Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published January 31, 2008 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

An austral anuran assemblage in the Neotropics: seasonal occurrence correlated with photoperiod

Creators

Description

Both, Camila, Kaefer, Ígor L., Santos, Tiago G., Cechin, Sonia T. Z. (2008): An austral anuran assemblage in the Neotropics: seasonal occurrence correlated with photoperiod. Journal of Natural History 42 (3-4): 205-222, DOI: 10.1080/00222930701847923, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930701847923

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFE8FFDDFFA9FFCCFFDEBA3BFFC7FFC2

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5219698 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5219700 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5219702 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5219704 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5219706 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5219708 (DOI)

References

  • Aichinger M. 1987. Annual activity patterns of anurans in the seasonal Neotropical environment. Oecologia 71:583-592.
  • Ayres M, Ayres MJr, Ayres DL, Santos AS. 2005. BioEstat 4.0. Aplicacoes estatisticas nas areas das ciencias biologicas e medicas. Belem: Sociedade Civil de Mamiraua.
  • Basso NG. 1990. Estrategias adaptativas en una comunidad subtropical de anuros. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 1:1-69.
  • Bernarde PS, Anjos L. 1999. Distribuicao espacial e temporal da anurofauna no Parque Estadual Mata dos Godoy, Londrina, Parana, Brasil (AMPHIBIA, ANURA). Comunicacoes do Museu de Ciencias e Tecnologia PUCRS serie Zoologia 12:111-140.
  • Bernarde PS, Machado RA. 2001. Riqueza de especies, ambientes de reproducao e temporada de vocalizacao da anurofauna em Tres Barras do Parana, Brasil (Amphibia: Anura). Cuardernos de Herpetologia 14:93-104.
  • Bertoluci J. 1998. Annual patterns of breeding activity in Atlantic rainforest anurans. Journal of Herpetology 32:607-611.
  • Bertoluci J, Rodrigues MT. 2002a. Seasonal patterns of breeding activity of Atlantic Rainforest anurans at Boraceia, Southeastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia 23:161-167.
  • Bertoluci J, Rodrigues MT. 2002b. Utilizacao de habitats reprodutivos e micro-habitats de vocalizacao em uma taxocenose de anuros (AMPHIBIA) da Mata Atlantica do Sudeste do Brasil. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia 42:287-297.
  • Both C, Kaefer IL, Cechin STZ. 2006. Amphibia, Anura, Aplastodiscus perviridis (Hylidae): range extension for Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil. Check List 2:30-31.
  • Braun PC, Braun CAS. 1980. Lista previa dos anfibios do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia Serie Zoologia 56:121-146.
  • Canelas MAS, Bertoluci J. 2007. Anurans of the Serra do Caraca, southeastern Brazil: species composition and phenological patterns of calling activity. Iheringia Serie Zoologia 97:21-26.
  • Cardoso AJ, Andrade GV, Haddad CFB. 1989. Distribuicao espacial em comunidades de anfibios (Anura) no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 33:329-335.
  • Cardoso AJ, Haddad CFB. 1992. Diversidade e turno de vocalizacoes de anuros em comunidade neotropical. Acta Zoologica Lilloana 41:93-105.
  • Cechin STZ, Giasson LM, Hartmann MA, Santos TG, Boelter R. 2002a. Anfibios. In: Itaqui J, editor. Quarta Colonia: Inventarios tecnicos. Santa Maria: Palloti. p. 201-205.
  • Cechin STZ, Santos TG, Kopp KA, Spies MR, Trevisan R. 2002b. Scinax nasica. Herpetological Review 33:222.
  • Centro de Previsao do Tempo e Clima [Internet], Dados meteorologicos, hidrologicos e ambientais de Plataformas de Coleta de dados, Ministerio da Ciencia e Tecnologia (BR). Cited 2007 Mar 2th. Available from: http://satelite.cptec.inpe.br/PCD/.
  • Collins JP, Wilbur H. 1979. Breeding habits and habitats of the amphibians of the Edwin S. George Reserve, Michigan, with notes on the local distribution of fishes. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan 686:1-34.
  • Colwell RK. 2005. Estimates 7.5.0. Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Copyright Colwell RK. Available from: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.
  • Conte CE, Machado RA. 2005. Riqueza de especies e distribuicao espacial e temporal em comunidade de anuros (Amphibia, Anura) em uma localidade de Tijucas do Sul, Parana, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 22:940-948.
