Published April 8, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Comparative phylogenetics of Papilio butterfly wing shape and size demonstrates independent hindwing and forewing evolution

  • 1. University of Copenhagen
  • 2. Burman University
  • 3. Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier
  • 4. University of Florida

Description

The complex forces that shape butterfly wings have long been a subject of experimental and comparative research. Butterflies use their wings for flight, camouflage, mate recognition, warning and mimicry. However, general patterns and correlations among wing shape and size evolution are still poorly understood. We collected geometric morphometric measurements from over 1400 digitized museum specimens of Papilio swallowtails and combined them with phylogenetic data to test two hypotheses: 1) forewing shape and size evolve independently of hindwing shape and size, and 2) wing size evolves more quickly than wing shape. We also determined the major axes of wing shape variation and discovered that most shape variability occurs in hindwing tails and adjacent areas. We conclude that forewing shape and size are functionally and biomechanically constrained, while hindwings are more labile, perhaps in response to disruptive selective pressure for Batesian mimicry or against predation. The development of a significant, re-usable, digitized data resource will enable further investigation on tradeoffs between flight performance and ecological selective pressures, along with the degree to which intraspecific, local-scale selection may explain macroevolutionary patterns.

Notes

As a caveat, please note that at each of the four instutions where specimens were imaged, a different camera lens was used (see Methods section). We did not correct for possible lens-based image distortion. We considered lens-based distortion of images to likely be very minor for this study because 1) the specimens are centered in the images, and 2) there is quite a bit of space between the specimen and the edge of the image (as we include color standards and all labels associated with the specimen in each image). Further, variance introduced by this distortion is likely minimal compared to variance between species. If our data were to be used for analyses at the intraspecies level in the future, as we hope they will, lens corrections will likely be necessary.

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: DEB 1523732

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: DEB 1557007

Funding provided by: Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001665
Award Number: ANR-10-LABX-25-01

Files

AMNHSpecimenImages.zip

Files (5.8 GB)

Name Size Download all
md5:05878ad12cb5649db7a8d78481d104ff
5.8 GB Preview Download
md5:03c0a68bdee56e503f440bd403574c4c
189.1 kB Preview Download
md5:04d556b809ad6c9a43207d6ec64196fb
63.5 kB Download
md5:683c888c95bf1cd903c6a9b5778f8ad2
2.7 MB Preview Download
md5:eaa35faf67df0c3743daf6388a644ef2
7.7 kB Download
md5:adb682b6c0144bb2d1f2c6d4850d57dd
232.6 kB Preview Download