition to land. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1-59.
  • Leach WE. 1820. Eleventh room. In: Synopsis of the contents of the British Museum, 17th edn. London: British Museum (Natural History).
  • Lecointre G, Philippe H, Van Le HL, Guyader HL. 1993. Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2: 205-224.
  • Lecointre G, Philippe H, Van Le HL, Guyader HL. 1994. How many nucleotides are required to resolve a phylogenetic problem? The use of a new statistical method applicable to available sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 3: 292-309.
  • Lee MSY. 1997. Molecules, morphology, and phylogeny: a response to Hedges and Maxson. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 394-395.
  • Lee MSY. 1999. Molecular phylogenies become functional. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 177-178.
  • Lee PLM, Clayton DH, Griffiths R, Page RDM. 1996. Does behavior reflect phylogeny in swiftlets (Aves: Apodidae)? A test using cytochrome b mitochondrial DNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 93: 7091- 7096.
  • Lee MSY, Doughty P. 1997. The relationship between evolutionary theory and phylogenetic analysis. Biological Reviews (Cambridge) 72: 471-495.
  • Lee K, Feinstein J, Cracraft J. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the ratite birds: resolving conflicts between molecular and morphological data sets. In: Mindell DP, ed. Avian molecular evolution and systematics. New York: Academic Press, 173-211.
  • Lee MSY, Hugall AF. 2005. Model type, implicit weighting, and model averaging in phylogenetics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38: 847-857.
  • Leeton PRJ, Christidis L, Westerman M, Boles WE. 1994. Molecular phylogenetic affinities of the night parrot (Geopsittacus occidentalis) and the ground parrot (Pezoporus wallicus). Auk 111: 833-843.
  • Leonard L, Dyke GJ, Van Tuinen M. 2005. A new specimen of the fossil palaeognath Lithornis from the Lower Eocene of Denmark. American Museum Novitates 3491: 1-11.
  • Lerner HRL, Mindell DP. 2005. Phylogeny of eagles, Old World vultures, and other Accipitridae based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 327-346.
  • Levinton J. 1988. Genetics, paleontology, and macroevolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lewis PO. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 50: 913-925.
  • Ligon JD. 1967. Relationships of the cathartid vultures. University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology Occasional Paper 651: 1-26.
  • Ligon JD. 1999. The evolution of avian breeding systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Lipscomb DL. 1992. Parsimony, homology and the analysis of multistate characters. Cladistics 8: 45-65.
  • Livezey BC. 1986. A phylogenetic analysis of Recent anseriform genera using morphological characters. Auk 105: 681- 698.
  • Livezey BC. 1988. Morphometrics of flightlessness in the Alcidae. Auk 105: 681-698.
  • Livezey BC. 1989a. Morphometric patterns in Recent and fossil penguins (Aves, Sphenisciformes). Journal of Zoology (London) 219: 269-307.
  • Livezey BC. 1989b. Flightlessness in grebes (Aves, Podicipedidae): its independent evolution in three genera. Evolution 43: 29-54.
  • Livezey BC. 1989c. Phylogenetic relationships and incipient flightlessness of the extinct Auckland Islands merganser. Wilson Bulletin 101: 410-435.
  • Livezey BC. 1990. Evolutionary morphology of flightlessness in the Auckland Islands Teal. Condor 92: 639-673.
  • Livezey BC. 1991. A phylogenetic analysis and classification of Recent dabbling ducks (Tribe Anatini) based on comparative morphology. Auk 108: 471-508.
  • Livezey BC. 1992a. Morphological corollaries and ecological implications of flightlessness in the kakapo (Psittaciformes: Strigops habroptilus). Journal of Morphology 213: 105-145.
  • Livezey BC. 1992b. Flightlessness in the Galapagos cormorant (Compsohalieus [Nannopterum] harrisi): heterochrony, giantism, and specialization. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 105: 155-224.
  • Livezey BC. 1993. An ecomorphological review of the dodo (Raphus cucullatus) and solitaire (Pezophaps solitaria), flightless Columbiformes of the Mascarene Islands. Journal of Zoology (London) 230: 247-292.
  • Livezey BC. 1994. The carpometacarpus of Aptornis [sic]. Notornis 41: 51-60.
  • Livezey BC. 1995a. Heterochrony and the evolution of avian flightlessness. In: McNamara KJ, ed. Evolutionary change and heterochrony. Chichester, UK: J. Wiley, 169-193.
  • Livezey BC. 1995b. A phylogenetic analysis of the whistling and white-backed ducks (Anatidae: Dendrocygninae) using morphological characters. Annals of Carnegie Museum 64: 65-97.
  • Livezey BC. 1995c. Phylogeny and evolutionary ecology of modern seaducks (Anatidae: Mergini). Condor 97: 233-255.
  • Livezey BC. 1995d. Phylogeny and comparative ecology of stiff-tailed Ducks (Anatidae: Oxyurini). Wilson Bulletin 107: 214-234.
  • Livezey BC. 1996a. A phylogenetic analysis of the geese and swans (Anseriformes: Anserinae), including selected fossil species. Systematic Biology 45: 415-450.
  • Livezey BC. 1996b. A phylogenetic reassessment of the tadornine-anatine divergence (Aves: Anseriformes, Anatidae). Annals of Carnegie Museum 65: 27-88.
  • Livezey BC. 1996c. A phylogenetic analysis of modern pochards (Anatidae: Aythyini). Auk 113: 74-93.
  • Livezey BC. 1997a. A phylogenetic analysis of basal Anseriformes, the fossil Presbyornis, and the interordinal relationships of waterfowl. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 121: 361-428.
  • Livezey BC. 1997b. An annotated phylogenetic classification of waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes), including selected fossil species. Annals of Carnegie Museum 67: 457-496.
  • Livezey BC. 1997c. A phylogenetic analysis of modern shelducks and sheldgeese (Anatidae, Tadornini). Ibis 139: 51-66.
  • Livezey BC. 1998a. Erratum - A phylogenetic analysis of basal Anseriformes, the fossil Presbyornis, and the interordinal relationships of waterfowl. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 124: 397-398.
  • Livezey BC. 1998b. A phylogenetic analysis of the Gruiformes (Aves) based on morphological characters, with an emphasis on the rails (Rallidae). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (Series B) 353: 2077-2151.
  • Livezey BC. 2003a. Avian spirit collections: attitudes, importance and prospects. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 123 (Suppl.): 35-51.
  • Livezey BC. 2003b. Evolution of flightlessness in rails (Gruiformes: Rallidae): phylogenetic, ecomorphological, and ontogenetic perspectives. Ornithological Monographs 53: 1-654.
  • Livezey BC. 2003c. Millenial status report as debate wanes [review]. Science 299: 1664-1665.
  • Livezey BC, Humphrey PC. 1986. Flightlessness in steamer-ducks (Anatidae: Tachyeres): its morphological bases and probable evolution. Evolution 40: 540-558.
  • Livezey BC, Martin LD. 1988. The systematic position of the Miocene anatid Anas[?] blanchardi Milne-Edwards. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 8: 196-211.
  • Livezey BC, Zusi RL. 2001. Higher-order phylogenetics of modern Aves based on comparative anatomy. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 51: 179-206.
  • Livezey BC, Zusi RL. 2006. Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy: I. - Methods and characters. Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 37: 1-556.
  • Lockhart PJ, Steel MA, Hendy MD, Penny D. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11: 605-612.
  • Lowe PR. 1922. On the significance of certain characters in some charadriine genera, with a provisional classification of the order Charadriiformes. Ibis 64: 475-495.
  • Lowe PR. 1923. Notes on the systematic position of Ortyxelus, together with some remarks on the relationships of the turnicomorphs and the position of the seed-snipe (Thinocoridae) and sand-grouse. Ibis 65: 276-299.
  • Lowe PR. 1924. On the anatomy and systematic position of the Madagascan bird Mesites (Mesoenas), with a preliminary note on the osteology of Monias. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1924: 1131-1152.
  • Lowe PR. 1925. (1) On the systematic position of the Jacanidae (Jacanas), with some notes on a hitherto unconsidered anatomical character of apparent taxonomic value, (2) a preliminary note on the classification of the Charadriiformes (Limicolae and Laro-Limicolae) based on this character, viz., the morphology of the quadrato-tympanic articulation. Ibis 67: 132-147.
  • Lowe PR. 1928. Studies and observations bearing on the phylogeny of the ostrich and its allies. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1928: 185-247.
  • Lowe PR. 1930. On the relationships of the AEpyornithes to the other Struthiones as revealed by a study of the pelvis of Mullerornis. Ibis 72: 470-490.
  • Lowe PR. 1931a. An anatomical review of the 'waders' (Telmatomorphae), with special reference to the families, subfamilies, and genera within the suborders Limicolae, Grui-Limicolae and Lari-Limicolae. Ibis 73: 712-771.
  • Lowe PR. 1931b. On the relations of the Gruimorphae to the Charadriimorphae and Rallimorphae, with special reference to the taxonomic position of Rostratulidae, Jacanidae, and Burhinidae (OEdicnemidae olim), with a suggested new order (Telmatomorphae). Ibis 73: 491-534.
  • Lowe PR. 1933. On the primitive characters of the penguins, and their bearing on the phylogeny of birds. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 102: 483-541.
  • Lowe PR. 1935. On the relationships of the Struthiones to the dinosaurs and the rest of the avian class, with special reference to the position of Archaeopteryx. Ibis 77: 298-429.
  • Lowe PR. 1939. On the systematic position of the swifts (Suborder Cypseli) and hummingbirds (Suborder Trochili), with special reference to their relation to the order Passeriformes. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 24: 307-348.
  • Lowe PR. 1942. Some additional anatomical factors bearing on the phylogeny of the Struthiones. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 112: 1-20.
  • Lowe PR. 1943. Some notes on the anatomical differences obtaining between the Cuculidae and the Musophagidae, with special reference to the specialization of the oesophagus in Cuculus canorus Linnaeus. Ibis 85: 490-515.
  • Lowe PR. 1944a. Some additional comments on the phylogeny of the Struthiones. Ibis 86: 37-42.
  • Lowe PR. 1944b. An analysis of the characters of Archaeopteryx and Archaeornis. Were they reptiles or birds? Ibis 86: 517-543.
  • Lowe PR. 1946. On the systematic position of the woodpeckers (Pici), honey-guides (Indicator), hoopoes and others. Ibis 88: 103-127.
  • Lowe PR. 1948. What are the Coraciiformes? Ibis 90: 572- 582.
  • Lucchini V, Hoglund J, Klaus S, Swenson J, Randi E. 2001. Historical biogeography and mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of grouse and ptarmigan. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20: 149-162.
  • Lyons-Weiler J, Hoelzer GA. 1997. Escaping from the Felsenstein zone by detecting long branches in phylogenetic data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 375- 384.
  • Lyons-Weiler J, Hoelzer GA, Tausch RJ. 1998. Optimal outgroup analysis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 64: 493-511.
  • Mabee PM. 2000. The usefulness of ontogeny in interpreting morphological characters. In: Wiens JJ, ed. Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 84-114.
  • Maddison DR. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
  • Maddison WP. 1993. Missing data versus missing characters in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 576- 581.
  • Maddison WP. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46: 523-536.
  • Maddison WP, Donoghue MJ, Maddison DR. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Systematic Zoology 33: 83- 103.