  • Crump ML. 1974. Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran community. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas 61:1-68.
  • Di-Bernardo M, Oliveira RB, Pontes GMF, Melchiors J, Sole M, Kwet A. 2004. Anfibios anuros da regiao de extracao e processamento de carvao de Candiota, RS, Brasil. In: Teixeira EC, editor. Estudos ambientais em Candiota - carvao e seus impactos. 4th ed. Porto Alegre: FINEP/PDACT/CIAMB/FAPERGS/FEPAM. p. 163-175.
  • Duellman WE. 1999. Distribution Patterns of Amphibians in South America. In: Duellman WE, editor. Patterns of distribution of Amphibians: a global perspective. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 255-328.
  • Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1994. Biology of Amphibians. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Esteves FA. 1998. Fundamentos de limnologia. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Interciencia.
  • Eterovick PC, Sazima I. 2000. Structure of an anuran community in a montane meadow in southeastern Brazil: effects of seasonality, habitat, and predation. Amphibia-Reptilia 21:439-461.
  • Feder ME, Burggren WW. 1992. Environmental physiology of the Amphibians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Garcia PCA, Vinciprova G. 2003. Anfibios. In: Fontana CS, Bencke GA, Reis RE, editors. Livro vermelho da fauna ameacada de extincao no Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs. p. 147-164.
  • Gotthard K. 2001. Growth strategies of ectothermic animals in temperate environments. In: Atkinson D, Thornyke M, editors. Environment and animal development. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers. p. 287-304.
  • Gudynas E, Gehrau A. 1981. Notas sobre la distribuicion y ecologia de Limnomedusa macroglossa (Dumeril & Bibron, 1841) en Uruguay (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Iheringia Serie Zoologia 60:81-99.
  • Haddad CFB. 1998. Biodiversidade dos anfibios anuros no Estado de Sao Paulo. In: Castro RMC, editor. Biodiversidade no estado de Sao Paulo: sintese do conhecimento no final do seculo XX, 6: Vertebrados. Sao Paulo: Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo. p. 16-26.
  • Haddad CFB, Prado CPA. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. BioScience 55:207-217.
  • Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2005. PAST - Palaeontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis version1.13. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:9.
  • Hatano FH, Rocha CFD, Sluys MV. 2002. Environmental factors affecting calling activity of a tropical diurnal frog (Hylodes phyllodes: Leptodactylidae). Journal of Herpetology 36:314-318.
  • Hazell D, Cunnningham R, Lindenmayer D, Mackey B, Osborne W. 2001. Use of farm dams as frog habitat in an Australian agricultural landscape: factors affecting species richness and distribution. Biological Conservation 102:155-169.
  • Heyer WR, Mcdiarmid RW, Weigmann DL. 1975. Tadpoles, predation and pond habitats in the tropics. Biotropica 7:100-111.
  • Heyer WR. 1979. Annual variation in larval amphibian populations within a temperate pond. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 69:65-74.
  • Kopp KA, Santos TG, Spies MR, Trevisan R, Cechin STZ. 2002. Hyla albopunctata. Herpetological Review 33:220.
  • Kopp K, Eterovick PC. 2006. Factors influencing spatial and temporal structure of frog assemblages at ponds in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Natural History 40:1813-1830.
  • Kovach WL. 2004. Oriana for Windows, version 2.02. Pentraeth, Wales, UK: Kovach Computer Services.
  • Krebs CJ. 1999. Ecological methodology. Menlo Park, California: Addison Wesley Educational Publishers.
  • Kwet A. 2001. Frosche im brasilianischen Araukarienwald. Anurengemeinschaft des Araukarienwaldes von Rio Grande do Sul: Diversitat, Reproduktion und Ressourcenaufteilung. Munster: Natur und Tier-Verlag.
  • Kwet A, Faivovich J. 2001. Proceratophrys bigibbosa species group, with description of a new species. Copeia 2001:203-215.
  • Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology developments in environmental modelling. New York: Elsevier.
  • Lema T. 1984. Relacoes herpetofaunisticas do Rio Grande do Sul com paises vizinhos. Veritas 29:421-429.
