An Index-Jets Framework for Irrationality: from Sturm-Liouville Operators to the AGM
Creators
- 1. Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, Arumbakkam, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
- 1. Research Associate, Department of Mathematics, Choolaimedu, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
- 2. Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College, Arumbakkam, Chennai (Tamil Nadu), India.
Description
Abstract: We describe a general method that proves irrationality statements from second-order equations and from the arithmeticgeometric mean (AGM). Let π³ > π and define the bump π©π,π³ (π) = πΈ π π! [π(π³ − π)] π (π ≤ π ≤ π³), where π³ = π·/πΈ ∈ β is in lowest terms. If π solves a second-order equation on [π,π³] and its Prüfer phase turns by an integer multiple of π , then repeated integration by parts shows that π°π: = ∫ π³ π π©π,π³ (π)π(π)π π is an integer combination of endpoint jets and of a fixed index term. Hence π°π ∈ β€ (or π«ππ°π ∈ β€ for a controlled denominator π«π that depends only on finitely many endpoint Taylor coefficients of the coefficients of the equation). A Beta-function estimate gives π < π°π ≤ π³ ππ+π πΈ ππ! (ππ+π)! βΆπ→∞ π so for large π we have π < π°π < π, which contradicts integrality. This scheme yields: (i) the irrationality of π from π(π) = πππ π on [π,π ]; (ii) a Sturm-Liouville version for analytic potentials with rational endpoint Taylor data and a halfturn of the Prüfer phase; and (iii) consequences for complete elliptic integrals, where the role of the index is played by the Legendre monodromy identity. In particular, for each π ∈ (π,π) not all of π²(π),π²(π ′ ),π¬(π),π¬(π ′ ) can be rational, and at π = π/√π at least one of π²(π) or π¬(π) is irrational.
Files
B122405021025.pdf
Files
(540.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:0aefeced24851490d84ff4e863f04d7c
|
540.4 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.54105/ijam.B1224.05021025
- EISSN
- 2582-8932
Dates
- Accepted
-
2025-10-15Manuscript received on 29 September 2025 | Revised Manuscript received on 04 October 2025 | Manuscript Accepted on 15 October 2025 | Manuscript published on 30 October 2025
References
- M. P. do Carmo, Riemannian Geometry, BirkhΓ€user, 1992. URL: link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4757-2184-1., works remain significant, see declaration
- E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis, 4th ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, 1927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608759., works remain significant, see declaration
- J. M. Borwein and P. B. Borwein, Pi and the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity, Wiley, 1987. DOI (eBook): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118032576., works remain significant, see declaration
- F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark (eds.), NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions. URL: https://dlmf.nist.gov/19 (Elliptic integrals and AGM)., works remain significant, see declaration
- G. Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Amer. Math. Soc., 2012. URL: https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~gerald/ftp/book-ode/ode.pdf. (For PrΓΌfer transformation and Sturm oscillation; see Sec. 11.), works remain significant, see declaration
- R. P. Brent, "Fast multiple-precision evaluation of elementary functions," J. ACM 23 (1976), 242-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/321941.321944. (For quadratic convergence underlying the AGM.), works remain significant, see declaration