  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1992. MacClade, Version 3. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Manegold A. 2005. Zur Phylogenie und Evolution dere 'Racken'-, Specht-, und Sperlingsvogel ('Coraciiformes', Piciformes und Passeriformes: Aves). Doctoral dissertation, Berlin: Freie Universitat.
  • Manegold A, Mayr G, Mourer-Chauvire C. 2004. Miocene songbirds and the composition of the European passeriform avifauna. Auk 121: 1155-1160.
  • Marceliano MLV. 1996. Estudo osteologico e miologico do cranio de Opisthocomus hoazin (Muller, 1776) (Aves: Opisthocomidae), comparado com algumas especies de Cracidae, Musophagidae e Cuculidae. Boletim do Museum Paraense Emilio Goeldi (Serie Zoologia) 12: 95-246.
  • Mariaux J, Braun MJ. 1996. A molecular phylogenetic survey of the nightjars and allies (Caprimulgiformes) with special emphasis on the potoos (Nyctibiidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6: 228-244.
  • Marks BD, Willard DE. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships of the Madagascan pygmy kingfisher (Ispidina madagascariensis). Auk 122: 1271-1280.
  • Marques AC, Gnaspini P. 2001. The problem of characters susceptible to parallel evolution in phylogenetic reconstructions: suggestion of a practical method and its application to cave animals. Cladistics 17: 371-381.
  • Marshall JT Jr. 1966. Relationships of certain owls around the Pacific. Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 21: 235-242.
  • Marshall CR. 1990. The fossil record and estimating divergence times between lineages: maximum divergence times and the importance of reliable phylogenies. Journal of Molecular Evolution 30: 400-408.
  • Martin LD. 1983. Origin and early evolution of birds. In: Brush AH, Clarke GA Jr, eds. Perspectives in ornithology: essays presented for the centennial of the American Ornithologists' Union. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 291-353.
  • Maryanska T, Osmolska H, Wolsan M. 2002. Avialian status for Oviraptorosauria. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 42: 361-371.
  • Maurer BA. 1998. The evolution of body size in birds. I. Evidence for non-random diversification. Evolutionary Ecology 12: 925-934.
  • Maurer DR, Raikow RJ. 1981. Appendicular myology, phylogeny, and classification of the avian order Coraciiformes (including Trogoniformes). Annals of Carnegie Museum 50: 417-434.
  • Mayr E. 1958. The sequence of songbird families. Condor 60: 194-195.
  • Mayr G. 1998a. Ein Archaeotrogon (Aves: Archaeotronidae) aus dem Mittel-Eozan der Grube Messel (Hessen, Deutschland)? Journal of Ornithology 139: 121-129.
  • Mayr G. 1998b. 'Coraciiforme' und 'piciforme' Kleinvogel aus dem Mittel-Eozan der Grube Messel (Hessen, Deutschland). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 205: 1-101.
  • Mayr G. 1998c. A new family of Eocene zygodactyl birds. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 78: 199-209.
  • Mayr G. 1999a. A new trogon from the middle Oligocene of Cereste, France. Auk 116: 427-434.
  • Mayr G. 1999b. Caprimulgiform birds from the Middle Eocene of Messel (Hessen, Germany). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19: 521-532.
  • Mayr G. 2000a. A new raptor-like bird from the lower Eocene of North America and Europe. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 80: 59-65.
  • Mayr G. 2000b. A new mousebird (Coliiformes: Coliidae) from the Oligocene of Germany. Journal of Ornithology 141: 85- 92.
  • Mayr G. 2000c. New or previously unrecorded avian taxa from the middle Eocene of Messel (Hessen, Germany). Mitteilungen aus dem. Museum Naturkunde in Berlin (Geowissenschaftliche Reihe) 3: 207-219.
  • Mayr G. 2000d. Tiny hoopoe-like birds from the middle Eocene of Messel (Germany). Auk 117: 964-970.
  • Mayr G. 2001a. New specimens of the middle Eocene fossil mousebird Selmes absurdipes Peters 1999. Ibis 143: 427- 434.
  • Mayr G. 2001b. A second skeleton of the early Oligocene trogon Primotrogon wintersteini Mayr 1999 (Aves: Trogoniformes: Trogonidae) in an unusual state of preservation. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 81: 335-338.
  • Mayr G. 2001c. A cormorant from the late Oligocene of Enspel, Germany (Aves, Pelecaniformes, Phalacrocoracidae). Senckenbergiana Lethaea 81: 329-333.
  • Mayr G. 2001d. The earliest fossil record of a modern-type piciform from the late Oligocene of Germany. Journal of Ornithology 142: 2-6.
  • Mayr G. 2001e. A new specimen of the tiny middle Eocene bird Gracilitarsus mirabilis (New Family: Gracilitarsidae). Condor 103: 78-84.
  • Mayr G. 2001f. The relationships of fossil apodiform birds - a comment on Dyke (2001). Senckenbergiana Lethaea 81: 1-2.
  • Mayr G, 2001g. Comments on the systematic position of the putative Lower Eocene parrot Pulchrapollia gracilis. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 81: 339-341.
  • Mayr G. 2002a. Osteological evidence for paraphyly of the avian order Caprimulgiformes (nightjars and allies). Journal of Ornithology 143: 82-97.
  • Mayr G. 2002b. Comments on the osteology of Masillapodar- gus longipes Mayr 1999 and Paraprefica major Mayr 1999, caprimulgiform birds form the middle Eocene of Messel (Hessen, Germany). Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie, Monatshefte (Stuttgart) 2001: 65-76.
  • Mayr G. 2002c. On the osteology and phylogenetic affinities of the Pseudasturidae - lower Eocene stem-group representatives of parrots (Aves, Psittaciformes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 715-729.
  • Mayr G. 2002d. A skull of a new pelecaniform bird from the middle Eocene of Messel, Germany. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 47: 507-512.
  • Mayr G. 2003a. The phylogenetic affinities of the shoebill (Balaeniceps rex). Journal fur Ornithologie 144: 157-175.
  • Mayr G. 2003b. On the phylogenetic relationships of trogons (Aves, Trogoniformes). Journal of Avian Biology 34: 81-88.
  • Mayr G. 2003c. Phylogeny of early Tertiary swifts and hummingbirds (Aves: Apodiformes). Auk 120: 145-151.
  • Mayr G. 2004a. A partial skeleton of a new fossil loon (Aves, Gaviiformes) from the early Oligocene of Germany with preserved stomach content. Journal of Ornithology 145: 281- 286.
  • Mayr G. 2004b. Tertiary plotopterids (Aves, Plotopteridae) and a novel hypothesis on the phylogenetic relationships of penguins (Spheniscidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 10: 1-11.
  • Mayr G. 2004c. Morphological evidence for sister group relationship between flamingos (Aves: Phoenicopteridae) and grebes (Podicipedidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 140: 157-169.
  • Mayr G. 2004d. Old World fossil record of modern-type hummingbirds. Science 304: 861-864.
  • Mayr G. 2004e. The phylogenetic relationships of the early Tertiary Primoscenidae and Sylphornithidae and the sister taxon of crown group piciform birds. Journal of Ornithology 15: 188-198.
  • Mayr G. 2004f. Phylogenetic relationships of the early Tertiary Messel rails (Aves Messelornithidae). Senckenbergiana Lethaea 88: 317-322.
  • Mayr G. 2005a. The Paleogene fossil record of birds in Europe. Biological Reviews (Cambridge) 80: 515-542.
  • Mayr G. 2005b. The postcranial osteology and phylogenetic position of the middle Eocene Messelastur gratulator Peters, 1994 - a morphological link between owls (Strigiformes) and 'falconiform' birds? Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25: 635-645.
  • Mayr G. 2005c. A chicken-sized crane precursor from the early Oligocene of France. Naturwissenschaften 92: 389-393.
  • Mayr G. 2005d. A new Eocene Chascacocolius-like mousebird (Aves: Coliiformes) with a remarkable gaping adaptation. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 5: 167-171.
  • Mayr G. 2005e. New trogons from the early Tertiary of Germany. Ibis 147: 512-518.
  • Mayr G. 2005f. The Paleogene Old World potoo Paraprefica Mayr, 1999 (Aves, Nyctibiidae): its osteology and affinities to the New World Preficinae Olson, 1987. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 3: 359-370.
  • Mayr G, 2005g. A, new cypselomorph bird from the middle Eocene of Germany and the early diversification of avian aerial insectivores. Condor 107: 342-352.
  • Mayr G, 2005h. A, tiny barbet-Iike bird from the lower Oligocene of Germany: the smallest species and earliest substantial fossil record of the Pici (woodpeckers and allies). Auk 122: 1055-1063.
  • Mayr G, 2005i. Phylogenetic affinities and composition of the early Eocene Gracilitarsidae (Aves, ?Piciformes). Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie Monatshefte 2005: 1-16.
  • Mayr G. 2006a. New specimens of the early Eocene stem group galliform Paraortygoides (Gallinuloididae), with comments on the evolution of a crop in the stem lineage of Galliformes. Journal of Ornithology 147: 31-37.
  • Mayr G. 2006b. The renaissance of avian paleontology and its bearing on the higher-level phylogeny of birds: Are there missing links between modern higher-level taxa [abstract]? Journal of Ornithology 147 (Suppl.): 42.
  • Mayr E, Amadon D. 1951. A classification of Recent birds. American Museum Novitates 1496: 1-42.
  • Mayr G, Clarke J. 2003. The deep divergences of neornithine birds: a phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters. Cladistics 19: 527-553.
  • Mayr G, Daniels M. 1998. Eocene parrots from Messel (Hessen, Germany) and the London Clay of Walton-on-the-Naze (Essex, England). Senckenbergiana Lethaea 78: 157-177.
  • Mayr G, Daniels M. 2001. A new short-legged landbird from the early Eocene of Wyoming and contemporaneous European sites. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 46: 393-402.
  • Mayr G, Ericson PGP. 2004. Evidence for a sister group relationship between the Madagascan mesites (Mesitornithidae) and the cuckoos (Cuculidae). Senckenbergiana Biologica 84: 1-17.
  • Mayr G, Gohlich UB. 2004. A new parrot from the Miocene of Germany, with comments on the variation of hypotarsus morphology in some Psittaciformes. Belgian Journal of Zoology 134: 47-54.
  • Mayr G, Manegold A. 2004. The oldest European fossil songbird from the early Oligocene of Germany. Naturwissenshaften 91: 173-177.
  • Mayr G, Manegold A, Johansson US. 2003. Monophyletic groups within 'higher land birds' - comparison of morphological and molecular data. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 41: 233-248.
  • Mayr G, Manegold A, Johansson US. 2004a. Erratum - monophyletic groups within 'higher land birds' - comparison of morphological and molecular data. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 42: 173-174.
  • Mayr G, Mourer-Chauvire C. 2000. Rollers (Aves: Coraciiformes s. s.) from the middle Eocene of Messel (Germany) and upper Eocene of the Quercy (France). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20: 533-546.
  • Mayr G, Mourer-Chauvire C. 2003. Phylogeny and fossil record of the Brachypteraciidae: a comment on Kirchman et al. (2001). Auk 120: 202-203.
  • Mayr G, Mourer-Chauvire C. 2004. Unusual tarsometatarsus of a mousebird from the Paleogene of France and the relationships of Selmes Peters, 1999. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24: 366-372.
