Published November 19, 2018 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Myotis sibiricus

Description

Myotis sibiricus (Kastshenko, 1905) —Siberian Myotis

Ƒespertilio brandtii Eversmann, 1845 p.505; Type locality- Ural, Russia.

Ƒ. mystacinus sibiricus Kastshenko, 1905 p.25; Type locality- Tomsk, Russia.

Myotis mystacinus: Thomas, 1907a p.404 (Sakhalin, Russia); Ellerman & Morrison-Scott, 1951 p.138; Won, 1968 p.93; Corbet, 1978 p.47; Son, 2001 p.98; Yoon, 2004 p.53; Yoon, 2010 p.23.

M. mystacinus gracilis Ognev, 1927 p.145; Type locality- Vladivostok, Russia; Kuroda, 1938 p.95; Ellerman & Morrison-Scott, 1951 p.140; Won, 1967 p.311; Won, 1968 p.94; Yoon, 1992 p.35; Yoon, 2010 p.23.

M. gracilis: Won, 1958 p.454.

M. brandtii: Han, 1994 p.45; Won & Smith, 1999 p.13; Jo et al., 2012 p.251.

M. sibiricus: Kruskop et al., 2012 p.1 (Asia).

M. (Aeorestes) sibirica: Kruskop, 2012 p.99 (Korea).

Range: The distribution of this common species covers the Korean Peninsula and Jeju Island (Yoon 2010; Fig. 29).

Remarks: Korean populations were regarded as M. mystacinus gracilis Ognev, 1927 (Won 1967). Although Yoshiyuki (1989) classified the subspecies as a distinct species, M. gracilis, Koopman (1993) treated M. gracilis as a synonym of M. brandtii. Then, Yoon (2010) assigned Korean populations of this species to M. mystacinus gracilis based on size and morphology of the teeth. However, the range of M. mystacinus is restricted to western Eurasia (Hutson et al. 2008) and DNA analysis supported a distribution of M. brandtii in eastern Asia (Kawai et al. 2003). Therefore, Korean subspecies of Siberian myotis subsumed to M. brandtii with two known subspecies, M. brandtii brandtii in Europe, Caucasus and western Siberia and M. b. gracilis in central and eastern Siberia, Mongolia, Korea, Manchuria, and Japan (Benda & Tsytsulina 2000; Tsytsulina 2001). Based on the dorsal profile of skull and morphology of the protoconules of premolar, Yoshiyuki (1989) elevated gracilis to a distinct species, and Horáček et al. (2000) provisionally kept gracilis as a species. Also, Kawai et al. (2006) supported the species M. gracilis because of great genetic distances (0.103 –0.107) between M. brandtii from Europe and M. b. gracilis from Hokkaido, Japan. DNA analysis indicated that M. mystacinus and M. ikonnikovi as Old World Myotis, and both M. brandtii and M. b. gracilis as New World Myotis grouping with American Myotis spp. (Stadelmann et al. 2007). Kruskop et al. (2012) also supported a distinct species from eastern Asia based on molecular markers, but they gave priority to the first name M. sibiricus (Kastshenko, 1905) from Tomsk in central Siberia over M. gracilis from Vladivostok in Russian Far East, which is followed here.

Notes

Published as part of Jo, Yeong-Seok, Baccus, John T. & Koprowski, John L., 2018, Mammals of Korea: a review of their taxonomy, distribution and conservation status, pp. 1-216 in Zootaxa 4522 (1) on pages 48-49, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4522.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/2610198

Files

Files (3.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4735cf369aa87ae4db74f0c255ff9ffc
3.4 kB Download

System files (37.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2978fdad85d77943a716ee59d348ad91
37.7 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Vespertilionidae
Genus
Myotis
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Chiroptera
Phylum
Chordata
Scientific name authorship
Kastshenko
Species
sibiricus
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Myotis sibiricus (Kastshenko, 1905) sec. Jo, Baccus & Koprowski, 2018

