Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published August 13, 2013 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Spatial niche variation in two sympatric species of Bokermannohyla (Anura: Hylidae) in southeastern Brazil

Creators

Description

Lima, Nathália Gonçalves da Silva, Lima, Raphael Costa Leite de, Dias, Juan Espanha Moreira, Torres, Priscilla Ferreira, Eterovick, Paula Cabral (2013): Spatial niche variation in two sympatric species of Bokermannohyla (Anura: Hylidae) in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Natural History 48 (3-4): 229-240, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2013.802044, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2013.802044

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFBCFFA0FFFF586BFFC77B68FFE17B63

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5199235 (DOI)

References

  • Afonso LG, Eterovick PC. 2007a. Microhabitat choice and differential use by anurans in forest streams in southeastern Brazil. J Nat Hist. 41:937-948.
  • Afonso LG, Eterovick PC. 2007b. Spatial and temporal distribution of breeding anurans in streams in southeastern Brazil. J Nat Hist. 41:949-963.
  • Ayres M, Ayres-Jr M, Ayres DL, Santos AAS. 2007. BioEstat 5.0-Aplicacoes estatisticas nas areas das Ciencias Biologicas e Medicas. Sociedade Civil Mamiraua/MCT - CNPq, Manaus, Brazil.
  • Bertoluci J, Rodrigues MT. 2002. Seasonal patterns of breeding activity of Atlantic Rainforest anurans at Boraceia, Southeastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia. 23:161-167.
  • Bokermann WCA. 1964. Dos nuevas especies de Hyla de Minas Gerais y notas sobre Hyla alvarengai Bok. (Amphibia, Salientia, Hylidae). Neotropica. 10:67-76.
  • Bokermann WCA, Sazima I. 1973. Anfibios da Serra do Cipo, Minas Gerais, Brasil. 1-Especies novas de Hyla (Anura, Hylidae). Rev Brasil Biol. 33:329-336.
  • Caldwell JP. 1996. The evolution of myrmecophagy and its correlates in poison frogs (Family Dendrobatidae). J Zool. 240:75-101.
  • Crump ML. 1971. Quantitative anlyses of the ecological distribution of a tropical herpetofauna. Univ Kansas Mus Nat Hist Occ Papers. 3:1-62.
  • Derby OA. 1966. The Serra of Espinhaco, Brazil. The Journal of Geology. 14:374-401.
  • Duellman WE. 1999. Patterns of distribution of amphibians. A global perspective. Baltimore (MA): Johns Hopkins University Press. Chapter 1, Global distribution of amphibians: patterns, conservation and future challenges; p. 1-30.
  • Eterovick PC, Lazarotti I, Franco BP, Dias CJ. 2010a. Seasonal variation of tadpole spatial niches in permanent streams: The roles of predation risk and microhabitat availability. Austral Ecol. 35:879-887.
  • Eterovick PC, Rievers CR, Kopp K, Wachlevski M, Franco BP, Dias CJ, Barata IM, Ferreira ADM, Afonso LG. 2010b. Lack of phylogenetic signal in the variation in anuran microhabitat use in southeastern Brazil. Evol Ecol. 24:1-24.
  • Eterovick PC, Sazima I. 2004. Anfibios da Serra do Cipo - Amphibians from the Serra do Cipo. Belo Horizonte (Brazil): Ed. Puc Minas.
  • Faivovich J, Haddad CFB, Garcia PCA, Frost DR, Campbell JA, Wheeler WC. 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bull Amer Mus Nat Hist. 294:1-240.
  • Giulietti AM, Pirani JR. 1988. Proceeding of a workshop on Neotropical distribution patterns. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): Academia Brasileira de Ciencias. Chapter, Patterns of geographic distribution of some plant species from the Espinhaco range, Minas Gerais and Bahia; p. 36-96.
  • Giulietti AM, Pirani JR, Harley RM. 1997. Centres of plant diversity: a guide and strategy for their conservation. Oxford (UK): Information Press. Chapter, Espinhaco range region, eastern Brazil; p. 397-404.
  • Gorman TA, Haas CA. 2011. Seasonal microhabitat selection and use of syntopic populations of Lithobates okaloosae and Lithobates clamitans clamitans. J Herpetol. 45:313-318.
  • Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL. 2001. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7.0. Acquired Intelligence, Inc. and KeseyBear. [cited 2012 Sept 17]. Available from: http:// homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm.
  • Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, Hayek LC, Foster MS. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: Standard methods for amphibians. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.
  • Hunt JJFG, Bonsall MB. 2009. The effects of colonization, extinction and competition on coexistence in metacommunities. J Anim Ecol. 78:866-879.
