Published September 29, 2025 | Version v1
Preprint Open

Decoding the Gender Gap: Addressing Gender Stereotypes and Psychological Barriers to Empower Women in Technology

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Independent Researcher

Description

This paper explores the gender gap in technology by analyzing the impact of gender stereotypes and psychological barriers that discourage women from pursuing careers in STEM. Based on research in social psychology, gender studies, and technology fields, the paper identifies key factors that shape women’s participation and persistence in technical domains. It further highlights the structural and cultural challenges that reinforce these barriers.

The study proposes actionable strategies for empowering women in technology, including mentorship models, awareness programs, inclusive workplace policies, and educational interventions aimed at dismantling stereotypes early in academic pathways. By addressing both systemic and individual-level obstacles, the paper contributes to ongoing discussions on equity, diversity, and inclusion in STEM.

The findings aim to support policymakers, educators, and organizations in creating more inclusive environments where women can innovate and lead in technology-driven fields.

Files

Decoding_the_Gender_Gap.pdf

Files (383.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e31aecfa8a86f18825d0cf8c5bb708aa
383.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Best, K.L., Sanwald, U., Ihsen, S., & Ittel, A. (2013). Gender and STEM in Germany: policies enhancing women's participation in academia. International Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology, 5, 292-304.
  • Brage-del-Río, M., Martín-Núñez, J.L., & Pablo-Lerchundi, I. (2025). Educational strategies to reduce the gender gap in the self-efficacy of high school students in stem teaching. Frontiers in Education.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Breidenbach, A., Mahlow, C., & Schreiber, A. (2021). Implicit gender bias in computer science—A qualitative study. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.01624
  • Bueno Merino, P., & Duchemin, M. (2022). Contribution of Psychological Entrepreneurial Support to the Strengthening of Female Entrepreneurial Intention in a Women-Only Incubator. M@n@gement.
  • Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
  • Corsbie-Massay, C.L., & Wheatly, M.G. (2022). The role of media professionals in perpetuating and disrupting stereotypes of women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) fields. Frontiers in Communication.
  • Dasgupta, N. (2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313
  • David, J. (2023). Gender Disparities in Stem Education and Career Choice. Social Science Reports.
  • Díez, J.L., Ramos, A., & Candela, C. (2022). Static and dynamic assessment of STEM gender stereotypes in secondary education using a novel cluster-based analysis. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33, 749-774.
  • Essinger, J. (2014). Ada's algorithm: How Lord Byron's daughter Ada Lovelace launched the digital age. Melville House.
  • Froehlich, L., Tsukamoto, S., Morinaga, Y., Sakata, K., Uchida, Y., Keller, M.M., Stürmer, S., Martiny, S.E., & Trommsdorff, G. (2022). Gender Stereotypes and Expected Backlash for Female STEM Students in Germany and Japan. Frontiers in Education.
  • Garrard, J. (2017). Health sciences literature review made easy: The matrix method (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Brisson, B. M., Hafner, I., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2015). Fostering adolescents' value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1226–1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000028
  • Goreth, S., & Vollmer, C. (2022). Gender does not make the difference: interest in STEM by gender is fully mediated by technical socialization and degree program. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1 - 23.
  • Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
  • Hess, C., Kunz, S., Steffen, A., Dodiya, J., Heinisch, C., Rebholz, S., Schlömer, I., & Vaas, S. (2023). How Does School Lesson Design Contribute to Girls' Perception of Their Future-Readiness for STEM Majors? – An Empirical Study Using Critical Incidents Technique. International Journal of Learning and Teaching.
  • Hunt, V., Layton, D., & Prince, S. (2015). Diversity matters. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/why-diversity-matters
  • Kovaleva, Y., Happonen, A., & Kindsiko, E. (2022). Designing Gender-neutral Software Engineering Program. Stereotypes, Social Pressure, and Current Attitudes Based on Recent Studies. 2022 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Gender Equality, Diversity and Inclusion in Software Engineering (GEICSE), 43-50.
