Understanding climate engagement and open recognition in European higher education: A mixed-methods study across four countries
Authors/Creators
- 1. ETSIIAA, University of Valladolid, Avenida de Madrid 44, Palencia, 34004, Spain
- 2. InTerACT (UP 2018.C102), UniLaSalle, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, Beauvais, 60000, France
- 3. Consorzio Scuola Comunità Impresa (CSCI), Via Francesco Sesalli 7, Novara, 28100, Italy
- 4. School of Business and Economics, NOVA University, R. da Holanda 1, Carcavelos, 2775-405, Norway
Description
Our research investigated how university students across four European countries (France, Italy, Portugal, and Spain) think about and engage with climate change issues, and what they think about using digital badges to recognize climate-related learning. We collected information through an online survey of 630 students, individual interviews with 69 participants, group discussions in each country, and an international group discussion.
The study revealed important insights about students' perspectives on climate change and environmental education. While students expressed strong concern about climate change, they felt only moderately responsible for taking action themselves. We found notable differences across demographics and countries: female students and those in advanced degree programs showed higher environmental awareness, and Portuguese students consistently demonstrated the highest climate awareness, while Italian students showed the lowest. Although students valued both formal education and informal learning about climate issues, they reported low participation in actual environmental activities. When it came to recognition of climate-related learning through digital badges, students showed moderate interest but expressed concerns about how employers would view these credentials.
These findings are significant because they help us understand how to better engage students in climate education and action. The research provides valuable insights for developing the European Open Badges Passport, a system that will recognize both formal and informal climate learning achievements. Our results suggest that effective climate education needs to bridge the gap between awareness and action, while recognition systems must balance standardization across Europe with flexibility for local needs. The findings emphasize the importance of ensuring digital badges are credible and valued by employers, while making climate education more accessible through both traditional and innovative learning approaches. These insights will directly inform how European universities approach climate education and recognize students' environmental competencies in the coming years.
Files
openreseurope-5-21536.pdf
Files
(826.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:ea6557025eca37030723c950689bc28b
|
826.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Ajzen I (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
- Bamberg S, Möser G (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
- Bianchi G, Pisiotis U, Cabrera Giraldez M (2022). GreenComp: the European sustainability competence framework. doi:10.2760/13286
- Breiting S, Mayer M, Mogensen F (2005). Quality criteria for ESD-schools.
- Bogner FX, Wiseman M (2006). Adolescents' attitudes towards nature and environment: quantifying the 2-MEV model. Environmentalist. doi:10.1007/s10669-006-8660-9
- (2024). Recommendation CM/Rec(2024)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on young people and climate action.
- (2022a). Council Recommendation of 16 June 2022 on learning for the green transition and sustainable development 2022/C 243/01.
- (2022b). Council Recommendation of 16 June 2022 on a European approach to micro-credentials for lifelong learning and employability 2022/C 243/02.
- Di Battista A, Grayling S, Hasselaar E (2023). Future of jobs report 2023.
- (2018). The European qualifications framework – supporting learning, work, and cross-border mobility – 10th anniversary. doi:10.2767/385613
- (2019). The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions (COM(2019) 640 final).
- (2020a). Special Eurobarometer 501: attitudes of European citizens towards the environment – Report. doi:10.2779/902489
- (2020b). European skills Agenda for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience.
- (2021a). Erasmus+ programme guide 2021-2027.
- (2021b). Digital education action plan (2021–2027).
- (2023). Special Eurobarometer 538: climate change.
- , Napoli V, Pisiotis U (2025). The GreenComp community - accountability report 2023/2024. doi:10.2760/7610494
- (2023). European Digital credentials for learning.
- Griffiths D, Burgos D, Aceto S (2024). Open education and alternative digital credentials in Europe. Int Rev Res Open Dis Learn. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7412
- Higgs AL, McMillan VM (2006). Teaching through modeling: four schools' experiences in sustainability education. J Environ Educ. doi:10.3200/JOEE.38.1.39-53
- Johnson B, Manoli CC (2010). The 2–MEV scale in the United States: a measure of children's environmental attitudes based on the theory of ecological attitude. J Environ Educ. doi:10.1080/00958964.2010.503716
- Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environ Educ Res. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401
- Leal-Filho W, Sima M, Sharifi A (2021). Handling climate change education at universities: an overview. Environ Sci Eur. doi:10.1186/s12302-021-00552-5
- Mathar R (2015). A whole school approach to sustainable development: elements of education for sustainable development and students' competencies for sustainable development. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09549-3_2
- McCright AM (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Popul Environ. doi:10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1
- Nair-Bedouelle S, (Ed.) (2021). Engineering for sustainable development: delivering on the sustainable development goals.
- Oliver B (2022). Towards a common definition of micro-credentials.
- Redman E, Wiek A, Redman A (2018). Continuing professional development in sustainability education for K-12 teachers: principles, programme, applications, outlook. J Educ Sustain Dev. doi:10.1177/2455133318777182
- Uitto A, Boeve-de Pauw J, Saloranta S (2015). Participatory school experiences as facilitators for adolescents' ecological behavior. J Environ Psychol. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.007
- (2021). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. doi:10.54675/ASRB4722
- (2022). Education for sustainable development: a roadmap. doi:10.54675/YFRE1448
- Vare P, Scott W (2007). Learning for a change: exploring the relationship between Education and Sustainable Development. J Educ Sustain Dev. doi:10.1177/097340820700100209
- von Davier M, Kennedy A, Reynolds K (2024). TIMSS 2023 International Results in Mathematics and Science. doi:10.6017/lse.tpisc.timss.rs6460
- Wastiau P, Looney J, Laanpere M (2024). Portugal's digital transition strategy for education.
- Zelezny LC, Chua PP, Aldrich C (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. J Soc Issues. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00177