Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published October 11, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Otomorphs (= otocephalans or ostarioclupeomorphs) revisited

Creators

Description

Arratia, Gloria (2018): Otomorphs (= otocephalans or ostarioclupeomorphs) revisited. Neotropical Ichthyology 16 (3): 1-24, DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20180079

Files

source.pdf

Files (22.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c2b5caaa101a65a2968ca481c34ecce3
22.1 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFB5FFAA101AFFA2FF8CFF81C34EFFE3
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFB5FFAA101AFFA2FF8CFF81C34EFFE3

Cites
Publication: 10.1186/s12862-017-0958-3 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/02724634.2013.835642 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/02724634.2017.1312690 (DOI)
Publication: 10.7717/peerj.2991 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1371/currents (DOI)
Publication: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2081 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/sysbio/syx038 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00122.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183879 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-177 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068719 (DOI)
Has part
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87D2101EFFA7FCD6FA99C1F8FC6A (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87D2101FFFA7FF2AFC30C60EF9EA (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.3716909 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87D2101FFFAAFCDEF9B0C289FCAB (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710046 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710048 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710050 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710052 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710054 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710056 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710058 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710060 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710062 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710064 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710066 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710068 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710070 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3710072 (DOI)

References

  • Albert JS, Reis RE, editors. Historical Biogeography of Neotropical Freshwater Fishes. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press; 2011.
  • Alvarado-Ortega J. Ancient herring from the Tlayua Quarry (Cretaceous, Albian) near Tepexi de Rodriguez, Puebla State, central Mexico, closing the gap in the early diversification of Clupeomorpha. Cretaceous Res. 2014; 50:171-80.
  • Alvarado-Ortega J, Ovalles-Damian E, Arratia G. A review of the interrelationships of the order Ellimmichthyiformes (Teleostei: Clupeomorpha). In: Arratia G, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 4 - Homology and Phylogeny. Munchen: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil; 2008. p.257-278.
  • Amaral CRL, Alvarado-Ortega J, Brito PM. Sapperichthys gen. nov., a new gonorynchid from the Cenomanian of Chiapas, Mexico. In: Arratia G, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 5 - Global Diversity and Evolution. Munchen: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil; 2013. p.305-324.
  • Arcila D, Orti G, Vari RP, Armbruster JW, Stiassny MLJ, Ko KD, Sabaj MH et al. Genome wide interrogation advances resolution of recalcitrant groups in the Tree of Life. Nature Eco Evo. 2017; 17:162. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-0958-3
  • Arratia G. El esqueleto caudal de los peces siluriformes y sus tendencias evolutivas (Fam. Diplomystidae y Trichomycteridae). Bol Mus Nac Hist Natur Chile. 1982; 38:49-61.
  • Arratia G. Basal teleosts and teleostean phylogeny. [PhD Thesis]. Uppsala: University of Uppsala; 1996.
  • Arratia G. Description of the primitive family Diplomystidae (Siluriformes, Teleostei, Pisces): morphology, taxonomy, and phylogenetic implications. Bonner zool Monogr. 1987; 24:1-120.
  • Arratia G. Development and variation of the suspensorium of primitive catfishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi) and their phylogenetic relationships. Bonn zool Monogr. 1992; 32:1-149.
  • Arratia G. Basal teleosts and teleostean phylogeny. Palaeo Ichthyologica. 1997; 7:1-168.
  • Arratia G. The monophyly of Teleostei and stem group teleosts. In: Mesozoic Fishes - Systematics and Fossil Record. Arratia G, Schultze H-P, editors. Munchen: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil; 1999. p.265-334.
  • Arratia G.The sister-group of Teleostei:consensus and disagreements. J Vert Paleont. 2001; 21:767-73.
  • Arratia G. Clupeocephala re-visited: Analysis of characters and homologies. Revista Biol Mar & Oceanogr. 2010; 45(Suppl.1):635-57.
  • Arratia G. Morphology, taxonomy, and phylogeny of Triassic pholidophorid fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei). J Vert Paleont. 2013; 33(Supl.):1-138. DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2013.835642
  • Arratia G. Complexities of Early Teleostei and the evolution of particular morphological structures through time. Copeia. 2015; 103(4):999-1025.
