Published December 22, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

PECULIARITIES OF INTERACTION OF COURTS AND MEDIA IN THE CONDITIONS OF DEMOCRACY

Creators

  • 1. Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

Description

The problem o f communication between courts (judiciary) and the media is analyzed.
It is noted that in a democracy, both institutions are interested in effective interaction: the
judicial system - in the objectivity and completeness o f coverage o f their work, and journalists
- in that they do not interfere in their activities to collect and disseminate information
about courts and judges. The directions o f cooperation between courts and the media
are proposed.

Files

Volyanska_Pidkurkova_144-154.pdf

Files (185.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1cb498abaed9869825c95ec2f245102e
185.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Baronin, D. B. (2014). Sud u systemi suspilnykh vidnosyn [Court in the system of public relations]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia Pravo - Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law Series, 3(28), 144146 [in Ukrainian].
  • Prylutskyi, S. V. (2017). Sud yak fundamentalnyi sotsialno-pravovyi fenomen (zarodzhennia, evoliutsiia, suchasnist) [Court as a fundamental socio-legal phenomenon (origin, evolution, modernity)]. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, 2(2), 37-44. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/srjusc_2017_2_9 [in Ukrainian].
  • Chernushenko, O. V. (2013). Sudova vlada yak sotsialnyi instytut [Judiciary as a social institution]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav - Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 3, 112-116 [in Ukrainian].
  • Volianska, O. V. & Pidkurkova, I. V. (2018). Indicators of confidence in sociological researches. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Iurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho". Seriia: Sotsiolohiia - Bulletin of the National University "Yaroslav Mudryi Law Academy o f Ukraine". Series: Sociology, 4(39), 112-125.
  • Lohunova, M. M., Lashkina, M. H., Hvozdyk, P. O. & Alieksieiev, A. H. (2012). Komunikatsii sudovoi vlady: naukovo-praktychnyi posibnyk [Communications of the judiciary: a scientific and practical guide]. Kyiv: «ADEF-Ukraina» [in Ukrainian].
  • Rozlutska, A. & Rybak, V. (2019). Yak nalahodyty dialoh sudu ta hromady? [How to establish a dialogue between the court and the community?]. Kyiv. Retrieved from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/ukraine/15253.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  • Kablak, P. (2014). Zasoby masovoi informatsii u vzaiemodii sudovoi vlady ta hromadskosti [Mass media in the interaction of the judiciary and the public]. Yurydychnyi visnyk - Legal Bulletin, 6, 47-54 [in Ukrainian].
  • Ovsiannikova, O. (2012). Etychni problemy vzaiemodii sudovoi vlady ta zasobiv masovoi informatsii [Ethical problems of interaction between the judiciary and the media]. Visnyk akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy - Bulletin of the Academy ofLegal Sciences of Ukraine, 1, 174-184 [in Ukrainian].
  • Yevtushenko, O. I. (2009). Vysvitlennia diialnosti sudovoi vlady u zasobakh masovoi informatsii [Coverage of the judiciary in the media]. Retrieved from https:// cedem.org.ua/articles/vysvitlennya-diyalnosti-sudovoyi-vlady-u-zasobah-masovoyiinformatsiyi/ [in Ukrainian].
  • Prystupennko, T. O. Vzaiemovidnosyny zasobiv masovoi informatsii ta sudovoi hilky vlady v konteksti prava na informatsiiu [The relationship between the media and the judiciary in the context of the right to information]. Retrieved from http://journlib.univ.kiev.ua/index.php?act=article&article=1374 [in Ukrainian].
  • Ivanova, O. A. Efektyvna komunikatsiia yak chynnyk doviry do sudu [Effective communication as a factor of trust in the court]. Retrieved from http://www.vru.gov.ua/ content/file/%D0%95 %D1 %84 %D0 %B5 %D0 %BA%D1 %82 %D0 %B8%D0 %B2 %D0 %BD%D0 %B0_%D0 %BA%D0 %BE%D0 %BC%D1 %83 %D0 %BD%D1 %9 6 %D0 %BA%D0 %B0%D1 %86 %D1 %96 %D1 %8F_%D1 %8F%D0 %BA_%D1 %8 4 %D0 %B0%D0 %BA%D1 %82 %D0 %BE%D1 %80_%D0 %B4 %D0 %BE%D0 %B 2 %D1 %96 %D1 %80 %D0 %B8_%D0 %B4 %D0 %BE_%D1 %81 %D1 %83 %D0 %B 4 %D1 %83.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  • Snyder, J. M., Stromberg, D. & Lim, C. S. H. (2010). Measuring Media Influence on U. S. State Courts. 2010 Meeting Papers, 1193, Society for Economic Dynamics. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed010/1193.html
  • Keyzer, P, Johnston, J., Pearson, M., Rodrick, S. & Wallace, A. (2013). The courts and social media: what do judges and court workers think? Judicial Officers' Bulletin, 25(6). July 2013: 47-51. Retrieved from https://journlaw.com/2013/08/07/the-courtsand- social-media-what-do-judges-and-court-workers-think/
  • Meyer, N. H. (2014). Social Media and the Courts: Innovative Tools or Dangerous Fad? A Practical Guide for Court Administrators. International Journalfor Court Administration, 6(1). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2894158
  • Stavlennia hromadian Ukrainy do sudovoi systemy [Attitudes of Ukrainian citizens to the judicial system]. URL: https://razumkov.org.ua/napriamky/sotsiologichni- doslidzhennia/stavlennia-gromadian-ukrainy-do-sudovoi-systemy [in Ukrainian].
  • Buromenskyi, M., Serdiuk, O. & Pidkurkova, I. (2008). Sudy u vidnosynakh z zhurnalistamy ta ZMI: Posibnyk dlia suddiv [Courts in relations with journalists and the media: A guide for judges]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].