Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published December 31, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Multiple 2D approaches to human sexual dimorphism of the distal end of femur

Creators

  • 1. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
  • 2. IRD, UMR IRD-CIRAD INTERTRYP, Campus international de Baillarguet, Montpellier, France Corresponding author, E-mail: dujjepi@gmail.com

Description

Piyaselakul, Sitha, Sanannam, Bumpenporn, Dujardin, Jean-Pierre (2017): Multiple 2D approaches to human sexual dimorphism of the distal end of femur. Zoological Systematics 42 (1): 108-122, DOI: 10.11865/zs.201710

Files

source.pdf

Files (1.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3447683ba0aa44ea74a0026a8d739bd4
1.0 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:3447683BFFAAFFEAFFA0026A8D73FFD4

Cites
Publication: 10.1002/9780470114209.ch25 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-266 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.012 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/joa.12528 (DOI)
Publication: 10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6292 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.008 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/sysbio/41.4.471 (DOI)
Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5365822 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5365824 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5365826 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5365828 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5365830 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5365832 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5365834 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5365836 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5365838 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5365840 (DOI)

References

  • Arnqvist, G., Martensson, T. 1998. Measurement error in geometric morphometrics: empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measure of shape. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 44(1): 73-96.
  • Baylac, M., Friess, M. 2005. Fourier descriptors, Procrustes superimposition, and data dimensionality: an example of cranial shape analysis in modern human populations. In: Slice, D.E. (ed.). Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. pp. 145-165.
  • Baylac, M., Villemant, C., Simbolotti, G. 2003. Combining geometric morphometrics with pattern recognition for the investigation of species complexes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 80(1): 89-98.
  • Bilfeld, M.F., Dedouit, F., Sans, N., Rousseau, H., Rouge, D., Telmon, N. 2013. Ontogeny of size and shape sexual dimorphism in the ilium: A multislice computed tomography study by Geometric Morphometry. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 58(2): 303-310.
  • Bookstein, F.L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, NY. 435pp.
  • Bookstein, F.L. 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: Localizing group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis, 1(3): 225-243.
  • Brouwer, G.M., van Tol, A.W., Bergink, A.P., Belo, J.N., Bernsen, R.M.D., Reijman, M., Pols, H.A.P., Bierma-Zeinstra, S.M.A. 2007. Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 56(4): 1204-1211.
  • Bytheway, J.A., Ross, A.H., 2010. A geometric morphometric approach to sex determination of the human adult os coxa. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 55(4): 859-864.
  • Klingenberg, C.P., McIntyre, G.S. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution, 52(5): 1363-1375.
  • Caro-Riano, H., Jaramillo, N., Dujardin, J.P. 2009. Growth changes in Rhodnius pallescens under simulated domestic and sylvatic conditions. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 9(2): 162-168.
  • Case, D.T., Ross, A.H. 2007. Sex determination from hand and foot bone lengths. Jounnal of Forensic Sciences, 52(2): 264-270.
  • Chen, C., Ma, Y.H., Geng, B., Tan, X.Y., Zhang, B., Jayswal, C.K., Khan, M.S., Meng, H.Q., Ding, N., Jiang, J., Wu, M., Wang, J., Xia, Y.Y. 2016. Intercondylar notch stenosis of knee osteoarthritis and relationship between stenosis and osteoarthritis complicated with anterior cruciate ligament injury: A study in MRI. Medicine, 95(17): e3439.
  • Cheng, F.B., Ji, X.F., Lai, Y., Feng, J.C., Zheng, W.X., Sun, Y.F., Fu, Y.W., Li, Y.Q. 2009. Three dimensional morphometry of the knee to design the total knee arthroplasty for Chinese population. The Knee, 16(5): 341-347.
  • Chichankul, C., Tanavalee, A., Itiravivong, P. 2011. Anthropometric measurements of knee joints in Thai population: Correlation to the sizing of current knee prostheses. The Knee, 18(1): 5-10.
