Sustainable open data ecosystems through data quality, governance, and infrastructure: Unlocking social, political and economic value
Authors/Creators
- 1. Centre Internet et Société, CNRS, Paris, 75017, France
Description
Open data are crucial for scientific knowledge production, transparency and accountability, as well as innovation. The European Union has implemented various policies and regulatory frameworks for open government data and open scientific data, as well as for data sharing and re-use of non-government data. However, the mere availability of open data does not ensure its reuse and distributional benefit to society, and its production can meet sustainability challenges. Working with open data requires data skills, access to data infrastructures, and regulatory guidance to address privacy, confidentiality and intellectual property requirements. Further, critical scholarship has cautioned against the de facto valorisation of open data, and urges focus on the socio-technical and political aspects of production, dissemination and use of open data beyond mere economic value. This open letter is building upon findings of an interdisciplinary Marie Curie Action Innovative Training Network focussed on 'Open Data ECOsystems' (ODECO). It claims that in a data-driven economy and a datafied society, more attention needs to be paid to the conditions within which open data is produced, disseminated and used, and by whom. Accordingly, this open letter provides a set of actionable recommendations for both practitioners and policymakers, to support sustainability as well as economic and social value in open data initiatives, through proposals in areas including data quality, governance, participation and infrastructure.
How can we ensure open data benefits everyone? Open data plays a key role in science, transparency, accountability, and innovation. However, simply making data available as open datasets does not guarantee it will be reused or benefit society equally. Effective use of open data requires skills, infrastructure, and clear rules to handle privacy, confidentiality, and intellectual property. Further, the use of open data must result in economic value as well as social value; but often only economic value generation is valourised. Drawing on research from the ODECO project, this open letter calls for more focus on how and by whom open data is produced, shared, and used. It provides a set of actionable recommendations for both practitioners and policymakers, to support sustainability as well as economic and social value in open data initiatives, through proposals in areas including data quality, governance, participation and infrastructure.
Files
openreseurope-5-22945.pdf
Files
(2.2 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:4ce4eb2663f74ed277fccc077c05a7e0
|
2.2 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Ahmed U (2023). Reimagining open data ecosystems: a practical approach using AI, CI, and knowledge graphs.
- Alexopoulos C, Maratsi MI, Ali M (2024). D4.2 An approach to steer the behaviour of non-government data holders towards open data through a technical strategy.
- Alexopoulos C, Zuiderwijk A, Charapabidis Y (2014). Designing a second generation of open data platforms: integrating open data and social media. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_19
- Ali M, Alexopoulos C, Charalabidis Y (2022). A comprehensive review of open data platforms, prevalent technologies, and functionalities. doi:10.1145/3560107.3560142
- Avila R, Weress G (2023). Citynetics in the South: a blueprint for a city data commons.
- Aziz A, Murillo DJH, Ali M (2023). D2.2 User needs from a technical perspective.
- Baack S (2015). Datafication and empowerment: how the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data Soc. doi:10.1177/2053951715594634
- Barry E, Bannister F (2014). Barriers to open data release: a view from the top. Inform Polity. doi:10.3233/IP-140327
- Bates J (2012). "This is what modern deregulation looks like": co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK's Open Government Data initiative. J Commun Inform. doi:10.15353/joci.v8i2.3038
- Berners-Lee T (null). Linked data—design issues.
- Bezuidenhout L, Chakauya E (2018). Hidden concerns of sharing research data by Low/Middle-Income Country scientists. Glob Bioeth. doi:10.1080/11287462.2018.1441780
- Bezuidenhout LM, Leonelli S, Kelly AH (2017). Beyond the digital divide: towards a situated approach to open data. Sci Public Policy. doi:10.1093/scipol/scw036
- Bietti E (2025). Data is infrastructure. Theor Inq Law. doi:10.1515/til-2025-0004
- Birkinshaw P (2006). Freedom of information and openness: fundamental human rights. Adm Law Rev.
