Published October 30, 2025 | Version CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0
Journal article Open

An Index-Jets Framework for Irrationality: from Sturm-Liouville Operators to the AGM

  • 1. Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, Arumbakkam, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.

Contributors

Contact person:

  • 1. Research Associate, Department of Mathematics, Choolaimedu, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
  • 2. Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, Arumbakkam, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.

Description

Abstract: We describe a general method that proves irrationality statements from second-order equations and from the arithmeticgeometric mean (AGM). Let 𝑳 > 𝟎 and define the bump 𝑩𝒏,𝑳 (𝒙) = 𝑸 𝒏 𝒏! [𝒙(𝑳 − 𝒙)] 𝒏 (𝟎 ≤ 𝒙 ≤ 𝑳), where 𝑳 = 𝑷/𝑸 ∈ β„š is in lowest terms. If 𝒖 solves a second-order equation on [𝟎,𝑳] and its Prüfer phase turns by an integer multiple of 𝝅, then repeated integration by parts shows that 𝑰𝒏: = ∫ 𝑳 𝟎 𝑩𝒏,𝑳 (𝒙)𝒖(𝒙)𝒅𝒙 is an integer combination of endpoint jets and of a fixed index term. Hence 𝑰𝒏 ∈ β„€ (or 𝑫𝒏𝑰𝒏 ∈ β„€ for a controlled denominator 𝑫𝒏 that depends only on finitely many endpoint Taylor coefficients of the coefficients of the equation). A Beta-function estimate gives 𝟎 < 𝑰𝒏 ≤ 𝑳 πŸπ’+𝟏 𝑸 𝒏𝒏! (πŸπ’+𝟏)! βŸΆπ’→∞ 𝟎 so for large 𝒏 we have 𝟎 < 𝑰𝒏 < 𝟏, which contradicts integrality. This scheme yields: (i) the irrationality of 𝝅 from 𝒖(𝒙) = π’”π’Šπ’ 𝒙 on [𝟎,𝝅]; (ii) a Sturm-Liouville version for analytic potentials with rational endpoint Taylor data and a halfturn of the Prüfer phase; and (iii) consequences for complete elliptic integrals, where the role of the index is played by the Legendre monodromy identity. In particular, for each π’Œ ∈ (𝟎,𝟏) not all of 𝑲(π’Œ),𝑲(π’Œ ′ ),𝑬(π’Œ),𝑬(π’Œ ′ ) can be rational, and at π’Œ = 𝟏/√𝟐 at least one of 𝑲(π’Œ) or 𝑬(π’Œ) is irrational.

Files

B122405021025.pdf

Files (540.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0aefeced24851490d84ff4e863f04d7c
540.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.54105/ijam.B1224.05021025
EISSN
2582-8932

Dates

Accepted
2025-10-15
Manuscript received on 29 September 2025 | Revised Manuscript received on 04 October 2025 | Manuscript Accepted on 15 October 2025 | Manuscript published on 30 October 2025

References

  • M. P. do Carmo, Riemannian Geometry, BirkhΓ€user, 1992. URL: link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4757-2184-1., works remain significant, see declaration
  • E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis, 4th ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, 1927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608759., works remain significant, see declaration
  • J. M. Borwein and P. B. Borwein, Pi and the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity, Wiley, 1987. DOI (eBook): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118032576., works remain significant, see declaration
  • F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark (eds.), NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions. URL: https://dlmf.nist.gov/19 (Elliptic integrals and AGM)., works remain significant, see declaration
  • G. Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Amer. Math. Soc., 2012. URL: https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~gerald/ftp/book-ode/ode.pdf. (For PrΓΌfer transformation and Sturm oscillation; see Sec. 11.), works remain significant, see declaration
  • R. P. Brent, "Fast multiple-precision evaluation of elementary functions," J. ACM 23 (1976), 242-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/321941.321944. (For quadratic convergence underlying the AGM.), works remain significant, see declaration