Published November 19, 2018 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Hydropotes Swinhoe 1870

Description

Genus Hydropotes Swinhoe, 1870

Both male and female Hydropotes have a different antlerless morphology from other cervids. Gentry and Hooker (1988) proposed consigning this genus to a separate family. Randi et al. (1998) identified Capreolus by mtDNA analysis as the closest taxa to Hydropotes and advocated placing Hydropotes in the Subfamily Capreolinae. We follow Grubb (2005) and classified the genus in Hydropotinae.

Notes

Published as part of Jo, Yeong-Seok, Baccus, John T. & Koprowski, John L., 2018, Mammals of Korea: a review of their taxonomy, distribution and conservation status, pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 4522 (1) on page 105, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4522.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/2610198

Files

Files (801 Bytes)

Name Size Download all
md5:f944a09a311231816fba3c14c26dcf33
801 Bytes Download

System files (7.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:88d531265283def614d5894270fd1dc4
7.4 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Swinhoe
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Chordata
Order
Artiodactyla
Family
Cervidae
Genus
Hydropotes
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Hydropotes Swinhoe, 1870 sec. Jo, Baccus & Koprowski, 2018

References

  • Swinhoe, R. (1870) On a new deer from China. Anthenaeum, 2208, 264.
  • Gentry, A. & Hooker, J. (1988) The phylogeny of the Artiodactyla. In: Benton, M. (Ed.), The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods. Fol. 2. Mammals. Clarendon, Oxford, pp. 235 - 272.
  • Randi, E., Mucci, N., Pierpaoli, M. & Douzery, E. (1998) New phylogenetic perspectives on the Cervidae (Artiodactyla) are provided by the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265, 793 - 801. https: // doi. org / 10.1098 / rspb. 1998.0362
  • Grubb, P. (2005) Order Artiodactyla. In: Wilson, D. E. & Reeder D. M. (Eds.), Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. 3 rd Edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 637 - 722.