  • Claude, J. 2008. Morphometrics with R. Springer Science & Business Media, LLC. 330 pp.
  • Collyer, M.C., Adams, D.C. 2007. Analysis of two-state multivariate phenotypic change in ecological studies. Ecology, 88(3): 683-692.
  • Dujardin, J.P., Cardozo, L., Schofield, C. 1996. Genetic analysis of Triatoma infestans following insecticidal control interventions in Central Bolivia. Acta Tropica, 61(3): 263-266.
  • Dujardin, J.P., Slice, D.E. 2007. Contributions of morphometrics to medical entomology. In: Tibayrenc, M. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Infectious Diseases: Modern Methodologies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 433-446. doi: 10.1002/9780470114209.ch25.
  • Dujardin, J.P., Kaba, D., Henry, A.B., 2010. The exchangeability of shape. BMC Research Notes, 3: 266. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-266.
  • Felson, D.T., Zhang, Y., Hannan, M.T., Naimark, A., Weissman, B., Aliabadi, P., Levy, D. 1997. Risk factors for incident radiographic knee osteoarthritis in the elderly: The framingham study. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 40(4): 728-733.
  • Gillespie, R.J., Levine, A., Fitzgerald, F.J., Kolakzco, J., DeMaio, M., Marcus, R.E., Cooperman, D.R. 2011. Gender differences in the anatomy of the distal femur. The Bone & Joint Journa, 93(3): 357-363.
  • Gonzalez, P.N., Bernal, V., Perez, S.I. 2009. Geometric morphometric approach to sex estimation of human pelvis. Forensic Science International, 189(1-3): 68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.012.
  • Gonzalez, N.C., Perez, J.R., Chamero, B., Cambra-Moo, O., Martin, A.G. 2016. Geometric morphometrics reveal restrictions on the shape of the female os coxae. Journal of Anatomy, doi: 10.1111/joa.12528.
  • Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P. 2013. Semilandmarks: A method for quantifying curves and surfaces. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 24(1): 103-109. doi: 10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6292.
  • Guy, S.P., Farndon, M.A., Sidhom, S., Al-Lami, M., Bennett, C., London, N.J. 2012. Gender differences in distal femoral morphology and the role of gender specific implants in total knee replacement: A prospective clinical study. The Knee, 19(1): 28-31.
  • Hayashizaki, Y., Usui, A., Hosokai, Y., Sakai, J., Funayama, M. 2015. Sex determination of the pelvis using Fourier analysis of postmortem CT images. Forensic Science International, 246: 122.e1-122.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.008.
  • Iwata, H. 2011. Quantitative genetic analyses of crop organ shape based on principal components of elliptic fourier descriptors. In: Lestrel, P. (ed.). Biological Shape Analysis: Proceedings of the First International Symposium, Tsukuba, Japan, 3-6 June 2009. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore. pp. 50-66.
  • Jolliffe, I.T. 1986. Principal Component Analysis. Series in Statistics. Springer, New York. 271pp.
  • Kendall, D.G. 1984. Shape manifolds, procrustean metrics, and complex projection spaces. Bulletin London Mathematical Society, 16(2): 81-121.
  • Krzanowski, W.J. 1987. Cross-validation in principal component analysis. Biometrics, 43(3): 575-584.
  • Kuhl, F.P., Giardina, C.R. 1982. Elliptic fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 18: 236-258.
  • Lestrel, P.E. 1989. Methods for analyzing complex two-dimensional forms: elliptic Fourier functions. American Journal of Human Biology, 1: 149-164.
  • Lestrel, P.E. 1997. Introduction and overview of Fourier descriptors. In: Lestrel, P.E. (ed.). Fourier Descriptors and their Applications in Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 22-44.
  • Lonner, J.H., Jasko, J.G., Thomas, B.S. 2008. Anthropomorphic differences between the distal femora of men and women. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 466(11): 2724-2729.
  • Manly, B.F.J. 2004. Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, Third Edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, US. 214pp.
  • Matsuda, S., Miura, H., Nagamine, R., Mawatari, T., Tokunaga, M., Nabeyama, R., Iwamoto, Y. 2004. Anatomical analysis of the femoral condyle in normal and osteoarthritic knees. Journal of Orthopaedic Resarch, 22: 104-109.
  • Miyazaki, T., Wada, M., Kawahara, H., Sato, M., Bada, H., Shimada, S. 2002. Dynamic Load at Baseline can Predict Radiographic Disease Progression in Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 61(7): 617-622.
  • Mukhopadhyay, P.P. 2012. Determination of sex from fragment of hip bone in Indian Bengali. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 34(4): 309-311.
  • Munoz, A.D., Soto, G.M. 2014. Skeletodental diagnosis using a geometric morphometric approach. International Journal of Odontostomatology, 8(1): 5-11.
