Published March 20, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Defamilisation/Familisation Measures and pension income of women – the case of Taiwan

  • 1. University of Sheffield
  • 2. Hong Kong Baptist University
  • 3. Yan Oi Tong Community Centre

Description

This paper examines how defamilization and familization measures can affect women's capacity to accumulate pension income and their subsequent standard of living after retirement. Firstly, it highlights the concepts of defamilization and familization and discusses the potential of these measures in assisting women to save pension income through the “commodification” and “decommodification” of labour. Secondly, it examines the major pension policies and examples of defamilization and familization measures in Taiwan. It shows how the current limited provision of such measures could create “double jeopardy” for women, affecting access to paid employment or resources to enable women who wish to undertake caring responsibilities to do so, ultimately impacting their capacity to accumulate pension income. Thirdly, it suggests ways to strengthen defamilization and familization measures in order to enable women to accumulate sufficient retirement income on the basis of three preconditions: policy attention to the reciprocal relationship between familization/defamilization measures and pension schemes for women; a recognition of differences between women in their preferred strategies to accumulate pension income; and an emphasis on a life course perspective to understand the double jeopardies faced by women in saving for retirement.

Files

ASWP-Aug-2016-0043 resubmission main text (2).pdf

Files (780.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1c17e6774ef82cc32693286f0ab5d8e0
780.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

European Commission
SIPEA – Social Investment Perspective in Work-Family Reconciliation Measures in Europe and East Asia 708305