Published March 31, 2025 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

Enablers of low-latency immersive interaction in future remote-rendered Mixed Reality applications

Description

Mixed Reality (MR) has launched from science fiction but its entrance
in reality can reshape our society. By combining the physical
and virtual worlds, it provides novel ways of immersive interactions
and experiences and by these means enables a new generation of
applications. The most exciting and challenging ones support collaborative,
multi-user operation in large geographical scale, require
real-time environment comprehension and high visual fidelity. The
success or failure is definitely impacted by the capabilities and
performance limits of edge cloud platforms and 5G/6G networks
providing the offloading features for CPU/GPU intensive MR functions.
In addition, the desired quality of user experience calls for further
mechanisms at the application level hiding the consequences
of varying network characteristics. In this paper, we propose a
novel edge cloud based architecture for future remote-rendered MR
applications supporting low-latency immersive interactions. Our
contribution is threefold. First, the system architecture is presented
focusing on the remote rendering, 3D simulation and environment
detection control loops. Second, we highlight the main features
of our proof-of-concept prototype and our dedicated application,
namely the Mixed Reality version of a Rocket League inspired game.
Third, the concepts are validated via experiments in a Beyond 5G
infrastructure where we analyze the operation and latency characteristics
of the overall system. In addition, the quality of the user
experience is also evaluated via real-life experiments conducted as
part of a student competition. The results show that the latency and
jitter characteristics of the most sensitive render loop can be managed
efficiently together by a network-level control (slice priorities)
and an application-level (dynamic jitter buffer) mechanism.

Files

3712676.3714448 (1).pdf

Files (3.4 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:189eeebc80c95b00f2fa223c8a0545b3
3.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

European Commission
IMAGINE-B5G - Advanced 5G Open Platform for Large Scale Trials and Pilots across Europe (IMAGINE-B5G) 101096452
European Commission
SMARTY - Scalable and Quantum Resilient Heterogeneous Edge Computing enabling Trustworthy AI 101140087

