ALFAwetlands - Wetland restoration for the future

Part of EU Open Research Repository
Published February 26, 2026 | Version v1
Presentation Open

In situ measurements of N2O emissions in various European wetlands

Authors/Creators

  • 1. ROR icon Centre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement
  • 2. EDMO icon Finnish Meteorological Institute
  • 3. Latvian State Forest Research Institute "Silava"
  • 4. EDMO icon Research Institute for Nature and Forest
  • 5. EDMO icon Universitat de Barcelona, Ecology Department
  • 6. ROR icon Natural Resources Institute Finland
  • 7. EDMO icon University of Tartu
  • 8. ROR icon Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications

Description

Wetlands play a complex role as both sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and carbon sinks, making it essential to understand their dynamics and effects on biodiversity. The increasing pressures from climate change and human activities can disrupt the natural balance of these ecosystems, resulting in elevated GHG emissions. Therefore, enhancing our understanding of the factors influencing GHG production in wetlands is urgent for improving large-scale modelling of these processes. This study focused on N2O, which is primarily produced through the microbial process of denitrification, and for which a satisfactory large-scale model formulation is lacking. Our objective was to quantify and characterize these emissions in situ and to identify unifying abiotic factors (humidity, carbon, temperature, and nitrate). To achieve this, in the framework of the European project Alfawetlands, we selected contrasting study sites that varied by wetland type (floodplains, peatlands, drained forests…) and climate zone, thereby gathering extensive data essential for our modelling efforts.

A total of 21 sites were selected across Belgium, Estonia, Finland, France, and Spain. For each location, three treatments were applied directly in soil: water, water with nitrate, and water with nitrate and acetate. N2O emissions, soil moisture, and soil temperature were regularly measured during one or two days after treatment.

The results indicated that N2O emissions varied significantly based on wetland type and latitude. Drained forests located in north-boreal vegetation regions in Finland demonstrated the lowest N2O fluxes, while floodplains and mountain peatlands respectively in Belgium and Spain showed the highest fluxes. As the lowest fluxes were observed in the highest latitudes, soil temperature could be an important factor to control denitrification and N2O emissions. Ongoing data analysis and measurements are focused on further elucidating the spatial and temporal heterogeneities of denitrification processes, with the goal of effectively incorporating these factors into our modelling efforts.

Files

Files (5.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0b3457210b25cdd646dffddb739fb1e4
5.6 MB Download

Additional details

Funding

European Commission
ALFAwetlands - Wetland restoration for the future 101056844

References

  • Fifth Assessment Report—IPCC. (n.d.). Retrieved 25 June 2025, from https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar5/
  • Frostegård, Å., Vick, S. H. W., Lim, N. Y. N., Bakken, L. R., & Shapleigh, J. P. (2022). Linking meta-omics to the kinetics of denitrification intermediates reveals pH-dependent causes of N2O emissions and nitrite accumulation in soil. The ISME Journal, 16(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01045-2
  • Hénault, C., & Germon, J. C. (2000). NEMIS, a predictive model of denitrification on the field scale. European Journal of Soil Science, 51(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00314.x
  • Kanaan, R., Darnajoux, R., Escarmena, L., Sauvage, S., Camboulive, T., Druilhe, J.-L., & Sánchez-Pérez, J. M. (2025). A New Method to Investigate Denitrification Dynamics During Simulated Floods in Soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 76(2), e70098. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70098
  • Mander, Ü., Krasnova, A., Escuer-Gatius, J., Espenberg, M., Schindler, T., Machacova, K., Pärn, J., Maddison, M., Megonigal, J. P., Pihlatie, M., Kasak, K., Niinemets, Ü., Junninen, H., & Soosaar, K. (2021). Forest canopy mitigates soil N2O emission during hot moments. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 4(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-021-00194-7
  • Tian, H., Xu, R., Canadell, J. G., Thompson, R. L., Winiwarter, W., Suntharalingam, P., Davidson, E. A., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Prather, M. J., Regnier, P., Pan, N., Pan, S., Peters, G. P., Shi, H., Tubiello, F. N., Zaehle, S., Zhou, F., … Yao, Y. (2020). A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks. Nature, 586(7828), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2780-0
  • Wrage, N., Lauf, J., Del Prado, A., Pinto, M., Pietrzak, S., Yamulki, S., Oenema, O., & Gebauer, G. (2004). Distinguishing sources of N2 O in European grasslands by stable isotope analysis. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 18(11), 1201–1207. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1461
  • Zhao, S., Zhang, B., Sun, X., & Yang, L. (2021). Hot spots and hot moments of nitrogen removal from hyporheic and riparian zones: A review. Science of The Total Environment, 762, 144168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144168