Published March 5, 2013 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: Scale-dependent shifts in the species composition of flower visitors with changing floral density

  • 1. University of California, Davis

Description

Responses of flower-visiting animals to floral density can alter interactions between plants, influencing a variety of biological processes, including plant population dynamics and the evolution of flowering phenology. Many studies have found effects of floral or plant density on pollinator visitation rates at patch scales, but little is known about responses of flower visitors to floral densities at larger scales. Here, I present data from an observational field study in which I measured the effects of floral density on visitation to the annual composite Holocarpha virgata at both patch (4 m(2)) and site (12.6 ha) spatial scales. The species composition of flower visitors changed with floral density, and did so in different ways at the two scales. At the site scale, average floral density within patches of H. virgata or within patches of all summer-flowering species combined had a significant positive effect on per-flowerhead visitation by the long-horned bee Melissodes lupina and no significant effects on visitation by any other taxa. At the patch scale, per-flowerhead visitation by honeybees significantly increased whereas visitation by M. lupina often decreased with increasing floral density. For both species, responses to patch-scale floral density were strongest when site-scale floral density was high. The scale-dependence of flower visitor responses to floral density and the interactions between site- and patch-scale effects of floral density observed in this study underscore the importance of improving our understanding of pollinators' responses to floral density at population scales.

Notes

Files

BodySize.csv

Files (227.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b98ec847741d47631cf0a8f5bb25d03f
1.4 kB Preview Download
md5:b0d18b9a4e2b837d7401670e40c6eba9
76.4 kB Preview Download
md5:d09441ed10eec56c66bcfe756429cd6b
9.6 kB Preview Download
md5:2a36c0d46a9b9b52b4a370ef5696e1b6
1.4 kB Preview Download
md5:0ba90e570816a0df1b1f641ad603311d
1.9 kB Preview Download
md5:926a1803b4de62905f1f7c88038e479c
7.2 kB Preview Download
md5:b2086fb049f53f51f4dd47ba2ce78ace
8.7 kB Preview Download
md5:b2086fb049f53f51f4dd47ba2ce78ace
8.7 kB Preview Download
md5:b2086fb049f53f51f4dd47ba2ce78ace
8.7 kB Preview Download
md5:b2086fb049f53f51f4dd47ba2ce78ace
8.7 kB Preview Download
md5:b2086fb049f53f51f4dd47ba2ce78ace
8.7 kB Preview Download
md5:b2086fb049f53f51f4dd47ba2ce78ace
8.7 kB Preview Download
md5:b2086fb049f53f51f4dd47ba2ce78ace
8.7 kB Preview Download
md5:b2086fb049f53f51f4dd47ba2ce78ace
8.7 kB Preview Download
md5:34f092130e68fd29ab3a8d9948d01a72
8.9 kB Preview Download
md5:63eb05754158407aa634a8af16de47c5
37.4 kB Preview Download
md5:f121eefab5345ca5eccfc9a83a9b9632
337 Bytes Preview Download
md5:e9e2f3ab66664a1d3a3f36acbd9a91ff
12.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1007/s00442-012-2391-z (DOI)