Published November 19, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Habitat selection of foraging male Great Snipes on floodplain meadows: importance of proximity to the lek, vegetation cover and bare ground

  • 1. Polish Academy of Sciences
  • 2. Nature Environnement 17
  • 3. Department of Plant Biology
  • 4. Evolutionary Biology and Ecology of Algae
  • 5. Museum and Institute of Zoology

Description

Drainage of wetlands and agricultural intensification has resulted in serious biodiversity loss in Europe, not least in grasslands. Consequently, many meadow birds have drastically declined, and the habitats they select for breeding currently rely on land management. However, the selection of habitats maintained by agriculture may contribute to reduced fitness and thus remain maladaptive for individuals, which makes conservation challenging. An understanding of the relationships between species' habitat selection, food supply and land management in the context of species' behaviour is therefore crucial for conservation. Lowland populations of Great Snipe Gallinago media are currently declining at a moderate rate, causing a conservation concern. We examined the daytime site selection (assumed as foraging sites) and food supply of radiotracked Great Snipe males breeding on a floodplain in NE Poland. Foraging sites were classified at micro- and macro-scale levels using the logistic regression in a use–availability design. On the microscale level, males selected moderate sward height and density, and a large amount of bare ground patches, and the importance of these increased as the breeding season progressed. On the macro-scale level, these conditions were associated with (1) meadows mown twice per season and grazed thereafter (associated with the most abundant food resources – earthworms) and (2) extensively managed pastures, suggesting the importance of grazing. Abandoned or late-mown meadows under agri-environmental schemes (AES) were avoided by foraging males. However, parcels with delayed mowing offer safe breeding sites for females nesting close to leks, unlike land-use types preferred by foraging males, which may act as an ecological trap. Effective conservation of Great Snipes on floodplain meadows requires precisely targeted AES schemes that will provide a mosaic of intensive and extensive land-use patches in the vicinity of identified leks.

Notes

Variable codes in Table 1 and Table 2 refers to headings columns of uploaded file: Korniluk_et_al_2000_Great_Snipe_habitat_selection_data.

Additional column headers are described in uploaded README file.

Table 1. Variables at two levels – micro- and macro-scale.

Scale

Variable code*

Variable name and unit

Description

 

 

 

 

Micro-scale variables

Date

Date of sampling [days]

Relative date within the breeding season, 1= 01 May

VegHeight

Vegetation height [cm]

Mean in a 50x50cm plot, measured with a ruler

VegCovV

Vertical vegetation cover [%]

Vegetation coverage of 10x10 cm paper blank placed in the center of the plot

VegCovH

Horizontal vegetation cover [m]

Mean of four perpendicular direction maximum distance from where we could not see a Great Snipe decoy

BareGr

Bare ground [%]

% of bare ground within the plot

Penetr

Soil penetrability [cm]

A mean of measured in the center of the plot by dropping 3 times a pointed iron pin (8 mm diameter and 180 g) from 1.5 m height

Tussok

Tussock height [cm]

Mean for all tussocks in the 50x50 cm plot, measured with a ruler

Moist

Moisture [1-6]

On a scale from 1 (dry) to 6 (flooded)

DistLek

Mean distance to leks [m]

Mean distance to the two leks (lek1 and lek 2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Macro- scale variables

Elev

Elevation [m]

A mean in 3 m radius based on Digital Terrain Model (Project ISOK of Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography GUGIK – Poland, 1 m resolution).

DistLek

Mean distance to leks [m]

Mean distance to the two permanent leks

DistTree

Distance to nearest single tree [m]

Distance between foraging and random sites to nearest landscape elements

DistShrub

Distance to nearest shrubs [m]

DistForest

Distance to nearest forest [m]

DistWater

Distance to nearest water surface [m]

 

LandUse

Land use type

Land use regime and type affects sward structure (Land use types listed in Table 2.)

 

 

 

 


Table 2. Land use types used in the macro-scale model.

Variable code

Variable name

Variable class and code

 

LandUse

Land use type

Meadows mowed twice and extensively grazed (2xMOW+COW)

 

 

 

Meadows mowed twice a year (2xMOW)

 

 

 

Meadows mowed once a year (1xMOW)

 

 

 

Abandoned meadows (ABAND)

 

 

 

Extensive pastures (COW)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funding provided by: LIFE programme
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013288
Award Number: LIFE11 NAT/PL/000436

Files

Korniluk_et_al_2000_Great_Snipe_habitat_selection_data.csv

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1111/ibi.12898 (DOI)