  • Arratia G. New Triassic teleosts (Actinopterygii, Teleosteomorpha) from northern Italy and their phylogenetic relationships among the most basal teleosts. J Vert Paleont. 2017; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2017.1312690
  • Arratia G, Cione LA. The fossil record of fossil fishes of Southern South America. In: Contributions of Southern South America to Vertebrate Paleontology. Arratia G, editor. Muenchner Geowiss. Abh.. Munchen: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil; 1996. p.9-72. (special volume)
  • Arratia G, Gayet M. Sensory canals and related bones of Tertiary siluriform crania from Bolivia and North America and comparison with Recent forms. J Vert Paleont. 1995; 15(3):482-505.
  • Arratia G, Huaquin L. Morphology of the lateral line system and of the skin of diplomystid and certain primitive loricarioid catfishes and systematic and ecological considerations. Bonner zool Monogr. 1995; 36:1-110.
  • Arratia G, Kapoor BG, Chardon M, Diogo R, editors. Catfishes. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers; 2003.
  • Arratia G, Quezada-Romegialli C. Understanding morphological variability in a taxonomic context in Chilean diplomystids (Teleostei: Siluriformes), including the description of a new species. PeerJ. 2017; 5(4):e2991; Available from: https://doi. org/10.7717/peerj.2991
  • Arratia G, Schultze H-P. Reevaluation of the caudal skeleton of certain actinopterygian fishes. III. Salmonidae. Homologization of caudal skeletal structures. J Morphol. 1992; 214(2):187-249.
  • Arratia G, Schultze H-P. Knochenfische im engeren Sinne (Teleostei). In: Solnhofen. Ein Fenster in the Jurazeit. Arratia G, Schultze H-P, Tischlinger H, Viohl G, editors. Munchen: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil.; 2015. p.389-409.
  • Begle DP. Relationships of the osmeroid fishes and the use of reductive characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Zool. 1991; 40(1):33-53.
  • Begle DP. Monophyly and relationships of the argentinoid fishes. Copeia. 1992;1992(2):350-66.
  • Berg LS. 1937. Classification of fishes, both Recent and fossil. Travaux de l'Institute de l'Academie des Sciences de l'URSS. 1937; 5:87-517.
  • Berg LS. 1958. System der Rezenten und fossilen Fischartigen und Fische. Berlin: Veb Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften. p. 1-310.
  • Betancur-R R, Broughton RE, Wiley EO, Carpenter K, Lopez JA, Li C et al. The tree of life and a new classification of bony fishes. PLoS Curr. 2013; Available from: doi:10.1371/currents. tol.53ba26640df0ccaee75bb165c8c26288.
  • Betancur-R R, Wiley EO, Arratia G, Acero A, Bailly N, Miya M et al. Phylogenetic classification of bony fishes. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2017; 17(162). Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0958-3
  • Bloom DD, Lovejoy NR. The evolutionary origins of diadromy inferred from a time-calibrated phylogeny for Clupeiformes (herrings and allies). Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2014; 281(1778). Available from: http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2081
  • Brito PM, Amaral CRL. An overview of the specific problems of Dastilbe Jordan, 1910 (Gonorynchiformes: Chanidae) from the Lower Cretaceous of western Gondwana. In: Mesozoic Fishes 4 - Homology and Phylogeny. Arratia G, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Munchen: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil; 2008. p.279-294.
  • Chakrabarty P, Faircloth BC, Alda F, Ludt WB, McMahan CD, Near TJ, Dornburg A et al. Phylogenomic systematics of ostariophysan fishes: ultraconserved elements support the surprising non-monophyly of Characiformes. Syst Biol. 2017; 66(6):881-885. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syx038.
  • Chang M-M, Maisey JG. Redescription of Ellimma branneri and Diplomystus shengliensis, and relations of some basal clupeomorphs. Amer Mus Novitates. 203; 3404:1-35
  • Chen WJ, Lavoue S, Mayden RL. Evolutionary origin and early biogeography of otophysan fishes (Ostariophysi: Teleostei). Evolution. 2013; 67(8):2218-39.
  • Davis MP, Arratia G, Kaiser TM. The first fossil shellear (Gonorynchiformes: Kneriidae) from the Eocene lake of Mahenge (Tanzania). In: Arratia G, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 5 - Global Diversity and Evolution. Munchen: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil; 2013. p.325-362.