- Bisztray T, Gruschka N, Bourlai T (2021). Emerging biometric modalities and their use: loopholes in the terminology of the GDPR and resulting privacy risks. doi:10.1109/BIOSIG52210.2021.9548298
- Bohman S (2015). Data visualization: an untapped potential for political participation and civic engagement. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22389-6_22
- Brewster C, Nouwt B, Raaijmakers S (2020). Ontology-Based Access Control for FAIR data. Data Intell. doi:10.1162/dint_a_00029
- Broomfield H (2023). Where is open data in the Open Data Directive?. Inform Polity. doi:10.3233/IP-220053
- Burgelman JC, Pascu C, Szkuta K (2019). Open science, open data, and open scholarship: European policies to make science fit for the twenty-first century. Front Big Data. doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00043
- Carroll SR, Garba I, Figueroa-Rodríguez OL (2020). The CARE principles for indigenous data governance. Data Sci J. doi:10.5334/dsj-2020-043
- Carroll SR, Herczog E, Hudson M (2021). Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR principles for indigenous data futures. Sci Data. doi:10.1038/s41597-021-00892-0
- Cazacu S, Chandrasekhar R, Dulong De Rosnay M (2024). D2.3 User needs from a governance perspective. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14574359
- Cazacu S, Chandrasekhar R, Ortiz HO (2025a). D5.2 Strategies to balance and distribute value in open data ecosystems.
- Cazacu S, Panagiotidou G, Steenberghen T (2025b). Disentangling the power dynamics in participatory data physicalisation. doi:10.1145/3706598.3713703
- Chafetz H, Saxena S, Verhulst SG (2024). A fourth wave of open data? Exploring the spectrum of scenarios for open data and generative AI. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.04333
- Chandrasekhar R (2025). Legal frictions for data openness: reflections from a case-study on re-use of the open web for AI training. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15579533
- Chandrasekhar R, Di Staso D, Dulong De Rosnay M (2024). D5.1 Models of allocating roles, tasks and responsibilities in open data ecosystems. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14571743
- Chattapadhyay S (2014). Access and use of government data by research and advocacy organisations in India: a survey of (potential) open data ecosystem. doi:10.1145/2691195.2691262
- Chokki AP, Alexopoulos C, Saxena S (2022). Metadata quality matters in Open Government Data (OGD) evaluation! An empirical investigation of OGD portals of the GCC constituents. Transforming government people process policy. doi:10.1108/TG-09-2022-0118
- Conradie P, Choenni S (2014). On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Gov Inf Q. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.003
- Crompvoets J, Santoro C, Shaharudin A (2024). D4.3 An approach to steer the behaviour of non-government data holders towards open data through a governance strategy.
- Dalla Corte L (2018). The European right to data protection in relation to open data. Open Data Exposed. doi:10.1007/978-94-6265-261-3_7
- Davies T (2019). High value datasets: an exploration.
- Davies T, Walker SB, Rubinstein M (2019). The state of open data: histories and horizons. doi:10.47622/9781928331957
- Denis J, Goëta S (2014). Exploration, extraction and 'Rawification'. The shaping of transparency in the back rooms of open data (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2403069). SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2403069
- Di Staso D, Christiansen L, Kleiman F (2024). A beginner's Game Jam to articulate social issues with open data.
- Di Staso D, Reyes MEL, Papageorgiou G (2023). D2.1 Open data user needs: seven flavours.
- Dodds L, Wells P (2019). Data infrastructure. The State of Open Data: Histories and Horizons. doi:10.47622/9781928331957
- Dulong de Rosnay M (2008). Check your data freedom: a taxonomy to assess life science database openness. Nature Precedings. doi:10.1038/npre.2008.2083.1
- Dulong de Rosnay M, Janssen K (2014). Legal and institutional challenges for opening data across public sectors: towards common policy solutions. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research. doi:10.4067/S0718-18762014000300002
- Dulong De Rosnay M, Stalder F (2020). Digital commons. Internet Policy Rev. doi:10.14763/2020.4.1530
- Enaholo P (2017). Beyond mere advocacy: CSOs and the role of intermediaries in Nigeria's open data ecosystem. The Social Dynamics of Open Data.
- Enders T, Benz C, Satzger G (2021). Untangling the Open Data Value Paradox: how organizations benefit from revealing data. Innovation Through Information Systems. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86800-0_15
- Enders T, Satzger G, Fassnacht M (2022). Why should i share? Exploring benefits of open data for private sector organizations. PACIS 2022 Proceedings.
- (1989). Guidelines for improving the synergy between the public and private sectors in the information market (92-825-9237–5).
- (2015). Creating value through open data: study on the impact of re use of public data resources. doi:10.2759/328101
- ((n.d.)). Open science.
