Data and Code for: Drivers of seedling establishment success in dryland restoration efforts
Creators
-
Nancy Shackelford
-
Gustavo Brant Paterno
- Daniel E. Winkler
- Todd E. Erickson
- Elizabeth A. Leger
- Lauren N. Svejcar
- Martin F. Breed
- Akasha M. Faist
- Peter A. Harrison1
- Michael F. Curran
- Qinfeng Guo
- Anita Kirmer
- Darin J. Law
- Kevin Z. Mganga
- Seth M. Munson
- Lauren M. Porensky
- R. Emiliano Quiroga2
- Péter Török2
- Claire E. Wainwright
- Ali Abdullahi
- Matt A. Bahm
- Elizabeth A. Ballenger
- Nichole Barger
- Owen W. Baughman
- Carina Becker
- Manuel Esteban Lucas Borja
- Chad S. Boyd
- Carla M. Burton
- hilip J. Burton
- Eman Calleja
- Peter J. Carrick
- Alex Caruana
- Charlie D. Clements
- Kirk W. Davies
- Balázs Deák
- Jessica Drake
- Sandra Dullau
- Joshua Eldridge
- Erin Espeland
- Hannah L. Farrell
- Stephen E. Fick
- Magda Garbowski
- Enrique G. de la Riva
- Peter J. Golos
- Penelope A. Grey
- Barry Heydenrych
- Patricia M. Holmes
- Jeremy J. James
- Jayne Jonas-Bratten
- Réka Kiss
- Andrea T. Kramer
- Julie E. Larson
- Juan Lorite
- C. Ellery Mayence
- Luis Merino-Martin
- Tamás Miglécz
- uanne Jane Milton
- Thomas A. Monaco
- Arlee M. Montalvo
- Jose A. Navarro-Cano
- Mark W. Paschke
- Pablo Luis Peri
- Monica L. Pokorny
- Matthew J. Rinella
- Nelmarie Saayman
- Merilynn C. Schantz
- Tina Schroeder
- Eric W. Seabloom
- Katharine L. Stuble
- Shauna M. Uselman
- Orsolya Valkó
- Kari Veblen
- Scott Wilson
- Megan Wong
- Zhiwei Xu
- Katharine L. Suding
Description
Code and Raw data for:
Drivers of seedling establishment success in dryland restoration efforts
Restoration of degraded drylands is urgently needed to mitigate climate change, reverse desertification, and secure livelihoods for the two billion people who live in these areas. Bold global targets have been set for dryland restoration to restore millions of hectares of degraded land. These targets have been questioned as overly ambitious, but without a global evaluation of successes and failures, it is impossible to gauge feasibility. Here, we examine restoration seeding outcomes across 174 sites on six continents, encompassing 594,065 observations of 671 plant species. Our findings suggest reason for optimism. Seeding had a positive impact on species presence: in almost a third of all treatments, 100% of species seeded were growing at first monitoring. However, dryland restoration is risky: 17% of projects failed, with no establishment of any seeded species, and consistent declines were found in seeded species as projects matured. Across projects, higher seeding rates and larger seed sizes resulted in a greater probability of recruitment, with further influences of site aridity, taxonomic identity, and species lifeform on species success. Our findings suggest that investigations examining these predictive factors will yield more effective and informed restoration decision-making.
Files
paternogbc/ms_global_dryland-restoration-v1.1.0.zip
Files
(13.1 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:24f07a3b5c54f410db7ca9fa73fabd7b
|
13.1 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is supplement to
- https://github.com/paternogbc/ms_global_dryland-restoration/tree/v1.1.0 (URL)