  • Mayr G, Mourer-Chauvire C, Weidig I. 2004b. Osteology and systematic position of the Eocene Primobucconidae (Aves, Coraciiformes sensu stricto), with first records from Europe. Journal of Systematic Paleontology 2: 1-12.
  • Mayr G, Peters DS. 1998. The mousebirds (Aves: Coliiformes) from the middle Eocene of Grube Messel (Hessen, Germany). Senckenbergiana Lethaea 78: 179-197.
  • Mayr G, Pohl B, Peters DS. 2005. A well-preserved Archaeopteryx specimen with theropod features. Science 310: 1483- 1486.
  • Mayr G, Smith R. 2002. A new record of the Prophaethontidae (Aves: Pelecaniformes) from the middle Eocene of Belgium. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 72: 135-138.
  • Mayr G, Weidig I. 2004. The early Eocene bird Gallinuloides wyomingensis - a stem group representativve of Galliformes. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 49: 211-217.
  • McCall RA, Nee AS, Harvey PH. 1998. The role of wing length in the evolution of avian flightlessness. Evolutionary Ecology 12: 569-580.
  • McCracken KG, Harshman J, McClellan DA, Afton AD. 1999. Data set incongruence and correlated character evolution: an example of functional convergence in the hind-limbs of stifftail diving ducks. Systematic Biology 48: 683-714.
  • McCracken KG, Sheldon FH. 1997. Avian vocalizations and phylogenetic signal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 94: 3833-3836.
  • McCracken KG, Sorenson MD. 2005. Is homoplasy or lineage sorting the source of incongruent mt DNA and nuclear gene trees in the stiff-tailed ducks (Nomonyx-Oxyura). Systematic Biology 54: 35-54.
  • McDowell S. 1948. The bony palate of birds. Part I, the Palaeognathae. Auk 65: 520-549.
  • McKinney ML, McNamara KJ, Zachos LG. 1990. Heterochronic hierarchies: application and theory in evolution. Historical Biology 3: 269-287.
  • McKitrick MC. 1991a. Forelimb myology of loons (Gaviiformes), with comments on the relationship of loons and tubenoses (Procellariiformes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 102: 115-152.
  • McKitrick MC. 1991b. Phylogenetic analysis of avian hindlimb musculature. University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology Miscellaneous Publications 179: 1-85.
  • McKitrick MC. 1993. Trends in the evolution of hindlimb musculature in aerial-foraging birds. Auk 110: 189-206.
  • Meekangvan P, Barhorst AA, Burton TD, Chatterjee S, Schovanec L. 2006. Nonlinear dynamical model and response of avian cranial kinesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 240: 32-47.
  • Meier R. 1997. A test and review of the empirical performance of the ontogenetic criterion. Systematic Biology 46: 699-721.
  • Meier R, Richter S. 1992. Suggestions for a more precise usage of proper names of taxa - ambiguities related to the stem lineage concept. Zeitschrift fur Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 30: 81-88.
  • Meyer A, Zardoya R. 2003. Recent advances in the (molecular) phylogeny of vertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34: 311-338.
  • Middleton KM, Gatesy SM. 2000. Theropod forelimb design and evolution. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 128: 149-187.
  • Miller AH. 1965. The syringeal structure of the Asiatic owl Phodilus. Condor 67: 536-538.
  • Milne-Edwards A. 1878a. Observations sur les affinites zoologiques du genre Phodilus et description d'un nouveau genre de rapace. Nouveau Archives du Musee d'Histoire Naturelle (Serie 2) 1: 185-199.
  • Milne-Edwards A. 1878b. Remarques sur le genre Mesites et sure la place qu'il doit occuper dans la serie ornithologique. Annales des Sciences Naturelles (Serie 6, Zoologie) 7: 1-13.
  • Mindell DP. 1992. Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution [review]. Systematic Biology 41: 126-134.
  • Mindell DP, Knight A, Baer C, Huddleston CJ. 1996. Slow rates of molecular evolution in birds and the metabolic rate and body temperature hypotheses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 422-426.
  • Mindell DP, Sorenson MD, Dimcheff DE. 1998. Multiple independent origins of mitochondrial gene order in birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 95: 10693-10697.
  • Mindell DP, Sorenson MD, Dimcheff DE, Hasegawa M, Ast JC, Yuri T. 1999. Interordinal relationships of birds and other reptiles based on whole mitochondrial genomes. Systematic Biology 48: 138-152.
  • Mindell DP, Sorenson MD, Huddleston CJ, Miranda HC Jr, Knight A, Swachuk SJ, Yuri T. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among and within select avian orders based on mitochondrial DNA. In: Mindell DP, ed. Avian molecular evolution and systematics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 213-247.
  • Minelli A. 1998. Molecules, developmental modules, and phenotypes: a combinatorial approach to homology. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution 9: 340-347.
  • Mishler BD. 1994. Cladistic analysis of molecular and morphological data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 94: 143-156.
  • Mishler BD. 2005. The logic of the data matrix in phylogenetic analysis. In: Albert VA, ed. Parsimony, phylogeny and genomics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 57-70.
  • Mitchell PC. 1896. A contribution to the anatomy of the hoatzin (Opisthocomus cristatus). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1896: 618-628.
  • Mitchell PC. 1913. Observations on the anatomy of the shoebill (Balaeniceps rex) and allied birds. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1913: 644-703.
  • Mitchell PC. 1915. Anatomical notes on the gruiform birds Aramus giganteus Bonap. & Rhinochetos kagu. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1915: 413-423.
  • Mitsiadis TA, Caton J, Cobourne M. 2006. Waking-up the Sleeping Beauty: recovery of the ancestral bird ontogeneic program. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Series B) 306: 1- 7.
  • Miyaki CY, Matioli SR, Burke T, Wajntal A. 1998. Parrot evolution and paleographical events: mitochondrial DNA evidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 544-551.
  • Monroe BL. 1989. Response to E. Mayr [review]. Auk 106: 515-516.
  • Mooers AO, Cotgreave P. 1994. Sibley and Ahlquist's tapestry dusted off. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 458- 459.
  • Mooers AO, Harvey PH. 1994. Metabolic rate, generation time, and the rate of molecular evolution in birds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 3: 344-350.
  • Moore WS. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mt DNA variation: mitochondrial gene trees versus nuclear gene trees. Evolution 49: 718-726.
  • Moore WS, deFilippis VR. 1997. The window of taxonomic resolution for phylogenies based on mitochondrial cytochrome b. In: Mindell DP, ed. Avian molecular evolution and systematics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 83- 119.
  • Mort M, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Mabry ML. 2000. Comparison of three methods for estimating internal support on phylogenetic trees. Systematic Biology 49: 160-171.
  • Moum T, Arnason U, Arnason E. 2002. Mitochondrial DNA sequence evolution and phylogeny of the Atlantic Alcidae, including the extinct great auk (Pinguinus impennis). Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 1434-1439.
  • Moum T, Johansen S, Erikstad KE, Piatt JF. 1994. Phylogeny and evolution of the auks (subfamily Alcinae) based on mitochondial DNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91: 7912-7916.
  • Mourer-Chauvire C. 1980. The Archaeotrogonidae of the Eocene and Oligocene Phosphorites du Quercy (France). Contributions to Science of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 330: 17-31.
  • Mourer-Chauvire C. 1985. Les Todidae (Aves, Coraciiformes) des Phosphorites du Quercy (France). Verhandlungen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Van Wetenschappen (Serie B) 88: 407-414.
  • Mourer-Chauvire C. 1992. Une nouvelle famille de perroquets (Aves: Psittaciformes dans l'Eocene Superieur des phosphorites du Quercy, France. Geobios Memoire Speciale 14: 169-177.
  • Mourer-Chauvire C. 2000. A new species of Ameripodius (Aves: Galliformes: Quercymegapodiidae) from the lower Miocene of France. Palaeontology 43: 481-493.
  • Mourer-Chauvire C, Balouet JC. 2005. Description of the skull of the genus Sylviornis Polin, 1980 (Galliformes, Sylviornithidae new family), a giant extinct bird from the Holocene of New Caledonia. In: Alcover JA, Bover P, eds. Insular vertebrate evolution: the paleontological approach. Monografies de la Societat d'Historia Natural de les Balears 12: 205-118.
  • Mourer-Chauvire C, Bertjet D, Hugueney M. 2004. The late Oligocene birds of the Crechy quarry (Allier, France), with a description of two new genera (Aves: Pelecaniformes: Phalacrocoracidae, and Anseriformes: Anseranatidae). Senckenbergiana Lethaea 84: 303-315.
  • Moyle RG. 2004. Phylogenetics of barbets (Aves: Piciformes) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 187-200.
  • Moyle RG. 2005. Phylogeny and biogeographical history of Trogoniformes, a pantropical bird order. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 725-738.
  • Moyle RG. 2006. A molecular phylogeny of kingfishers (Alcedinidae) with insights into early biogeographic history. Auk 123: 487-499.
  • Muller HJ. 1961a. Die Morphologie und Entwicklung des Craniums von Rhea americana Linne. I. Das knorpelige Neurocranium. Zeitschrift fur Wissenschaftliche Zoologie 165: 221-319.
  • Muller HJ. 1961b. Uber strukturelle Ahnlichkeiten der Ohr- und Occipitalregion bei Vogel und Sauger. Zoologischer Anzeiger 166: 391-402.
  • Muller HJ. 1963. Die Morphologie und Entwicklung des Craniums von Rhea americana Linne. II. Viszeralskelett, Mittelohr und Osteocranium. Zeitschrift fur Wissenschaftliche Zoologie 168: 35-118.
  • Muller K. 2004. PRAP - computation of Bremer support for large data sets. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 780-782.
  • Muller K. 2005. The efficiency of different search strategies for estimating parsimony jackknife, bootstrap, and Bremer support. BMC (Biomed Central) Evolutionary Biology 5 (57): 1-10.
  • Muller GB, Newman SA. 1999. Generation, integration, autonomy. Three steps in the evolution of homology. In: Bock GR, Cardew G, eds. Homology. Chichester, UK: J. Wiley and Sons, 65-79.
  • Murie J. 1871. On the dermal and visceral structures of the kagu, sun-bittern, and boatbill. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 7: 465-492.
  • Murie J. 1872a. On the genus Colius, its structure and systematic position. Ibis 14: 262-280.
  • Murie J. 1872b. On the motmots and their affinities. Ibis 14: 383-412.
  • Murie J. 1872c. On the skeleton of Todus, with remarks as to its allies. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1872: 664-680.
  • Murie J. 1873. On the Upupidae and their relationships. Ibis 15: 181-211.
  • Murray PR, Megirian D. 1998. The skull of dromornithid birds: anatomical evidence for their relationship to Anseriformes. Records of the South Australian Museum 31: 51-97.
  • Murray PR, Vickers-Rich P. 2004. Magnificent Mihirungs: the colossal flightless birds of the Australian dreamtime. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Neff NA. 1986. A rational basis for a priori character weighting. Systematic Zoology 35: 110-123.
  • Nelson G. 1994. Homology and systematics. In: Hall BK, ed. Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 101-149.
  • Nielsen C. 1995. Animal evolution: interrelationships of the living phyla. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Nielsen KK, Arctander P. 2001. Recombination among multiple mitochondrial pseudogenes from a passerine genus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18: 362-369.