  • Di Dario F. Evidence supporting a sister group relationship between Clupeoidea and Engrauloidea. Copeia. 2002; 2002:496-503.
  • Di Dario F. Homology between the recessus lateralis and cephalic sensory canals, with the proposition of additional synapomorphies for the Clupeiformes and the Clupeoidei. Zool J Linn Soc. 2004; 141(2):257-70. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00122.x
  • DiDarioF.Chirocentridsasengrauloids:evidencefromsuspensorium, branchial arches, and infraorbital bones (Clupeomorpha, Teleostei). Zool J Linnean Soc. 2009; 156(2):363-83.
  • Di Dario F, de Pinna MCC. The supratemporal system and the pattern of ramification of cephalic sensory canals in Denticeps clupeoides (Denticipitidae, Teleostei): Additional evidence formonophyly of Clupeiformes and Clupeoidei. Pap. Avulsos Zool. 2006; 46(10):107-23.
  • Dietze K. Redescription of Dastilbe crandalli (Chanidae, Euteleostei) from the Early Cretaceous Crato Formation in north-eastern Brazil. J Vert Paleont. 2007; 27(1):8-16.
  • Dingerkus G, Uhler LD. Enzyme clearing of alcian blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstration of cartilage. Stain Technol. 1977; 52:229-32.
  • Diogo R. On the cephalic and pectoral girdle muscles of the deep sea fish Alepocephalus rostratus, with comments on the functional morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the Alepocephaloidei (Teleostei).Animal Biology. 2008; 58(1):23-9.
  • Filleul A, Maisey J. 2004. Description of Santanichthys diasii (Otophysi, Characiformes) from the Albian of the Santana Formation and comments on its implications for otophysan relationships. Amer Mus Novitates. 2004; 3455:1-21.
  • Fink WL. Basal euteleosts: Relationships. In: Ontogeny and Systematic of Fishes. Moser GH, Richards WJ, Cohen DM, Fahay MP, Kendall AW, Jr, Richarson SL, editors. Lawrence, KS: Amer. Soc. Ichthyol. Herpetol. 1984; p.2002-6.
  • Fink WL, Weitzman SH. Relationships of the stomiiform fishes (Teleostei), with a redescription of D iplophos. Bull Mus Comp Zool. 1982; 150:31-93.
  • Fink SV, Fink WL. Interrelationships of the Ostariophysan Fishes (Teleostei). Zool J Linnean Soc. 1981; 72(4):297-353.
  • Fink SV, Fink WL. Interrelationships of ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei). In: Interrelationships of fishes. Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Johnson GD, editors. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996; p.209-249.
  • Fink SV, Greenwood PH, Fink WL. A critique on recent work on fossil ostariophysan fishes. Copeia. 1984; 1984(4):1033-41.
  • Forey PL.A three-dimensional skull of a primitive clupeomorph from the Cenomanian English Chalk, and implications for the evolution of the clupeomorph acusticolateralis system. In: Mesozoic Fishes 3 - Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. Arratia G, Tintori A, editors. Munchen: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil.; 2004. p.404-427.
  • Fujita K. The Caudal Skeleton of Teleostean Fishes. Tokyo: Tokai Univ. Press; 1990.
  • Gayet M. Cypriniform cretace en Amerique du Sud. Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris. 1982; 295(3): 1037-40.
  • Gayet M. Contribution a l'etude anatomique et systematique de l'ichthyofaune Cenomanienne du Portugal. Comun Serv Geol Port. 1985; 71:91-118.
  • Gayet M, Meunier F. Premiare decouverte de Gymnotiformes fossils (Pisces, Ostariophysi) dans le Miocene superieur de Bolivie. Comptes Rendue Acad Sci, Paris. 1991; 313:471-76.
  • Girone A. The Pleistocene bathyal teleostean fauna of Archi (Southern Italy): palaeoecological and palaeobiogeographic implications. Riv Italiana Paleont Strat. 2003; 109(1):99-110.
  • Girone A, Nolf D, Cappetta, H. Pleistocene fish otoliths from the Mediterranean Basin: a synthesis. Geobios. 2006; 39(5):651-71.
  • Gosline WA. Contributions toward a classification of modern isospondylous fishes. Bull British Mus Natur Hist, Zool. 1960; 6:265-327.
  • Grande L. Recent and fossil clupeomorph fishes with materials for revisions of the subgroups of clupeids. Bull Amer Mus Natur Hist. 1985; 181:231-372.
