Published April 17, 2017 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: Vegetation response to control of invasive Tamarix in southwestern US rivers: a collaborative study including 416 sites

  • 1. University of Toulouse
  • 2. University of Denver
  • 3. Bureau of Land Management
  • 4. Université Laval
  • 5. Colorado State University
  • 6. Rim to Rim Restoration; P.O. Box 297 Moab Utah 84532 USA*
  • 7. University of New Mexico
  • 8. Colorado Mesa University
  • 9. National Park Service
  • 10. Grand Canyon National Park; 1824 S, Thompson Street, Suite 200 Flagstaff Arizona 86001 USA*
  • 11. United States Geological Survey
  • 12. Grand County Weed Department; 125 East Center Street Moab Utah 84532 USA*

Description

Most studies assessing vegetation response following control of invasive Tamarix trees along southwestern U.S. rivers have been small in scale (e.g., river reach), or at a regional scale but with poor spatial-temporal replication, and most have not included testing the effects of a now widely-used biological control. We monitored plant composition following Tamarix control along hydrologic, soil and climatic gradients in 244 treated and 172 reference sites across six U.S. States. This represents the largest comprehensive assessment to date on the vegetation response to the four most common Tamarix control treatments. Biocontrol by a defoliating beetle (treatment #1) reduced the abundance of Tamarix less than active removal by mechanically using hand and chain-saws (#2), heavy machinery (#3) or burning (#4). Tamarix abundance also decreased with lower temperatures, higher precipitation, and follow-up treatments for Tamarix resprouting. Native cover generally increased over time in active Tamarix removal sites, however, the increases observed were small and was not consistently increased by active revegetation. Overall, native cover was correlated to permanent stream flow, lower grazing pressure, lower soil salinity and temperatures, and higher precipitation. Species diversity also increased where Tamarix was removed. However, Tamarix treatments, especially those generating the highest disturbance (burning and heavy machinery), also often promoted secondary invasions of exotic forbs. The abundance of hydrophytic species was much lower in treated than in reference sites, suggesting that management of southwestern U.S. rivers has focused too much on weed control, overlooking restoration of fluvial processes that provide habitat for hydrophytic and floodplain vegetation. These results can help inform future management of Tamarix-infested rivers to restore hydrogeomorphic processes, increase native biodiversity and reduce abundance of noxious species.

Notes

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: 1617463

Files

Files (1.9 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bbbcacda22596429de94893084e98236
1.9 MB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1002/eap.1566 (DOI)