  • Nixon KC. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407-414.
  • Norell MA. 1992. Taxic origin and temporal diversity: the effect of phylogeny. In: Novacek MJ, Wheeler QD, eds. Extinction and phylogeny. New York: Columbia University Press, 89-118.
  • Norell MA, Clark JN, Dasheveg D, Barsbold R, Chiappe LM, Davidson AR, McKenna MC, Perle A, Novacek MJ. 1994. A theropod dinosaur embryo and the affinities of the Flaming Cliffs dinosaur eggs. Science 266: 779-782.
  • Norell MA, Clarke JA. 2001. Fossil that fills a critical gap in avian evolution. Nature 409: 181-184.
  • Norell MA, Wheeler W. 2003. Missing entry replacement data analysis: a replacement approach to dealing with missing data in paleontological and total evidence data sets. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 275-283.
  • Noriega JI, Tambussi CO. 1995. A late Cretaceous Presbyornithidae (Aves: Anseriformes) from Vega Island, Antarctic peninsula: paleobiogeographic implications. Ameghiniana 32: 57-61.
  • Nudds RL, Rayner JMV. 2006. Scaling of body frontal area and body width in birds. Journal of Morphology 267: 341- 346.
  • Nunn GB, Cooper J, Jouventin P, Robertson CJR, Robertson GG. 1996. Evolutionary relationships among extant albatrosses (Procellariiformes: Diomedeidae) established from complete cytochrome- b gene sequences. Auk 113: 784- 801.
  • Nunn GB, Cracraft J. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships among major lineages of the birds-of-paradise (Paradisaeidae) using mitochondrial DNA gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5: 445-459.
  • Nunn GB, Stanley SE. 1998. Body size effects and rates of cytochrome b evolution in tube-nosed seabirds. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 1360-1371.
  • Odeen A, Hastad O. 2003. Complex distribution of avian color vision systems revealed by sequencing the SWS1 opsin from total DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 855- 861.
  • Ogilvie-Grant WR. 1889. On the genus Turnix. Ibis 31: 446- 475.
  • Oliveira CA, Silva RM, Santos MM, Mahecha GAB. 2004. Location of the uretal openings in the cloacas of tinamous, some ratite birds, and crocodilians: a primitive character. Journal of Morphology 260: 234-246.
  • Olson SL. 1971. Taxonomic comments on the Eurylaimidae. Ibis 113: 507-516.
  • Olson SL. 1976. Oligocene fossils bearing on the origins of the Todidae and the Momotidae (Aves: Coraciiformes). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 27: 111-119.
  • Olson SL. 1977. A lower Eocene frigatebird from the Green River Formation of Wyoming (Pelecaniformes, Fregatidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 35: 1-33.
  • Olson SL. 1978. Multiple origins of the Ciconiiformes. Proceedings of Conference of the Colonial Waterbird Group 1978: 165-170.
  • Olson SL. 1980. A new genus of penguin-like pelecaniform bird from the Oligocene of Washington (Pelecaniformes: Plotopteridae). Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Contributions in Science 330: 51-57.
  • Olson SL. 1982. A critique of Cracraft's classification of birds. Auk 99: 737-759.
  • Olson SL. 1983a. Evidence for a polyphyletic origin of the Piciformes. Auk 100: 126-133.
  • Olson SL. 1983b. A new genus of tropicbird (Pelecaniformes: Phaethontidae) from the middle Miocene Calvert Formation of Maryland. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 98: 851-855.
  • Olson SL. 1985. The fossil record of birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC, eds. Avian biology, Vol. 8. New York: Academic Press, 79-238.
  • Olson SL. 1987. An early Eocene oilbird from the Green River Formation of Wyoming (Caprimulgiformes: Steatornithidae). Documents des Laboratoires de Geologie de Lyon 99: 57-99.
  • Olson SL. 1992a. Neogaeornis wetzeli Lambrecht, a Cretaceous loon from Chile (Aves: Gaviidae). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 12: 122-124.
  • Olson SL. 1992b. A new family of primitive landbirds from the lower Eocene Green River Formation of Wyoming. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Series 36: 127-136.
  • Olson SL. 1994. A giant Presbyornis (Aves: Anseriformes) from the Palaeocene Aquia Formation of Maryland. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 107: 429- 435.
  • Olson SL. 1999a. A new species of pelican (Aves: Pelecanidae) from the lower Pliocene of North Carolina and Florida. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 112: 503-509.
  • Olson SL. 1999b. The anseriform relationships of Anatalavis Olson and Parris (Anseranatidae), with a new species of the London Clay. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 89: 231-243.
  • Olson SL. 2001. Why so many kinds of passerine birds? Bioscience 51: 268-269.
  • Olson SL, Feduccia A. 1980a. Presbyornis and the origin of the Anseriformes (Aves: Charadriomorphae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 323: 1-24.
  • Olson SL, Feduccia A. 1980b. Relationships and evolution of flamingos (Aves: Phoenicopteridae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 316: 1-73.
  • Olson SL, Hasegawa Y. 1979. Fossil counterparts of giant penguins from the North Pacific. Science 206: 688-689.
  • Olson SL, Hasegawa Y. 1996. A new genus and two new species of gigantic Plotopteridae from Japan (Aves: Pelecaniformes). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 16: 742-751.
  • Olson SL, Houde P. 1989. Small arboreal nonpasserine birds from the Early Tertiary of western North America. In: Ouellet H, ed. Acta XIX Congressua Internationalia Ornithologici. Ottawa, Ontario: University of Ottawa Press, 2030- 2036.
  • Olson SL, Matsuoka H. 2005. New specimens of the early Eocene frigatebirds Limnofregata (Pelecaniformes: Fregatidae), with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 1046: 1-15.
  • Olson SL, Parris DC. 1987. The Cretaceous birds of New Jersey. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 63: 1-22.
  • Olson SL, Rasmussen PC. 2001. Miocene and Pliocene birds from the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 90: 233-365.
  • Olson SL, Steadman DW. 1981. The relationships of the Pedionomidae (Aves: Charadriiformes). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 337: 1-25.
  • Omland KE. 1997a. Correlated rates of molecular and morphological evolution. Evolution 51: 1381-1393.
  • Omland KE. 1997b. Examining two standard assumptions of ancestral reconstructions: repeated loss of dichromatism in dabbling ducks (Anatini). Evolution 51: 1636-1646.
  • Ovenden JR, Mackinlay AG, Crozier RH. 1987. Systematics and mitochondrial genome evolution of Australian rosellas (Aves: Platycercidae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 526-543.
  • Overton LC, Rhoads DD. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic relationships based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences for the todies (Todus, Todidae) of the Caribbean. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32: 524-538.
  • Owen R. 1873. Description of the skull of a dentigerous bird (Odontopteryx toliapicus, Ow.) from the London Clay of Sheppey. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 29: 511-522.
  • Padian K, Chiappe LM. 1998. The origin and early evolution of birds. Biological Reviews (Cambridge) 73: 1-42.
  • Page RDM. 1993. On islands of trees and efficacy of different methods of branch swapping in finding most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Biology 42: 200-209.
  • Page RDM, Charleston M. 1997. From gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees and the gene tree/species tree problem. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 231- 240.
  • Page RDM, Lee PLM, Becher SA, Griffiths R, Clayton DH. 1998. A different tempo of mitochondrial DNA evolution in birds and their parasitic lice. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 276-293.
  • Pamilo P, Nei M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 5: 568-583.
  • Parker WK. 1860. Abstract of notes on the osteology of Balaeniceps rex. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1860: 324-330.
  • Parker WK. 1861. On the osteology of Balaeniceps rex (Gould). Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 4: 269-351.
  • Parker WK. 1862. Abstract of a memoir on the osteology of the genera Pterocles, Syrrhaptes, Hemopodius, and Tinamus. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1862: 253- 260.
  • Parker WK. 1869. On the osteology of the kagu (Rhinochetus jubatus). Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 8: 501-521.
  • Parker WK. 1889a. On the 'manus' of Phoenicopterus. Ibis 31: 183-185.
  • Parker WK. 1889b. On the osteology of Steatornis caripensis. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1889: 161- 190.
  • Parker WK. 1891. On the morphology of a reptilian bird, Opisthocomus cristatus. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 13: 43-85.
  • Parsons CW. 1954. Note on the embryonic development of the hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin). Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (Series B) 65: 205-212.
  • Patak AE, Baldwin J. 1998. Pelvic limb musculature in the emu Dromaius novaehollandiae (Aves: Struthioniformes: Dromaiidae): adaptations to high-speed running. Journal of Morphology 238: 23-37.
  • Paterson AM, Gray RD. 1996. Analytical tests of host/ parasite cospeciation. In: Clayton DH, Moore J, eds. Coevolutionary biology of birds and parasites. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 236-259.
  • Paterson AM, Gray RD, Wallis GP. 1993. Parasites, petrels and penguins: Does louse presence reflect seabird phylogeny? International Journal of Parasitology 23: 515-526.
  • Paterson AM, Wallis GP, Gray RD. 1995. Penguins, petrels, and parsimony: Does cladistic analysis of behavior reflect seabird phylogeny? Evolution 49: 974-989.
  • Paton TA, Baker AJ. 2006. Sequences from 14 mitochondrial genes provide a well-supported phylogeny of the charadriiform birds congruent with the nuclear RAG-1 tree. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 657-667.
  • Paton TA, Baker AJ, Groth JG, Barrowclough GF. 2003. RAG-1 sequences resolve phylogenetic relationships within charadriiform birds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 268-278.
  • Paton TA, Haddrath O, Baker AJ. 2002. Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences show that modern birds are not descended from transitional shorebirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 269: 839-846.
  • Patterson C, Williams DM, Humphries CJ. 1993. Congruence between molecular and morphological phylogenies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 153-188.
  • Paxinos EE, James HF, Olson SL, Sorenson MD, Jackson J, Fleischer RC. 2002. mt DNA from fossils reveals of radiation of Hawaiian geese recently derived from the Canada goose (Branta canadensis). Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 99: 1399-1404.
  • Pereira SL, Baker AJ. 2004. Vicariant speciation of curassows (Aves, Cracidae): a hypothesis based on mitochondrial DNA phylogeny. Auk 121: 682-694.
  • Pereira SL, Baker AJ. 2005. Multiple gene evidence for parallel evolution and retention of ancestral morphological states in the shanks (Charadriiformes: Scolopacidae). Condor 107: 514-526.
  • Pereira SL, Baker AJ. 2006a. A molecular timescale for galliform birds accounting for uncertainty in time estimate and heterogeneity of rates of DNA substitutions across lineages and sites. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38: 499- 509.
  • Pereira SL, Baker AJ. 2006b. A mitogenomic timescale for birds detects variable phylogenetic rates of molecular evolution and refutes the standard molecular clock. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 1731-1740.
  • Pereira SL, Baker AJ, Wajntal A. 2002. Combined nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences resolve generic relationships within the Cracidae (Galliformes, Aves). Systematic Biology 51: 94-958.
  • Perrin JB. 1875. On the myology of Opisthocomus cristatus. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 9: 353-370.
  • Peters JL. 1934. Check-list of birds of the world, Vol. II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Philippe H, Laurent J. 1998. How good are deep phylogenetic trees? Current Opinions on Genetic Development 8: 616-623.
