SOURCES OF TERMINOLOGICAL FORMATION AND PATTERNS OF BORROWING IN UZBEK SIGN LANGUAGE
Authors/Creators
- 1. National Pedagogical University of Uzbekistan 2nd year master's student in the field of Surdopedagogy
- 2. Worldly Knowledge Publishing Centre
Description
This thesis examines the sources through which specialized vocabulary may develop in Uzbek Sign Language (UzSL), with attention to internal sign formation, contact-induced borrowing, fingerspelling, semantic extension and educational standardization. The analysis combines Uzbek legal and scholarly sources with established international research on sign-language lexicons. It distinguishes documented policy and general linguistic mechanisms from hypothetical examples that require verification with Deaf signers. A comparative matrix illustrates the strengths and limitations of different term-formation pathways. The study argues that sustainable terminological development depends on Deaf-community participation, video-based documentation, regional variation research and transparent evaluation of proposed signs. No original corpus or fieldwork is claimed.
Files
138-140.pdf
Additional details
References
- 1.Republic of Uzbekistan. Law No. O'RQ-641, On the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (15 October, 2020). https://www.lex.uz/en/docs/5694817
- 2.President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Resolution No. PQ-407, On Additional Measures for the Development of Uzbek Sign Language and Braille (20 October). https://www.lex.uz/uz/acts/6248469
- 3.Urunova, Z. N., & Bakhromova, N. A. Research on terminology issues in Uzbek Sign Language. Ethiopian International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 13(4), 1455–1460. https://zenodo.org/records/19691687. 2026.
- 4.Historical Change in Signed Languages. (2016). In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Linguistics / Oxford Handbook Topics in Linguistics (online chapter). https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/42051/chapter/355826164
- 5.Montemurro, K., & Brentari, D. Emphatic fingerspelling as code-mixing in American Sign Language. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 3(1), 61:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v3i1.4357