RESTORE H2020 Project - Renewable Energy based seasonal Storage Technology in Order to Raise Economic and environmental sustainability of District Heating and Cooling
Published September 30, 2025 | Version 2.0
Project deliverable Open

D1.7 Report on the assessment of the environmental sustainability (V2)

Authors/Creators

  • 1. ROR icon Babeș-Bolyai University

Description

The current deliverable addresses the environmental assessment of six virtual use cases through the application of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. The main objective is to evaluate the integration of the RESTORE solution and renewable energy sources (RESs) within various plants connected to district heating and cooling (DHC) networks. The Use Case models combined with the RESTORE virtual tool, and developed on the IPSE Go platform, are based on data provided by the Use Case partners. additional details on the development of these models are available in Deliverables D5.4, D5.5, D5.6, D5.7, D5.8, and D5.9.

The LCA calculations are based on the mass and energy balance data obtained from both modelling activities and relevant scientific literature. The system boundaries considered in the LCA include: i) Upstream processes, such as raw material supply chains (e.g., organic fluids, Therminol V66, oil, copper sulphate), equipment manufacturing, and energy generation; ii) operational processes, including charging and discharging cycles; iii) Downstream processes, such as recycling and reuse of materials (e.g., organic fluids (Cyclopentane, NOVEC 649), Therminol V66, oil, copper sulphate), wastewater treatment (WWT), and final waste management.

Conventional LCA methodology has been employed to comprehensively address each of the four LCA steps: 1) definition of the goal and objectives of the intended study; 2) Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) – building the input and output inventory; 3) Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) – impact evaluation step; and 4) Interpretation – analysing the results while providing recommendations to further enhance the overall performance of the system. The ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method has been employed to perform the impact analysis during the LCIA stage by following the Hierarchist (H) cultural perspective. LCA for Experts software (formerly known as GaBi software) version 10.8 has been used throughout this investigation.
The results of the environmental analysis indicate that, during the charging phase, electricity is the dominant contributor to environmental impacts. It accounts for the highest share in both Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Fossil Depletion Potential (FDP), underlining the importance of increasing the use of RESs while reducing dependence on fossil-based resources. In the discharging phase, five out of six virtual use cases achieve negative emissions in GWP and FDP, primarily due to the electricity produced during this stage. The exception is Use Case VI, which shows positive emissions, largely explained by the significant contributions from the production of copper sulphate and organic fluid used. With respect to plant construction, the analysis reveals that its overall impact is considerably lower compared to the operational phases.

Further details on the main impact drivers across key environmental categories, along with recommendations to reduce the environmental footprint, are provided in the present deliverable.

Files

D1.7 - Report on the assessment of environmental sustainability (V2)_final.pdf

Files (7.6 MB)

Additional details

Continues
Project deliverable: https://zenodo.org/records/14628282 (URL)
Is supplemented by
Project deliverable: https://zenodo.org/records/17395342 (URL)
Project deliverable: https://zenodo.org/records/16962323 (URL)
Project deliverable: https://zenodo.org/records/16962506 (URL)
Project deliverable: https://zenodo.org/records/16962632 (URL)
Project deliverable: https://zenodo.org/records/16962970 (URL)
Project deliverable: https://zenodo.org/records/16963092 (URL)
Project deliverable: https://zenodo.org/records/16963300 (URL)

Funding

European Commission
RESTORE - Renewable Energy based seasonal Storage Technology in Order to Raise Economic and environmental sustainability of DHC 101036766

