Published October 17, 2017 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Epimeriella Walker 1906

  • 1. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Service Heritage, Rue Vautier 29, B- 1000 Brussels, Belgium. & Corresponding author: cdudekem @ naturalsciences. be
  • 2. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational direction Taxonomy and Phylogeny, Rue Vautier 29, B- 1000 Brussels, Belgium. & Email: mverheye @ naturalsciences. be

Description

Subgenus Epimeriella Walker, 1906

Epimeriella Walker, 1906: 17 (in part).

Epimeriella – Gurjanova 1955: 189, 206 (in part). — J.L. Barnard 1961: 102 (in part); 1969: 161, 395 (in part). — McCain 1971: 160 (in part). — Karaman & J.L. Barnard 1979: 109 –110 (in part). — Holman & Watling 1983: 31 (in part, discussion). — Andres & Lott 1986: 131–136 (in part). — J.L. Barnard & Karaman 1991: 380, 394, 702 (in part). — Coleman 1998b: 215 (in part); 2007: 56 (in part). — Lörz & Brandt 2004: 179, 184, 188, 189 (in part).

Type species

Epimeriella macronyx Walker, 1906.

Description

Body pellucid with teguments very weakly calcified. Rostrum minute (not reaching 0.2 of length of article 1 of peduncle of antenna 1), reduced to a narrow tiny blade-shaped process separating the bases of the first articles. Ventral lobe of head rounded. Eyes present, extremely large, not conical. Pereionite 7 and pleonites 1–3 with or without small posterodorsal tooth directed backwards; all pereionites and pleonites without dorsolateral pair of teeth, swelling or carina. Pereionites 1–7 without tooth or protrusion just above connection with coxa. Coxae 1–3 with rounded tip; coxa 4 with tip of variable sharpness. Coxae 1–3 not keeled or not strongly keeled along their axis. Coxa 4 narrow, not carinate; posteroventral border straight or very weakly concave. Coxae 5–6 without tooth. Mid of posterior border of epimeral plates 1–3 not produced into a tooth. Posteroventral tooth of epimeral plate 3 very small. Dorsal process of urosomite 1 produced into a low rounded process or into a carina posteriorly terminated in tooth directed backwards. Urosomite 2 without pair of small teeth pointing upwards. Lateral borders of urosomite 3 posteriorly terminated into an acute angle. Telson deeply cleft. Peduncle of antenna 1 with dentition very reduced (tiny ventral denticles may be present). Mandible with molar process drawn out, without triturative surface. Lower lip with wide hypopharyngeal gap. Palp of maxilliped with 4 articles. Gnathopods of normal size, with carpus and propodus broad to very broad, with palm obliquely transverse (gnathopods subcheliform); propodus not expanded distally; posterior border of dactylus lined by row of small oblique slender teeth. Basis of pereiopods 5–6 moderately broad, without posteroproximal protrusion or tooth and without posterodistal tooth projecting posteriorly. Posterior border of basis of pereiopod 7 convex along all its length, with tip angular or rounded. Dactylus of pereiopods 5–7 long to very long.

Body length

The maximum body length recorded in Epimeriella species ranges between 8 and 28 mm.

Ecology

Epimeria (Epimeriella) macronyx is obviously pelagic, as it is usually found in plankton nets. The fragile and poorly caclified morphology of other species suggest that they might also be pelagic or semipelagic. 0–1200 m.

Distribution

Circum-Antarctic, as far north as the South Orkney Islands.

Remarks

Epimeriella was initially erected as a genus (Walker 1906), on the basis of the non triturative molar process of the mandibles. This character is considered as a synapomorphy since Epimeriella sensu Walker, 1906 forms a clade in our phylogenetic trees. It is herein split into two subgenera corresponding to two sub-clades with very different morphotypes. The robust benthic forms of the group walkeri are now placed into the new subgenus Laevepimeria subgen. nov. Only the slender pelagic or semipelagic forms (Epimeria macronyx, E. scabrosa and their relatives) are retained within the subgenus Epimeriella. The extralimital species Epimeria pelagica Birstein & Vinogradov, 1958 also exhibits adaptations to a pelagic lifestyle: enlarged eyes and elongation of the posterior pereiopods (Birstein & Vinogradov 1958). However, this species exhibits many other characters not observed in Epimeriella species such as the shape of the mandible.

