Published February 5, 2019
| Version v1
Dataset
Open
Data from: Drivers of vegetative dormancy across herbaceous perennial plant species
Authors/Creators
- Shefferson, Richard P.1
- Kull, Tiiu2
- Hutchings, Michael J.3
- Selosse, Marc-André4
- Jacquemyn, Hans5
- Kellett, Kimberly M.6
- Menges, Eric S.7
- Primack, Richard B.8
- Tuomi, Juha9
- Alahuhta, Kirsi5
- Hurskainen, Sonja5
- Alexander, Helen M.10
- Anderson, Derek S.11
- Brys, Rein12
- Brzosko, Emilia13
- Dostálik, Slavomir14
- Gregg, Katharine15
- Ipser, Zdeněk16
- Jäkäläniemi, Anne5
- Jersáková, Jana16
- Kettle, W. Dean10
- McCormick, Melissa K.17
- Mendoza, Ana18
- Miller, Michael T.2
- Moen, Asbjørn19
- Øien, Dag-Inge19
- Püttsepp, Ülle2
- Roy, Mélanie20
- Sather, Nancy11
- Sletvold, Nina18
- Štípková, Zuzana2
- Tali, Kadri2
- Warren II, Robert J.21
- Whigham, Dennis F.17
- 1. University of Tokyo
- 2. Estonian University of Life Sciences
- 3. University of Sussex
- 4. Sorbonne University
- 5. University of Oulu
- 6. University of Georgia
- 7. Norwegian University of Science and Technology
- 8. Boston University
- 9. University of Turku
- 10. University of Kansas
- 11. Department of Natural Resources
- 12. Research Institute for Nature and Forest
- 13. Bialystok University of Technology
- 14. Daskabát Olomouc Czech Republic*
- 15. West Virginia Wesleyan College
- 16. University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
- 17. Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
- 18. Uppsala University
- 19. National Taiwan Normal University
- 20. Paul Sabatier University
- 21. State University of New York
Description
Vegetative dormancy, that is the temporary absence of aboveground growth for ≥ 1 year, is paradoxical, because plants cannot photosynthesise or flower during dormant periods. We test ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for its widespread persistence. We show that dormancy has evolved numerous times. Most species displaying dormancy exhibit life‐history costs of sprouting, and of dormancy. Short‐lived and mycoheterotrophic species have higher proportions of dormant plants than long‐lived species and species with other nutritional modes. Foliage loss is associated with higher future dormancy levels, suggesting that carbon limitation promotes dormancy. Maximum dormancy duration is shorter under higher precipitation and at higher latitudes, the latter suggesting an important role for competition or herbivory. Study length affects estimates of some demographic parameters. Our results identify life historical and environmental drivers of dormancy. We also highlight the evolutionary importance of the little understood costs of sprouting and growth, latitudinal stress gradients and mixed nutritional modes.
Notes
Files
Files
(81.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:154eb755a31bf5f8d2436ce301471c4d
|
81.4 kB | Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is cited by
- 10.1111/ele.12940 (DOI)