- Gates N, Tridgell J, Torraco RM (2025). Funding Europe's Open Digital Infrastructure: the study on the economic, legal, and political feasibility of an EU Sovereign Tech Fund (EU-STF). Open Forum Europe. doi:10.24406/PUBLICA-4949
- Giannopoulou A (2018). Understanding open data regulation: an analysis of the licensing landscape. Open Data Exposed. doi:10.1007/978-94-6265-261-3_6
- Goëta S, Davies T (2016). The daily shaping of state transparency: standards, machine-readability and the configuration of open government data policies. Science & Technology Studies. doi:10.23987/sts.60221
- Gray J (2014). Towards a genealogy of open data. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2605828
- Greenhalgh T, Thorne S, Malterud K (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?. Eur J Clin Invest. doi:10.1111/eci.12931
- Gurstein MB (2011). Open data: empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone?. First Monday. doi:10.5210/fm.v16i2.3316
- Hardinges J, Pearson S, Ross R (2025). From human content to machine data: introducing CC signals.
- Herala A, Vanhala E, Porras J (2016). Experiences about opening data in private sector: a systematic literature review. doi:10.1109/SAI.2016.7556060
- Herrera-Murillo DJ, Aziz A, Nogueras-Iso J (2022). Analysing user involvement in open government data initiatives. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_14
- Janssen M, Charalabidis Y, Zuiderwijk A (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
- Jarke J (2019). Open government for all? Co-creating digital public services for older adults through data walks. Online Information Review. doi:10.1108/OIR-02-2018-0059
- Jetzek T (2017). Innovation in the open data ecosystem: exploring the role of real options thinking and multi-sided platforms for sustainable value generation through open data. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-37879-8_6
- Jetzek T, Avital M, Bjørn-Andersen N (2013). Generating value from open government data.
- Johnson JA (2014). From open data to information justice. Ethics Inf Technol. doi:10.1007/s10676-014-9351-8
- Kitchin R (2014). The data revolution. doi:10.4135/9781473909472
- Kostakis V, Pazaitis A, Liarokapis M (2023). Beyond high-tech versus low-tech: a tentative framework for sustainable urban data governance. Big Data Soc. doi:10.1177/20539517231180583
- Ktistakis M, Di Staso D, Reyes MEL (2023). D3.1 closing the cycle: understanding potential contributions of open government data users to the open data ecosystem.
- Lansana AS, Migisha C, Minjire D (2020). Drivers of data for development.
- Lohr KD (2025). Digital literacy and access: equity from a global and local perspective. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. doi:10.1002/ace.20559
- López Reyes ME, Magnussen R (2022). The use of open government data to create social value. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15086-9_16
- Lund A, Zukerfeld M (2020). Corporate capitalism's use of openness: profit for free. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28219-6
- MacFeely S, Me A, Schueuer F (2025). Towards a set of universal data principles. Stat J IAOS. doi:10.1177/18747655241307544
- Magnussen R, Larsen B, Di Staso D (2024). D3.3 closing the cycle: promoting open data users' contributions from a governance perspective.
- Maratsi MI, Alexopoulos C, Charalabidis Y (2024a). A structured analysis of domain-specific Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV): indicators for interoperability and reusability. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-56478-9_10
- Maratsi MI, Alexopoulos C, Charalabidis Y (2024b). On the semantic analysis of open (Government) data portals' metadata provision and schema. doi:10.1145/3680127.3680130
- Millerand F, Meunier S (2025). Les publics « impensés » des données ouvertes.
- Molina AL (2022). The value of open data and use cases (Open Government).
- Nikiforova A (2020). Comparative analysis of national open data portals or whether your portal is ready to bring benefits from open data.
- Nikiforova A, Clarinval A, Zuiderwijk A (2024). Innovation resistance theory in action: unveiling barriers to open government data adoption by public organizations to unlock open data innovation. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.10883
- Nogueras-Iso J, Lacasta J, Ureña-Cámara MA (2021). Quality of metadata in open data portals. IEEE Access. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073455
- Nthubu B, Perez D, Richards D (2022). Navigating complexity through co-design: visualising, understanding and activating entrepreneurial ecosystems. The Design Journal. doi:10.1080/14606925.2022.2088096
- Okorie C, Marivate V (2024). How African NLP experts are navigating the challenges of copyright, innovation, and access. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- (2015). Open Data Charter principles.
- (n.d.). A European public digital infrastructure fund.
- (null). Open definition 2.1—open definition—defining open in open data, open content and open knowledge.
- Overton M, Kleinschmit S (2022). Data science literacy: toward a philosophy of accessible and adaptable data science skill development in public administration programs. Teaching Public Administration. doi:10.1177/01447394211004990
- Pflücke F (2024). Interoperability in the EU: paving the way for digital public services. doi:10.1093/9780198919575.003.0010
- Philippe B (2020). The age of low tech: towards a technologically sustainable civilization. doi:10.46692/9781529213294
- Polini A, Ahmed U, Aziz A (2024). D3.2 closing the cycle: promoting open data users' contribution from a technical perspective.
