Published January 9, 2016 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Multi-Site Fat-Water Phantom MRI Data

  • 1. University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • 2. Johns Hopkins University
  • 3. Vanderbilt University
  • 4. University of California, San Diego
  • 5. Siemens Healthcare, Baltimore, MD
  • 6. Duke University
  • 7. Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
  • 8. University of Texas - Southwestern

Description

Dataset description: Accompanying data for manuscript “Multi-Site,

Multi-Vendor Validation of the Accuracy and Reproducibility of

Proton-Density Fat-Fraction Quantification at 1.5T and 3T using a

Fat-Water Phantom”, submitted for publication in Magnetic Resonance in

Medicine in January 2016.

 

Details: The 'datasets' folder contains multiple MATLAB MAT-files

files with chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI data for validation of fat

quantification techniques in a fat-water phantom. Data was acquired at

six sites with different MRI vendors, two field strengths (1.5T and

3T) per site, and two protocols per field strength. The goal of these

techniques is to measure proton-density fat-fraction (PDFF) accurately

and reproducibly. Data from site 1 was acquired both at the beginning

(October 2014) and at the end (December 2015) of this study, in order

to evaluate the integrity of the phantom. 

 

Details on the vendors, platforms and protocols are described in the

file 'vendors_platforms_protocols.pdf' in this same folder.

 

The phantom consists of 11 vials with different fat concentrations

(PDFF = 0%, 2.6%, 5.3%, 7.9%, 10.5%, 15.7%, 20.9%, 31.2%, 20.9%,

31.2%, 41.3%, 51.4% and 100%, respectively). At each magnet, the vials

were arranged horizontally along the B0 field and scanned with axial

slices using a 3D multi-echo spoiled gradient echo pulse sequence.

 

Each of the MAT-files contains the acquired complex-valued images over

the three central slices within the phantom vials. The structure

'imDataAll' contains the acquired data, with the following fields:

'TE' (echo times), 'FieldStrength' (in Tesla), 'PrecessionIsClockwise'

(describing whether water has higher resonance frequency than fat

according to the reconstruction convention), 'echo_polarity' (relative

polarity of the acquired echoes, ie: monopolar vs bipolar readouts),

'images' (five-dimensional array containing the complex valued images,

coil-combined in datasets received with multiple channels, with

dimensions X x Y x Slices x Coils x Echoes).

 

Additionally, the MAT-files contain reconstruction results as

described in the manuscript, in the arrays 'fwmc_*' of size X x Y x

Slices. Note that the nomenclature 'fwmc' stands for 'Fat-Water

separated with Magnitude fitting (performed after complex fitting in

order to obtain full 0-100% range of PDFF while avoiding errors

related to phase shifts in the data), and a Common initial phase for

the water and fat signals. The specific arrays are 'fwmc_ff' (PDFF

map), 'fwmc_r2star' (R2*=1/T2* decay rate), 'fwmc_w' (water image),

'fwmc_f' (fat image).

Files

PDFF_Phantom_Data.zip

Files (183.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ec076addb3c8b5ad615a8e7bb0d98792
183.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
DOI 10.1002/mrm.26228 (Handle)