  • Philippe H, Lecointre G, Van Le HL, Guyader JL. 1996. A critical study of homoplasy in molecular data with the use of a morphologically based cladogram, and its consequences for character weighting. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 1174-1186.
  • Philippe H, Yan Z, Brinkmann H, Rodrigue N, Delsuc F. 2005. Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics. BMC (Biomed Central) Evolutionary Biology 5 (50): 1-8.
  • Phillips A, Janies D, Wheeler W. 2000. Multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 317-330.
  • Pickett KM, Randle CP. 2005. Strange Bayes indeed: uniform topological priors imply non-uniform clade priors. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 34: 203-211.
  • Pickett KM, Tolman GL, Wheeler WC, Wenzel JW. 2005. Parsimony overcomes statistical inconsistency with the addition of more data from the same gene. Cladistics 21: 438- 445.
  • Pisani D, Yates AM, Langer MC, Benton MJ. 2002. A genus-level supertree of the Dinosauria. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 269: 915-921.
  • Pitra C, Lieckfeldt D, Frahnert S, Fickel J. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships and ancestral areas of the bustards (Gruiformes: Otididae), inferred from mitochondrial DNA and nuclear intron sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 63-74.
  • Ploeger PL. 1968. Geographical differentiation in arctic Anatidae as a result of isolation during the last glacial. Ardea 56: 1-159.
  • Poe S, Chubb AL. 2004. Birds in a bush: five genes indicate explosive evolution of avian orders. Evolution 58: 404-415.
  • Pol D, Norell MA, Siddall ME. 2004. Measures of stratigraphic fit to phylogeny and their sensitivity to tree size, tree shape, and scale. Cladistics 20: 64-75.
  • Pollock DD, Zwickl DJ, McGuire JA, Hillis DM. 2002. Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology 51: 664-671.
  • Pons J-M, Hassanin A, Crochet P-A. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships within the Laridae (Charadriiformes: Aves) inferred from mitochondrial markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 686-699.
  • Poplin F, Mourer-Chauvire C. 1985. Sylviornis neocaledoniae (Aves, Galliformes, Megapodidae), oiseau geant eteint de l'Ile des Pins (Nouvelle-Caledonie). Geobios 18: 73- 97.
  • Posso SR, Donatelli RJ. 2001. Cranial osteology and systematic implications in Crotophaginae (Aves, Cuculidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 39: 247-256.
  • Prager EM, Wilson AC. 1975. Slow evolutionary loss of the potential for interspecific hybridization in birds: a manifestation of slow regulatory evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 72: 200-204.
  • Prager EM, Wilson AC. 1976. Congruency of phylogenies derived from different proteins: a molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of cracid birds. Journal of Molecular Evolution 9: 45-57.
  • Prager EM, Wilson AC, Osuga DT, Feeney RE. 1976. Evolution of flightless land birds on southern continents: transferrin comparison shows monophyletic origin of ratites. Journal of Molecular Evolution 8: 283-294.
  • Prendini L. 2003. Species or supraspecific taxa as terminals in cladistic analysis? Groundplans versus exemplars revisted. Systematic Biology 50: 290-300.
  • Primmer CR, Ellegren H. 1998. Patterns of molecular evolution in avian microsatellites. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 997-1008.
  • Prum RO. 1988. Phylogenetic interrelationships of the barbets (Capitonidae) and toucans (Ramphastidae) based on morphology with comparisons to DNA-DNA hybridization. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 92: 313- 343.
  • Prum RO. 1993. Phylogeny, biogeography, and evolution of the broadbills (Eurylaimidae) and asites (Philepittidae) based on morphology. Auk 110: 304-324.
  • Prychitko TM, Moore WS. 1997. The utility of DNA sequences of an intron from the β- fibrinogen gene in phylogenetic analysis of woodpeckers (Aves: Picidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 193-204.
  • Prychitko TM, Moore WS. 2003. Alignment and phylogenetic analysis of β -fibrinogen intron 7 sequences among avian orders reveal conserved regions within the intron. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 762-771.
  • Quicke DL, Taylor J, Provis A. 2001. Changing the landscape: a new strategy for estimating large phylogenies. Systematic Biology 50: 60-66.
  • Quinn TW. 1992. The genetic legacy of Mother Goose - phylogeographic patterns of lesser snow goose Chen caerulescens caerulescens maternal lineages. Molecular Ecology 1: 1-5-711.
  • Raff RA, Parr BA, Parks AL, Wray GA. 1990. Heterochrony and other mechanisms of radical evolutionary change in early development. In: Nitecki MH, ed. Evolutionary innovations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 71-98.
  • Raff EC, Raff RA. 2000. Dissociability, modularity, evolvability. Evolution and Development 2: 235-237.
  • Rafinesque CS. 1815. Analyse de la nature, ou tableau de l'univers et des corps organises. Palaermo: Published privately.
  • Raikow RJ. 1981. Old birds and new ideas: progress and controversy in paleornithology [review]. Wilson Bulletin 93: 407-412.
  • Raikow RJ. 1982. Monophyly of the Passeriformes: test of a phylogenetic hypothesis. Auk 99: 431-445.
  • Raikow RJ. 1985a. Problems in avian classification. In: Johnston RF, ed. Current ornithology, Vol. 2. New York: Plenum Press, 187-212.
  • Raikow RJ. 1985b. Locomotor system. In: King AS, McLelland J, eds. Form and function in birds, Vol. 3. London, UK: Academic Press, 57-147.
  • Raikow RJ. 1986. Why are there so many kinds of passerine birds? Systematic Zoology 35: 255-259.
  • Raikow RJ. 1988. The analysis of evolutionary success. Systematic Zoology 37: 76-79.
  • Raikow RJ. 1994a. A phylogeny of the woodcreepers (Dendrocolaptinae). Auk 111: 104-114.
  • Raikow RJ. 1994b. Climbing adaptations in the hindlimb musculature of the woodcreepers (Dendrocolaptinae). Condor 96: 1103-1106.
  • Raikow RJ, Bledsoe AH. 2000. Phylogeny and evolution of passerine birds. Bioscience 50: 487-499.
  • Raikow RJ, Borecky SR, Berman SL. 1980. The evolutionary reestablishment of a lost ancestral muscle in the bowerbird assemblage. Condor 81: 203-206.
  • Raikow RJ, Cracraft J. 1983. Monophyly of the Piciformes: a reply to Olson. Auk 100: 134-138.
  • Randi E, Fusco G, Lorenzini R, Spina F. 1991. Allozyme divergence and phylogenetic-relationships within the Strigiformes. Condor 93: 295-301.
  • Rawal UM, Bhatt PL. 1974. Comparative morphology of the feeding apparatus in a few representative birds from order Coraciiformes. Vidya (Series B) 17: 1-21.
  • Rea AM. 1983. Cathartid affinities: a brief overview. In: Wilbur SR, Jackson JA, eds. Vulture biology and management. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 26-54.
  • Redelings BD, Suchard MA. 2005. Joint Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny. Systematic Biology 54: 401-408.
  • Ree RH, Donoghue MJ. 1998. Step matrices and the interpretation of homoplasy. Systematic Biology 47: 582-588.
  • Rees J, Lindgren J. 2005. Aquatic birds from the upper Cretaceous (lower Campanian) of Sweden and the biology and distribution of hesperornithiforms. Palaeontology 48: 1321- 1329.
  • Reinhardt J. 1860. On the affinities of Balaeniceps. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1860: 377-380.
  • Reinhardt J. 1862. Some remarks on the genus Balaeniceps. Ibis 4: 158-175.
  • Ribas CC, Gaban-Lima R, Miyaki CY, Cracraft J. 2005. Historical biogeography and diversification within the Neotropical parrot genus Pionopsitta (Aves: Psittacidae). Journal of Biogeography 32: 1409-1427.
  • Rice KA, Donoghue MJ, Olmstead RG. 1997. Analyzing large data sets: rbcL 500 revisited. Systematic Biology 46: 554-563.
  • Rich PV. 1979. The Dromornithidae, an extinct family of large ground birds endemic to Australia. Bulletin of Bureau of Natural Resources, Geology and Geophysics 184: 1-196.
  • Rich PV. 1980. The Australian Dromornithidae: a group of large extinct ratites. Los Angeles County Natural History Museum Contributions to Science 330: 93-103.
  • Richardson MK, Jeffrey JE, Tabin CJ. 2004. Proximodistal patterning of the limb: insights from evolutionary morphology. Evolution and Development 6: 1-5.
  • Richardson MK, Minelli A, Coates KI. 1999. Some problems with typological thinking in evolution and development. Evolution and Development 1: 5-7.
  • Rieppel O. 1992. Homology and logical fallacy. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 5: 701-715.
  • Rieppel O. 1994. Homology, topology, and typology: the history of modern debates. In: Hall BK, ed. Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 63-100.
  • Rodriguez-Trelles F, Tarrio R, Ayala FJ. 2002. A methodological bias toward overestimation of molecular evolutionary time scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 99: 8112-8115.
  • Romer AS. 1968. Notes and comments on vertebrate paleontology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Rotthowe K, Starck JM. 1998. Evidence for a phylogenetic position of button quails (Turnicidae: Aves) among the Gruiformes. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 36: 39-51.
  • Roulin A. 2004. The evolution, maintenance and adaptive function of genetic colour polymorphism in birds. Biological Reviews (Cambridge) 79: 815-848.
  • Russello MA, Amato G. 2004. A molecular phylogeny of Amazona: implications for Neotropical parrot biogeography, taxonomy, and conservation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 421-477.
  • Ruta M, Coates MI, Quicke DLJ. 2003. Early tetrapod relationships revisited. Biological Reviews (Cambridge) 78: 251- 345.
  • Salter LA. 2001. Complexity of the likelihood surface for a large DNA dataset. Systematic Biology 50: 970-978.
  • Sanderson MJ. 1991. In search of homoplastic tendencies: statistical inference of topological patterns in homoplasy. Evolution 45: 351-358.
  • Sanderson MJ. 1995. Objections to bootstrapping phylogenies: a critique. Systematic Biology 44: 299-320.
  • Sanderson MJ. 1997. A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 1218-1231.
  • Sanderson MJ, Donoghue MJ. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43: 1781-1795.
  • Sanderson MJ, Donoghue MJ. 1996. The relationship between homoplasy and confidence in a phylogenetic tree. In: Sanderson MJ, Hufford L, eds. Homoplasy: the recurrence of similarity in evolution. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 67-89.
  • Sangster G. 2005. A name for the flamingo-grebe clade. Ibis 147: 612-615.
  • Santini F, Stellwag EJ. 2002. Phylogeny, fossils, and model systems in the study of evolutionary developmental biology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: 379-383.
  • Sarich VM, Schmid CW, Marks J. 1989. DNA hybridization as a guide to phylogenies: a critical analysis. Cladistics 5: 3- 32.
  • Saunders DA, Smith GT, Campbell NA. 1984. The relationship between body weight, egg weight, incubation period, nestling period and nest site in the Psittaciformes, Falconiformes, Strigiformes, and Columbiformes. Australian Journal of Zoology 32: 57-67.
  • Scherer S, Hilsberg T. 1982. Hybridisierung und Verwandtschaftsgrade innerhalb der Anatidae - eine systematische und evolutionstheoretische Betrachtung. Journal fur Ornithologie 123: 357-380.