Key to the species of Epimeriella

1. Pleonites 1–3 (and sometimes pereionite 7) with small posterodorsal tooth; dorsal process of urosomite 1 not produced into a tooth ………………………………………………………………2

– Pleonites 1–3 without posterodorsal tooth; dorsal process of urosomite 1 posteriorly produced into a tooth directed backwards …………………………………… Epimeria (Epimeriella) macronyx (Walker, 1906) [Antarctic Peninsula to Ross Sea, usually caught in plankton nets]

2. Pereionite 7 with posterodorsal tooth; eye broadly elliptic; coxa 4 fairly wide, ventrally produced into a blunt angle ………………………......…… E. (Epimeriella) atalanta sp. nov. [Weddell Sea]

– Pereionite 7 without posterodorsal tooth; eye narrowly elliptic; coxa 4 fairly wide, ventrally pointed ………………………….........…… E. (Epimeriella) scabrosa (K.H. Barnard, 1930) [Oates Coast]

– Pereionite 7 without posterodorsal tooth; eye broadly elliptic; coxa 4 slender, ventrally rounded ………………………… E. (Epimeriella) truncata (Andres, 1985) [west of Antarctic Peninsula]

Notes

Published as part of d'Acoz, Cédric d'Udekem & Verheye, Marie L., 2017, Epimeria of the Southern Ocean with notes on their relatives (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Eusiroidea), pp. 1-553 in European Journal of Taxonomy 359 on pages 67-68, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2017.359, http://zenodo.org/record/3855694

Files

Files (5.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:46bfd0ad519e0a2abea68682d7c3090b
5.9 kB Download

System files (29.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:dd147b5d8e4405af119471088c729b67
29.4 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Epimeriidae
Genus
Epimeriella
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Walker
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Epimeriella Walker, 1906 sec. d'Acoz & Verheye, 2017

References

  • Walker A. O. 1906. Preliminary descriptions of new species of Amphipoda from the ' Discovery' Antarctic Expedition, 1902 - 1904. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 7 18: 13 - 18. http: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 19366255 [accessed 27 Sep. 2016].
  • Gurjanova E. F. 1955. New species of gammarideans (Amphipoda, Gammaridea) from the northern part of the Pacific Ocean. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Leningrad 18: 166 - 218 [in Russian].
  • Barnard J. L. 1961. Gammaridean Amphipoda. Galathea Report 5: 23 - 128. Available from http: // www. zmuc. dk / inverweb / Galathea / Pdf _ filer / Volume _ 05 / galathea-vol. 05 - pp _ 023 - 128. pdf [accessed 27 Sep. 2016].
  • McCain J. C. 1971. A new deep-sea species of Epimeria (Amphipoda, Paramphithoidae) from Oregon. Crustaceana 20 (2): 159 - 166. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854069 X 00187
  • Karaman G. S. & Barnard J. L. 1979. Classificatory revisions in gammaridean Amphipoda (Crustacea), part I. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 92 (1): 106 - 165. Available from http: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 35513813 [accessed 27 Sep. 2016].
  • Holman H. & Watling L. 1983. A revision of the Stilipedidae (Amphipoda). Crustaceana 44 (1): 29 - 53. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854083 x 00037
  • Andres H. G. & Lott N. 1986. Where to place Eclysis similis K. H. Barnard, 1932? Hints at its relationships and remarks on the systematic position of the Astyridae (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Mitteilungen aus den Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 83: 131 - 137.
  • Barnard J. L. & Karaman G. S. 1991. The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda (except gammaroids). Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 13, Parts 1 and 2: 1 - 866. Part 1: https: // doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0812 - 7387.13.1991.91
  • Coleman C. O. 1998 b. Epimeria vaderi, a new species (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Epimeriidae) from the Antarctic Ocean. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 74 (2): 215 - 224. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / mmnz. 19980740205
  • Lorz A. - N. & Brandt A. 2004. Phylogeny of Antarctic Epimeria (Epimeriidae: Amphipoda). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 84: 179 - 190. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 002531540400904 Xh
  • Birstein Y. A. & Vinogradov M. E. 1958. Pelagicheskie gammaridy (Amphipoda, Gammaridea) severozapadnoi chasti Tikhogo Okeana. [Pelagic Gammaridea from the northwestern Pacific Ocean]. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii Akademija Nauk SSSR 27: 219 - 257. [in Russian]
  • Barnard K. H. 1930. Crustacea. Part XI. Amphipoda. British Antarctic (" Terra Nova ") Expedition, 1910. Natural History Report, Zoology 8 (4): 307 - 454. Available from http: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / item / 195187 # page / 7 / mode / 1 up [accessed 12 Sep. 2017].
  • Andres H. G. 1985. Die Gammaridea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) der Deutschen Antarktis-Expeditionen 1975 / 76 und 1977 / 78. 4. Acanthonotozomatidae, Paramphithoidae und Stegocephalidae. Mitteilungen aus den Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 82: 119 - 153.