  • Grande L. Redescription of †Hypsidoris farsonensis (Teleostei: Siluriformes) with a reassessment of its phylogenetic relationships. J Vert Paleont. 1987; 7:24-54.
  • Grande T,Arratia G. Morphological analysis of the gonorynchiform postcranial skeleton. In: Gonorynchiformes and Ostariophysan Relationships. Grande T, Poyato-Ariza FJ, Diogo R, editors. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers; 2010. p.39-71.
  • Grande T, Poyato-Ariza FJ, Diogo R, editors. Gonorynchiformes and Ostariophysan Relationships. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers; 2010.
  • Greenwood PH. Fossil denticipid fishes from East Africa. Bull Brit Mus Nat Hist, Geol.1960; 5:1-11.
  • Greenwood PH, Rosen DE, Weitzman SH, Myers GS. Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes with a provisional classification of living forms. Bull Amer Mus Natur Hist. 1966; 131(4):339-456.
  • Greenwood PH, Rosen DE. Notes on the structure and relationships of the alepocephaloid fishes. American Mus Novitates. 1971; 2473:1-48.
  • Grunbaum T, Cloutier R. Ontogeny, variation, and homology in Salvelinus alpinus caudal skeleton (Teleostei: Salmonidae). J Morphol. 2010; 271(1):12-24.
  • Harrison T, Msuya P, Murray AM, Jacobbs BF, Baez, AM et al. Paleontological investigations at the Eocene locality of Mahenge in North-Central Tanzania, East Africa. In: Unusual Occurrences and Rarely Sampled Habitats. Gunnel GF, editor. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2001. p.39-74.
  • Ishiguro NB, Miya M, Nishida M. Basal euteleostean relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogenetic reality of the "Protacanthopterygii". Mol Phylog Evol. 2003; 27(3):476-88.
  • Jerzmaska A. Oligocene alepocephaloid fishes from the Polish Carpathians. Acta Paleontol Pol. 1979; 24(1):65-76.
  • Johnson GD, Patterson C. The gill arches of gonorynchiform fishes. South Afr J Sci. 1997; 93:594-600.
  • Johnson GD, Patterson C. Relationships of lower euteleostean fishes. In: Interrelationships of fishes. Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Johnson GD, editors. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. p.251-332.
  • Kaiser TM, Ansorge J, Arratia G, V. Bullwinkel V, Gunnell G, Herendeen PS et al. In: The maar lake of Mahenge (Tanzania) - unique evidence of Eocene terrestrial environments in sub-Sahara Africa. Z Deut Gesells Geowissenschaf. 2006; 157(3):99-120.
  • Lauder GV, Liem KF. The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian fishes. Bull Mus Comp Zool. 1983; 150:95-197.
  • Lavoue S, Konstantinidis P, Chen W-J. Progress in clupeiform systematics. In: Gania K, editor. Biology and Ecology of Sardines and Anchovies. VRC Press. Boca Raton, FL; 2014. p.3-42.
  • Lavoue S, Miya M, Inoue JG, Saitoh K, Ishiguro NB et al. Molecular systematics of the gonorynchiform fishes (Teleostei) based on whole mitogenome sequences: implications for higher-level relationships within the Otocephala. Mol Phyl Evol. 2005; 37(1):165-77.
  • Lavoue S, Miya M, Musikasinthorn P, Chen WJ, Nishida M. Mitogenomic evidence for an Indo-West Pacific origin of the Clupeoidei (Teleostei: Clupeiformes). PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e56485.
  • Lavoue S, Miya M, Poulsen JY, Moller PR, Nishida M. Monophyly, phylogenetic position and interfamilial relationships of the Alepocephaliformes (Teleostei) based on whole mitogenome sequences. Mol Phyl Evol. 2008; 47(3):1111-21.
  • Le HLV, Lecointre G, Perasso R. A 28S rRNA-based phylogeny of the gnathostomes: first steps in the analysis of conflict and congruence with morphologically based cladograms. Mol Phyl Evol. 1993; 2(1):31-51.
  • Lecointre G. Etude d l'impact de l'echantillonnage des especes et de la longueur des sequences sur la robustesse des phylogenies moleculaires; implications sur la phylogenie des teleosteens. [PhD Thesis]. Paris: Universite Paris VII, 1993.
