Published December 1, 2018 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: A persistent lack of international representation on editorial boards in environmental biology

Description

The scholars comprising journal editorial boards play a critical role in defining the trajectory of knowledge in their field. Nevertheless, studies of editorial board composition remain rare, especially those focusing on journals publishing research in the increasingly globalized fields of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Using metrics for quantifying the diversity of ecological communities, we quantified international representation on the 1985–2014 editorial boards of 24 environmental biology journals. Over the course of 3 decades, there were 3,827 unique scientists based in 70 countries who served as editors. The size of the editorial community increased over time—the number of editors serving in 2014 was 4-fold greater than in 1985—as did the number of countries in which editors were based. Nevertheless, editors based outside the "Global North" (the group of economically developed countries with high per capita gross domestic product [GDP] that collectively concentrate most global wealth) were extremely rare. Furthermore, 67.18% of all editors were based in either the United States or the United Kingdom. Consequently, geographic diversity—already low in 1985—remained unchanged through 2014. We argue that this limited geographic diversity can detrimentally affect the creativity of scholarship published in journals, the progress and direction of research, the composition of the STEM workforce, and the development of science in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and much of Asia (i.e., the "Global South").

Notes

Files

AuthorCountries_1985_2014.csv

Files (2.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6401b546c36a37346c36fb8352618a4e
112.1 kB Preview Download
md5:2dad1be19e8f1061239802b0f6f15013
2.1 MB Preview Download
md5:0c4b802cb5e28caf58741bb6aefd1eb1
2.4 kB Preview Download
md5:40f75bcbf739c20fa25609f0d90918db
374 Bytes Preview Download
md5:b82f26dcb2549793f3b019ea9edd8e8f
534 Bytes Preview Download
md5:26aa6e6a5049d1eae51599c816b99df5
19.7 kB Download
md5:c0536b60fb05c9e8eaef826c952193cd
23.5 kB Download
md5:0899aa34ebacb96457d79ad0f6ce819d
20.5 kB Download
md5:0899aa34ebacb96457d79ad0f6ce819d
20.5 kB Download
md5:0899aa34ebacb96457d79ad0f6ce819d
20.5 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1371/journal.pbio.2002760 (DOI)
Is derived from
10.5281/zenodo.1067800 (DOI)