Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published October 5, 2020 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

Accuracy Benchmark of Galileo and EGNOS for Inland Waterways

  • 1. Intelligent Mobile Platforms (IMP) Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Belgium

Description

While Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) serve as a fundamental positioning technology for autonomous ships in Inland Waterways (IWW), in order to compensate for unexpected signal outages from constellations due to structures such as bridges and high buildings, it is not uncommon to use a sensor fusion setup with GNSS and Inertial Measurement Units (IMU)/Inertial Navigation Systems (INS). However, the accuracy of this fusion relies on the accuracy of the main localization technology itself. In Europe, Galileo and the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) are two satellite navigation systems under civil control and they provide European users with independent access to a reliable positioning satellite signal, claiming better accuracy
than what is offered by other accessible systems. Therefore, considering the potential utilization of these systems for autonomous navigation, in this paper, we discuss the results of a case study for benchmarking the accuracy of Galileo and EGNOS in IWW. We used a Coordinate Measurement Machine (CMM) and a sub-cm Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) service which is available in Flanders to quantify the benchmark reference. The results with and without sensor fusion show that Galileo has a better horizontal accuracy profile than standalone Global Positioning System (GPS), and its augmentation with EGNOS is likely to provide European IWW users more accurate positioning levels in the future.

Files

iSCSS_2020_Paper_20.pdf

Files (1.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c6e3ef7367214fc5661d1601035677ce
1.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • The Hull-to-Hull (H2H) Project, 2020. URL: https://www.sintef.no/projectweb/hull-to-hull/.
  • Kotz´e M., Junaid A.B, Afzal M.R., Peeters G., Slaets P., 2019. Use of Uncertainty Zones for Vessel Operation in Inland Waterways. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
  • Demoz G., Gleason S., 2009. GNSS Applications and Methods. Artech House.
  • Gonzalez R., Giribet J.I, Pati˜no H.D., 2015. An approach to benchmarking of loosely coupled low-cost navigation systems. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13873954.2014.952642.
  • Munguia R., 2014. A GPS-aided Inertial Navigation System in Direct Configuration. Journal of Applied Reasearch and Technology, 803-814.
  • Peeters G., Catoor T., Afzal M.R., Kotze M., Geenen P., Van Baelen S., Vanierschot M., Boonen R., Slaets P., 2019. Design and build of a scale model unmanned inland cargo vessel: actuation and control architecture, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
  • Peeters G., Kotze M., Afzal M.R., Catoor T., Van Baelen S., Geenen P., Vanierschot M., Boonen R., Slaets P., 2020. An unmanned inland cargo vessel: Design, build, and experiments. IEEE J.Ocean Eng.Vol.201, pp.17, URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107056.
  • SBG, 2018. Ekinox Surface Series Tactical Grade MEMS Inertial Sensors Hardware Manual. Tech. rep.. SBG Systems. Septentrio, 2017.
  • Septentrio, 2017. AsteRx-U User Manual. Tech. rep.. Septenrio, Leuven.
  • Flepos, 2020, URL: https://overheid.vlaanderen.be/flepos-algemeen.
  • Heller, V., 2011. Scale Effects in Physical Hydraulic Engineering Models. Journal of Hydraulic Research, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 293–306.
  • Federal Aviation Administration (USA). GPS Performance Analysis Report, Jan 2017, Available at: https://www.nstb.tc.faa.gov/reports/.
  • GSA, Galileo Initial Services - Open Service Performance Report, March 2018, Available at: https://www.gsceuropa. eu/.
  • ESSP, Monthly Performance Report, January 2020, Available at: https://egnos-user-support.essp-sas.eu/.