Published January 10, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Metabolomics should be deployed in the identification and characterization of gene‐edited crops

  • 1. School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK
  • 2. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
  • 3. Wageningen Research, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Wageningen, the Netherlands; Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Wageningen,the Netherlands; Netherlands Metabolomics Centre, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden, the Netherlands
  • 4. Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academyof Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518124, China; Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops of the Ministry of Agriculture, Sino-Dutch JointLaboratory of Horticultural Genomics, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100084, China
  • 5. USDA-ARS, Robert W. Holley Center and Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853, USA
  • 6. Department of Biology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • 7. Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am M€uhlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany

Description

Gene‐editing techniques are currently revolutionizing biology, allowing far greater precision than previous mutagenic and transgenic approaches. They are becoming applicable to a wide range of plant species and biological processes. Gene editing can rapidly improve a range of crop traits, including disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, yield, nutritional quality and additional consumer traits. Unlike transgenic approaches, however, it is not facile to forensically detect gene‐editing events at the molecular level, as no foreign DNA exists in the elite line. These limitations in molecular detection approaches are likely to focus more attention on the products generated from the technology than on the process in itself. Rapid advances in sequencing and genome assembly increasingly facilitate genome sequencing as a means of characterizing new varieties generated by gene‐editing techniques. Nevertheless, subtle edits such as single base changes or small deletions may be difficult to distinguish from normal variation within a genotype. Given these emerging scenarios, downstream ‘omics’ technologies reflective of edited affects, such as metabolomics, need to be used in a more prominent manner to fully assess compositional changes in novel foodstuffs. To achieve this goal, metabolomics or ‘non‐targeted metabolite analysis’ needs to make significant advances to deliver greater representation across the metabolome. With the emergence of new edited crop varieties, we advocate: (i) concerted efforts in the advancement of ‘omics’ technologies, such as metabolomics, and (ii) an effort to redress the use of the technology in the regulatory assessment for metabolically engineered biotech crops.

Files

Fraser_tpj.14679.pdf

Files (122.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3934972826c8456706e1c446f56250e5
122.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

European Commission
Newcotiana - Developing Multipurpose Nicotiana Crops for Molecular Farming using New Plant Breeding Techniques 760331