- (2020). The economic impact of open data: opportunities for value creation in Europe. doi:10.2830/63132
- Ramachandran R, Bugbee K, Murphy K (2021). From open data to open science. Earth Space Sci. doi:10.1029/2020EA001562
- Re B, Ortiz HO, Shaharudin A (2024). D4.1 Motivations of non-government actors to become active contributors to the Open Data ecosystem.
- Robinson P, Scassa T (2022). The future of open data.
- Ruijer E, Grimmelikhuijsen S, Meijer A (2017). Open data for democracy: Developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Gov Inf Q. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.01.001
- Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068
- Santoro C (2024). On the concept of traditional knowledge—ODECO.
- Santoro C, Chandrasekhar R, Milan S (2025). From open data to data justice. Internet Policy Review.
- Scassa T (2019). Open Data & Privacy.
- Scassa T (2022). Open government Data and confidential commercial information: challenging the future of open data. doi:10.1515/9780776629759-004
- Senabre Hidalgo E, Calleja A, Gonzalo SS (2024). Co-creation of the digital democracy and data commons manifesto: alternative sociotechnical visions of data [version 2; peer review: 4 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. Open Res Eur. doi:10.12688/openreseurope.17020.2
- Shaharudin A, van Loenen B, Janssen M (2023). Towards a common definition of Open Data intermediaries. Digital Government: Research and Practice. doi:10.1145/3585537
- Shaharudin A, Van Loenen B, Janssen M (2024). Exploring the contributions of open data intermediaries for a sustainable open data ecosystem. Data & Policy. doi:10.1017/dap.2024.63
- Sharma C (2022). Tragedy of the digital commons. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4245266
- (2021). Guide on public procurement of open data-driven innovation.
- Stallman RM (2015). Free software, free society.
- (null). The open data handbook.
- Tkacz N (2012). From open source to open government: a critique of open politics. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization.
- Toots M, McBride K, Kalvet T (2017). Open data as enabler of public service co-creation: exploring the drivers and barriers. 2017 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM). doi:10.1109/CeDEM.2017.12
- Valli Buttow C, Weerts S (2022). Public sector information in the European Union policy: the misbalance between economy and individuals. Big Data & Society. doi:10.1177/20539517221124587
- Van Audenhove L, Van den Broeck W, Mariën I (2020). Data literacy and education: introduction and the challenges for our field. J Media Lit Educ. doi:10.23860/JMLE-2020-12-3-1
- Van Loenen B, Vancauwenberghe G, Crompvoets J (2018). Open data exposed. doi:10.1007/978-94-6265-261-3
- Van Loenen B, Zuiderwijk A, Vancauwenberghe G (2021). Towards value-creating and sustainable open data ecosystems: a comparative case study and a research agenda. JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government. doi:10.29379/jedem.v13i2.644
- Vargas AC, Magnussen R, Larsen B (2024a). Open data learning designs in elementary school: defining the essential elements for developing open data competencies. Information Polity. doi:10.1177/15701255241297863
- Vargas AC, Papageorgiou G, Magnussen R (2024b). The open data newsroom: a game approach for developing open data competencies in elementary school. European Conference on Games Based Learning. doi:10.34190/ecgbl.18.1.2637
- Venturini T, Munk A, Meunier A (2018). Data-sprinting. doi:10.4324/9781315714523
- Verhulst S, Sandor L, Mejia Pardo N (2024). Responsible data re-use in developing countries: social licence through public engagement.
- Verhulst S, Young A, Zahuranec A (2020). The emergence of a third wave of open data: how to accelerate the re-use of data for public interest purposes while ensuring data rights and community flourishing. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3937638
- Vitard A (2025). Health data hub: un nouveau recours contre Microsoft rejeté par le Conseil d'Etat. L'Usine Digitale.
- Whittington J, Calo R, Simon M (2015). Push, pull, and spill: a transdisciplinary case study in municipal open government. Berkeley Tech L J.
- Wilk R (2024). European open science cloud.
- Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJJ (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18
- Zuiderwijk A, Janssen M (2014a). Barriers and development directions for the publication and usage of open data: a socio-technical view. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_8
- Zuiderwijk A, Janssen M (2014b). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: a framework for comparison. Gov Inf Q. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003
- Zuiderwijk A, Janssen M, Choenni S (2012a). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of E-Government.
- Zuiderwijk A, Janssen M, Choenni S (2012b). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of E-Government.
- Zuiderwijk A, Janssen M, Davis C (2014). Innovation with open data: essential elements of open data ecosystems. Information Polity. doi:10.3233/IP-140329