  • Schluter D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
  • Schulmeister S, Wheeler WC. 2004. Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of developmental sequences. Evolution and Development 6: 50-57.
  • Schweitzer MH, Jackson FD, Chiappe LM, Schmitt JG. 2002. Late Cretaceous avian eggs with embryos from Argentina. Journal of Vertebrae Paleontology 22: 191-195.
  • Scotland RW, Olmstead RG, Bennett JR. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction: the role of morphology. Systematic Biology 52: 539-548.
  • Seebohm H. 1888. An attempt to diagnose the suborders of the great Gallino-Gralline group of birds, by the aid of osteological characters alone. Ibis 30: 415-435.
  • Seebohm H. 1889. An attempt to diagnose the suborders of the ancient Ardeino-Anserine assemblage of birds by the aid of osteological characters alone. Ibis 31: 92-104.
  • Seebohm H. 1890a. An attempt to diagnose the subclass Coraciiformes and the orders, suborders, and families comprised therein. Ibis 32: 200-205.
  • Seebohm H. 1890b. The classification of birds: an attempt to classify the subclasses, orders, suborders, and some of the families of existing birds. London, UK: R. H. Porter.
  • Seebohm H. 1890c. An attempt to diagnose the Pico- Passerine group of birds and the suborders of which it consists. Ibis 32: 29-37.
  • Seebohm H. 1895. Classification of birds: an attempt to classify the subclasses, orders, suborders, and some of the families of existing birds (Supplement). London, UK: R. H. Porter.
  • Seibel DE. 1988. A phylogenetic analysis of the Cuculiformes and Opisthocomus, based on postcranial skeletal characters, Doctoral dissertation, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
  • Seibold I, Helbig AJ. 1995. Evolutionary history of New and Old world vultures inferred from nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 150: 163-178.
  • Seibold I, Helbig AJ. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships of the sea eagles (genus Haliaetus): reconstruction based on morphology, allozymes, and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 34: 103-112.
  • Semple C, Steel M. 2003. Phylogenetics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Sepkowski JJ Jr. 1999. Rates of speciation in the fossil record. In: Magurran AE, May RM, eds. Evolution of biological diversity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 260- 282.
  • Sereno PC. 1994. The pectoral girdle and forelimb of the basal theropod Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 13 [1993]: 425-450.
  • Sereno PC. 2001. Alvarezsaurids: birds or ornithomimosaurs? In: Gauthier J, Gall LF, eds. New perspectives on the origin and early evolution of birds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 69-98.
  • Sereno PC, Novas FE. 1994. The skull and neck of the basal theropod Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 13 [1993]: 451-476.
  • Shafer HB, Clark JM, Kraus F. 1991. When molecules and morphology clash: a phylogenetic analysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Zoology 40: 284-305.
  • Shapiro B, Sibthorpe D, Rambaut A, Austin J, Wragg GM, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Lee PLM, Cooper A. 2002. Flight of the dodo. Science 295: 1683.
  • Sharkey MJ. 1989. A hypothesis-independent method of character weighting for cladistic analysis. Cladistics 5: 63-86.
  • Sheehan PM, Fastovsky DE. 1992. Major extinctions of land-dwelling vertebrates at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, eastern Montana. Geology 20: 556-570.
  • Sheldon FH, Jones CE, McCracken KG. 2000. Relative patterns and rates of evolution in heron nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 437- 450.
  • Shetty S, Griffin DK, Graves JAM. 1999. Comparative painting reveals strong chromosome homology over 80 million years of bird evolution. Chromosome Research 7: 289- 295.
  • Shields GF, Wilson AC. 1987. Calibration of mitochondrial DNA evolution in geese. Journal of Molecular Evolution 24: 212-217.
  • Shpak M, Churchill GA. 2000. The information content of a character under a Markov model of evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17: 231-243.
  • Shubin NH. 1994. The phylogeny of development and the origin of homology. In: Grande L, Rieppel O, eds. Interpreting the hierarchy of nature: from systematic patterns to evolutionary process theories. New York: Academic Press, 210-225.
  • Shufeldt RW. 1885. Contribution to the comparative osteology of the Trochilidae, Caprimulgidae, and Cypselidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1885: 886- 915.
  • Shufeldt RW. 1889a. Note on the anserine affinities of the flamingoes. Science 14: 224-225.
  • Shufeldt RW. 1889b. Studies of the Macrochires, morphological and otherwise, with the view of indicating their relationships and defining their several positions in the system. Journal of the Linnean Society of London 20: 299-394.
  • Shufeldt RW. 1900. On the osteology of the Striges (Strigidae and Bubonidae). Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 39: 665-722.
  • Shufeldt RW. 1901a. Notes on the osteology of Scopus umbretta and Balaeniceps rex. Journal of Anatomy (Series 2) 15: 405-412.
  • Shufeldt RW. 1901b. Osteology of the flamingoes (Odontoglossae). Family: Phoenicopteridae, sp. P. ruber. Annals of Carnegie Museum 1: 295-324.
  • Shufeldt RW. 1901c. On the systematic position of the sandgrouse (Pterocles; Syrrhaptes). American Naturalist 35: 11- 16.
  • Shufeldt RW. 1918. Notes on the osteology of the young of the hoatzin (Opisthocomus cristatus) and other points on its morphology. Journal of Morphology 31: 599-606.
  • Sibley CG. 1957. The evolutionary and taxonomic significance of sexual dimorphism and hybridization in birds. Condor 59: 166-191.
  • Sibley CG. 1974. The relationships of the lyrebirds. Emu 74: 65-79.
  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE. 1970. A comparative study of the egg white proteins of passerine birds. Peabody Museum of Natural History Bulletin 32: 1-131.
  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE. 1972. A comparative study of the egg white proteins of non-passerine birds. Peabody Museum of Natural History Bulletin 39: 1-276.
  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE. 1973. The relationships of the hoatzin. Auk 90: 1-13.
  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE. 1981. The phylogeny and relationships of the ratite birds as indicated by DNA-DNA hybridization. In: Scudder GGE, Reveal JL, eds. Evolution today. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University, 301-335.
  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE. 1987. Avian phylogeny reconstructed from comparisons of the genetic material, DNA. In: Paterson C, ed. Molecules and morphology in evolution: conflict or compromise? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 95-121.
  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE, Monroe BL Jr. 1988. A classification of the living birds of the world based on DNA-DNA hybridization studies. Auk 105: 409-423.
  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE, Monroe BL Jr. 1990. Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE, DeBenedictus P. 1993. The phylogenetic relationships of the rails, based on DNA comnparisons. Journal of the Yamashina Institute of Ornithology 25: 1-11.
  • Sibley CG, Frelin C. 1972. The egg white protein evidence for ratite affinities. Ibis 114: 377-387.
  • Siegel-Causey D. 1988. Phylogeny of the Phalacrocoracidae. Condor 90: 885-905.
  • Siegel-Causey D. 1997. Phylogeny of the Pelecaniformes: molecular systematics of a privative group. In: Mindell DP, ed. Avian molecular evolution and systematics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 159-171.
  • Simmons NB. 2001. Misleading results from the use of ambiguity coding to score polymorphisms in higher-level taxa. Systematic Biology 50: 613-620.
  • Simmons MP, Pickett KM, Miya M. 2004. How meaningful are Bayesian support values? Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 188-199.
  • Simmons MP, Reeves A, Davis JI. 2004. Character-states space versus rates of evolution in phylogenetic inferences. Cladistics 20: 191-204.
  • Simon J, Laurent S, Grolleau G, Thoraval P, Soubieux D, Rasschaert D. 2004. Evolution of preproinsulin gene in birds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 755- 766.
  • Simon C, Nigro L, Sullivan J, Holsinger K, Martin A, Grapputo A, Franke A, McIntosh C. 1996. Large differences in substitutional pattern and evolutionary rate of 12S ribosomal RNA genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 923-932.
  • Simonetta AM. 1963. Cinesi e morfologiea del cranio negli uccelli non passeriformi. Studio su varie tendenze evolutive. Parte Ia. Archivio Zoologico Italiano (Torino) 48: 53- 135.
  • Simpson GG. 1944. Tempo and mode in evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Simpson SF, Cracraft J. 1981. The phylogenetic relationships of the Piciformes (Class Aves). Auk 98: 481-494.
  • Slack KE, Delsuc F, McLenachan PA, Arnason U, Penny D. 2006a. Resolving the root of avian mitogenomic tree by breaking up long branches. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 42: 1-13.
  • Slack KE, Janke A, Penny D, Amason U. 2003. Two new avian mitochondrial genomes (penguin and goose) and a summary of bird and reptile mitogenomic features. Gene 302: 43-52.
  • Slack KE, Jones CM, Ando T, Harrison GL, Fordyce RE, Arnason U, Penny D. 2006b. Early penguin fossils, plus mitochondrial genomes, calibrate avian evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 1144-1155.
  • Slikas B. 1997. Phylogeny of the avian family Ciconiidae (storks) based on cytochrome b sequences and DNA-DNA hybridization distances. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 275-300.
  • Slikas B. 1998. Recognizing and testing homology of courtship displays in storks (Aves: Ciconiiformes: Ciconiidae). Evolution 52: 884-893.
  • Smith GA. 1975. Systematics of parrots. Ibis 117: 18-68.
  • Smith AB. 1994. Systematics and the fossil record: documenting evolutionary patterns. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  • Smith AB. 1998. What does palaeontology contribute to systematics in a molecular world? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 437-447.
  • Smith EJ, Li S, Zhijian T. 2005. Gallus gallus aggrecan gene-based phylogenetic analysis of selected avian taxonomic groups. Genetica 124: 23-32.
  • Smith VS, Page RDM, Johnson KP. 2004. Data incongruence and the problem of avian louse phylogeny. Zoologica Scripta 33: 239-259.
  • Smith AB, Peterson KJ. 2002. Dating the time of origin of major clades: molecular clocks and the fossil record. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 30: 65-88.
  • Snively E, Russell AP, Powell GL. 2004. Evolutionary morphology of the coelurosaurian arctometatarsus: descriptive, morphometric and phylogenetic approaches. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 525-553.
  • Sober E. 1982. Parsimony methods in systematics. In: Platnick NI, Funk VA, eds. Advances in cladistics, Vol. 2. New York: Columbia University Press, 37-48.
  • Sober E. 2005. Parsimony and its presuppositions. In: Albert VA, ed. Parsimony, phylogeny, and genomics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 43-56.
  • Sommer RJ. 1999. Convergence and the interplay of evolution and development. Evolution and Development 1: 8-10.
  • Sorenson MD. 1999. TreeRot, Version 2. Boston, MA: Boston University.
  • Sorenson MD, Cooper A, Paxinos EE, Quinn TW, James HF, Olson SL, Fleischer RC. 1999. Relationships of the extinct moa-nalos, flightless Hawaiian waterfowl, based on ancient DNA. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 266: 2187-2194.
  • Sorenson MD, O'Neal E, Garcia-Moreno J, Mindell DP. 2003. More taxa, more characters: the hoatzin problem is still unresolved. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 1484- 1499.
  • Sorenson MD, Payne RB. 2003. Molecular systematics: cuckoo phylogeny inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. In: Payne RB, ed. Bird families of the world: cuckoos. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 68-108.
