Piloting the use of PIDGraph data in Research.fi
Authors/Creators
-
1.
CSC - IT Center for Science (Finland)
-
2.
DataCite
Description
Research.fi is a national service for collecting, integrating and disseminating information on research conducted in Finland. This includes information on publications and related research outputs (including in the arts), datasets, funding decisions and research infrastructures. Many other countries and regions also work on the development of CRISes. Sometimes features are developed before there is enough data to take full advantage of them. Sometimes you just wait for a critical mass of data to be available before starting as feature development. In this case it is a question of information on the various connections between different research objects. Research.fi has been somewhere in between, with 4 years since its initial release waiting for relationship data to come. You build it, and the data will come - has been a long wait. But PIDGraph to the rescue! This paper describes to piloting of PIDGraph scientific knowledge graph data in research.fi - to fill in the missing links. The PIDGraph is a collection of metadata about research objects, authors, publishers, institutions, and other research related items, all identified by persistent identifiers, and a series of systems to expose that metadata and make it available for analysis and integration with other systems.
Files
PROC_CRIS2014_Suominen.pdf
Files
(1.5 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:6d79976032def8e8b5bb87cc07cd8b18
|
1.5 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Anonymous, 2019. Latest PID best practices and user stories topics - the PID forum. URL: https://pidforum.org/c/pid-best-practices/8.
- Brito, G., Mombach, T., Valente, M.T., 2019. Migrating to GraphQL: A practical assessment, in: 2019 IEEE 26th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), IEEE. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2019.8667986, doi:10.1109/saner.2019.8667986
- de Castro, P., Herb, U., Rothfritz, L., Schöpfel, J., 2022. Some reflections on the current PID landscape – with an emphasis on risks and trust issues. Procedia Computer Science 211, 28–35. URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877050922016386, doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.173
- Cousijn, H., Braukmann, R., Fenner, M., Ferguson, C., van Horik, R., Lammey, R., Meadows, A., Lambert, S., 2021. Connected research: The potential of the PID Graph. Patterns 2, 100180. doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100180
- Dengis, P.B., Bal, I.D., 2022. Monitoring open science policy using a regional CRIS – the flanders case with FRIS. Procedia Computer Science 211, 101–110. doi:10.1016/J.PROCS.2022.10.181.
- Fenner, M., Aryani, A., 2019. Introducing the PID Graph — FREYA. URL: https://www.project-freya.eu/en/blogs/blogs/the-pid-graph https://blog.datacite.org/introducing-the-pid-graph/, doi:10.5438/jwvf-8a66
- Haak, L.L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., Ratner, H., 2012. ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing 25, 259–264. doi:10.1087/20120404
- Haapamäki, J., 2024. Developing Research Information Hub in Finland, a view from the ministry, euroCRIS. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11366/2571
- Ibanez, K.H., 2022. Research Portal Denmark: an update, euroCRIS. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11366/2251
- Jeffery, K.G., Asserson, A., 2006. CRIS: Central relating information system, Leuven University Press. pp. 109–120
- Končić, I., Konjević, S., Hoić, M., Macan, B., 2024. The role of CroRIS in promoting Open Science in Croatia, euroCRIS. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11366/2537
- Lammey, R., 2020. Solutions for identification problems: a look at the research organization registry. Science Editing 7, 65–69. URL: http://escienceediting.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.6087/kcse.192, doi:10.6087/KCSE.192
- Manghi, P., Bardi, A., 2019. The OpenAIRE Research Graph - Opportunities and challenges for science. URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2600275#.X6LAY8MpZph.mendeley, doi:10.5281/ZENODO.2600275
- Meadows, A., Haak, L.L., Brown, J., 2019. Persistent identifiers: The building blocks of the research information infrastructure. Insights: the UKSG Journal 32. doi:10.1629/UKSG.457
- Quiña Mera, A., Fernandez, P., García, J.M., Ruiz-Cortés, A., 2023. GraphQL: A Systematic Mapping Study. ACM Comput. Surv. 55. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3561818, doi:10.1145/3561818
- Neff, S., Hartmann, S., Hicker, U., Fürst, E., Erat, V., 2022. Implementing CRIS interfaces with RIS Synergy: Challenges and opportunities of a multidisciplinary bottom-up approach. Procedia Computer Science 211, 118–125. doi:10.1016/J.PROCS.2022.10.183
- Nikkanen, J., Puuska, H.M., 2022. Researchers' profiles in Finnish Research Information Hub. Procedia Computer Science 211, 206–210. URL: https://dspacecris.eurocris.org/handle/11366/1989, doi:10.1016/J.PROCS.2022.10.193
- Nurseitov, N., Paulson, M., Reynolds, R., Izurieta, C., 2009. Comparison of JSON and XML data interchange formats: A case study, pp. 157–162
- Paskin, N., 2009. Digital Object Identifier (DOI®) System. CRC Press. pp. 1586–1592. URL: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781000031805/chapters/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044418, doi:10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044418
- Sivertsen, G., 2016. Data integration in scandinavia. Scientometrics 106. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1817-x
- de Sompel, H.V., Sanderson, R., Shankar, H., Klein, M., 2014. Persistent identifiers for scholarly assets and the web: The need for an unambiguous mapping. International Journal of Digital Curation 9, 331–342. URL: https://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/9.1.331, doi:10.2218/IJDC.V9I1.320
- Suominen, T., Rydman, W., 2021. Research.fi is a national PID-graph implementation. URL: https://zenodo.org/record/4494378, doi:10.5281/ZENODO.4494378
- Suominen, T., Tatum, C., Sipponen, S., Rydman, W., & Ross, S. (2024). Piloting the use of RAiD in Research.fi. Procedia Computer Science, 249, 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2024.11.068