Published May 28, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Climatic niche shifts in 815 introduced plant species affect their predicted distributions: Data and scripts

  • 1. Earlham College
  • 2. Virginia Tech

Description

Aim: Introduced species often occupy different climates in their introduced than their native range, but to what degree do such 'climatic niche shifts' interfere with our ability to predict invasions? Answering this question is crucial if we are to understand the threat invasive species pose to human and natural systems, especially given the ever increasing use of species distribution models as tools for invasive species risk assessment and management. Here we investigated how strongly climatic niche shifts interfered with the transferability of native- and introduced-range species distribution models.

Location: Our dataset consisted of ~14 million occurrences distributed worldwide.

Time Period: Occurrence data were collected from online repositories dating from ca. 1600 with the vast majority being from the 20th century. Climatic data represent means between 1970–2000.

Major Taxa Studied: Our database represented 815 terrestrial plant species.

Methods: We used ordination to identify climatic niche shifts as species moved between continents. Next, we trained separate MAXENT models using native- or introduced-range occurrences, and projected those models into each species' introduced range. We compared the ordination and MAXENT models to determine whether niche shifts were associated with errors in MAXENT predictions.

Results: Models trained on native-range occurrences poorly predicted introduced-range occurrences, and transferability was lowest in species with large climatic niche shifts. Directional shifts in species' predicted geographic distributions mirrored their niche dynamics. This is concerning because native-range data are often used to predict introduced-range distributions.

Main Conclusions: Our results highlight the importance of considering niche shifts when modeling the potential geographic distributions of introduced species, and cast doubt on the assumption that the climatic niche of a species can be transferred between native and invasive ranges.

Notes

Scripts can be executed sequentially. Users will need to ensure that documents are in the correct folders, following instructions given in the R scripts.

Funding provided by: U.S. Department of Agriculture
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000199
Award Number: 2013-67013-21306

Funding provided by: National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005825
Award Number: 2015-68004-23492

Files

025-MAXENT-Evals.csv

Files (2.2 GB)

Name Size Download all
md5:355e0196076dcd99e5d7efc9fd5f06c4
9.0 MB Preview Download
md5:fa69bbb6f7f5092771cfb939e5c04e41
1.8 GB Preview Download
md5:df1e9f918823bcef450ca37a7d744b56
164.9 kB Preview Download
md5:e82793c4af059b2b308bfa02b5ec94df
99 Bytes Preview Download
md5:549052dfbc1812018a2ac8b245b77695
8.4 MB Preview Download
md5:063fc46ebfbb381a26f18f10d00d6f76
11.9 MB Preview Download
md5:e8e81fc1649e8cd18bc64ded214a601f
299.1 kB Preview Download
md5:74cfc7b23448b9d94df23d883dae6188
885.4 kB Preview Download
md5:e124524f0414065d308268d6674b842b
450.1 kB Preview Download
md5:df5d30f9bd98e634c0663319fa3c6a73
1.8 MB Preview Download
md5:600bd5eb95b272d0e7dc37b9930dfbeb
4.2 MB Preview Download
md5:9f836479d0c4a9d1b15baadc5b8f85d8
413.5 kB Preview Download
md5:088c93ad144b3561eb808049f75b00ad
9.2 kB Download
md5:81e3fbbd6ecbf3c59aec94095e0abbfc
6.2 kB Download
md5:02297da13ec2ddc9c115a738e9bb4fa5
2.7 kB Download
md5:8347706ebc54e4f6a5fe1e003a617cb2
12.9 kB Download
md5:6303f5036034f1dddba968f5535f3b66
88.8 kB Download
md5:54a95277c56e2fdae9753720b6e59139
87.3 MB Preview Download
md5:a3da5d0f48bdb6cd87c2d65b2d7ba122
88.2 MB Preview Download
md5:2b15cc400815761c773393db582b1a46
87.7 MB Preview Download
md5:30741fe433998dff87dd24ec717462b9
88.8 MB Preview Download