Deterministic Bias Detection for NYC Local Law 144: Why Reproducibility Matters More Than Accuracy
Description
This technical report presents a reproducibility-first architecture for detecting linguistic bias in job descriptions under New York City Local Law 144. While most bias detection tools rely on probabilistic machine-learning models, this work argues that regulatory compliance requires deterministic systems capable of producing identical, verifiable results over time.
The paper details a deterministic bias detection engine built around rule-based pattern matching, version-controlled lexicons, reproducible scoring, and cryptographic evidence generation. It explains why probabilistic AI models struggle to meet evidentiary and auditability requirements, and how deterministic architectures enable replayable analyses, tamper-evident audit trails, and legally defensible documentation.
The report covers system architecture, implementation trade-offs, performance characteristics, known limitations, and deployment patterns, with specific focus on compliance obligations imposed by NYC Local Law 144. It is intended for compliance officers, legal counsel, auditors, HR technology leaders, and engineers building or evaluating AI systems used in employment decision workflows.
This work positions deterministic bias detection as a preventive compliance control rather than a substitute for statutory bias audits, and emphasizes transparency, reproducibility, and evidentiary integrity as foundational requirements for responsible AI governance in regulated hiring contexts.
Files
Deterministic Bias Detection for NYC Local Law 144 Why Reproducibility Matters More Than Accuracy In AI Law.pdf
Files
(469.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:5880fe8c760b902cdddcfd110410a19b
|
469.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
Dates
- Issued
-
2025-12-25Compliance documentation
Software
- Development Status
- Active
References
- Dastin, J. (2018). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. October 10, 2018
- Gaucher, D., Friesen, J., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109-128.
- Horvath, L. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2021). The buffering effect of social networks on the relationship between gender bias in tech job descriptions and interest. Sex Roles, 85, 592-605
- Meyman, E. (2024). Deterministic governance as epistemic commitment: Why reproducibility matters for AI accountability. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5659170
- New York City Council. (2021). Local Law 144 of 2021.
- New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection. (2024)
- Automated Employment Decision Tools. Enacted December 11, 2021
- New York State Office of the Comptroller. (2025).
- Enforcement of Local Law 144, Automated employment decision tools. Audit Report, December 2, 2024.
- Final rules for automated employment decision tools. Published April 6, 2023.