  • Lecointre G, Nelson GJ. 1996. Clupeomorpha, sister-group of Ostariophysi. In: Interrelationships of Fishes. Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Johnson GD, editors. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. p.193-207.
  • Li C, Orti G. Molecular phylogeny of Clupeiformes (Actinopterygii) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phyl Evol. 2007; 44(1):386-398.
  • Lunberg JG, Baskin JN. The caudal skeleton of catfishes, order Siluriformes. Amer Mus Novitates. 1969; 2399:1-49.
  • Maisey J. A new clupeomorph fish from the Santana Formation (Albian) of NE Brazil. Amer Mus Novitates. 1993; 3076:1-15.
  • Malabarba LR, Di Dario F. A new predatory herring-like fish (Teleostei: Clupeiformes) from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil, and implications for relationships in the Clupeoidei. Zool J Linn Soc. 2017; 180(1):175-94.
  • Malabarba LR, Reis RE, Vari RP, Lucena ZMS, Lucena CAS, editors. Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS; 1998.
  • Malabarba MC, Malabarba LR. Biogeography of Characiformes: an evaluation of the available information of fossil and extant taxa. In: Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts. Nelson JS, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Munchen: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil; 2010. p.317-336.
  • Markle DF. Preliminary studies on the systematics of deep-sea Alepocephaloidea (Pisces: Salmoniformes). PhD Thesis, Virginia: The College of William and Mary. 1976.
  • Mayrinck D, Brito PM, Otero O. Anatomical review of Salminops ibericus, a Teleostei incertae sedis from the Cenomanian of Portugal, anciently assigned to Characiformes and possibly related to crossognathiform fishes. Cretaceous Res. 2015b; 56:66-75.
  • Mayrinck D, Brito PM, Otero O. Review of the osteology of the fossil fish formerly attributed to the genus Chanoides and implications for the definition of otophysan bony characters. J Syst Paleont. 2015a; 13(5):1-24.
  • Mayrinck, D, Brito PM, Meunier FJ, Alvarado-Ortega J, Otero O. †Sorbinichthys verraesi: An unexpected case of a benthic fish outside Acanthomorpha in the Upper Cretaceous of the Tethyan Sea. PlosOne. 2017; 12(8):e0183879. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183879
  • Monod T. Le complexe urophore des poisons teleosteens. Mem Inst Fondament. Afrique Noire. 1968; 81:1-705.
  • Murray AM, Wilson MVH. Two new paraclupeid fishes (Clupeomorpha: Ellimmichthyiformes) from the Upper Cretaceous of Morocco. In: Mesozoic Fishes 5 - Global diversity and Evolution, Arratia G, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Munchen: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil; 2013. p.267-290.
  • Nakatani M, Miya M, Mabuchi K, Saitoh K, Nishida M. Evolutionary history of Otophysi (Teleostei), a major clade of the modern freshwater fishes: Pangaean origin and Mesozoic radiation. BMC Evol Biol. 2011; 11:177. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-177
  • Near TJ, Eytan RI, Dornbur A, Kuhn KL, Moore JA, Davis PM et al. Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification. Proc Nat Acad Sciences USA. 2012; 109(34):13698-13703.
  • Nelson GJ. Epibranchial organs in lower teleostean fishes. J Zool, London. 1967; 153:71-89.
  • Nelson JS. Fishes of the World. 3rd ed.. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
  • Nelson JS: Fishes of the World. 4thed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
  • Nelson JS, Grande T, Wilson MVH. Fishes of the World. 5th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
  • Nybelin O. The polyural skeleton of Lepisosteus and certain other actinopterygians. Zool Scripta. 1977; 6(3):233-44.
  • Patterson, C. Two Upper Cretaceous Salmoniform fishes from the Lebanon. Bull Brit Mus Nat Hist, Geol. 1970; 19:205-96.
  • Patterson C, Rosen DE. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bull Amer Mus Natur Hist. 1977; 158:81-172.
  • de Pinna MCC. Teleostean monophyly. In: Interrelationships of fishes. Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Johnson GD, editors. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. p.147-162.
  • de Pinna MCC, di Dario F. The branchial arches of the primitive clupeomorpzh fish, Denticeps clupeoides, and their phylogenetic implication (Clupeiformes, Denticipitidae). In: Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts. Nelson JS, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Munchen: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil; 2010. p.251-268.
