Published August 31, 2021 | Version v1
Software Open

Code and data from: Differential retention contributes to racial/ethnic disparity in U.S. academia

  • 1. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior; University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Saint Paul, MN 55108, United States of America
  • 2. Department of Plant and Microbial Biology; University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Saint Paul, MN 55108, United States of America
  • 3. Wildlife and Habitats Division, WWF India, New Delhi, Delhi 110003, India

Description

This contains model code and data from the paper titled
  "Differential retention contributes to racial/ethnic disparity in U.S. academia"
  By: Allison K. Shaw, Chiara Accolla, Jeremy M. Chacón, Taryn L. Mueller, Maxime Vaugeois, Ya Yang, Nitin Sekar, Daniel E. Stanton
  Submitted to: PLoS ONE
  Abstract: Several racial and ethnic identities are widely understood to be under-represented within academia, however, actual quantification of this under-representation is surprisingly limited. Challenges include data availability, demographic inertia and identifying comparison points. We use de-aggregated data from the U.S. National Science Foundation to construct a null model of ethnic and racial representation in one of the world’s largest academic communities. Making comparisons between our model and actual representation in academia allows us to measure the effects of retention (while controlling for recruitment) at different academic stages. We find that, regardless of recruitment, failed retention contributes to mis-representation across academia and that the stages responsible for the largest disparities differ by race and ethnicity: for Black and Hispanic scholars this occurs at the transition from graduate student to postdoctoral researcher whereas for Native American/Alaskan Native and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander scholars this occurs at transitions to and within faculty stages. Even for Asian and Asian-Americans, often perceived as well represented, circumstances are complex and depend on choice of baseline. Our findings demonstrate that while recruitment continues to be important, retention is also a pervasive barrier to proportional representation. Therefore, strategies to reduce mis-representation in academia must address retention. Although our model does not directly suggest such strategies, our framework could be used to project how representation in academia might change in the long-term under different scenarios.
 

Files

code_retrievedata.zip

Files (509.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5f1c8da6d6c011988a3a1d6ad179df37
19.1 kB Preview Download
md5:0384c68462031c1cb5776c4ebf6a369f
37.1 kB Preview Download
md5:29ef27ac5a3bc620aea04ac83d8941f3
13.8 kB Preview Download
md5:05366e15393c513a53619cbbfd2192cc
428.8 kB Preview Download
md5:957ea6708d75ee99832da670f0e84639
9.6 kB Preview Download
md5:2416d91d01e59618499c61d2d2e8d004
1.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
Preprint: 10.1002/essoar.10506980.1 (DOI)