References

  • Jakučionytė-Skodienė M, Krikštolaitis R, Liobikienė G. The contribution of changes in climate-friendly behaviour, climate change concern and personal responsibility to household greenhouse gas emissions: Heating/cooling and transport activities in the European Union. Energy 2022;246:123387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123387.
  • Okonkwo EC, AlNouss A, Shahbaz M, Al-Ansari T. Developing integrated direct air capture and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage systems: progress towards 2 °C and 1.5 °C climate goals. Energy Convers Manag 2023;296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117687.
  • Gustavsen M, Mikkelsen MS, Luft F, Riisgaard H, Elliot T. The role of excess heat in reducing the environmental impacts of district heating systems. J Environ Manage 2025;390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126234.
  • Calvin K, Dasgupta D, Krinner G, Mukherji A, Thorne PW, Trisos C, et al. IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. 2023. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.
  • IEA - International Energy Agency. Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach - 2023. 2023.
  • Bang A, Moreno D, Lund H, Nielsen S. Regional CCUS strategies in the context of a fully decarbonized society. J Clean Prod 2024;477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143882.
  • Schmieder L, Jezernik S, Gatt S, Steinacher N, Winter F. Influence of system pressure on gas–solid reactions for thermochemical energy storage in a suspension reactor. Energy Conversion and Management: X 2025;27:101179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101179.
  • Galusnyak SC, Petrescu L, Chisalita DA, Cormos C-C. Life cycle assessment of methanol production and conversion into various chemical intermediates and products. Energy 2022;259:124784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124784.
  • IEA - International Energy Agency. Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2023 – Analysis - IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-clean-energy-progress-2023 (accessed June 20, 2025).
  • Edenhofer Ottmar, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, et al. IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014 : Mitigation of Climate Change : Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
  • Lund H, Østergaard PA, Sorknæs P, Nielsen S, Skov IR, Yuan M, et al. District heating in clean energy systems. Nature Reviews Clean Technology 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44359-025-00076-8.
  • Schmieder L, Kuloglija S, Ilyina-Brunner K, Jezernik S, Winter F. Calcium chloride dihydrate as a promising system for seasonal heat storage in a suspension reactor. Appl Therm Eng 2025;258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124557.
  • Luberti M, Gowans R, Finn P, Santori G. An estimate of the ultralow waste heat available in the European Union. Energy 2022;238:121967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121967.
  • Moser S, Lassacher S. External use of industrial waste heat - An analysis of existing implementations in Austria. J Clean Prod 2020;264:121531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121531.
  • Mathiesen B, Vad ;, Wild C;, Nielsen S. Aalborg Universitet Heat Matters: The Missing Link in REPowerEU 2030: District Heating Deployment for a long-term Fossil-free Future. 2023.
  • Piron M, Wu J, Fedele A, Manzardo A. Industry 4.0 and life cycle assessment: Evaluation of the technology applications as an asset for the life cycle inventory. Science of the Total Environment 2024;916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170263.
  • Tessitore S, Testa F, Di Iorio V, Iraldo F. Life cycle assessment as an enabler of an environmental sustainability strategy evolution amid institutional pressures: A best practice from the furniture industry. Cleaner Environmental Systems 2025;16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100255.
  • Jolliet O, Saade-Sbeih M, Shaked S, Jolliet A, Crettaz P. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment 2015. https://doi.org/10.1201/B19138.
  • Rihner MCS, Whittle JW, Gadelhaq MHA, Mohamad SN, Yuan R, Rothman R, et al. Life cycle assessment in energy-intensive industries: Cement, steel, glass, plastic. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2025;211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115245.
  • Klüppel H-J. The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management - Life cycle assessment; Requirements and guidelines. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2005;10:165–165. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.03.001.
  • ISO - ISO 14040:2006 - Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html (accessed February 10, 2022).
  • Curran AM. Goal and Scope Definition in Life Cycle Assessment. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0855-3.
  • Pillain B GESG. Identification of Key Sustainability Performance Indicators and related assessment methods for the carbon fiber recycling sector. Ecol Indic 2017;72:833–47.
  • Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira M, et al. ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2017;22:138–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y.
  • Sphera LCA for Experts Software (GaBi) 2024.
  • Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts MAJ. Introducing Life Cycle Impact Assessment, 2015, p. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9744-3_1.
  • ISO - ISO 14044:2006 - Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html (accessed February 10, 2022).