  • Spicer GS, Dunipace L. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of songbirds (Passeriformes) inferred from mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 325-335.
  • Springer MS. 1995. Molecular clocks and the incompleteness of the fossil record. Journal of Molecular Evolution 41: 531- 538.
  • Sraml M, Christidis L, Easteal S, Horn P, Collet C. 1996. Molecular relationships between Australian waterfowl (Anseriformes). Australian Journal of Zoology 44: 47-58.
  • Stanley SE, Cracraft J. 2002. Higher-level systematic analysis of birds: current problems and possible solutions. In: DeSalle R, Giribet G, Wheeler W, eds. Molecular systematics and evolution: theory and practice. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser-Verlag, 31-43.
  • Stanley SE, Harrison RG. 1999. Cytochrome b evolution in birds and mammals: an evaluation of the avian constraint hypothesis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1575-1585.
  • Stapel SO, Leunissen JA, Versteeg M, Wattel J, de Jong W. 1984. Ratites as oldest offshoot of avian stem - evidence from α- crystallin A sequences. Nature 311: 257-259.
  • Starck D. 1955. Die endocraniale Morphologie der Ratiten, besonders der Apterygidae und Dinornithidae. Gegenbaurs Morphologisches Jahrbuch 96: 14-72.
  • Starck D. 1969. Parallel development and specialisation during the evolution of the bird skull. Annale Universiteit Van Stellenbosch (Serie A) 44: 217-228.
  • Starck JM, Sutter E. 2000. Patterns of growth and heterochrony in moundbuilders (Megapodiidae) and fowl (Phasianidae). Journal of Avian Biology 31: 527-547.
  • Steel M, Penny D. 2005. Maximum parsimony and the phylogenetic information in multistate characters. In: Albert VA, ed. Parsimony, phylogeny, and genomics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 163-180.
  • Steel M, Pickett KM. 2006. On the impossibility of uniform priors on clades. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38: 585-586.
  • Stegmann BK. 1957. [Uber die Eigenheiten des Fluges der Pterocliden]. Zoologichesky Zhurnal 36: 1521-1529 [in Russian, German summary].
  • Stegmann BK. 1959. [Some structual peculiarities of the skull and vertebral column in pigeons and sand-grouses]. Zoologichesky Zhurnal 38: 1049-1059 [in Russian, English summary].
  • Steinbacher J. 1968. Bemerkungen zur Brutbiologie, Morphologie und Anatomie von Kagu-Jungen (Rhynochetos jubatus Verreaux & Des Murs). Bonner Zoologische Beitrage 19: 198-205.
  • Stevens PF. 2000. On characters and character states: Do overlapping and non-overlapping variation, morphology and molecules all yield data of the same value?. In: Scotland R, Pennington RT, eds. Homology and systematics: coding characters for phylogenetic analysis. London: Taylor & Francis, 81-105.
  • Stidham TA. 1998. A lower jaw from a Cretaceous parrot. Nature 396: 29-30.
  • Stolpe M. 1935. Colymbus, Hesperornis, Podiceps: ein Vergleich ihrer hinteren Extremitat. Journal fur Ornithologie 83: 115-128.
  • Stonor CR. 1938. Some features of the variation of the birds of paradise. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 108: 417-481.
  • Storer RW. 1956. The fossil loon, Colymboides minutus. Condor 58: 413-426.
  • Storer RW. 1960a. The classification of birds. In: Marshall AJ, ed. Biology and comparative physiology of birds, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 57-93.
  • Storer RW. 1960b. Evolution in the diving birds. In: Bergman G, Donner KO, von Haartman L, eds. Proceedings of the XII International Ornithological Congress, Vol. 2. Helsinki, Finland: Tilgmannin Kirjapaino. 694-707.
  • Storer RW. 1971a. Adaptive radiation of birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, eds. Avian biology, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 149-188.
  • Storer RW. 1971b. Classification of birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, eds. Avian biology, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 1-18.
  • Storer RW. 2000. The metazoan parasite fauna of grebes (Aves: Podicipediformes) and its relationship to the birds' biology. Miscellaneous Publications of the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology 188: 1-74.
  • Storer RW. 2002. The Metazoan parasite fauna of loons (Aves: Gaviiformes), its relationship to the birds' evolutionary history and biology, and a comparison with the parasite fauna of grebes. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Miscellanious Publications 191: 1-36.
  • Storer RW. 2006. The grebe-flamingo connection: a rebuttal. Auk 123: 1183-1184.
  • Strauch JG Jr. 1978. The phylogeny of the Charadriiformes (Aves): a new estimate using the method of character compatibility analysis. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 34: 263-345.
  • Strauch JG Jr. 1985. The phylogeny of the Alcidae. Auk 102: 520-539.
  • Stresemann E. 1934. Aves. In: Kukenthal W, Krumbach T, eds. Handbuch der Zoologie, Vol. 7: part 2. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Stresemann E. 1959. The status of avian systematics and its unsolved problems. Auk 76: 269-280.
  • Stucchi M, Urbina M. 2004. Ramphastosula (Aves, Sulidae): a new genus from the early Pliocene of the Pisco Formation, Peru. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24: 974-978.
  • Sumrall CD, Brochu CA, Merck JW Jr. 2001. Global lability, regional resolution, and majority-rule consensus bias. Paleobiology 27: 254-261.
  • Suzuki Y, Glazko GV, Nei M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 99: 16138- 16143.
  • Suzuki N, Laskowski M Jr, Lee YC. 2004. Phylogenetic expression of Gal α1-4Gal on avian glycoproteins: glycan differentiation inscribed in the early history of modern birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 101: 9023-9028.
  • Swierczewski EV, Raikow RJ. 1981. Hindlimb morphology, phylogeny, and classification of the Piciformes. Auk 98: 466- 480.
  • Swofford DL. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? In: Miyamoto MM, Cracraft J, eds. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 295-333.
  • Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4. Sunderlund, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Tavares ES, Baker AJ, Pereira SL, Miyaki CY. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of Neotropical parrots (Psittaciformes: Psittacidae: Arini) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Systematic Biology 55: 454-470.
  • Taylor PG. 1996. Reproducibility of ancient DNA sequences from extinct Pleistocene fauna. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 283-285.
  • Telford MJ. 2000. Turning Hox 'signatures' into synapomorphies. Evolution and Development 2: 360-364.
  • Templeton AR. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
  • Temrin H, Sillen-Tullberg B. 1994. The evolution of avian mating systems: a phylogenetic analysis of male and female polygamy and length of pair bond. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 52: 121-149.
  • Temrin H, Sillen-Tullberg B. 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of avian mating systems in relation to altricial and precocial young. Behavioral Ecology 6: 296- 307.
  • Thomas GH, Wills MA, Szekely T. 2004a. Phylogeny of shorebirds, gulls, and alcids (Aves: Charadrii) from the cytochrome- b gene: parsimony, Bayesian inference, minimum evolution, and quartet puzzling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 516-526.
  • Thomas GH, Wills MA, Szekely T. 2004b. A supertree approach to shorebird phylogeny. BMC (Biomed Central) Evolutionary Biology 4 (28): 1-18.
  • Thomassen HA, den Tex R-J, de Bakker MAG, Povel GDE. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships amongst swifts and swiftlets: a multi-locus approach. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 264-277.
  • Thomassen HA, Wiersema AT, de Bakker MAG, de Knijff P, Hetebrij E, Povel GDE. 2003. A new phylogeny of swiftlets (Aves: Apodidae) based on cytochrome- b DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 86-93.
  • Thorne JL, Kishno H, Painter LS. 1998. Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15: 1647-1657.
  • Thornton J. 2002. Gene tree phylogenetics: tracing protein evolution on trees. In: DeSalle R, Giribet G, Wheeler W, eds. Molecular systematics and evolution: theory and practice. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser-Verlag.
  • Tsaousis AD, Martin DP, Ladoukakis ED, Posada D, Zouros E. 2005. Widespread recombination in published animal mt DNA sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 925-933.
  • Tullberg BS, Ah-King M, Temrin H. 2002. Phylogenetic reconstruction of parental-care systems in the ancestors of birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 357: 251-257.
  • Tyler C. 1969. A study of the egg shells of the Gaviiformes, Procellariiformes, Podicipitiformes [sic] and Pelecaniformes. Journal of Zoology (London) 159: 395-412.
  • Unwin DM. 1993. Aves. In: Benton MJ, ed. The fossil record 2. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, 717-737.
  • Valentine JW. 1990. The macroevolution of clade shape. In: Ross RM, Allmon WD, eds. Causes of evolution: a paleontological perspective. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 128-150.
  • Van Tets GF. 1965. Comparative study of some social communiation patterns in the Pelecaniformes. Ornithological Monographs 2: 1-88.
  • Van Tuinen M. 2002. Relationships of birds - molecules versus morphology. In: Electronic encyclopedia of life sciences. London: Nature Publishing Group.
  • Van Tuinen M, Butvill DB, Kirsch JAW, Hedges SB. 2001. Convergence and divergence in the evolution of aquatic birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B) 268: 1-6.
  • Van Tuinen M, Dyke GJ. 2004. Calibration of galliform molecular clocks using multiple fossils and genetic partitions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 74-88.
  • Van Tuinen M, Hadly EA. 2004. Error in estimation of rate and time inferred from the early amniote fossil record and avian molecular clocks. Journal of Molecular Evolution 59: 267-276.
  • Van Tuinen M, Hedges SB. 2001. Calibration of avian molecular clocks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 206- 213.
  • Van Tuinen M, Hedges SB. 2004. The effect of external and internal fossil calibrations on the avian evolutionary timescale. Journal of Paleontology 78: 45-50.
  • Van Tuinen M, Sibley CG, Hedges SB. 1998. Phylogeny and biogeography of ratite birds inferred from DNA sequences of the mitochondrial ribosomal genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 370-376.
  • Van Tuinen M, Sibley CG, Hedges SB. 2000. The early history of modern birds inferred from DNA sequences of nuclear and mitochondrial ribosomal genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 451-457.
  • Van Tuinen M, Stidham TA, Hadly EA. 2006. Tempo and mode of modern bird evolution observed with large-scale taxonomic sampling. Historical Biology 18: 205-221.
  • Van Tuinen M, Waterhouse D, Dyke GJ. 2004. Avian molecular systematics on the rebound: a fresh look at modern shorebird phylogenetic relationships. Journal of Avian Biology 35: 191-194.
  • Vargas AO, Fallon JF. 2005a. Birds have dinosaur wings: the molecular evidence. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Series B) 304: 86-90.
  • Vargas AO, Fallon JF. 2005b. The digits of the wing of birds are 1, 2, and 3: a review. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Series B) 304: 206-219.
  • Vazquez RJ. 1992. Functional osteology of the avian wrist and the evolution of flapping flight. Journal of Morphology 211: 259-268.
  • Verheyen R. 1956a. Note systematique sur Opisthocomus hoazin (St. Muller). Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 32 (32): 1-8.
  • Verheyen R. 1956b. Note sur l'anatomie et al classification des Coliiformes. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences, Naturelles de Belgique 32 (47): 1-7.
  • Verheyen R. 1959a. Les plongeons (Gaviae) et les grebes (Podicitides) dans les systemes de classification. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 35 (44): 1-12.
  • Verheyen R. 1959b. Les Striges, les Trogones et les Caprimulgi dans la systematique moderne. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 32 (3): 1- 31.
