MECHANICAL & APPLIED SCIENCE DOMAIN
Published August 27, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Comparison of Aerodynamic Behaviour between NACA 0018 and NACA 0012 Airfoils at Low Reynolds Number Through CFD Analysis

Creators

  • 1. Dept. of Mechatronics and Industrial Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh
  • 2. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh
  • 3. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh

Description

For better designing of an airfoil, the aerodynamic characteristics of the airfoil need to be investigated both experimentally and numerically. Coefficient of lift (CL), coefficient of drag (CD), variation of CL/CD ratio with angle of attack is very important parameters in CFD analysis. In this study the above parameters are investigated for two symmetric airfoils (NACA0018 and NACA0012) at two different low Reynolds numbers of 300,000 and 700,000. This numerical results show that the stall angle for NACA0018 airfoil at Re=300,000 is less than 17 degree and at Re=700,000 for the same airfoil it is 17.5 degree and this happened due to the increased velocity. CL increases more linearly than CD up to about 10 degree so that CL/CD ratio increases with the angle of attack and then decreases after or near about 10 degree. It has been also found that higher the Reynolds number, greater the value of CL/CD ratio. Besides, it is evident from this simulation that NACA 0012 produces more lift than NACA 0018 for the same Reynolds number. That’s why, NACA 0012 airfoil may be verily used for aircraft application whereas NACA 0018 airfoil may be used in VAWT (Vertical Axis Wind Turbine) And HAWT (Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine) to capture the wind energy and convert it to useable energy which is one form of renewable energy.

Files

Comparison of Aerodynamic Behaviour.pdf

Files (727.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a01ab75383295b4edc76d6e2c43a4469
727.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Hassan, G. E., Hassan, A., & Youssef, M. E. (2014). Numerical investigation of medium range re number aerodynamics characteristics for NACA0018 airfoil. CFD letters, 6(4), 175-187.
  • Sereez, M., Abramov, N., & Goman, M. (2016, July). Computational simulations of airfoils stall aerodynamics at low reynolds numbers. Royal Aeronautical Society, Applied Aerodynamics Conference.
  • Ladson, C. L. (1988). Effects of independent variation of Mach and Reynolds numbers on the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 0012 airfoil section (Vol. 4074). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Division.
  • Brendel, M. (1987). Experimental study of the boundary layer on a low reynolds number airfoil in steady and unsteady flow.
  • Abbott, I. H., & Von Doenhoff, A. E. (2012). Theory of wing sections: including a summary of airfoil data. Courier Corporation.
  • Hu, H., Yang, Z., & Igarashi, H. (2007). Aerodynamic hysteresis of a low-Reynolds-number airfoil. Journal of Aircraft, 44(6), 2083-2086.Brendel, M., & Mueller, T. J. (1988). Boundary-layer measurements on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of aircraft, 25(7), 612-617.
  • Jacobs, E. N., & Sherman, A. (1937). Airfoil section characteristics as affected by variations of the Reynolds number. NACA report, 586, 227-264.
  • Timmer, W. A. (2008). Two-dimensional low-Reynolds number wind tunnel results for airfoil NACA 0018. Wind engineering, 32(6), 525-537.
  • Anderson Jr, J. D. (2010). Fundamentals of aerodynamics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.