Published October 16, 2026 | Version v1

Mapping Baseline Perceptions of Industry 5.0 Technology: A Survey Design for Pilot Organisations

Description

Background

As the focus shifts towards Industry 5.0, successful implementation requires an understanding of how workers and teams perceive key ELSA dimensions, such as cybersecurity, privacy, trust, and fairness. Despite the centrality of these factors, there is limited systematic baseline data on how these dimensions interact and support AI adoption. The Horizon Europe SEISMEC project aims to co-design and pilot Industry 5.0 technologies in the workplace. Establishing a baseline for this project is essential for examining the efficacy of the co-design process, and for supporting innovation within SEISMEC. 

 

Research Approach

This study aims to determine a baseline for worker perceptions on factors which may impact AI adoption. We have developed a survey, utilising standardised instruments, which is being administered to the organisations participating in SEISMEC. Respondents are asked to answer either with reference to (a) the technologies they currently use in their work, or (b) the SEISMEC technology that will be implemented in the future. The survey includes measures covering cybersecurity and privacy perceptions and practices, trust and understanding, perceived fairness, organisational learning opportunities, and existing co-design practices. It also incorporates items on the SEISMEC CAPS factors which include productivity, collaboration, automation and autonomy, and physical and psychological safety. 

 

Findings

Data collection is currently underway. This contribution focuses on the survey design, conceptual rationale, and preliminary findings. The presentation will focus on the baseline measures for the concepts and the CAPS empowerment factors, distinguishing between current and anticipated technologies implemented by the pilot organisations. 

 

Conclusion

This work provides a methodological foundation for evaluating Industry 5.0 implementation across diverse pilot contexts. The baseline survey will inform subsequent co-design activities within the SEISMEC project as well as enabling longitudinal comparisons once the technologies are deployed. Future stages will analyse changes over time and explore how organisational conditions shape adoption.

 

Files

AIHHH_Mapping_ONeill_Brown_Sept2026.pdf

Files (467.6 kB)

Name Size
md5:77350d04913b5a5c142c91cd540e876b
467.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

European Commission
SEISMEC - Supporting European Industry Success Maximization through Empowerment Centred development 101135884

References

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Ehrhardt, N., Renn, M., & Utz, S. (2025). Navigating fairness: Introducing the multidimensional AIM-FAIR scale for evaluating AI decision-making. AI & Society, 40, 6181–6199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02354-2
  • Gulati, S., Sousa, S., & Lamas, D. (2019). Design, development and evaluation of a human-computer trust scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(10), 1004–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1656779
  • McKnight, D. H., Carter, M., & Clay, P. (2009). Trust in technology: Development of a set of constructs and measures. In Proceedings of the 2009 DIGIT Conference (Paper 10). Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/digit2009/10
  • Schoeffer, J., Machowski, Y., & Kühl, N. (2022). Perceptions of fairness and trustworthiness based on explanations in human vs. automated decision-making. In Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1095–1102). University of Hawai'i Press. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2022.134