The academe as the source of research and the knowledge utilization uptake in the health care system
Description
This descriptive-correlational research determined the relationship between the perceived level of the characteristics of the academe as the source of research and the knowledge utilization uptake of the academic research among health care professionals in the health care systems. Researcher-made questionnaire was used consisting of items related to credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, support, sophistication and communication quality was also employed. Moreover, an adapted questionnaire from the Knowledge Utilization Uptake Scale was used. The overall level of the perceived characteristics of the source in terms of the credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, support, sophistications and communication quality was fair. Generally, a very poor level of knowledge utilization uptake of the academic research was identified. Respondents were highly aware of the research but very poor in the aspects of reception, cognition, discussion, reference, effort, adoption and impact. Pearson r revealed a strong positive correlation between the variables. Finally, the perceived level on the characteristics of the source of the health research was associated with the knowledge utilization uptake. Hence, this contributed to the theory on the research translation from the academe to the health care system that source was an influential element.
Files
52-Article Text-67-1-10-20181125.pdf
Files
(787.3 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:227d4e3b9bca8f32c1508e9dac72015b
|
787.3 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Beebe, S., & Beebe, S. (2005). Public speaking: An audience-centered approach (6th edition).
- Allyn and Bacon Publishers.Bonin, E.N. (2007). How context influences knowledge use in public health units (Master's thesis, University of Waterloo). Retrieved from http://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/10012/3465/1/Bonin_MSc_Thesis.pdf
- Cook, S. (2013). Assessing the credibility of a source. Retrieved from http://goldenageofgaia.com/disclosure/channels-and-sources/credibility-analysis/
- Cornell University Library (2010). Critically analyzing information sources. Retrieved from http://olinuris.library.cornell.edu/ref/research/skill26.htm
- Desberg, P., & Fisher, F. (1998). Determining the credibility of sources. Retrieved from http://www.abacon.com/twt/cred.html
- Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., Lindzey, G. (1998). The Handbook of Social Psychology. Oxford University Press.
- Joshi, K.D., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2004). Knowledge transfer among face-to-face information systems development team members: Examining the role of knowledge, source, and relational context. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04). Track 8: 80248a.
- Ko, D.G., Kirch, L.J., & King, W.R. (2005). Antecedents of Knowledge transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations. Management Information System Quarterly, 29(1), 59-85.
- National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research (1996). A review of the literature on dissemination and knowledge utilization. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.researchutilization.org/matrix/resources/dedp/
- Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (2008). A review of the literature on dissemination and knowledge utilization. Retrieved from http://www.researchutilization.org/matrix/resources/dedp/
- The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York (2013). Evaluating the credibility of your sources. Retrieved from https://www.college.columbia.edu/academics/integrity/credibility