  • Kube, D., Weidlich, J., Kreijns, K., & Drachsler, H. (2024). Addressing gender in STEM classrooms: The impact of gender bias on women scientists' experiences in higher education careers in Germany. Educ. Inf. Technol., 29, 20135-20162.
  • Law, F., McGuire, L., Winterbottom, M., & Rutland, A. (2021). Children's gender stereotypes in STEM following a one-shot growth mindset intervention in a science museum. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 641695. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641695
  • Lazzaroni, R.M., & Pal, S. (2024). AI's Missing Link: The Gender Gap in the Talent Pool. Interface EU Policy Publication. Retrieved from https://www.interface-eu.org/publications/ai-gender-gap
  • Martínez, M., Segura, F., Andújar, J.M., & Ceada, Y. (2023). The Gender Gap in STEM Careers: An Inter-Regional and Transgenerational Experimental Study to Identify the Low Presence of Women. Education Sciences.
  • Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls' interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
  • Master, A., & Meltzoff, A.N. (2020). Cultural Stereotypes and Sense of Belonging Contribute to Gender Gaps in STEM. International Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology, 12, 152-198.
  • Master, A. (2021). Gender stereotypes influence children's STEM motivation. Child Development Perspectives, 15(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12424
  • McCullough, L. (2011). Women's Leadership in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics: Barriers to Participation.
  • Miller, D. I., Lauer, J. E., Tanenbaum, C., & Burr, L. (2024). The development of children's gender stereotypes about STEM and verbal abilities: A preregistered meta-analytic review of 98 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 150(12), 1363–1396. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000456
  • Olsson, M.I., & Martiny, S.E. (2018). Does Exposure to Counterstereotypical Role Models Influence Girls' and Women's Gender Stereotypes and Career Choices? A Review of Social Psychological Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
  • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  • Perera, T.P., Asanka, P.P., & Prasadika, A. (2024). Gender Biases and Gender Stereotypes in STEM Sectors: A Systematic Literature Review. 2024 International Research Conference on Smart Computing and Systems Engineering (SCSE), 7, 1-5.
  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Phillips, M.J. (2024). Empowering Undergraduate Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine: Exploring Experiences, Fostering Motivation, and Advancing Gender Equity. Social Sciences.
  • Prives, L. (2013). Studying Stereotypes: Examining Why Many Women Do Not Pursue STEM Careers [The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly: Engineering FACTS]. IEEE Women in Engineering Magazine, 7, 15-17.
  • Shafiq, D.A., Al-Obaidi, A.S., Gunasagaran, S., & Mari, T.S. (2024). Empowering Engineering Female Students to Improve Retention and Progression: A Program Evaluation Study Completed with Bibliometric Analysis. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology.
  • Schmader, T. (2022). Gender Inclusion and Fit in STEM. Annual review of psychology.
  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
  • Stoeger, H., Ziegler, A., & Schimke, D. (2013). The effectiveness of a one-year online mentoring program for girls in STEM. Computers & Education, 69, 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.032
  • Thackeray, S. (2016). Overcoming the toxic influence of subtle messaging: Utah women who persist in stem.
  • Trinkenreich, B., Britto, R., Gerosa, M. A., & Steinmacher, I. (2022). An empirical investigation on the challenges faced by women in the software industry: A case study. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.10555
  • Vaka, S., Trestian, R., Baskent, C., Shayesteh, H., & Megeney, A. (2024). Paving the Path: Empowering Women in STEM from University to Industry. 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1-10.
  • Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33(4), 304–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001
  • Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
  • Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268
  • World Economic Forum. (2024). Global Gender Gap Report 2024. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-gender-gap-report-2024/
  • Yağan, E., & Avcı, S. (2023). The Effect of Stereotype Threat on Academic Success of Female Students. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies.
  • Yates, J., & Skinner, S.Y. (2021). How do female engineers conceptualise career advancement in engineering: a template analysis. Career Development International.
  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983