File uploads: We have fixed an issue which caused file uploads to fail. We apologise for the inconvenience it may have caused.

Published September 9, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: Age-based changes in kairomone response mediate task partitioning in stingless bee soldiers (Tetragonisca angustula)

Description

Collective defense is one of the most ubiquitous behaviors performed by social groups. Because of its importance, complex societies may engage a set of defensive specialists, with physical and/or neurological attributes tuned for defense against specific invaders. These strategies must be balanced, however, with the need to flexibly respond to different threat levels and sources. Insect societies rely heavily on olfaction for detecting and communicating in the context of defense. We therefore asked whether threat detection via olfaction is specialized towards invader-specific cues and how this may be integrated into defense task specialization. Colonies of the stingless bee, Tetragonisca angustula, deploy a morphologically distinct sub-caste of larger-bodied workers (soldiers) for colony defense. These soldiers transition between two different guarding tasks as they age, progressing from guarding in a hovering position near the nest entrance to guarding in a standing position on the nest entrance tube. Hovering and standing guards intercept different types of invaders: primarily heterospecific versus conspecific, respectively. We asked whether hovering and standing guarding behaviors were modulated by differential sensitivity to invader-associated olfactory stimuli; then we compared their responses to these cues to those of smaller workers that perform predominantly non-defense tasks. We exposed bees under both field and lab conditions to citral, a kairomone produced by an obligate heterospecific nest robber, primarily intercepted by hovering guards. Consistent with their roles, hovering guards were more likely to move towards citral than were either standing guards or small-bodied bees within a Y-maze. We also presented guards at field nests with dummies of conspecific versus heterospecific invader types, varying whether they included citral odors. Standing guards were more responsive to conspecific intruder scenarios than hovering guards, but heterospecific response differed by presence of citral. Standing and hovering guards responded in similar proportions when citral was absent, but the addition of citral produced a marginally non-significant reduction in standing guard participation. Our results potentially demonstrate differentiated cue-specific responses that correspond to morphological task specialization and age polyethism in these eusocial societies.

Notes

At nest manipulations.csv

This file contains all at-nest manipulation data associated used in this study.  Headder definitions are as follows.

ColonyID - unique identifier for each of 5 naturally occuring colony/nest entrances used in this part of the study.

Rep - replicate ID (repeated across 3 days, 3 levels: day 1, 2, or 3)

guardTYPE - type of responding soldier (2 levels: hovering guard, standing guard)

guardRESP - number of each guard type identified in "guardTYPE" responding to each invader type

 

food detection Y-maze.csv  & alarm detection Y-maze.csv

These files contain all y-maze data analyzed in this study (other than first arm choice, which is presented in tables within the manuscript). They contain data for speed at which different task group bees detected food and citral (respectively) within Y-mazes. Headder definitions are as follows:

BeeID - individually unique identifier of each naive bee used in this study. 

ColonyID - unique identifier for each of 3 naturally occuring colony/nest entrances used in this part of the study.

Task - task group of each bee (3 levels sampled in each colony: hovering guard, standing guard, & foragers)

cens - censor data used in the performed survival analysis. Because all bees found the odor sources in the maze eventually, these values are all "1"

Funding provided by: School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006755
Award Number: Innovative Postdoctoral Research Award

Funding provided by: United States Air Force/Eglin AFB/FL*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number: FA8651-17-F-1013

Funding provided by: United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000185
Award Number: W31P4Q18-C-0054

Funding provided by: United States Air Force/Eglin AFB/FL
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number: FA8651-17-F-1013

Files

alarm_detection_Y-maze.csv

Files (5.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:834179caef99a8b4ad56ce17a64b1f6a
1.2 kB Preview Download
md5:ce531dd1fec26d2fb94e125dcb4b32d1
2.8 kB Preview Download
md5:b5543bc529b36af026a9dd2f0a984d45
1.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works