Published July 7, 2020 | Version v2.0
Dataset Open

Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean-sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)

  • 1. Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
  • 2. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 3. Brown University, New Providence, RI, USA
  • 4. Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany
  • 5. State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Description

Datasets for the  Geoscientific Model Development publication: "Impact of horizontal resolution on global ocean-sea-ice model simulations based on the experimental protocols of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project phase 2 (OMIP-2)"

Abstract:  This paper presents global comparisons of fundamental global climate variables from a suite of four pairs of matched low- and high-resolution ocean and sea-ice simulations that are obtained following the OMIP-2 protocol (Griffies et al., 2016) and integrated for one cycle (1958-2018) of the JRA55-do atmospheric state and runoff dataset (Tsujino et al., 2018). Our goal is to assess the robustness of climate-relevant improvements in ocean simulations (mean and variability) associated with moving from coarse (~1º) to eddy-resolving (~0.1º) horizontal resolutions. The models are diverse in their numerics and parameterizations, but each low-resolution and high-resolution pair of models is matched so as to isolate, to the 20 extent possible, the effects of horizontal resolution. A variety of observational datasets are used to assess the fidelity of simulated temperature and salinity, sea surface height, kinetic energy, heat and volume transports, and sea ice distribution. This paper provides a crucial benchmark for future studies comparing and improving different schemes in any of the models used in this study or similar ones. The biases in the low-resolution simulations are familiar and their gross features – position, strength, and variability of western boundary currents, equatorial currents, and Antarctic Circumpolar Current – are 25 significantly improved in the high-resolution models. However, despite the fact that the high-resolution models “resolve’’ most of these features, the improvements in temperature or salinity are inconsistent among the different model families and some regions show increased bias over their low-resolution counterparts. Greatly enhanced horizontal resolution does not deliver unambiguous bias improvement in all regions for all models.

Files

README.txt

Files (2.2 GB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b7c88737e28946d3885e4321d72a07dd
85.9 MB Download
md5:e6d7a259faeba6904db21f9bc91cdcbb
5.3 kB Download
md5:1e5df986d1f1b52f20a133e88a906af9
102.7 MB Download
md5:1d00ed183a04fcbfc3bde18c785e7d1f
3.5 kB Download
md5:3aed72dee26956bd3f996f9bf4185bc3
4.4 MB Download
md5:9e1d20c930c1f731c1b365ace54b1319
52 Bytes Download
md5:b2c2f8b5051585482700bef328d14c7b
73.2 MB Download
md5:01f940ff65a65968d218a02a2693a553
3.8 kB Download
md5:194195d2f96351f154eb9bf542f0b2eb
495.4 MB Download
md5:d0a7354cc08914cbc546dd17d97c120b
3.0 kB Download
md5:6530ee57f086aa05a46a0abf8613f25b
1.4 GB Download
md5:55c09f25a88c571532732fd8fc97cad1
1.5 kB Download
md5:85c3d8410387bcbbec5372d2574f9345
794 Bytes Preview Download
md5:2dd780b2ca79f75050672c76375d321a
68.1 kB Download
md5:b51da49df30bfb0affffa3dd4a4b4187
2.5 kB Download