Published February 11, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Ecological impacts of pesticide seed treatments on arthropod communities in a grain crop rotation

  • 1. University of Maryland, College Park
  • 2. University of Maryland University College

Description

1. While many studies have investigated non-target impacts of neonicotinoid seed treatments (NSTs), they usually take place within a single crop and focus on specific pest or beneficial arthropod taxa.

2. We compared the impacts of three seed treatments to an untreated control: imidacloprid + fungicide products, thiamethoxam + fungicide products, and fungicide products alone in a three-year crop rotation of full-season soybean, winter wheat, double-cropped soybean and maize. Specifically, we quantified neonicotinoid residues in the soil and in weedy winter annual flower buds and examined treatment impacts on soil and foliar arthropod communities as well as on plant growth and yield.

3. Unquantifiably low amounts of insecticide were found in winter annual flowers of one species in one site year, which did not correspond with our treatments. Although low levels of insecticide residues were present in the soil, residues were not persistent. Residues were highest in the final year of the study, suggesting some accumulation.

4. We observed variable impacts of NSTs on the arthropod community; principle response curve and redundancy analyses exhibited occasional treatment effects, with treatments impacting the abundance of various taxa, including predators and parasitoids. Overall, foliar taxa were impacted more than soil taxa, and the fungicides occasionally effected communities and individual taxa.

5. Pest pressure was low throughout the study, and although pest numbers were reduced by the insecticides, corresponding increases in yield were not observed.

6. Synthesis and applications. Pesticide seed treatments can impact arthropod taxa, including important natural enemies even when environmental persistence and active ingredient concentrations are low. The foliar community in winter wheat showed that in some cases, these impacts can last for several months after planting. Given the low pest pressure and lack of yield improvement in full-season and double-cropped soybean, winter wheat, and maize, we did not observe benefits that could justify the risks associated with neonicotinoid seed treatment (NST) use. Our results suggest that NSTs are not warranted in Maryland grain production, outside of specific instances of high pest pressure.

Notes

All information needed to use this dataset is included within the metadata tabs of individuals files. Raw arthropod data for pitfall traps, litter extraction, sticky cards and sweep net samples was collected using a system of plot numbers and numeric taxon codes, both of which are detailed within the individual data files. The raw arthropod data was formatted for analysis using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The code used to format the data is included in a separate file titled 'SAS Code for Formatting Raw Arthropod Data' along with detailed notes on how to use it for the different data sets. The formatted data sets are also included as separate files.

Funding provided by: U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Hatch/Multistate funds)
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number: project no. MD-ENTM648 8887/project accession no. 1009567 and project no. MD-ENTO-9589/project accession no. 649 1012455

Funding provided by: U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (North East SARE program)
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (North East SARE program)
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number: sub-award number 651 GNE16- 11B-29994

Funding provided by: U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Crop Protection and Pest Management Program)
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Crop Protection and Pest Management Program)
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number: grant no. 2017-70006-27171/project accession no. 655 1013913

Funding provided by: Maryland Grain Producers Utilization Board
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Maryland Soybean Board
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Files

Files (3.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:853b079a4563653dc3b7c9cd3785bdf0
202.5 kB Download
md5:8fd8caeb5659d31c9de02f8dca3f8eed
373.5 kB Download
md5:54e0bfcdeab0542c4e1bc1f3ad6ce3cc
468.1 kB Download
md5:855de12f628464e3c45aeec76d16945d
159.2 kB Download
md5:43edf2ff2d8200ae07fddf407fb4c970
488.6 kB Download
md5:1fff772132be34780635dd90a5201319
108.5 kB Download
md5:c009ea458b204f65ba199fc80ee5150d
64.2 kB Download
md5:a69b73ec71ad991981262419a6863615
56.6 kB Download
md5:57372e73dbd8105fde067ed8029d09de
169.6 kB Download
md5:e6ee727d30af1ebbb40ecc37825453b9
495.3 kB Download
md5:1cda322156407eda728904020539d671
69.6 kB Download
md5:5fda7e3ee075e0947aad24f99694085a
79.1 kB Download
md5:e633d419f9a821f398b31ceaeaa56ffb
26.7 kB Download
md5:ee921e8c68815ba63fd258cb3a265bff
128.6 kB Download
md5:b78dff91051e5dc71d16c3eabd7b9f63
171.0 kB Download
md5:293b07a77444151accc2b28f8563b257
55.8 kB Download