Published November 20, 2025 | Version v1
Report Open

ACIX-III AQUA: EVALUATION OF ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION PROCESSORS FOR HYPERSPECTRAL SATELLITE OVER INLAND AND COASTAL WATERS

  • 1. ROR icon Sapienza University of Rome
  • 2. ROR icon National Research Council

Description

This report shows the main outcomes of the Atmospheric Correction Intercomparison Exercise (ACIX-III Aqua), aiming to test atmospheric correction (AC) processors on spaceborne imaging spectroscopy. Developed under the same concepts of ACIX-Aqua that enabled an evaluation of eight state-of-the-art AC processors available for multi-spectral satellite data, ACIX-III Aqua focuses on hyperspectral data, particularly as those acquired by the Italian Space Agency (ASI) satellite hyperspectral mission PRecursore IperSpettrale della Missione Operativa (PRISMA). Launched in March 2019, the PRISMA mission has acquired thousands of images over various marine and freshwaters, where in situ measurements were collected to enable match-up generation with satellite products. The in situ dataset originates from two sources: hyperspectral data contributed by the international community (called Community Validation Database, CVD) and multispectral measurements provided by the AERONET-OC network. This extensive data set allows the performance of each AC processor to be evaluated in different spectral regions and on eight different Optical Water Types (OWTs). Five AC models are participating in ACIX-III Aqua: ACOLITE, hGRS, POLYMER, iCOR, and MIP. Additionally, the standard AC product of PRISMA L2C was included in the comparison. Moreover, T-Mart, which focuses solely on adjacency effect correction, was also evaluated in combination with the ACOLITE model. PRISMA data were selected based on the synchronicity with the in situ measurements and the percentage of cloud cover, which was required to be less than 2%. The dataset finally consists of 174 images with in situ data derived from the AERONET-OC network and 65 images with in situ data obtained from the CVD network, for a total of 239 images. The match-up analysis is provided both per site and across the OWTs; the Quality Water Index Polynomial (QWIP) is also included in the analysis to identify Rrs spectra that fall outside the general trends observed in aquatic optics for optically deep inland and coastal waters. So far ACIX-III Aqua results seem consistent with previous findings of ACIX-Aqua for Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2. In particular, we observe largest differences between satellite and in situ measurements associated with the blue bands and NIR bands, and that each AC model has different degrees of accuracy depending on OWTs. Further results will be presented based on the latest progress in data analysis to understand how the variations in AC performance are related to the increased hyperspectral information content of PRISMA and how the results of this exercise compare to those obtained with other satellites to support the generation of improved products for aquatic applications from hyperspectral data collected by other current and future missions (e.g., CHIME). To the aim, the last section shows the first results obtained with EnMAP for 2022 to 2023 by applying three of the AC processors used with PRISMA (i.e. ACOLITE, MIP and POLYMER), and also including the PACO land AC processor in combination with WASI (PACO-WASI). In this case, the dataset consists of 25 images with in situ data derived from the AERONET-OC network and 21 images with in situ data obtained from the CVD network, for a total of 46 images. 

Other

 List of authors

Claudia Giardino1, Nima Pahlevan2, Alice Fabbretto1,3, Lodovica Panizza1, Andrea Pellegrino1,4, Ryan Vandermeulen5, Marco Gianinetto6, Stefan Adriaensen7, Joram Agten7, Hendrik Bernert8, Liesbeth De Keukelaere7, Tristan Harmel9, Thomas Heege8, Anders Knudby9, Karin Schenk8, François Steinmetz10, Sindy Sterckx7, Quinten Vanhellemont12, Yulun Wu10, Federica Braga13, Vittorio E. Brando14, Mariano Bresciani1, Ana Dogliotti15, Susanne Kratzer16, Salvatore Mangano1, Daniel Odermatt17, Gian Marco Scarpa13, Thomas Schroeder18, Mortimer Werther17, Ettore Lopinto19, Kevin Alonso20, Noelle Cremer20, Georgia Doxani20, Ferran Gascon20

Astrid Bracher21,22, Mariana A. Soppa21, Avotramalala Najoro Radrianalisoa21 and additionally all other coauthors from Soppa et al. (2024) who are not listed above: Maximilian Brell23, Sabine Chabrillat24, Leonardo M. A. Alvarado25, Peter Gege26, Stefan Plattner24, Ian Somlai-Schweiger24, Nicole Pinnel24, Simone Collela14, Dieter Vansteenwegen25, Maximilian Langheinrich26, Emiliano Carmona26, Martin Bachmann26, Miguel Pato26, Sebastian Fischer27

 

1 Institute of Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment (IREA), CNR, Milan, Italy.

2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.

3 Department of Remote Sensing, Tartu Observatory, University of Tartu, Tõravere, Estonia

4 Department of Engineering, University of Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

5 NOAA Fisheries, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

6 Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.

7 Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.

8 EOMAP GmbH & Co. KG, Seefeld, Germany.

9 Earth Observation Unit, Magellium, Ramonville-Saint-Agne, France.

10 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

11 HYGEOS, Lille, France.

12 Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS), Brussels, Belgium.

13 Institute of Marine Sciences (ISMAR), CNR, Venice, Italy.

14 Institute of Marine Sciences (ISMAR), CNR, Rome, Italy.

15 Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio (IAFE), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

16 Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences (DEEP), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

17 Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG), Dübendorf, Switzerland.

18 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Brisbane, Australia.

19 Italian Space Agency (ASI), Rome, Italy.

20 European Space Research Institute, European Space Agency (ESA), Frascati, Italy.

21 Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany

22 Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Otto-Hahn-Allee 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany

23 GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany21 CSIRO, Brisbane, Australia

24 German Aerospace Center (DLR), Remote Sensing Technology Institute, Weßling, Germany

25 Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), Oostende, Belgium

26 Earth Observation Center (EOC), German Aerospace Center (DLR), Weßling, Germany

27 German Aerospace Center (DLR), Bonn, Germany

Files

ACIX-III-Aqua_final-report.pdf

Files (10.4 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5b55af88779b1e7852032675c4813c42
10.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

ISBN
979-12--9853552-7

Related works

Is supplement to
Journal article: 10.1080/01431161.2025.2574517 (DOI)

Dates

Available
2025-11-20