Presence Engine™ Living Thesis: Building Human-Centric AIX™ (AI Experience)
Description
The Presence Engine™ Living Thesis presents Human-Centric AIX™ (AI Experience), a framework for building AI systems with contextual continuity architecture instead of stateless task execution. This work addresses the fundamental gap in current AI design: systems that optimize for productivity while failing at presence, memory, and sustained human development.
Grounded in Bandura’s social learning theory, Hogan’s critical thinking dispositions research, and the OCEAN personality framework, this thesis argues that AI systems train humans through repeated interaction—and current architectures are training poorly. The proposed solution: privacy-first infrastructure modeling how humans think across time rather than what they say in discrete moments.
"The impact of AI on humanity may have less to do with the way we use it than how it is built. Presence Engine offers a way of favoring continuity and coherence over present shock and calibration. It's an approach worth our attention." — Douglas Rushkoff, Author of Team Human and Present Shock
This is active research. The framework includes technical architecture, theoretical grounding, and early prototype evidence, but requires longitudinal validation. Version 4 (forthcoming) will expand real-world testing and results and continued technical methodology, evidence, and honest assessment of limitations.
Current Status: Phase 1 Validation (5-10 users) is underway. Version 4 (forthcoming) will integrate longitudinal data and expanded failure mode analysis. Follow the Technical Architecture Specification for real-time methodology updates.
Files
PresenceEngine_TSmithAntiparty_v3.pdf
Files
(3.4 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:ccb347bd4428f20e93e7af4d6eb1c968
|
3.4 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Additional titles
- Subtitle (English)
- A theory of change for emotional infrastructure in artificial intelligence
Identifiers
Dates
- Copyrighted
-
2025-09-09A Theory of Change for Emotional Infrastructure in Artificial Intelligence
Software
- Development Status
- Active
References
- Lappalainen, J. K., Tschopp, F. D., Prakhya, S., McGill, M., Nern, A., Shinomiya, K., Takemura, S., Gruntman, E., Macke, J. H., & Turaga, S. C. (2024). Connectome-constrained networks predict neural activity across the fly visual system. Nature, 634, 1083–1089. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07939-3
- Hogan, M. (2016). What are the key dispositions of good critical thinkers? Michael Hogan Psychology Blog.
- Hogan, M. (2012). Critical thinking and real-world outcomes. Psychology Today.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
- Li, Y., et al. (2024). Developing trustworthy artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1382693.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Wan, Z., & Song, J. (2026). CaveAgent: Transforming LLMs into Stateful Runtime Operators. arXiv:2601.01569. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01569
- Zeppieri, S. (2025). MMAG: Mixed Memory-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models Applications. arXiv:2512.01710. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01710
- Tang, Y., Yang, Y., & Abbasi, A. (2025). PersonaFuse: A Personality Activation-Driven Framework for Enhancing Human-LLM Interactions. arXiv:2509.07370. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07370
- Wu, B., Wang, W., Li, H., Li, Y., Yu, J., & Wang, B. (2025). Interpersonal Memory Matters: A New Task for Proactive Dialogue Utilizing Conversational History. arXiv:2503.05150. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05150