  • Poulsen JY, Moller PR, Lavoue S, Knudsen SW, Nishida M, Miya M. Higher and lower-level relationships of the deep-sea fish order Alepocephaliformes (Teleostei: Otocephala) inferred from whole mitogenome sequences. Biol J Linn Soc. 2009; 98(4):923-36.
  • Poyato-Ariza FJ, Grande T, Diogo R: Gonorynchiform interrelationships: Historic overview, analysis, and revised systematics of the group. In: Gonorynchiformes and Ostariophysan Relationships. Grande T, Poyato-Ariza FJ, Diogo R, editors. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers; 2010. p.227-338.
  • Reis RE, Kullander SO, Ferraris Junior CJ, editors. Check list of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. CLOFFSA. Fish Base Data of Neotropical Fishes. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs; 2003.
  • Rosen DE. Interrelationships of higher euteleostean fishes. In: Interrelationships of Fishes. Greenwood PH, Miles RS, Patterson C, editors. London: Academic Press; 1973. p.397-513.
  • Rosen DE. Phylogeny and zoogeography of salmoniform fishes and relationships of Lepidogalaxias salamandroides. Bull Amer Mus Natur Hist. 1974; 153:265-326.
  • Rosen DE. Teleostean interrelationships, morphological function and evolutionary inference. Amer Zool. 1982; 22:261-73.
  • Rosen DE. An essay on euteleostean classification. Amer Mus Novitates. 1985; 2827:1-57.
  • Rosen DE, Greenwood PH. Origin of the Weberian apparatus and the relationships of ostariophysans and gonorynchiform fishes. Amer Mus Novitates. 1970; 2428:1-25.
  • Sabaj Perez MH. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology: an online reference. Version 5.0. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. Available at http://www.asih.org (accessed on 22 September 2014).
  • de Santana CD, Vari RP, Wosiacki WB. The Untold Story of the Caudal Skeleton in the Electric Eel (Ostariophysi: Gymnotiformes: Electrophorus. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(7):e68719. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068719
  • Schultze H-P, Arratia G. Reevaluation of the caudal skeleton of teleosts (Actinopterygii, Osteichthyes). - Zool J Linn Soc. 1989; 97(3):189-231.
  • Schultze H-P, Arratia G. The caudal skeleton of basal teleosts, its conventions, and some of its major evolutionary novelties in a temporal dimension. In: Mesozoic Fishes 5 - Global Diversity and Evolution. Arratia G, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Munchen: Verlag F. Pfeil, 2013. p.187-246.
  • Sullivan JP, Lundberg JG, Hardman M. A phylogenetic analysis of the major groups of catfishes (Teleostei: Siluriformes) using rag1 and rag2 nuclear gene sequences. Mol Phyl Evol. 2006; 41(3):636-62.
  • Swofford DL, Maddison D. Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony. Math Biosci. 1987; 87(2):199- 229.
  • Whitehead PJP. Clupeoid fishes of the world (suborder Clupeoidei). Part 1. Chirocentridae, Clupeidae and Pristigasteridae. FAO Species Catalogue, 7. FAO Fish Synop. 1985; 7:1-303.
  • Whitehead PJP, Nelso GJ, Wongrata T. Clupeoid fishes of the world (suborder Clupeoidei). Part 2. Engraulididae. FAO Species Catalogue, 7. FAO Fish Synop. 1988; 7:305-579.
  • Wiley EO, Fuiten AM, Doosey MH, Lohman BK, Merkes C, Azuma M. The caudal skeleton of the zebrafish, Danio rerio, from a phylogenetic perspective: A polyural interpretation of homologous structures. Copeia. 2015; 103(4):740-750.
  • Wiley EO, Johnson GD. A teleost classification based on a monophyletic group. In: Origin and Phylogenetic Relationships on Teleosts. Nelson JS, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Munchen: Verlag. Dr. F. Pfeil; 2010. p.123-182.
  • Wiley EO, Lieberman BS. Phylogenetics. Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. Hoboken: New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011.
  • Zaragueta-Basil R. Basal clupeomorphs and ellimmichthyiform phylogeny. In: Mesozoic Fishes 3 - Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity.Arratia G, Tintori A, editors. Munchen: Verlag. Dr. F. Pfeil; 2004. p.391-404.