Published November 28, 2020 | Version 1.0.0
Dataset Open

Learning Dynamics of Electrophysiological Brain Signals During Human Fear Conditioning (Open Data and Open Materials)

  • 1. University of Marburg, Department of Psychology; University of Giessen, Department of Psychology
  • 2. University of Marburg, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
  • 3. University of Marburg, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy; University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Systems Neuroscience
  • 4. University of Marburg, Department of Psychology

Description

Open Data and Open Materials of: Sperl, M. F. J., Wroblewski, A., Mueller, M., Straube, B., & Mueller, E. M. (2021). Learning Dynamics of Electrophysiological Brain Signals During Human Fear Conditioning. NeuroImage226, 117569.

Electrophysiological studies in rodents allow recording neural activity during threats with high temporal and spatial precision. Although fMRI has helped translate insights about the anatomy of underlying brain circuits to humans, the temporal dynamics of neural fear processes remain opaque and require EEG. To date, studies on electrophysiological brain signals in humans have helped to elucidate underlying perceptual and attentional processes, but have widely ignored how fear memory traces evolve over time. The low signal-to-noise ratio of EEG demands aggregations across high numbers of trials, which will wash out transient neurobiological processes that are induced by learning and prone to habituation. Here, our goal was to unravel the plasticity and temporal emergence of EEG responses during fear conditioning. To this end, we developed a new sequential-set fear conditioning paradigm that comprises three successive acquisition and extinction phases, each with a novel CS+/CS- set. Each set consists of two different neutral faces on different background colors which serve as CS+ and CS-, respectively. Thereby, this design provides sufficient trials for EEG analyses while tripling the relative amount of trials that tap into more transient neurobiological processes. Consistent with prior studies on ERP components, data-driven topographic EEG analyses revealed that ERP amplitudes were potentiated during time periods from 33–60 ms, 108–200 ms, and 468–820 ms indicating that fear conditioning prioritizes early sensory processing in the brain, but also facilitates neural responding during later attentional and evaluative stages. Importantly, averaging across the three CS+/CS- sets allowed us to probe the temporal evolution of neural processes: Responses during each of the three time windows gradually increased from early to late fear conditioning, while long-latency (460–730 ms) electrocortical responses diminished throughout fear extinction. Our novel paradigm demonstrates how short-, mid-, and long-latency EEG responses change during fear conditioning and extinction, findings that enlighten the learning curve of neurophysiological responses to threat in humans.

Notes

Open Data and Open Materials of: Sperl, M. F. J., Wroblewski, A., Mueller, M., Straube, B., & Mueller, E. M. (2021). Learning Dynamics of Electrophysiological Brain Signals During Human Fear Conditioning. NeuroImage, 226, 117569.

Files

Sperl_et_al_NeuroImage_AbstractGraphical.pdf

Files (3.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6bcf448630a9e0c7ab1ce4956e34796e
526.7 kB Preview Download
md5:b51c39762cb449fbd610e9466a4dcccf
573.4 kB Preview Download
md5:f6262e488370c9a56ad3654ac323000a
1.8 MB Download
md5:2ae38903a279cba832c402dcb9dab612
7.5 kB Download
md5:521450e10c18e387f85e2641b661f6fd
7.1 kB Download
md5:e26e34aa31bb587166d0c4cfc5374334
19.1 kB Download
md5:081506fdd5e6d565d78852628c060aac
6.5 kB Download
md5:95864f3bfb1369230aea5d4fdf4028cf
43.1 kB Download
md5:d0d8561d3f2115effac5d9fb0f5f9cb4
17.3 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
Journal article: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117569 (DOI)