  • Mushed, K.A., Cicekcibasi, A.E., Karabacakoglu, A., Seker, M., Ziylan, T. 2005. Distal femur morphometry: a gender and bilateral comparative study using magnetic resonance imaging. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 27: 108-112.
  • Nagaoka, T., Hirata, K. 2009. Reliability of metric determination of sex based on long-bone circumferences: perspectives from Yuigahama-minami, Japan. Anatomical Science International, 84(1-2): 7-16.
  • Palmer, A.R., Strobeck, C. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis, patterns. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17: 391-421.
  • Polly, P.D., Head, J.J. 2004. Maximum-likelihood identification of fossils: taxonomic identification of Quaternary marmots (Rodentia, Mammalia) and identification of vertebral position in the pipesnake Cylindrophis (Serpentes, Reptilia). In: Elewa, A.M.T. (ed.). Morphometrics, Applications in Biology and Paleontology. Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York. pp.197-221.
  • Rogers, T., Saunders, S. 1994. Accuracy of sex determination using morphological traits of human pelvis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39(4): 1047-1056.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 1990a. Fitting curves to outlines. In: Rohlf, F.J., Bookstein, F.L. (eds.). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication Number 2. University of Michigan Museums, Ann Arbor. pp. 168-177.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 1990b. Rotational fit (Procrustes) methods. In: Rohlf, F.J., Bookstein, F.L. (eds.). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication Number 2. University of Michigan Museum. Ann Arbor. pp. 227-236.
  • Rohlf, F.J. 1996. Morphometric spaces, shape components and the effects of linear transformations. In: Marcus, L.F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G., Slice, D. (eds.). Advances in Morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York. pp. 117-129.
  • Ros, J., Evin, A., Bouby, L., Rus, M.P. 2014. Geometric morphometric analysis of grain shape and the identification of two-rowed barely (Hordeum vulgare subsp. Distichum L.) in southern France. Journal of Archaeologicla Science, 41: 568-575.
  • Sharma, L., Song, J., Dunlop, D., Felson, D., Lewis, C.E., Segal, N., Toner, J., Cooke, T.D.V., Hietpas, J., Lynch, J., Nevitt, M. 2010. Varus and Valgus Alignment and Incident and Progressive Knee Osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 69(11): 1940- 1945.
  • Sheets, H.D., Covino, K.M., Panasiewicz, J.M., Morris, S.M., 2006. Comparison of geometric morphometric outline methods in the discrimination of age-related differences in feather shape. Frontiers in Zoology, 3(1): 15.
  • Shelbourne, K.D., Facibene, W.A., Hunt, J.J. 1997. Radiographic and intraoperative intercondylar notch width measurements in men and women with unilateral and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament tears. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 5(4): 229-233.
  • Slemenda, C., Heilman, D.K., Bradt, K.D., Katz, P., Mazzuca, S.A., Braunstein, E.M., Byrd, D. 1998. Reduced Quadriceps Strength Relative to Body Weight : A Risk Factor for Knee Osteoarthritis in Women? Arthritis & Rheumatism, 41(11): 1951-1959.
  • Standring, S. 2016. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 41st Edition. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, London. 1584 pp.
  • Stein, V., Li, L., Guermaz, A., Zhang, Y., Kwoh, C.K., Eaton, C.B., Hunter, D.J. 2010. The relation of femoral notch stenosis to ACL tears in persons with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 18(2): 192-199.
  • Tillman, M.D., Smith, K.R., Bauer, J.A., Cauraugh, J.H., Falsetti, A.B., Pattishall, J.L. 2002. Differences in three intercondylar notch geometry indices between males and females: a cadaver study. The Knee, 9(1): 41-46.
  • Veleminsk, J., Krajicek, V., Dupej, J., Gomez- Valdes, J.A., Veleminsky, P., Sefcakova, A., Pelikan, J., Sanchez- Mejorada, G., Bruzek., J. 2013. Technical Note: Geometric morphometrics and sexual dimorphism of the greater sciatic notch in adults from two skeletal collections: The Accuracy and Reliability of Sex Classification. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 152(4): 558-565.
  • von Cremon-Taubadel, N. 2011. Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49): 19546-19551.
  • Yezerinac, S.M., Lougheed, S.C., Handford, P. 1992. Measurement error and morphometric studies: statistical power and observer experience. Systematic Biology, 41: 471-482. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/41.4.471.

This site uses cookies. Find out more on how we use cookies