Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published December 31, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Unravelling a tangle of Mexican serpents: a systematic

Description

Robert C. Jadin, Eric N. Smith, Jonathan A. Campbell (2011): Unravelling a tangle of Mexican serpents: a systematic. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 163: 943-958, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00748.x

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:5A46FFA8FFA0FFC0FFCDFF98FFDAFFA2
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/5A46FFA8FFA0FFC0FFCDFF98FFDAFFA2

References

  • Arevalo ES, Davis SK, Sites JJW. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence and phylogenetic relationships among eight chromosome races of the Sceloporus grammicus complex (Phrynosomatidae) in central Mexico. Systematic Biology 43: 387-418.
  • Benabib M, Kjer KM, Sites JJW. 1997. Mitochondrial DNA sequence-based phylogeny and the evolution of viviparity in the Sceloporus scalaris group Reptilia, Squamata). Evolution 51: 1262-1275.
  • Campbell JA. 1976. A new terrestrial pit viper of the genus Bothrops (Reptilia, Serpentes, Crotalidae) from western Mexico. Journal of Herpetology 10: 151-160.
  • Campbell JA. 1977. The distribution, variation, and natural history of the Middle American highland pitvipers, Bothrops barbouri and Bothrops godmani. Master's thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.
  • Campbell JA. 1985. A new species of highland pitviper of the genus Bothrops from southern Mexico. Journal of Herpetology 19: 48-54.
  • Campbell JA. 1988. The distribution, variation, natural history, and relationships of Porthidium barbouri (Viperidae). Acta Zoologica Mexicana, Nueva Serie 26: 1- 32.
  • Campbell JA, Flores-Villela O. 2008. A new long-tailed rattlesnake (Viperidae) from Guerrero, Mexico. Herpetologica 64: 246-257.
  • Campbell JA, Lamar WW. 1989. Venomous reptiles of Latin America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Campbell JA, Lamar WW. 1992. Taxonomic status of miscellaneous Neotropical viperids, with the description of a new genus. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University 153: 1-31.
  • Campbell JA, Lamar WW. 2004. Venomous reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. 2 vols. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing Associates.
  • Campbell JA, Solorzano A. 1992. The distribution, variation, and natural history of the Middle American montane pitviper, Porthidium godmani. In: Campbell JA, Brodie ED Jr, eds. Biology of the pitvipers. Tyler, TX: Selva, 223- 250.
  • Castoe TA, Daza JM, Smith EN, Sasa MM, Kuch U, Campbell JA, Chippindale PT, Parkinson CL. 2009. Comparative phylogeography of pitvipers suggests a consensus of ancient Middle American highland biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 36: 88-103.
  • Castoe TA, Parkinson CL. 2006. Bayesian mixed models and the phylogeny of pitvipers (Viperidae: Serpentes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 91-110.
  • Cuesta-Terron C. 1921. Los crotalinos Mexicanos. Memorias de la Sociedad Cientifica Antonio Alzate 39: 173- 194.
  • Davis WB, Dixon JR. 1959. Snakes of the Chilpancingo region, Mexico. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 72: 79-92.
  • Daza JM, Castoe TA, Parkinson CL. 2010. Using regional comparative phylogeographic data from snake lineages to infer historical processes in Middle America. Ecography 33: 343-354.
  • Dowling HG. 1951. A proposed standard system of counting ventrals in snakes. British Journal of Herpetology 1: 97- 99.
  • Dowling HG, Savage JM. 1960. A guide to the snake hemipenis: a survey of basic structure and systematic characteristics. Zoologica 45: 17-30.
  • Duges AAD. 1896. Reptiles y batracios de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. La Naturaleza 2: 479-485.
  • Dunn ER. 1919. Two new crotaline snakes from western Mexico. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 32: 213-216.
  • Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792-1797.
  • Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
  • Fenwick AM, Gutberlet RL Jr, Evans JA, Parkinson CL. 2009. Morphological and molecular evidence for phylogeny and classification of South American pitvipers, genera Bothrops, Bothriopsis, and Bothrocophias (Serpentes: Viperidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 156: 617- 640.
  • Flores-Villela O, Canseco-Marquez L. 2004. Nuevas especies y cambios taxanomicos para la herpetofauna de Mexico. Acta Zoologica Mexicana, Nueva Serie 20: 115- 144.
  • Flores-Villela O, Kjer KM, Benabib M, Sites JJW. 2000. Multiple data sets, congruence, and hypothesis testing for the phylogeny of basal groups of the lizard genus Sceloporus (Squamata, Phrynosomatidae). Systematic Biology 49: 713- 739.
  • Grismer LL, Grismer JL, McGuire JA. 2006. A new species of pitviper of the genus Popeia (Squamata: Viperidae) from Pulau Tioman, Pahang, West Malaysia. Zootaxa 1305: 1-19.
  • Gunther ACL. 1863. Hird account of the snakes in the collection of the British Museum. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 3rd Series 12: 348-365.