References

  • Kastshenko, N. F. (1905) A review of mammals of Western Siberia and Turkestan. Part 1. Chiroptera and Insectivora, M. N. Kononov Printing House, Tomsk, 107 pp. [in Russian]
  • Eversmann, A. D. E. (1845) Vespertiliones in Promontoriis Uralensibus Tractibusque: Confinibus Observati. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists, 18, 489 - 516. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 86316
  • Thomas, O. (1907 a) The Duke of Bedford's Zoological Exploration in Eastern Asia. - IV. List of mammals from Island of Saghalien and Hokkaido. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 77, 404 - 414. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.1907. tb 01825. x
  • Ellerman, J. R. & Morrison-Scott, T. C. S. (1951) Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals 1758 to 1946. British Museum (Natural History), London, 810 pp.
  • Won, H. K. (1968) The mammals of Korea. Institute of Science Press, Pyeongyang, 408 pp. [in Korean]
  • Corbet, G. B. (1978) The mammals of the Palaearctic region: a taxonomic review. British Museum (Natural History), London, 314 pp.
  • Son, S. W. (2001) Ji-sung natural history series. Fol. 3. Bats. Ji-Sung Publishing, Seoul, 164 pp. [in Korean]
  • Yoon, M. H. (2004) Order Chiroptera. In: Won, B. O. (Ed.), The mammals of Korea. Dongbang Media Press, Seoul, pp. 36 - 94. [in Korean]
  • Yoon, M. H. (2010) Fertebrate Fauna of Korea. Fol. 5. No. 1 (Chordata: Fertebrata: Mammalia: Theria: Chiroptera) Bats. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, 123 pp.
  • Ognev, S. I. (1927) A synopsis of the Russian Bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 8, 140 - 157. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 1373648
  • Kuroda, N. (1938) A list of the Japanese Mammals. Published by Author, Tokyo, 122 pp.
  • Won, P. H. (1967) Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna and flora of Korea. Fol. 7. Mammals. Ministry of Education, Seoul, 663 pp. [in Korean]
  • Yoon, M. H. (1992) The wildlife of Korea. Daewonsa Publishing Company, Seoul, 142 pp. [in Korean]
  • Won, P. H. (1958) A hand list of Korean mammals. Bulletin of Kyung-Hee University, 1, 427 - 460.
  • Han, S. H. (1994) The checklist of Mammals in North Korea. Nature Conservation, 86, 44 - 50. [in Korean]
  • Won, C. M. & Smith, K. G. (1999) History and current status of mammals of the Korean Peninsula. Mammal Review, 29, 3 - 33. https: // doi. org / 10.1046 / j. 1365 - 2907.1999.00034. x
  • Jo, Y. S., Kim, T. W., Choi, B. J. & Oh, H. S. (2012) Current status of terrestrial mammals on Jeju Island. Journal of Species Research, 1, 249 - 256. https: // doi. org / 10.12651 / JSR. 2012.1.2.249
  • Kruskop, S. V., Borisenko, A. V., Ivanova, N. V., Lim, B. K. & Eger, J. L. (2012) Genetic diversity of northeastern Palaearctic bats as revealed by DNA barcodes. Acta Chiropterologica, 14, 1 - 14. https: // doi. org / 10.3161 / 150811012 X 654222
  • Kruskop, S. V. (2012) Order Chiroptera. In: Pavlinov, I. Y. & Lissovsky, A. A. (Eds.), The Mammals of Russia: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. KMK scientific press, Moscow, pp. 73 - 126.
  • Yoshiyuki, M. (1989) A Systematic Study of the Japanese Chiroptera. National Science Museum, Tokyo, 242 pp.
  • Koopman, K. F. (1993) Chiroptera. In: Wilson, D. E. & Reeder, D. M. (Eds.), Mammal Species of the World. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C., pp. 137 - 232.
  • Hutson, A. M., Spitzenberger, F., Aulagnier, S. & Coroiu, I. (2008) Myotis mistacinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2008. Available from: http: // www. iucnredlist. org / (accessed 11 October 2015)
  • Kawai, K., Nikaido, M., Harada, M., Matsumura, S., Lin, L. K., Wu, Y., Hasegawa, M. & Okada, N. (2003) The status of the Japanese and East Asian bats of the genus Myotis (Vespertilionidae) based on mitochondrial sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 28, 297 - 307. https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / S 1055 - 7903 (03) 00121 - 0
  • Benda, P. & Tsytsulina, K. A. (2000) Taxonomic revision of Myotis mystacinu s group (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in the western Palearctic. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae, 64, 331 - 398.
  • Tsytsulina, K. (2001) Myotis ikonnikovi (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) and its relationships with similar species. Acta Chiropterologica, 3, 11 - 19.
  • Horacek, I., Hanak, V. & Gaisler, J. (2000) Bats of the Palearctic region: a taxonomic and biogeographic review. In: Woloszyn, B. W. (Ed.), Proceedings of the FIIIth EBRS. Fol. 1. Approaches to Biogeography and Ecology of Bats. Chiropterological Information Center, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals PAS, Krakow, pp. 11 - 157.
  • Kawai, K., Kondo, N., Sasaki, N., Fukui, D., Dewa, H., Sato, M. & Yamaga, Y. (2006) Distinguishing between cryptic species Myotis ikonnikovi and M. brandtii gracilis in Hokkaido, Japan: evaluation of a novel diagnostic morphological feature using molecular methods. Acta Chiropterologica, 8, 95 - 102. https: // doi. org / 10.3161 / 1733 - 5329 (2006) 8 [95: DBCSMI] 2.0. CO; 2
  • Stadelmann, B., Lin, L. K., Kunz, T. H. & Ruedi, M. (2007) Molecular phylogeny of New World Myotis (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 43, 32 - 48. https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. ympev. 2006.06.019