Published December 21, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Ergativity and depth of analysis

  • 1. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History

Description

In this paper, I argue that “depth of analysis” does not deserve the prestige that it is sometimes given in general linguistics. While language description should certainly be as detailed as possible, general linguistics must rely on worldwide comparison of languages, and this cannot be based on language-particular analyses. Rigorous quantitative comparison requires uniform measurement, and this implies abstracting away from many language-particular peculiarities. I will illustrate this on the basis of ergative patterns, starting out from I.A. Mel’čuk’s (1981) proposal for Lezgian. This proposal was not successful, but why not? And why is Baker’s (2015) theory of dependent case likewise unsuccessful? By contrast, quantitative worldwide research has found striking similarities of ergative coding patterns, which can be explained by the efficiency theory of asymmetric coding. I will argue that this success is due to a more cautious approach to understanding Human Language, which does not rely on the Mendeleyevian vision for grammar (that all grammars are made from the same innate building blocks).

Files

Haspelmath2019.pdf

Files (551.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:756da67267f8de684b1ab82a769fa17d
551.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

FormGram – Form-frequency correspondences in grammar 670985
European Commission