  • Gutberlet RL Jr. 1998. Phylogenetic position of the Mexican black-tailed pitviper (Squamata: Viperidae: Crotalinae). Herpetologica 54: 184-206.
  • Gutberlet RL Jr, Harvey MB. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of new world pitvipers as inferred from anatomical evidence. In: Schuett GW, Hoggren M, Douglas ME, Greene HW, eds. Biology of the vipers. Eagle Mountain, UT: Eagle Mountain Publishing, 51-68.
  • Gutberlet RL Jr, Harvey MB. 2004. The evolution of new world venomous snakes. In: Campbell JA, Lamar WW, eds. Venomous reptiles of the Western Hemisphere. 2 Vols. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing Associates, 634-682.
  • Jadin RC. 2007. Prey items of the Tzotzil montane pitviper (Cerrophidion tzotzilorum). Southwestern Naturalist 52: 437-438.
  • Jadin RC. 2010. Morphological phylogeny of the montane pitvipers (Crotalinae: Cerrophidion) with comments on the conservation of Mesoamerican highlands. In: Wilson LD, Townsend JH, Johnson JD, eds. Conservation of Mesoamerican amphibians and reptiles. Eagle Mountain, UT: Eagle Mountain Publishing, 674-685.
  • Jadin RC, Gutberlet RL Jr, Smith EN. 2010. Phylogeny, evolutionary morphology, and hemipenis descriptions of the Middle American jumping pitvipers (Serpentes: Crotalinae: Atropoides). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 48: 360-365.
  • Keogh JS. 1999. Evolutionary implications of hemipenial morphology in the terrestrial Australian elapid snakes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 125: 239- 278.
  • Kjer KM, Swigonova Z, LaPolla JS, Broughton RE. 2007. Why weight? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 999-1004.
  • Klauber LM. 1972. Rattlesnakes: their habits, life histories, and influence on mankind, 2nd edn. 2 vol. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Knight A, Mindell DP. 1993. Substitution bias, weighting of DNA sequence evolution, and the phylogenetic position of Fea's viper. Systematic Biology 42: 18-31.
  • Lopez-Luna MA, Vogt RC, de la Torre-Loranca MA. 1999. A new species of montane pitviper from Veracruz, Mexico. Herpetologica 55: 382-389.
  • Leviton AE, Gibbs JRH, Heal E, Dawson CE. 1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology. Part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia 1985: 802-832.
  • Martin del Campo R. 1935. Nota acerca de la distribucion geografica de los reptiles ponzonosos en Mexico. Anales del Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma Mexico 6: 291-300.
  • Myers CW, Cadle JE. 2003. On the snake hemipenis, with notes on Psomophis and techniques of eversion: a response to Dowling. Herpetological Review 34: 295-302.
  • Nicholas KB, Nicholas HB. 1997. GeneDoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Available at: http://www.cris.com/~Ketchup/genedoc.shtml
  • Nylander JAA. 2004. Mrmodeltest v2.2. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
  • Parkinson CL, Campbell JA, Chippindale PT. 2002. Multigene phylogenetic analyses of pitvipers, with comments on their biogeography. In: Schuett GW, Hoggren M, Douglas ME, Greene HW, eds. Biology of the vipers. Eagle Mountain, UT: Eagle Mountain Publishing, 93-110.
  • Parkinson CL, Moody SM, Ahlquist JE. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the 'Agkistrodon Complex' based on mitochondrial DNA sequence data. In: Thorpe RS, Wuster W, Malhotra A, eds. Snakes: ecology, evolution, and snakebite. Oxford, UK: The Zoological Society of London, Clarendon Press, 63-78.
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2009. Tracer v1.5. Available at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/
  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
  • Savage JM. 2002. The amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Shreve B. 1938. A new Agkistrodon from Mexico. Copeia 1938: 9.
  • Smith EN, Ferrari-Castro JA. 2008. A new species of jumping pitviper of the genus Atropoides (Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae) from the Sierra de Botaderos and the Sierra La Muralla, Honduras. Zootaxa 1948: 57- 68.
  • Smith HM. 1941. Notes on Mexican snakes of the genus Trimeresurus. Zoologica 26: 61-64.
  • Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). version 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1596- 1599.
  • Vogel G, David P, Pauwels OSG. 2004. A review of morphological variation in Trimeresurus popeiorum (Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae), with the description of two new species. Zootaxa 727: 1-63.
  • Werman SD. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Central and South American pitvipers of the genus Bothrops (sensu lato): cladistic analyses of biochemical and anatomical characters. In: Campbell JA, Brodie ED Jr, eds. Biology of the pitvipers. Tyler, TX: Selva, 21-40.
  • Wuster W, Thorpe R, Puorto G, BBBSP. 1996. Systematics of the Bothrops atrox complex (Reptilia: Serpentes: Viperidae) in Brazil: a multivariate analysis. Herpetologica 52: 263-271.
  • Zaher H, Prudente ALC. 2003. Hemipenes of Siphlophis (Serpentes, Xenodontinae) and techniques of hemipenial preparation in snakes: a response to Dowling. Herpetological Review 34: 302-307.