  • Lingnau R, Zank C, Colombo P, Vinciprova G. 2006. Amphibia, Hylidae, Itapotihyla langsdorffii: distribution extension. Check List 2:38-39.
  • Magurran AE. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Maluf JRT. 2000. Nova classificacao climatica do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia 8:141-150.
  • Maneyro R, Langone JA. 2001. Categorizacion de los anfibios del Uruguay. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 15:107-118.
  • Parris KM, McCarthy M. 1999. What influences the structure of frog assemblages at forest streams? Australian Journal of Ecology 24:495-502.
  • Pereira PRB, Netto LRG, Borin CJA, Sartori MGB. 1989. Contribuicao a geografia fisica do municipio de Santa Maria: unidades de paisagem. Geografia - Ensino & Pesquisa 3:37-68.
  • Pombal JPJr. 1997. Distribuicao espacial e temporal de anuros (Amphibia) em uma poca permanente na Serra de Paranapiacaba, sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 57:583-594.
  • Pough FH, Andrews RM, Cadle JE, Crump ML, Savitzky AH, Wells KD. 2001. Reproduction and Life History. In: Herpetology. New Jersey: Princet Hall. p. 228-259.
  • Prado CPA, Uetanabaro M, Haddad CFB. 2005. Breeding activity patterns, reproductive modes, and habitat use by anurans (Amphibia) in a seasonal environment in the Pantanal, Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia 26:211-221.
  • Quadros FLF, Pillar VP. 2002. Transicoes floresta - campo no Rio Grande do Sul. Fitogeografia do Sul da America. Ciencia & Ambiente 24:109-118.
  • Rangel TFLVB, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM. 2006. Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Global Ecology and Biogeography 15:321-327.
  • Rodel M, Ernst R. 2004. Measuring and monitoring amphibian diversity in tropical forests. An evaluation of methods with recommendations for standardization. Ecotropica 10:1-14.
  • Rohlf FJ. 2000. NTSYS 2.1: Numerical Taxonomic and Multivariate Analysis System. New York: Exeter Software.
  • Romesburg HC. 1984. Cluster analysis for researchers. Malabar (Florida): Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, INC.
  • Rossa-Feres DC, Jim J. 2001. Similaridade no sitio de vocalizacao em uma comunidade de anfibios anuros na regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 18:439-454.
  • Ryan PD, Harper DAT, Whalley JS. 1995. PAST: Palaeontological Statistics, ver. 1.13.
  • Saidapur SK, Hoque B. 1995. Effect of photoperiod and temperature on ovarian cycle of the frog Rana tigrina (Daud.). Journal of Bioscience 20:445-452.
  • Santos TG, Kopp K, Spies MR, Trevisan R, Cechin SZ. In press. Distribuicao temporal e espacial de anuros em area de Pampa (Santa Maria, RS). Iheringia Serie Zoologia.
  • Santos TG, Rossa-Feres DC, Casatti L. 2007. Diversidade e distribuicao espaco-temporal de anuros em regiao com pronunciada estacao seca no sudeste do Brasil. Iheringia Serie Zoologia 97:37-49.
  • Scott Jr, Woodward BD. 1994. Standard techniques for inventory and monitoring: surveys at breeding sites. In: Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid R W, Hayek LC, Foster MS, editors. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity, standard methods for amphibians. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. p. 92-96.
  • Segalla MV, Langone JA. 2004. Anfibios. In: Mikich SB, Bernils RS, editors. Livro vermelho da fauna ameacada no estado do Parana [online]. Available: http://www.pr.gov.br/iap via the INTERNET Accessed 2007 Apr 14.
  • Spathelf P, Fleig FD, Vaccaro S, Esber LM. 2000. Analise dendroecologica de Ocotea pulchella Nesse et Mart. ex Ness (Canela lageana) na serra geral de Santa Maria, RS, Brasil. Ciencia Florestal 10:95-108.
  • Vasconcelos TS, Rossa-Feres DC. 2005. Diversidade, distribuicao espacial e temporal de anfibios anuros (Amphibia, Anura) na regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica [serial online]; 5. Available: http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v5n2/ pt/abstract?article+BN01705022005 via the INTERNET Accessed 2007 Aug 16.
  • Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Zimmerman BL. 1994. Standard techniques for inventory and monitoring: audio strip transects. In: Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, Hayek LC, Foster MS, editors. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity, standard methods for amphibians. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. p. 92-96.