Published October 6, 2017 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Mus fuscipes Waterhouse 1839

Description

Mus fuscipes Waterhouse, 1839

Zoology of the Voyage of HMS Beagle p. 66, pl. 25. (September 1839).

Common name. Australian Bush Rat.

Current name. Rattus fuscipes (Waterhouse, 1839), following Taylor & Horner (1973).

Material. PA.23, indeterminate sex, skull, study skin, registered in c. 1879 in the Palmer Register with original entry of Mus fuscipes “dry skin in bottle Gould’s type ” but without locality, collector or any other entries by Palmer. Taylor & Horner (1973) identified PA.23 as an example of R. lutreolus lutreolus (J. Gray, 1841).

Condition. Incomplete cranium, missing most of braincase, zygomatic arches, both molar tooth rows and most of palate. Left dentary missing coronoid, condylar and angular processes; right dentary complete. Study skin: missing right proximal limb, missing tail tip, fracture in distal third of tail.

Comments. The entry made by E. Palmer in the Palmer Register that PA.23 was “Gould’s type” probably reflects the loose use of the term “type” by early AM staff because in plate and text Gould (1863b) attributes authorship of Mus fuscipes to Waterhouse. The skull of PA.23 was extracted from the skin in 1965 for the study by Taylor & Horner (1967), who designated a neotype for Rattus fuscipes and provide a detailed assessment of the issue. They believed that the specimen could have been the basis of Gould’s account and sketch of Mus fuscipes in his monograph. Taylor & Horner (1973) refer PA.23 (as AM 23) to R. lutreolus lutreolus and discuss the confusion surrounding the application and differing concepts of the names Mus fuscipes Waterhouse (now Rattus fuscipes fuscipes), Mus assimilis Gould, 1858 (now Rattus fuscipes assimilis) and Mus lutreolus J. Gray, 1841 (now Rattus lutreolus lutreolus). They note that prior to Thomas (1906d), all authors followed the mistaken views of Gray and Gould in applying the name fuscipes to specimens of what are now recognized as Rattus lutreolus.

Notes

Published as part of Parnaby, Harry E., Ingleby, Sandy & Divljan, Anja, 2017, Type Specimens of Non-fossil Mammals in the Australian Museum, Sydney, pp. 277-420 in Records of the Australian Museum 69 (5) on page 407, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.69.2017.1653, http://zenodo.org/record/5237800

Files

Files (2.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8f453ef79785944bddaf9d6c592b3692
2.5 kB Download

System files (14.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:58c51d0c0b1dcc9d6848c69e1aea369b
14.6 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Muridae
Genus
Mus
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Rodentia
Phylum
Chordata
Scientific name authorship
Waterhouse
Species
fuscipes
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Mus fuscipes Waterhouse, 1839 sec. Parnaby, Ingleby & Divljan, 2017

References

  • Waterhouse, G. R. 1839. Part 2. Mammalia. In The Zoology of the Voyage of H. M. S. Beagle, under the command of Captain Fitzroy, R. N., during the years 1832 to 1836., ed. C. Darwin, pp. 49 - 100, 9 pls. London: Smith, Elder and Co. [Pp. 1 - 100 published in three parts, 1838 - 1839].
  • Gray, J. E. 1841. Contributions towards the geographical distribution of the Mammalia of Australia, with notes on some recently discovered species, in a letter addressed to the Author. Appendix C. In Journals of Two Expeditions of Discovery in North-west and Western Australia, During the Years 1837, 38, and 39, Under the Authority of Her Majesty's Government. Describing many newly discovered, important, and fertile districts, with observations on the moral and physical condition of the aboriginal inhabitants, & c., ed. G. Grey, pp. 397 - 414. London: T. & W. Boone. Vol. 2.
  • Gould, J. 1863 b. The Mammals of Australia. London: John Gould. Volumes 1 - 3 https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 112962
  • Thomas, O. 1906 d. On mammals collected in south-west Australia for Mr. W. E. Balston. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 76 (1906): 468 - 478.