  • Verheyen R. 1960a. Contribution a osteologie et a la systematique des Ratitae. Bulletin de l'Societe Royal des Zoologique d'Anvers 36 (56): 1-19.
  • Verheyen R. 1960b. Les Pelecaniformes et le paille-en-quene (Phaethon). Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 36 (25): 1-18.
  • Verheyen R. 1961. A new classification for the non-passerine birds of the world. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 37 (27): 1-36.
  • Vermeij GJ. 1988. The evolutionary success of passerines: a question of semantics? Systematic Zoology 37: 69-71.
  • Veron G. 1999. Phylogenie des touracos (Aves, Musophagidae). Analyse des caracteres morphologiques. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 37: 39- 48.
  • Vickers-Rich P, Trusler P, Rowley MJ, Cooper A, Chambers GK, Bock WJ, Millener PR, Worthy TH, Yaldwyn JC. 1995. Morphology, myology, collagen and DNA of a mummified upland moa, Megalapteryx didinus (Aves: Dinornithiformes), from New Zealand. Tuhinga: Records of the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa 4: 1-26.
  • Von Nathusius W. 1881. Uber die Structur der Eischale von Opisthocomus cristatus und deren Beziehungen zu diesen Verhaltnissen bei den Huhnern. Journal fur Ornithologie 29: 334-336.
  • Waddell PJ, Cau Y, Hasegawa M, Mindell DP. 1999. Assessing the Cretaceous superordinal divergence times within birds and placental mammals by using whole mitochondrial protein sequences and an extended statistical framework. Systematic Biology 48: 119-137.
  • Wagele JW. 1995. On the information content of characters in comparative morphology and molecular systematics. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 33: 42-47.
  • Wagele JW. 1996. First principles of phylogenetic systematics, a basis for numerical methods used for morphological and molecular characters. Vie Milieu 46: 125-138.
  • Wagner GP. 1989. The origin of morphological characters and the biological basis of homology. Evolution 43: 1157- 1171.
  • Wagner GP. 1994. Homology and the mechanisms of development. In: Hall BK, ed. Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 273- 299.
  • Wagner PJ. 2000a. The quality of the fossil record and the accuracy of phylogenetic inferences about sampling and diversity. Systematic Biology 49: 65-86.
  • Wagner PJ. 2000b. Exhaustion of morphologic character states among fossil taxa. Evolution 54: 365-386.
  • Wagner GP, Gauthier JA. 1999. 1, 2, 3 = 2, 3, 4: a solution to the problem of the homology of the digits in the avian hand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 96: 5111-5116.
  • Wake DB. 1999. Homoplasy, homology, and the problem of 'sameness' in biology. In: Bock GR, Cardew G, eds. Homology. Chichester, UK: J. Wiley and Sons, 24-46.
  • Wakeley J. 1994. Substitution-rate variation among sites and the estimation of transition bias. Molecular Biology and Evolution 11: 436-442.
  • Watanabe M, Nikaido M, Tsuda TT, Inoko H, Mindell DP, Murata K, Okada N. 2006. The rise and fall of the CR1 subfamily in the lineage leading to penguins. Gene 365: 57-66.
  • Wattel J, Stapel S, de Jong WW. 1988. Amino acid sequences of the eye-lens protein alpha-crystallin A in avian taxonomy. In: Ouellet H, ed. Acta XIX Congressua Internationalia Ornithologici, Vol. 2. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press, 1905-1911.
  • Webb DM, Moore WS. 2005. A phylogenetic analysis of woodpeckers and their allies using 12S, cyt b, and COI nucleotide sequences (Class Aves: Order Piciformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36: 233-248.
  • Weber E. 1990. Zur Kraniogenese bei der Lachmowe (Larus ridibundus L.), zugleich ein Beitrag zur Rekonstuktion des Grundplans der Vogel. Gegenbaurs Morphologisches Jahrbuch (Leipzig) 136: 335-387.
  • Weber E. 1993. Zur Evolution basicranialer Gelenke bei Vogeln, insbesondere bei Huhner- und Entenvogeln (Galloanseres). Zeitschrift fur Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 31: 300-317.
  • Wechstein JD. 2005. Molecular phylogenetics of the Ramphastos toucans: implications for the evolution of morphology, vocalizations, and coloration. Auk 122: 1191-1209.
  • Weibel AC, Moore WS. 2002a. Molecular phylogeny of a cosmopolitan group of woodpeckers (genus Picoides) based on COI and cyt b mitochondrial gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 65-75.
  • Weibel AC, Moore WS. 2002b. A test of a mitochondrial genebased phylogeny of woodpeckers (genus Picoides) using an independent nuclear gene, β- fibrinogen intron 7. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 247-257.
  • Weldon WFR. 1883. On some points in the anatomy of Phoenicopterus and its allies. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1883: 638-652.
  • Welten MCM, Verbeek FJ, Meijer AH, Richardson MK. 2005. Gene expression and digit homology in the chicken embryo wing. Evolution and Development 7: 18-28.
  • Wesolowski T. 1994. On the origin of parental care and the early evolution of male and female parental roles in birds. American Naturalist 143: 39-58.
  • West-Eberhard MJ. 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Wetmore A. 1926. Fossil birds from the Green River deposits of eastern Utah. Annals of Carnegie Museum 16: 391- 402.
  • Wetmore A. 1930. A systematic classification for the birds of the world. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 76: 1-8.
  • Wetmore A. 1960. A classification for the birds of the world. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collection 139: 1-37.
  • Wheeler QD. 1986. Character weighting and cladistic analysis. Systematic Zoology 38: 102-109.
  • Wheeler WC, Gatesy J, DeSalle R. 1995. Elision: a method for accommodating multiple molecular sequence alignmentambiguous sites. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4: 1-9.
  • Whittingham LA, Sheldon FH, Emlen ST. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of jacanas and its implications for morphologic and biogeographic evolution. Auk 117: 22-32.
  • Wiens JJ. 2003. Incomplete taxa, incomplete characters, and phylogenetic accuracy: Is there a missing data problem? Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 297-310.
  • Wiens JJ. 2004. The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Systematic Biology 53: 653-661.
  • Wiens JJ. 2005. Can incomplete taxa rescue phylogenetic analyses from long-branch attraction? Systematic Biology 54: 731-742.
  • Wiens JJ, Chippindale PT, Hillis DM. 2003. When are phylogenetic analyses misled by convergence? A case study in Texas cave salamanders. Systematic Biology 52: 501-514.
  • Wiley EO. 1981. Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. New York: J. Wiley.
  • Wilkinson M. 1995. Coping with abundant missing entries in phylogenetic inference using parsimony. Systematic Biology 44: 501-514.
  • Wilkinson M. 2003. Missing entries and multiple trees: instability, relationships, and support in parsimony analysis. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 311-323.
  • Wilkinson M, LaPointe F-J, Gower DJ. 2003. Branch lengths and support. Systematic Biology 52: 127-130.
  • Wilson SJ. 1999. A higher-order parsimony method to reduce long-branch attraction. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 694-705.
  • Wimberger PH, de Queiroz A. 1996. Comparing behavioral and morphological characters. In: Martins EP, ed. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 206-223.
  • Wink M. 1995. Phylogeny of Old and New World vultures (Aves: Accipitridae and Cathartidae) inferred from nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Zeitschrift der Naturforschenden (Abteilung C) 50: 868-882.
  • Wink M, Heidrich P. 1999. Molecular evolution and systematics of the owls (Strigiformes). In: Konig C, Wieck F, Becking JH, eds. Owls: a guide to the owls of the world. Sussex, UK: Pica Press, 39-57.
  • Winkler DW, Sheldon FH. 1993. Evolution of nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae): a molecular phylogenetic perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 90: 5705-5707.
  • Winnepennincks B, Backeljau T. 1996. 18S r RNA alignments derived from different secondary structure models can produce alternative phylogenies. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 34: 135-143.
  • Witmer LM. 1991. Perspectives on avian origins. In: Schultze H-P, Trueb L, eds. Origins of the higher groups of tetrapods. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishers, 427-466.
  • Worthy TH, Holdaway RN. 2002. The lost world of the moa: prehistoric life of New Zealand. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Wyles JS, Kunkel JG, Wilson AC. 1983. Birds, behavior, and anatomical evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 80: 4394-4397.
  • Xia X, Xie Z, Kjer KM. 2003. 18S ribosomal RNA and tetrapod phylogeny. Systematic Biology 52: 283-295.
  • Yang Z, Bielawski JP. 2000. Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 496-503.
  • Yang Z, Rannala B. 2006. Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 212-226.
  • Yeates DK. 1995. Groundplans and exemplars: paths to the tree of life. Cladistics 11: 343-357.
  • Yuri T, Mindell DP. 2002. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Fringillidae, 'New World nine-primaried oscines' (Aves: Passeriformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 229- 243.
  • Zardoya R, Cao Y, Hasegawa M, Meyer A. 1998. Searching for the closest living relative(s) of tetrapods through evolutionary analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 506-517.
  • Zardoya R, Meyer A. 1996. Phylogenetic performance of mitochondrial protein-coding genes in resolving relationships among vertebrates. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 933-942.
  • Zeffer A, Johansson C, Marmebro A. 2003. Functional correlation between habitat use and leg morphology in birds (Aves). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 461-484.
  • Zeffer A, Norberg L. 2003. Leg morphology and locomotion in birds: requirements for force and speed during ankle flexion. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Series B) 206: 1085- 1097.
  • Zelditch ML, Fink WL. 1996. Heterochrony and heterotopy: stability and innovation in the evolution of form. Paleobiology 22: 241-254.
  • Zhou Z, Zhang F. 2005. Discovery of an ornithurine bird and its implication for early Cretaceous avian radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 102: 18998- 19002.
  • Zink RM, Klicka J. 2006. The tempo of avian diversification: a comment on Johnson and Cicero. Evolution 60: 411-412.
  • Zusi RL. 1993. Patterns of diversity in the avian skull. In: Hanken J, Hall BK, eds. The skull, vol. 2: patterns of structural and systematic diversity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 391-437.
  • Zusi RL, Livezey BC. 2000. Homologies and phylogenetic implications of some enigmatic cranial features in galliform and anseriform birds. Annals of Carnegie Museum 69: 157- 193.
  • Zusi RL, Livezey BC. 2006. Variation in the os palatinum and its structural relation to the palatum osseum of birds (Aves). Annals of Carnegie Museum 75: in press.
  • Zusi RL, Storer RW. 1969. Osteology and myology of the head and neck of the pied-billed grebes (Podilymbus). University of Michigan Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology 139: 1-49.
  • Zusi RL, Warheit KI. 1992. On the evolution of intraramal mandibular joints in pseudodontorns (Aves: Odontopterygia). In: Campbell KE, ed. Papers in avian paleontology honoring Pierce Brodkorb. Los Angeles, CA: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 351-360.
  • Zweers GA, Vanden Berge JC. 1997a. Evolutionary transitions in the trophic system of the wader-waterfowl complex. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 47: 255-287.
  • Zweers GA, Vanden Berge JC. 1997b. Birds at geological boundaries. Zoology 100: 183-202.
  • Zweers GA, Vanden Berge JC, Berkhoudt H. 1997. Evolutionary patterns of avian trophic diversification. Zoology 100: 25-57.