Published October 29, 2025 | Version v1
Publication Open

Pseudothermality Resolves the Black-Hole Information Paradox in Hawking Radiation

Description

This work presents a constructive resolution of the black-hole information paradox based on pseudothermality: radiation that looks thermal at all low orders while still carrying recoverable information at higher orders. This order-threshold structure reconciles Hawking-like observations with unitarity without requiring exact thermality.

The derivation is executed on a fully discrete register-space framework with minimal imported interfaces. A capacity bound tied to a minimal interior cut yields a post-Page constraint that forbids purely product emission and enforces correlation-bearing increments at late times. Exterior emission chains and discrete mode counting establish a luminosity scaling law, with the temperature scale calibrated directly from register-space statistics; the familiar surface-gravity identification is treated only as an optional recovery statement.

As non-normative context, the predicted signature—thermal agreement at low order with nonzero connected structure at higher order—aligns with reported higher-order correlations in thermalized many-body experiments (e.g., cold-atom systems), suggesting a general mechanism rather than a black-hole-specific exception.

Files

Pseudothermality_and_blackholes.pdf

Files (396.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c8752f067737d8a877e887aba380b944
396.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • S. W. Hawking, Nature 248, 30 (1974)
  • S. W. Hawking, Communications in Mathematical Physics 43, 199 (1975).
  • J. D. Bekenstein, Physical Review D 7, 2333 (1973)
  • J. D. Bekenstein, Physical Review D 9, 3292 (1974).
  • O. Ahaneku, Quantum entanglement spacetime theory (quest) (2025), version published on Zenodo.
  • S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Physical Review Letters 96, 181602 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603001 [hep-th].
  • S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Journal of High Energy Physics 2006, 045 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605073 [hep-th].
  • J. M. Maldacena, Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2, 231 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th].
  • M. V. Raamsdonk, General Relativity and Gravitation 42, 2323 (2010), arXiv:1005.3035 [hep-th].
  • T. Schweigler, V. Kasper, S. Erne, I. Mazets, B. Rauer, F. Cataldini, T. Langen, T. Gasenzer, J. Berges, and J. Schmiedmayer, Nature 545, 323 (2017).
  • J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Fortschritte der Physik 61, 781 (2013), arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]
  • T. Jacobson, Physical Review Letters 116, 201101 (2016), arXiv:1505.04753 [gr-qc]
  • P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Journal of High Energy Physics 2007, 120 (2007), arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th].
  • S. Wolfram, Finally we may have a path to the fundamental theory of physics. . . and it's beautiful, Blog post (2020).
  • O. Ahaneku, Symbolic holography in the quantum entanglement spacetime theory (quest) (2025), version pub- lished on Zenodo.
  • O. Ahaneku, Entropy–area relations in the quantum entanglement spacetime theory (quest) (2025), version pub- lished on Zenodo.
  • T. Schweigler, V. Kasper, S. Erne, and et al., Nature 545, 323 (2017)