Published December 16, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Pupil and masking responses to light as functional measures of retinal degeneration in mice Mus Musculus

Description

Background: Pre-clinical testing of retinal pathology and treatment efficacy depends on reliable and valid measures of retinal function. The electroretinogram (ERG) and tests of visual acuity are the ideal standard, but can be unmeasurable while useful vision remains. Non-image-forming responses to light such as the pupillary light reflex (PLR) are attractive surrogates. However, it is not clear how accurately such responses reflect changes in visual capability in specific disease models. The purpose of this study was to test whether measures of non-visual responses to light correlate with previously determined visual function in two photoreceptor degenerations.

Methods: The sensitivity of masking behavior (light induced changes in running wheel activity) and the PLR were measured in 3-month-old wild-type mice (WT) with intact inner retinal circuitry, Pde6b-rd1/rd1 mice (rd1) with early and rapid loss of rods and cones, and Prph2-Rd2/Rd2 mice (Rd2) with slowly progressing loss of rods and cones.

Results: In rd1 mice, negative masking had increased sensitivity, positive masking was absent, and the sensitivity of the PLR was severely reduced. In Rd2 mice, positive masking identified useful vision at higher light levels, but there was a limited decrease in the irradiance sensitivity of negative masking and the PLR, and the amplitude of change for both underestimated the reduction in irradiance sensitivity of image-forming vision.

Conclusions: Together these data show that in a given disease, two responses to light can be affected in opposite ways, and that for a given response to light, the change in the response does not accurately represent the degree of pathology. However, the extent of the deficit in the PLR means that even a limited rescue of rod/cone function might be measured by increased PLR amplitude. In addition, positive masking has the potential to measure effective treatment in both models by restoring responses or shifting thresholds to lower irradiances.

Notes

Funding provided by: Frank and Sheri Etscorn*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number: Robert Cormack Memorial award

Funding provided by: Frank and Sheri Etscorn
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number: Robert Cormack Memorial award

Files

Files (52.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b0eec74b11af625fd65a8f11763bd8f5
29.9 MB Download
md5:e4ba25a74cab21da1c3c572dccb4f4a8
635.9 kB Download
md5:a30e35cb951b21cc953a66f7a3d9f4e3
21.7 MB Download