  • Hutchinson GE. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quantit Biol. 22:415-427.
  • Inger RF, Voris HK, Frogner KJ. 1974. Organization of a community of tadpoles in rain forest streams in Borneo. J Trop Ecol. 2:413-417.
  • Jacobs J. 1974. Quantitative measurement of food selection: a modification of the forage ration and Ivlev´s electivity index. Oecologia. 14:413-417.
  • Kopp K, Wachlevski M, Eterovick PC. 2006. Environmental complexity reduces tadpole predation by water bugs. Can J Zool. 84:136-140.
  • Leite FSF, Junca FA, Eterovick PC. 2008. Status do conhecimento, endemismo e conservacao de anfibios anuros da Cadeia do Espinhaco, Brasil. Megadiversidade. 4:182-200.
  • Leite FSF, Pezzuti TL, Viana PL. 2006. Amphibia, Bokermannohyla nanuzae, Scinax curicica, Leptodactylus camaquara, Physalaemus evangelistai and Proceratophrys cururu: Distribution extensions. Check List. 2:5.
  • Levins R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton Monogr Popul Biol. 2:1-120.
  • Lisicic D, Drakulic S, Herrel A, Dikic D, Benkovic V, Tadic Z. 2012. Effect of competition on habitat utilization in two temperate climate gecko species. Ecol Res. 27:551-560.
  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403:853-845.
  • Nakagawa H, Yamane H, Yasugi M, Fujita T, Yokoi K, Ashiwa H, Kitada N, Takano H, Suzuki N, Kishimoto J, et al. 2012. Diel changes in resource use and diet overlap in temperate stream fishes. Ecol Res. 27:417-426.
  • Napoli MF. 2000. Taxonomia, variacao morfologica e distribuicao geografica das especies do grupo Hyla circumdata (Cope, 1870) (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae) [dissertation]. Rio de Janeiro ( Brazil): Museu Nacional/UFRJ.
  • Napoli M, Feio R. 2006. Bokermannohyla feioi. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.1; [cited 2011 Oct 25]. Available from: www.iucnredlist.org.
  • Oliveira FFR, Eterovick PC. 2010. Patterns of spatial distribution and microhabitat use by syntopic anuran species along permanent lotic ecosystems in the cerrado of southeastern Brazil. Herpetologica. 66:159-171.
  • Parris KM. 2004. Environmental and spatial variables influence the composition of frog assemblages in sub-tropical eastern Australia. Ecography. 27:292-400.
  • Pianka ER. 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 4:53-74.
  • Poindexter CJ, Schnella GD, Sanchez-Hernandez C, Romero-Almaraz ML, Kennedy ML, Best TL, Wooten MC, Owen RD. 2012. Variation in habitat use of coexisting rodent species in a tropical dry deciduous forest. Mamm Biol. 77:249-257.
  • Putman RJ. 1994. Community ecology. London ( UK): Chapman & Hall.
  • Rice WR. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution. 43:223-225.
  • Rice AM, Leichty AR, Pfennig DW. 2009. Parallel evolution and ecological selection: replicated character displacement in spadefoot toads. Proc R Soc B. 276:4189-4196.
  • Rocha CFD, Cogliatti-Carvalho L, Nunes-Freitas AF, Rocha-Pessoa TC, Dias AS, Ariani CV, Morgado LN. 2004. Conservando uma larga porcao de diversidade biologica atraves da conservacao de Bromeliacea. Vidalia. 2:52-68.
  • Schoener TW. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science. 185:27-39.
  • Silva JMC, Bates JM. 2002. Biogeographic patterns and conservation in the South American Cerrado: A tropical savanna hotspot. BioScience. 52:225-233.
  • Strahler AN. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed morphology. Trans Am Geophys Union. 38:913-920.
  • Tabarelli M, Pinto LP, Silva JMC, Hirota MM, Bede LC. 2005. Desafios e oportunidades para a conservacao da biodiversidade na Mata Atlantica brasileira. Megadiversidade. 1:132-138.
  • Viveros RS. 2010. Pteridofitas da Serra do Caraca, Minas Gerais, Brasil [thesis]. Belo Horizonte (Brazil): Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
  • Wachlevski M, Souza PHC, Kopp K, Eterovick PC. 2008. Microhabitat use and feeding habits of Crossodactylus bokermanni Caramaschi and Sazima, 1985 (Anura, Hylodidae) at a site in south- eastern Brazil. J Nat Hist. 42:1421-1434.
  • Warkentin KM. 1992. Microhabitat use and feeding rate variation in Green frog tadpoles (Rana clamitans). Copeia. 3:731-740.
  • Yamada K, Kumagai NH. 2012. Importance of seagrass vegetation for habitat partitioning between closely related species, mobile macrofauna Neomysis (Misidacea). Hydrobiologia. 680:125-133.
  • Zimmerman BL, Simberloff D. 1996. An historical interpretation of habitat use by frogs in a Central Amazonian Forest. J Biogeogr. 23:27-46.

This site uses cookies. Find out more on how we use cookies