References

  • Narmeen N. Al-Hiyari and Shaidah S. Jusoh. 2021. Healthcare Training Application: 3D First Aid Virtual Reality. In International Conference on Data Science, E-Learning and Information Systems 2021 (DATA'21). Association for Computing Machinery, 107–116. doi:10.1145/3460620.3460741
  • Fredrik Alriksson, Oskar Drugge, Anders Furuskär, Jonas Kronander, Jose Luis Pradas, Ying Sun, et al. 2023. Future network requirements for extended reality applications. Ericsson Technology Review 2023, 4 (2023), 2–12.
  • Apple. 2025. ARKit. https://developer.apple.com/augmented-reality/arkit/.
  • Jieyu Chen, Zhenghao Xi, Junxin Lu, and Jingjing Ji. 2022. Multi-object tracking based on network flow model and ORB feature. Applied Intelligence 52, 11 (Sept. 2022), 12282–12300. doi:10.1007/s10489-021-03042-6
  • Hung-Lin Chi, Shih-Chung Kang, and Xiangyu Wang. 2013. Research trends and opportunities of augmented reality applications in architecture, engineering, and construction. Automation in Construction 33 (Aug. 2013), 116–122. doi:10.1016/j. autcon.2012.12.017
  • Archi Dasgupta, Mark Manuel, Rifat Sabbir Mansur, Nabil Nowak, and Denis Gračanin. 2020. Towards Real Time Object Recognition For Context Awareness in Mixed Reality: A Machine Learning Approach. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). 262–268. doi:10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00054
  • Mohammed S. Elbamby, Cristina Perfecto, Mehdi Bennis, and Klaus Doppler. 2018. Toward Low-Latency and Ultra-Reliable Virtual Reality. IEEE Network 32, 2 (2018), 78–84. doi:10.1109/MNET.2018.1700268
  • Yalda Ghasemi, Heejin Jeong, Sung Ho Choi, Kyeong-Beom Park, and Jae Yeol Lee. 2022. Deep learning-based object detection in augmented reality: A systematic review. Computers in Industry 139 (2022), 103661. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2022. 103661
  • Tariq Masood and Johannes Egger. 2019. Augmented reality in support of Industry 4.0—Implementation challenges and success factors. Robotics and Computer- Integrated Manufacturing 58 (2019), 181–195. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2019.02.003
  • Microsoft. 2024. Network requirements. https://learn.microsoft.com/enus/ azure/remote-rendering/reference/network-requirements.
  • Microsoft. 2025. Azure Remote Rendering. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/remote-rendering
  • Reza Moezzi, David Krcmarik, Jindřich Cýrus, Haythem Bahri, and Jan Koci. 2022. Object Detection Using Microsoft HoloLens by a Single Forward Propagation CNN. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Vision and Computing (ICIVC 2021). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 507–517.
  • Nvidia. 2025. CloudXR. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/design-visualization/solutions/cloud-xr/.
  • Open5GS. 2024. Open5GS. https://github.com/open5gs
  • Psyonix. 2024. RocketLeague. https://www.rocketleague.com/en
  • Qualcomm. 2018. Boundless XR in a new era of distributed computing. https://www.qualcomm.com/news/onq/2018/09/boundless-xr-new-eradistributed- computing.
  • Shu Gan Raobo Li, Xiping Yuan and Rui Bi. 2024. A robust correspondencebased registration method for large-scale outdoor point cloud. International Journal of Digital Earth 17, 1 (2024), 2407943. doi:10.1080/17538947.2024.2407943 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2024.2407943
  • Jangwoo Son, Serhan Gül, Gurdeep Singh Bhullar, et al. 2020. Split Rendering for Mixed Reality: Interactive Volumetric Video in Action. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2020 XR. New York, NY, USA. doi:10.1145/3415256.3421491
  • Balázs Sonkoly, Bálint György Nagy, János Dóka, Zsófia Kecskés-Solymosi, János Czentye, Bence Formanek, Dávid Jocha, and Balázs Péter Gerő. 2023. Towards an Edge Cloud Based Coordination Platform for Multi-User AR Applications Built on Open-Source SLAMs. In NOMS 2023-2023 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium. 1–6. doi:10.1109/NOMS56928.2023.10154295
  • Daniel Stadler and Jürgen Beyerer. 2022. BYTEv2: Associating more detection boxes under occlusion for improved multi-person tracking. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Springer, 79–94.
  • Jakob Struye, Sam Van Damme, Nabeel Nisar Bhat, Arno Troch, Barend Van Liempd, Hany Assasa, Filip Lemic, Jeroen Famaey, and Maria Torres Vega. 2024. Toward Interactive Multi-User Extended Reality Using Millimeter-Wave Networking. IEEE Communications Magazine 62, 8 (2024), 54–60. doi:10.1109/ MCOM.001.2300804
  • Bruce H. Thomas. 2012. A survey of visual, mixed, and augmented reality gaming. Computers in Entertainment 10, 1 (Oct. 2012), 1–33. doi:10.1145/2381876.2381879
  • Unity. 2025. Barracuda. https://docs.unity3d.com/Packages/com.unity.barracuda@3.0/manual/.
  • J. M. P. van Waveren. 2016. The asynchronous time warp for virtual reality on consumer hardware. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Munich, Germany) (VRST '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 37–46. doi:10.1145/2993369.2993375
  • Visiometry. 2024. VisionLib. https://visionlib.com/.
  • Shuang Wu, Yawen Fan, Shibao Zheng, and Hua Yang. 2012. Object tracking based on ORB and temporal-spacial constraint. In 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI). IEEE, 597–600.
  • Xuefeng Xie and Hefeng Wu. 2012. ORB tracking via random model and sample consensus. In 2012 5th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing. IEEE, 113–117.
  • Yingen Xiong and Christopher Peri. 2021. Space-Warp with Depth Propagation in XR Applications. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM). 50–57. doi:10.1109/ISM52913.2021.00017
  • Vinay Yadhav, Andrew Williams, Ondrej Smid, Jimmy Kjällman, Raihan Islam, Joacim Halén, and Wolfgang John. 2024. Benefits of Dynamic Computational Offloading for Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science - Volume 1: CLOSER. INSTICC, SciTePress, 265–276. doi:10.5220/0012719800003711
  • Zhehui Zhang, Shu Shi, Varun Gupta, and Rittwik Jana. 2019. Analysis of cellular network latency for edge-based remote rendering streaming applications. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2019 Workshop on Networking for Emerging Applications and Technologies. 8–14.