Do-it-Together Concept for Production Ecosystems
Authors/Creators
- 1. Institute for Industrial Engineering (FIR) at RWTH Aachen University, Aachen Germany
Description
The do-it-yourself mentality is particularly widespread in the furniture sector. Homemade furniture is very popular. The individualisation of furniture can be observed in internet forums, such as the online platform Pinterest. These creative ideas of potential customers show a need for individualized sustainable pieces of furniture. The current production structures, however, do not allow individual production according to the end customer's specifications. In addition, information logistics faces a major challenge: making the creative ideas of end consumers available to producers in parametric form. Topics such as customer requirements in relation to sustainable production, material specifications, industrial property rights, fair production conditions and traceability are the focus of this data interchange. An open and innovative European furniture ecosystem must be created to connect all stakeholders in the production process. This is made possible by a platform that channels the creativity of consumers and makes it designable and producible through the professional skills of designers. This requires the involvement of manufacturing specialists who can produce personalised products through sustainable intelligent production technologies. An exchange of information must also take place securely and quickly in order to protect the personal rights of the sources of ideas. This is being developed in the EU research project INEDIT - Open Innovation Ecosystem for do-it-together process. By connecting many different stakeholders along the entire value creation process, a change towards efficient collaborative collaboration is achieved. This paper presents a project insight for the development of an international co-creation platform by presenting the problem and linking it to a potential solution.
Files
Kuelschbach 2020 - Do-it-Together Concept for.pdf
Files
(1.5 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:a5043b6413ae0e51b69d522746864bb7
|
1.5 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Jung, S., 2015. Sustainable prosperity through qualitative growth: An economic analysis using the example of China. Anchor Academic Publishing, Hamburg
- Silvestri, C., Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B. (Eds.), 2020. Customer satisfaction and sustainability initiatives in the fourth industrial revolution. IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania (701 E. Chocolate Avenue, Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, USA)
- Piller, F.T., 2008. Mass Customization: Ein wettbewerbsstrategisches Konzept im Informationszeitalter. Zugl.: Würzburg, Univ., Diss., 1999 u.d.T.: Kundenindividuelle Massenproduktion (mass customization) als wettbewerbsstrategisches Modell industrieller Wertschöpfung in der Informationsgesellschaft, 4., überarb. und erw. Aufl., Nachdr ed. Dt. Univ.-Verl., Wiesbaden, 425 pp
- Slamanig, M., 2011. Produktwechsel als Problem im Konzept der Mass Customization: Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Befunde. Zugl.: Klagenfurt, Univ., Diss., 2010, 1. Aufl. ed. Gabler Verlag / Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden
- Priest, J., Sanchez, J., 2012. Product Development and Design for Manufacturing, 2nd ed. ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 1457 pp
- Duarte, S., Cabrita, M.d.R., Cruz-Machado, V., 2020. Business Model, Lean and Green Management and Industry 4.0: A Conceptual Relationship, in: Xu, J., Ahmed, S.E., Cooke, F.L., Duca, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management, vol. 1001. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 359–372
- Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., Franzò, S., Frattini, F., Manfredi Latilla, V., 2017. Overcoming internal barriers to industrial energy efficiency through energy audit: a case study of a large manufacturing company in the home appliances industry. Clean Techn Environ Policy 19 (4), 1031–1046
- Thollander, P., Palm, J., 2013. Improving energy efficiency in industrial energy systems: An interdisciplinary perspective on barriers, energy audits, energy management, policies, and programs. Springer, London, 1151 pp
- Cusumano, M.A., 2010. Staying Power: Six Enduring Principles for Managing Strategy and Innovation in an Uncertain World (Lessons from Microsoft, Apple, Intel, Google, Toyota and More). OUP Oxford, Oxford, 631 pp
- eMarketer, AP, 2019. Internet user penetration in Western Europe from 2014 to 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/283814/western-europe-internet-user-penetration/. Accessed Accessed 15 October 2019
- Statista, 2019. Furniture & Appliances - worldwide. https://www.statista.com/outlook/247/100/furnitureappliances/worldwide. Accessed 15 October 2019
- Hornung, A. (Ed.), 2011. Do it yourself: Die Mitmach-Revolution : [… anlässlich der Ausstellung "Do It Yourself: die Mitmach-Revolution" im Museum für Kommunikation Frankfurt vom 25. August 2011 bis 19. Februar 2012, weitere Stationen: Museum für Kommunikation Berlin, 29. März bis 2. September 2012, [1. Aufl.] ed. Ventil-Verl; Museumsstiftung Post und Telekommunikation, Mainz, Berlin, 214 pp
- Wolf, M., McQuitty, S., 2011. Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS Rev 1 (3-4), 154–170
- 2019. Die deutsche Möbelbranche: Struktur, Trends und Herausforderungen
- Hirscher, A.-L., Niinimäki, K., Joyner Armstrong, C.M., 2018. Social manufacturing in the fashion sector: New value creation through alternative design strategies? Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 4544–4554
- Jiang, P., Leng, J., Ding, K., Gu, P., Koren, Y., 2016. Social manufacturing as a sustainable paradigm for mass individualization. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 230 (10), 1961–1968
- Radziwon, A., Bogers, M. (Eds.), 2017. Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem
- Thoresen, V.W., Doyle, D., Klein, J., Didham, R.J., 2015. Responsible Living. Springer International Publishing, Cham
- Chesbrough, H., 2010. Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers. Long Range Planning 43 (2-3), 354–363
- Rayna, T., Striukova, L., Darlington, J., 2015. Co-creation and user innovation: The role of online 3D printing platforms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 37, 90–102
- Gawarzynska, M., 2010. Open innovation and business success, 1. Aufl. ed. Diplomica Verlag, Hamburg, 105 pp
- Dickel, S., Thiem, C., 2018. Zur Organisation von Arbeit 4.0: Crowdsourcing als Sozialtechnologie, in: Redlich, T., Moritz, M., Wulfsberg, J.P. (Eds.), Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zur Zukunft der Wertschöpfung. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 247–254
- Bonvoisin, J., Boujut, J.-F., 2015. OPEN DESIGN PLATFORMS FOR OPEN SOURCE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: CURRENT STATE AND REQUIREMENTS, 10 pp
- Board of Innovation, 2011. How to kickstart your co-creation platform: 20 examples. https://de.slideshare.net/boardofinnovation/how-to-kickstart-your-cocreation-platform-20-examples. Accessed 15 October 2019
- Chanal, V., CARON-FASAN, M.-L., 2010. The Difficulties involved in Developing Business Models open to Innovation Communities: the Case of a Crowdsourcing Platform. M@n@gement 13 (4), 318