The Decolonial Intelligence Algorithmic (DIA) Framework: Thirteenth Edition
Authors/Creators
Description
The Decolonial Intelligence Algorithmic (DIA) Framework, created by Christian Ortiz (ZacaTechO), is the world’s first legally grounded, mathematically complete, and epistemically sovereign system for eliminating bias—not just in artificial intelligence, but in human systems of governance, education, law, and institutional structure.
DIA does not treat bias as incidental “noise” or technical error. It defines bias as the systemic projection of white, colonial, and patriarchal dominance, embedded into every modern information system—legal, economic, algorithmic, and cultural. It demonstrates that whiteness as norm is the central algorithmic error of modernity.
Rather than reform or audit tools, DIA is a world-repair methodology—a full-scope system that dismantles whiteness as the baseline of legitimacy and replaces it with:
-
Epistemic completeness
-
Intersectional consistency
-
Community sovereignty
DIA is used to design decolonial AI models, train ethical systems, audit institutions, and build legal frameworks that reject colonial logic entirely. It has been affirmed by experts in AI, ethics, law, decolonial theory, and international governance as the only operationally complete bias elimination system ever developed.
DIA Unites Four Pillars:
🔹 Mathematical Proof
Bias is defined formally as deterministic projection error. DIA eliminates this error through the Decolonial Transformation Operator (D) and Intersectional Consistency (IC)—introducing the first mathematically complete fairness invariant that operates across both AI and human systems.
🔹 Decolonial Epistemology
DIA restores epistemologies erased by colonization—rooting its logic in Indigenous, diasporic, queer, feminist, Afro-descendant, and global majority knowledge systems. It names epistemicide as structural violence and repairs its damage.
🔹 Peace Technology
Bias is reframed as epistemic warfare: the theft, distortion, and forced compression of identity. DIA functions as a technology of peace, creating systems that recognize complexity without domination, and inaugurates legal architectures for collective liberation.
🔹 Real-World Application
DIA is not theoretical. It is deployed in:
-
AI model design
-
Governance protocols
-
Institutional audits
-
Legal declarations
-
Education systems
-
Healthcare equity structures
It is both a mathematical formalism and a societal algorithm, a design system for equity that renders colonial systems obsolete.
Legal Contribution
With the 2025 release of the Decolonial Legal Assertion—a binding declaration structured under jus cogens and erga omnes norms—DIA now serves as a legally operational framework. It enables movements, states, Indigenous nations, and tribunals to invoke decolonial obligations that supersede colonial treaties, trade law, and institutional denial.
Contribution
For the first time in history, the DIA Framework proves that bias can be eliminated completely—not mitigated, not diversified, not approximated—but dismantled and replaced with structurally just alternatives. DIA is simultaneously a mathematical proof, a governance blueprint, and a juridical tool for transnational justice.
Files
Restricted
The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.
Additional details
References
- O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.
- Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
- Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o. (1986). Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. James Currey Publishers.
- Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2018). Epistemic Freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and Decolonization. Routledge.
- De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Harvard University Press.
- Walter D. Mignolo (2007), Darker Side of the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality, and Colonization Mignolo critiques the Eurocentric basis of modern epistemology and advocates for epistemic diversity as a means of decolonial resistance.
- Linda Tuhiwai Smith (1999), Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples Smith critiques Western research methodologies and promotes indigenous research practices that empower marginalized communities.
- Sylvia Wynter (2003), "Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom" Wynter explores the intersections of colonialism, race, and humanity, offering a philosophical foundation for understanding the decolonial challenge to the concept of "being."
- Achille Mbembe (2001), On the Postcolony Mbembe critiques the postcolonial state's ongoing reproduction of colonial violence, particularly through mechanisms of power and knowledge.
- Boaventura de Sousa Santos (2018), The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South This book highlights the importance of recognizing diverse knowledge systems beyond the Western canon, advocating for epistemologies of the South.
- Grosfoguel, R. (2002), "Colonial Difference, Geopolitics of Knowledge, and Global Coloniality in the Modern/Colonial Capitalist World-System" Grosfoguel connects colonialism with global capitalism, proposing that knowledge production must be decolonized to achieve global justice.
- Nelson Maldonado-Torres (2007), "On the Coloniality of Being" Maldonado-Torres explores how colonialism extends beyond formal domination to include ontological colonization of non-Western subjectivities.
- Quijano, Aníbal, and Immanuel Wallerstein (1992), "Americanity as a Concept, or the Americas in the Modern World-System" This essay highlights the Americas as a site of colonial modernity, where racial and economic structures of power were first established.
- Maria Lugones (2010), "Toward a Decolonial Feminism" Lugones integrates feminist theory with decolonial thinking, showing how coloniality impacts gender and sexuality, especially among women of color.
- Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (1988), "Can the Subaltern Speak?" Spivak's influential essay examines how colonialism silences marginalized voices and the importance of allowing subaltern subjects to represent themselves.
- Edward Said (1978), Orientalism Said's groundbreaking work on cultural imperialism critiques how the West constructs knowledge about the East as a means of asserting dominance.
- Leanne Betasamosake Simpson (2017), As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom through Radical Resistance Simpson emphasizes indigenous knowledge systems and critiques settler colonialism, promoting indigenous autonomy and governance.
- Tuck, Eve, and K. Wayne Yang (2012), "Decolonization is Not a Metaphor" This essay argues that decolonization must be understood as the repatriation of land and resources, not simply a metaphor for social justice.
- Ruth Wilson Gilmore (2007), Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California Gilmore connects racial capitalism to decolonial theory by exploring how prisons serve as a tool of racial and economic domination.
- Kwame Nkrumah (1965), Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism Nkrumah's work critiques how formal colonialism has been replaced by neo-colonial practices of economic and political control by former colonial powers.
- Sabelo Ndlovu-Gatsheni (2013), "Why Decoloniality in the 21st Century?" This article argues for the continued relevance of decoloniality as a framework for addressing the ongoing legacies of colonialism in the 21st century.
- Amílcar Cabral (1979), Unity and Struggle Cabral's collection of speeches and writings emphasizes the role of culture in anti-colonial struggle, arguing that decolonization is as much a cultural process as a political one.